"Tales of the Black Freighter" - classic or dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
do you feel the bits in "Watchmen" about the Pirates (arrrr) serve any purpose, and if so what is that purpose?

I find them straightforwardly rather enjoyable, though I know many people don't really like them and see them as unnecessary and pointless. I suspect that part of the point of them is that the increasing mentalness of the main character in them is meant to mirror Ozymandias' increasing detachment from normal human values, but that's open to discussion.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:17 (twenty-two years ago)

when re-reading i always wish they would have been given their own page within the narrative because it's a little too choppy for my poor brain to handle.

i really wish the pirate comics described in the text section actually existed. also, the idea the pirate comics would supplant superhero comics when superheroes became real = k-genius.

dengo matherton (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, that was the main point - just a sort of what-if thing.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I've got a suspicion that giving the pirate bits from Watchmen their own page would be like putting somebody's spleen in their knee.

Al Ewing (Al Ewing), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Yarrrrrrrrrrrrr. It is a pity Alan Moore went for the so-called 'adult' grim'n'gritty pirate stories from TOTBF rather than more mainstream wenches'n'grog fare it though.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 31 August 2003 22:28 (twenty-two years ago)

But that's why there are movies.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 August 2003 22:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Capital K classic. Without it, the reader might actually think that Ozzy was doing the right thing.

Scabarous pirates, yahr!

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Sunday, 31 August 2003 22:50 (twenty-two years ago)

You mean he wasn't?

Leee (Leee), Sunday, 31 August 2003 23:13 (twenty-two years ago)

for some odd reason, when i saw the documentary 'Crumb' it felt that it was all a natural extention of Charles Crumb's obsession with Treasure Island, and Alan Moore had tapped into the same weirdness.

badgerminor (badgerminor), Monday, 1 September 2003 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)

i really wish the pirate comics described in the text section actually existed. also, the idea the pirate comics would supplant superhero comics when superheroes became real = k-genius.

EC actually did do a line of Pirate comics in the 1950s... I read reprints of them a few years ago. They were good fun. But obviously they were a sideline to the more normal BLOOD AND GUTS EC fare.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:31 (twenty-two years ago)

also it surely sets up a subliminal atmos of "you know what, the hero is a menko? the evil corruption of the world is in his head" etc

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)

=> comix are a map of the world
=> watchmen knows what time it's at

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:43 (twenty-two years ago)

=> what can you say abt a world where comix are what knows what time it is?

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:45 (twenty-two years ago)

(it's 1993 again?)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:54 (twenty-two years ago)

what mark s said -- it's a morality tale questioning the reason of someone resorting to murderous methods regardless of their belief in a just motive. Also that no one person can be trusted with the good of all, cos you can't trust yourself. Who watches, etc.

Anyone else pick up the not-for-profit book on Moore for his 50th. He's retiring apparently.

Alan (Alan), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Again? (again)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I like how the pirate thing actually contradicts the famous "open" ending of Watchmen. You know, "I leave it entirely to your hands", so the reader is supposedly free to decide whether Ozymandias was right or wrong, but then again in the pirate comic Moore still says he's wrong.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't think it is open. the diary IS discovered, the deception will be uncovered. no?

Alan (Alan), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)

i think it's a subconscious indictment of moore himself, for making a comic which everyone says is much better than it actually is

WHO WATCHES THE AUTHOR OF WATCHMEN?

(haha "free to decide so hmmm what shall i call call him, why OZYMANDIAS no hints there...")

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)

But if whatisface doesn't pick the diary from the loony file, it'll be in the trash the next day, no?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)

no bcz "the trash" = "level of culture at which comics are assumed to operate (viz the collective unconscious as shaped by non-art art)" => everything will resurface like the corpses the guy in the pirate comic makes his boat out of

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Still openended. Whole point. Hurm.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't think it is open. the diary IS discovered, the deception will be uncovered. no?

No. As I said, the last line of the comic is "I leave it entirely to your hands", and then the fat bloke maybe picks up Rorschach's diary or maybe something else, it's up to the reader to decide. But Moore, being an anarchist (at that point) obviously wasn't able to leave all the moral judgement up to the reader, so that's why there's the pirate story, the name Ozymandias etc.

Mark, I think Watchmen is overrated too. I hated the "alien" ending, it simply isn't credible, and the "brain of a psychic" part makes it even more ludicrous. Otherwise, it's a fine comic, but definitely overrated.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Oops, an x-post there.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't expect or even want the ending of a superhero comic to be credible, myself

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Isn't the point of the Alien that it's ridiculous and implausible like the idea that two civilised nations would consider nuclear war (maaaan)?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Obv it's far more "realistic"/political than the stereotype superhero comic but it's the fact that it's that kind of treatment of superheroes (their being active in our (80s) world,I guess) that gives it a lot of its appeal, for me, so I'm very happy w/the cartoonish ending that roots it in that. Oh and I love the "Black Freighter" sections, they're ridiculously melodramatic and a little scary and are maybe a worst case type version of Ozymandias's actions. And anyway, he DID avert nuclear apocalypse, didn't he? First time I read it I was pretty strongly anti-him, now I'm more or less in his favour (though we don't get to see what could've happened had Jon returned and intervened in the existing situation). My idea of this book is kinda wonky, though, I was VERY stoned when I first read it and it left me w/my basic impressions. Andrew, weren't Russia/US considering nuclear war in the 80s? And w/the Cuban missile crisis? At least in serious theory? Or are you saying that the existence of this alien/the fact Ozymandias's plot was credible to him and believed by the world is no more ridiculous than world nuclear war?

