http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/wedge/
A new regular magazine review bit on the Brown Wedge. I need suggestions so I don't chicken out and just end up buying all the stuff I usually do.
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:47 (twenty-two years ago)
David - would you like to write about gaming matters for us?
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― chris (chris), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
i really like the middle brow trifecta of new yorker, harpers and atlantic.
for art/fashion mags i really like dutch/purple/id/art on paper/paper and as milo said juztapoz which is univerally excellendt and of course flashart, modern painters has matthew collings and frieze can live with the odd good essay.
for film i likesight and sound/ew
i really also like the progressive farmer,this, Z and mother jones, as well as the national repbulic, christian sci. monitor and the economist. i cannot recommend progerssive farmer enough though.
lit critLRB and NYRB are industry standards for a reason, american poetry review comes in this neat little tabloid format, rambles is good for odd genre and sf stuff sometimes,
for religous magazinestikkun, shambala, tablet, the catholic intellectual one from england and Sunstonne which is progressive and lds
you could read disease of the weeks, like additude for attention defict disorder, poz for hiv+ people or the couple of cancer rags
(i also got on the mailing list for men of intergirty, i would not recommend that one at all, it loves jesus.)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:17 (twenty-two years ago)
Speaking of which, is Mam still around?
― Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)
but it is not nearly as cool as progresive farmers
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)
I made the last one up. But I bet it exists.
― Calz (Calz), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 18 August 2003 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)
" nest is more fun than any of the magazines listed so far and belongs on your list.
― dan (dan), Monday, 18 August 2003 22:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)
-- Archel
Yes. Yes. You are so right. I don't understand how it produces these contradictory states.
I say Elle Girl (UK edition) which I love and Jane because it would be interesting to see what an English male makes of the gap between the girl power rhetoric and the actual content.
― Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)
I guess what really bothers me about certain magazines is although I know that magazines are COMMERCIAL entities relying more on advertising revenue than newsstand sales and thus vulnerable to the dictates of the advertisers to some extent, the amount of pre-emptive compliance with those advertisers means the more intelligent reader will come to devalue the magazine for being co-opted like this.
Obviously I am talking about a reader who has become well-versed in the way the media works in the manner of an informed consumer, who is usually a bit older. Magazines vaguely in the 'youth' marketplace that act as a kind of portal to intellectual and aesthetic things for people, from the sticks to the cities, do have to keep reinventing the product because the nature/culture of the youngest entering readers (who will probably read the magazine for 5-10 years on average) might be vastly different in attitude to older readers (who may well stop reading next year). Commerce may beat art by a nose in this world, but I think it's a hollow victory in most cases.
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Calz (Calz), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)