Originality

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Do we ('still'?) believe in it? If so, what do we mean by it?

the pinefox, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't think anyone really still believes in Originality though people still expect it.

jamesmichaelward, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What he said.

mark s, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I pity the original, for to be original is to have your work co-opted by thee advertising industry, w/o recompense.

Sorry folx, I'm knacked, and that's the best I can do this evening.

x0x0

Norman Fay, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If no-one believes in it, why do people expect it?

the pinefox, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

because people are stewpeed.

jess, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I expect it. And believe in it.

DG, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(look how 2nd, more difficult, part of question grandly avoided by universal agreement that no one "believes in it" therefore we do not have to know what we mean)

Tracer Hand, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i believe in it and simultaneously don't believe in it. i think that new and interesting things can be created from stuff that isn't purely original. sure, stuff isn't necessarily original but it can fuse with other ideas and mutate to create fresh things.

my life as a "musician" depends on this, cos i know that what i do in my band isn't original in itself. But my guitar parts don't exist by themselves, they come as a part of a whole band, and what each band member brings to our music melds together to create something "new".

di, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

what do you mean "believe" in it? (what do you mean "mean" by it?)

duane, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Originality died with elliot and pound. The twentith cenury has been a curitorial century. It is about going thru the slag heap of history and finding things to recontextaulize

anthony, Monday, 24 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'Twas ever thus

dave q, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I believe one can still be original, but I probably have a different concept of originality to those who have posted above. (Eliot & Pound = last word in originality means nothing to me). I think maybe those who say you can't be original anymore focus on the art work something of itself and forget about context. And Dre.

Nick, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nick is OTM: just as criticism of artwork is utterly dependent on personal context, so creation of art is also dependent. Frankly if I am writing something, my concern is to express it in a way that is new to me - to have a dialogue with myself, I suppose. Conscious plagiarism or recontextualisation doesn't come into it, nor does a concern as to whether people think it 'original' or not.

Tom, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Are Werther's Originals original?

Emma, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Surely only the first one was original. All the others are mere imitations of the original Werthers Original.

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But perhaps each one is original and lots of time and money is poured into its creation

Ronan, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But maybe the very first one was a rip-off of some other tasty 'butter candy' and not at all original?

Emma, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If that's true then I shall sue the blighters. I want to get the old man from the commercial on child abuse claims too.

Paul Strange, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

He's just an actor, you know. He knows nowt about it.

Ally, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

if ti was truly original, we'd never be able to understand it.

Geoff, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Perhaps each one is rather like a snowflake. Not a Snow Flake, though.

I believe in originality. Even if you say something which has been said before, it's never been said by you before. Hence it is original and unique.

Ally C, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I pity the original, for to be original is to have your work co- opted by thee advertising industry, w/o recompense.

An advertising producer caught one of my shows as the Earl of Amiga, a time-travelling 18th century libertine, wit and fop. He later wrote a campaign for a dot com company based around this idea. I was screentested to play the lead role, failed the second audition, and was then sent off to score music for the campaign for $11,000. I think my story proves that, yes, your ideas will be ripped off, but no, it's not always without recompense.

Momus, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I insist on believing in it whether it exists or not because thinking that this century is a slag heap of recontextualizations is just too depressing. I don't know if it does exist, but that might be only because I'm uncreative.

Maria, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

1. Ewing has a nice point - which is also Cookie's point, I think, kind of.

2. Di is correct that originality could be about new combinations, rather than utterly new things.

3. Eliot (sp!) and Pound are good names to drop, yes; but so much culture since. (Why not mention Joyce, anyway, if you're talking modernism-puts-seal-on originality?)

4. Pastiche = unoriginal seems convincing - but then, Ulysses and The Waste Land do feel original (and they feel NEW, even now); and more to the point, I recall Steady Mike's comment re. Merritt: despite borrowing from everyone else, he finally sounds like no-one but himself.

5. How about melodies? Is it still possible to write an original melody? (Let's define as, for instance: "a combination of melody & chords that has not been used in pop before".)

the pinefox, Tuesday, 25 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.