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Anyone else pick up the not-for-profit book on Moore for his 50th. He's retiring apparently.

isn't he always retiring? or always announcing that he will never write another superhero title?

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, despite being a "superhero" comic, Watchmen is otherwise quite credible and realistic, that's why the ending always struck to me as silly. I don't think the alien could've brought such a peace between the Russians and the Yankees as seen on the last pages of Watchmen, and the fact that Moore had to back the ending up with the psychic's brain bit seems to imply that he wasn't so sure about it either. Anyways, within a few decades people would still have forgotten the alien and the cold war would be back in effect, unless Ozymandias would keep bombarding the Earth again and again with new aliens. So he'd eventually lose anyhow.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:38 (twenty-two years ago)

And anyway, he DID avert nuclear apocalypse, didn't he?

He put the matter back in the hands of fools, is my view of the last panel.

Or are you saying that the existence of this alien/the fact Ozymandias's plot was credible to him and believed by the world is no more ridiculous than world nuclear war?

I'm saying that's what Moore's saying, yes. More the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction, which is insane, rather than Limited Nuclear War, which is just stupid.

Was Watchmen before or after the V for Vendetta collection with the foreword where he says "I appear to have given the impression that nuclear war would be survivable. Sorry about that"?

Also complaining about the use of a psychic in a comic that features Dr. Manhattan is on the face of it a little strange, except that part of the set-up is the fact that Dr. Manhattan is completely unlike anything else ever and is immediately the elephant in the living room.

x-post: Toumas, why do you assume the cold war would re-assert itself in a few decades?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Also complaining about the use of a psychic in a comic that features Dr. Manhattan is on the face of it a little strange, except that part of the set-up is the fact that Dr. Manhattan is completely unlike anything else ever and is immediately the elephant in the living room.

I wasn't complaining about the psychic, I was just saying that I thought Moore came up with the psychic's brain bit only after he realized that the whole "alien-equipped-with-a-psychic's-brain-will-scare-people-off-the-war" solution was kinda cheap and not truly plausible.


x-post: Toumas, why do you assume the cold war would re-assert itself in a few decades?

Because people forget. If fear forces folks to make a solution, that solution won't last that long unless there are other reasons to back it up. Of course you could argue that the peace between USA and Soviet Union would make them forget their differences, but it'd be just as likely that cold war would eventually continue. Remember, in the real world all the treaties between USA and SU weren't enough end the cold war, it took the fall of the latter to do that.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 11:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Whoops, that was supposed to read "'an-alien-will-scare-people-off-the-war' solution".

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 11:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Was Watchmen before or after the V for Vendetta collection with the foreword where he says "I appear to have given the impression that nuclear war would be survivable. Sorry about that"?

I think the V For Vendetta collection didn't come out until the late '80s. but most of V For Vendetta was written and published before Watchmen, in Warrior comic.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 1 September 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)

DV is right. The bulk of V for Vendetta predated Watchmen by a couple of years. I'm pretty sure that Book 3 (as in the collected edition) was written entirely after Watchmen. None of V for Vendetta made it over to the states before Watchmen (unless you count enterprising importers of Warrior magazine.)

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Monday, 1 September 2003 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm trying to remember my conversations with Alan about all this. One thing to note is that the faked disaster to unite the world is a steal from at least one '50s monster-era Marvel story. I think the use of a silly old plot like that is one of the few things in Watchmen that doesn't have "we are superior to superhero nonsense" running through it.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 1 September 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)

eight months pass...
In my best estimation, the pirate story in Watchmen serves as an allegory to, and possible condemnation of, Veidt's character. A man, beset by death and disaster, goes to great lengths to achieve what he believes to be the right thing, all on the backs of murdered innocents. The pale, mottled shark is Rorschach; the shark's blinding at the hands of the pirate story protagonist parallels Veidt's misdirection of Rorschach via the Moloch trap. Moore practically tips his hand when Veidt confers with Jon toward the end of the book after his plan is enacted, Veidt saying "At night I dream of swimming towards a hideous . . . no never mind, it isn't important." And in condemning Veidt, I don't think the allegory makes any statements about Watchmen's deliberately ambiguous ending. It condemns the perpetrator of the act (and the act itself) -- but I think the allegory ends there.

C/D: Jumping into a thread almost 9 months after the fact?

Josh Davis (josh_anomaly), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

four years pass...

I watched this online today and would say it's the most violent cartoon I've ever seen. Totally fucking awesome.

Nate Carson, Friday, 20 March 2009 10:23 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

Bought the DVD the other day and had to watch the cartoon twice in a row! Really gruesome stuff. Haven't seen the Under The Hood documentary yet.

dog latin, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 08:48 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.