We're trying this instead of a comments section on The Brown Wedge. If you read something on the Wedge at any time and want to comment and don't fancy emailing us, then use this thread as a springboard for conversation. We'll put a link to it on TBW and update if and when the thread gets long and we need to start a new one.
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 08:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:14 (twenty-two years ago)
i forget the hero's name — it's something like hasselblad? — but he is PURE OF DEED and i think in context his torments are about "impure thoughts" re the lusty wench (also this is where his admiration for her temptress skillZoRz comes from)
tom have you ever read KING SOLOMON'S MINES or SHE?
they are like this: "hmm this is a cracking tale if v.silly and ahem yes somewhat racist OH MY GOD LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THE SEXUAL SUBTEXT!!"
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)
I think I might go on a Victorian Adventure Fiction binge now, so yes those books will be near in line. I know Starry has read one or both and speaks highly of them.
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:17 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm looking forward to Tim's rundown of the Sunday Times Bestseller list calle The Brown Eye.
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 29 August 2003 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 29 August 2003 11:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 29 August 2003 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 29 August 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Has anybody actually read it?
― ben welsh (benwelsh), Friday, 29 August 2003 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Friday, 29 August 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 15:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― ben welsh (benwelsh), Friday, 29 August 2003 18:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 29 August 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mandee, Friday, 29 August 2003 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)
You seem like you would be into stern taskmaster thing so I'm going to suggest the new Ann Coulter tome Treason.
― ben welsh (benwelsh), Friday, 29 August 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― ben welsh (benwelsh), Friday, 29 August 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Angus Gordon (angusg), Saturday, 30 August 2003 07:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:28 (twenty-two years ago)
Oh wait, you do.
― Tom (Groke), Sunday, 31 August 2003 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Monday, 8 September 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Monday, 8 September 2003 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 11:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 11:21 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd ask you about what browser you were using but I wouldn't be able to do anything with the reply.
― Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 11:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 12 September 2003 06:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 15 September 2003 22:39 (twenty-two years ago)
iggo's first novel came out the same week as roger scruton's: the combo gave a lot of malicious ppl a tremendous amt of decide-which-is-worse pleasure
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 22 September 2003 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)
Genius. As is Bum Tit Tit, obv.
― gobemouche, Wednesday, 24 September 2003 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― chris (chris), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 14:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 3 October 2003 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 3 October 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd mis-remembered that that story was Bunty BTW, it was something else like a recent "Penny" (obv a reprint of an old story).
― Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)
*goes to amazon*
Any more anyone??
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)
adrian serle!!! has this man been to any art in the last four decades!!!! or has he been living in a cave?
the brietz show is marvellous. we had to rush through it, but i could have happily spent another half an hour there easily. is serle known for being this rubbish?
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 10:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 22 October 2003 17:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― pip pop bim bam (mark s), Friday, 24 October 2003 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 October 2003 10:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 October 2003 10:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony easton (anthony), Sunday, 26 October 2003 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 October 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Sunday, 26 October 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 26 October 2003 20:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Sunday, 26 October 2003 23:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 October 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 27 October 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)
(sent to freakytrigger@hotmail.com)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 October 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 27 October 2003 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)
Would that Richard Carpenter be the same one from telly's Robin of Sherwood/Dick Turpin/Catweazle d'ya reckon?
― Alan (Alan), Thursday, 30 October 2003 13:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 30 October 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)
Briefly (mark you deserve a longer comment, sorry)- "wire jacket" in Dragon fucking scary. Yi fucking sexy. Mixture of desire and horror (always a Flashman staple) done better than ever.- Don't see GMF (at least in Flashman) being anti or pro Empire. Back that up with more than just deep-reader reference!
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 31 October 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 31 October 2003 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)
(and charge and great game are not dissimilar in focus - the crimea was a catastrophe, and he's very even-handed about the mutiny) (and this was classic 60s/70s anti-hero debunking of the unthought past)
by mountain of light, though, i think he's quite assiduously explaining how i. the brits on the whole DIDN'T WANT AN EMPIRE OH NO THEY WERE TRICKED INTO IT BY THEIR FOES and ii. said foes are not exactly spotless/blameless in other ways blah blah (he starts rather crustily using the term "revisionist" in the notes, w/o saying who he means, but to point at - yes unthinking- CRITICS of brit imperialism)
in dragon he fairly carefully sets up the horrors of both sides of the taiping rising/civil war - compared to the brits ie - in order to take the line that elgin's destruction of the summer palace was justified (and cheerfully downplays eg the opium wars) (i mean, they come in a bit, under the heading of "haha classic wicked amoral flashy business", when flashy himself has long ago stopped being plausible as a villain...)
but what i'm talking abt in dragon really is the (unconsious?) association of Ged and the Brit Emp: on the surface he is still working hard to be even-handed but i do think his underlying allegiance has switched (he used to think the brits were all pompous moralising idiots - eg anti-arnoldism - but now he';s thinking, well they could be a lot worse - eg pro-elginism)
yes, i have a blind spot abt the spelling of GMF's name, i actually went to look at the spine of the book in the book-case and still got it wrong!!
(also: ged is not actually the prisoner who's naked and trussed up in tombs of atuan, that wz some other ppl)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 31 October 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)
I need someone's apart from F's view on the period to really make a judgement! (Like I need someone apart from Asterix's view of the Romans.) But F's view of his superiors in Dragon IS different (Elgin vs Elphinstone - or Custer!) - and his juniors too - he romanticises the Scotsman who refuses to bow and gets killed, (which to be honest the sucker in me completely responded to, but it wasn't very Flash).
(I know your post was actually about Le Guin but I haven't read any!)
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 31 October 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)
*returns to photocopying which is clearly all she's good for*
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)
Sort of Carsmile. Its about time some of those tags were changed.
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 November 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 28 November 2003 23:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Saturday, 29 November 2003 08:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Tim, I totally sympathise with what you say about it being a bit of a waste him getting upset and writing about this, but when you say "Can he really mean that the words of the artist, or the curator, invalidate his enjoyment of a piece of art?" - I totally sympathise with Mr Searle, yes the words of the artist and/or curator can totally ruin what little enjoyment of art I manage to squeeze out. Then again I'm not an arts reviewer for a nash paper
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 8 December 2003 11:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jaunty Alan (Alan), Monday, 8 December 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 08:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 10:09 (twenty-two years ago)
Mark, it's OK, step away slowly from the theatre, just put the osborne down and everything will be OK, nobody's been hurt yet...
(sounds like a grebt book by the way)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 11:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― private health insurance plan, Thursday, 11 August 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Thursday, 11 August 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 12 August 2005 08:18 (twenty years ago)
― Artemiy, Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:03 (twenty years ago)