Now, I'm no expert on these things, but I'm sure its considered a bit tame for your average porn consumer... but do people really buy it for the articles? What are said articles actually about for that matter? And if people ARE reading it, its hardly ideal for reading in any of the places where people generally read magazines (ie in public).
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 10:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:02 (twenty-two years ago)
David I cannot believe you didn't buy Playboy with Tiffany in. That's like, a thousand wanks as a young adolescent...
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― fletrejet, Monday, 18 August 2003 11:08 (twenty-two years ago)
My guess is that some of its readers buy it because its 'classy' - they buy into the idea that the playmate of the month is the current definitional standard of beauty, photographed tastefully - the Playboy branding is that it's kind of the Moet of adult entertainment, and proper porn is yer Thunderbirds or 20/20s, good only for giving small boys a quick thrill.
(I think this branding is completely delusional but it's a seductive delusion for the people who still read it.)
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 11:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Monday, 18 August 2003 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― JuliaA (j_bdules), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris P (Chris P), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― JuliaA (j_bdules), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris V. (Chris V), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)
http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cache:1CBedb9GL8YJ:www.hycyber.com/MYST/playboy_index.html+playboy+article+index&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
― fletrejet, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)
Any idea if this is the case?
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Hanle y (mike), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 18 August 2003 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)
Lessee... 10 new ways to lie to women you want to shag... hm... seems like a lot of trouble. I'll just have a wank on page 62 here.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Man they call Dan (The Man they call Dan), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)
The Hustler interview w/ Al Jourgensen was classic.
― fletrejet, Monday, 18 August 2003 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)
Then I also picked up some old issue from the late 60's on eBay because it was supposed to have a really good interview with Michaelangelo Antonioni in it (it was a good interview).
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― kirsten (kirsten), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
i still feel a little gyped by soft porn, i just can't imagine myself in it without having a big cock.
― Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― j0e (j0e), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ, Monday, 18 August 2003 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't particularly care for nudie pics of women, but if people are actually buying this magazine even just partly for the articles, then more power to 'em. And besides, they're not exactly aiming for my demographic here. *grin*
― Just Deanna (Dee the Lurker), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)
I actually just got in a conversation with a couple of guys at work that was kind of about this. (These guys are both right around 40.) They're both frequent readers and/or subscribers. The impression that I got was that they really didn't want to see anything more graphic (or at least that there was a time and place for that sort of thing). One guy (bit of a ladies' man!) said disgustedly that Penthouse has begun showing penetration. (And I don't mean that he was disgusted by penetration, just that he made it clear it wasn't what he was looking for in porn, y'know.) And everyone uses the 'for the articles' defense, but last I looked (last year) it really wasn't stimulating on any level.
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.flash.net/~numatic/aacover4/at_m2.jpg
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ, Monday, 18 August 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 18 August 2003 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 18 August 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ, Monday, 18 August 2003 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)
anthony, i never thought i would believe someone who said that :-)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Monday, 18 August 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)
Dads do. Because they're people's DADS.
― Kim (Kim), Monday, 18 August 2003 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spinktor the Unmerciful (mawill5), Monday, 18 August 2003 23:33 (twenty-two years ago)
One guy (bit of a ladies' man!) said disgustedly that Penthouse has begun showing penetration.What the? When did this begin to happen? I mean, Penthouse was always Playboy's naughtier cousin but I don't remember ANY of the magazines in the stash (Playboy, Penthouse, Swank, etc) showing actual hardcore penetration.
"You know, Fox turned into a hardcore sex channel so gradually that I hardly even noticed!"
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 18 August 2003 23:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Monday, 18 August 2003 23:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 18 August 2003 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Texas Sam (thatgirl), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)
fave P-boy interview evah: Siskel & Ebert from '92. they also did a 20 Questions (great mini-interview feature I don't think they do anyomre sadly) in 1984 (read it at an uncle's apt a few times when I spent nights there). the ones by Lawrence Grobel inc. the S&E one are in a book on movies he did a few years back called Above the Line, which is worth picking up if you're interested in the topic; there's also some things Bill Zehme did that are in his new collection, Intimate Strangers. but yeah, for about 30 years Playboy Interviews were the fucking bomb, wish that were still true.
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― nnnh oh oh nnnh nnnh oh (James Blount), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Texas Sam (thatgirl), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― rosemary (rosemary), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Texas Sam (thatgirl), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:53 (twenty-two years ago)
hugh hefner is such a despicable character.
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 05:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 06:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 06:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 06:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 06:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 06:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― j'aime les sucettes (call mr. lee), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:04 (twenty-two years ago)
They have had some really good interviews, but I don't pay attention enough anymore to know when the last good one was. Hefner was into animal porn according to Linda Lovelace, don't know if it's true (nobody, after all, knows how much of what Lovelace said was ever true) but he has helped restore some classic films. "The Big Sleep" for one.
I think his outlook is horribly, horribly sexist though and I never quite comprehended why he went to great lengths to try and defend himself from such warranted accusations. But Larry Flynt is just shameful, and that sort of thing is gross in my opinion.
― Calz (Calz), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickn (nickn), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 07:04 (twenty-two years ago)
While I'm not at all enamored with Playboy, it certainly isn't the kinda weak shit my generation seems to be all down with, that being Maxim. I mean, what the fuck? If you want your celebrity/electronics masturbation magazine, might as well actually see the T&A, yes? I guess it's just become the Dads' magazine now.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 3 January 2004 01:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 3 January 2004 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Sunday, 4 January 2004 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)