is there such a thing as an 'ordinary person'? or is it a chimera?
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not ordinary or extraordinary, I'm just Nick.
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)
(but give up the Daily Mail, for the love of god. That is WARPED and DEVIANT)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't think anyone is ordinary, though there is a stereotype for males and a different one for females and people conform to that in varying degrees. I like that it exists and I conform in some ways myself aswell.
You are what you want to be, ultimately, ordinary people are those who don't aspire to be different from what they percieve as ordinary people.
I think ordinary people might view me as slightly quirky, but also maybe assume I am more different from them or want to be more different from them than I am/do.
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex K (Alex K), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:15 (twenty-two years ago)
The ordinary things are only ordinary cos they're probably the best, love, marriage, kids etc.
(no worries matt
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex K (Alex K), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)
sometimes I'm right, I'd like to be wrong, my own beliefs are in my song, the butcher, the baker, the drummer and then you can't figure out what bag I'm in
― I am everyday (ordinary) people (nickalicious), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex K (Alex K), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex K (Alex K), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)
Also thanks Mark C.
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)
Either that, or *everyone* I've met is ordinary. I can't decide.
― Archel (Archel), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)
I think I'm fairly ordinary though, but with a few eccentricities. I have a baby rabbit running around on the carpet while I'm typing this - to my parents that would have seemed odd, for instance.
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 18 August 2003 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)
before starting the thread i was curious about peoples need to be non-ordinary, an unexpected result of this thread has been peoples equally strong desire to be ordinary. it is as prized as its opposite. i am now equally curious about both desires. the desire to be non-ordinary seems to be born of insecurity, and involves the setting up of exclusionary boundaries and a false dichotomy between the two. the desires of those to be ordinary seem to involve re-inforcing the rules of those that exclude themselves from the category. a mutually beneficial scenario?
― gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)
This is cuter than words can say. :-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 August 2003 15:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― kephm, Monday, 18 August 2003 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― nestmanso (nestmanso), Monday, 18 August 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 18 August 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― isadora (isadora), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 01:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan I., Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― nnnh oh oh nnnh nnnh oh (James Blount), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 04:23 (twenty-two years ago)
Gareth is right in that the term becomes a straw man, and often for people who want to be considered or consider themselves 'special'(but conversely I think anyone who says 'ooh you think you're soooo special' to anyone else instantly places themselves in the MOR demographic and should therefore not complain if called on that).
I think people are far less likely to see themselves as 'ordinary' if:
1. Their early lives contain nothing but incidents of WEIRD SHIT.2. They have been alienated/excluded by/from the mainstream experience in some significant way.3. They have some kind of talent which society rates in theory.
Calling someone 'ordinary' is also a coping strategy for people who have been called 'weirdo'. Have also noticed 'angry' is becoming a new derogation, eg. 'this person is a bit...angry' to indicate the person under discussion doesn't fit in.
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:20 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm still not sure whether 'ordinary' and 'normal' mean the same thing. I don't think they do. I would much rather be considered normal than ordinary.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:43 (twenty-two years ago)
It's probably necessary to distinguish between Behaviour and Psyche for these purposes, and that's quite hard to do when you don't know someone.
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― duane, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:55 (twenty-two years ago)
Writing well = intelligence, usually. Therefore most of ILX = intelligent, usually.
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:59 (twenty-two years ago)
< /blind optimism>
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:07 (twenty-two years ago)
is this something to do with difficulty in visualizing peoples individulaties, so it is easier to conflate them?
― gareth (gareth), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)
I wasn't saying ordinary people are dumb, plenty of the co-workers that I think of as ordinary are way smart. It's just that the things that they do and the opinions and preferences they express just seem really typical to me. They are steadfastly in line with the habits of the majority in every observable way.
I also realized that there's not just one ordinary, of course. These people are ordinary american college students, not ordinary 20-or-30-something english office workers (for example).
― Dan I., Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan I., Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan I., Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:53 (twenty-two years ago)
- where do you draw the line of significance?
- how many 'ordinary' things does a person need to do/think to be 'ordinary'.
I don't think ordinariness is a straw man, though. If you were a particular kind of criminal, for instance, or a spy, you might want very much to 'appear ordinary' and there would be a way of life and behaviour that you would have in your mind as a template. Maybe everybody carries their own 'ordinary' around with them.
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 09:16 (twenty-two years ago)
Also consider the meaning of 'common' (everyday) in the US is very different to the meaning of 'common' (which has class connotations) in the UK.
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 09:21 (twenty-two years ago)
And you're right, everybody does carry their own ordinary around with them. it's a personal science; one categorizes actual frequencies by purely subjective criteria.
― Dan I., Tuesday, 19 August 2003 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)