I find them straightforwardly rather enjoyable, though I know many people don't really like them and see them as unnecessary and pointless. I suspect that part of the point of them is that the increasing mentalness of the main character in them is meant to mirror Ozymandias' increasing detachment from normal human values, but that's open to discussion.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:17 (twenty-two years ago)
i really wish the pirate comics described in the text section actually existed. also, the idea the pirate comics would supplant superhero comics when superheroes became real = k-genius.
― dengo matherton (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Al Ewing (Al Ewing), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Sunday, 31 August 2003 22:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 31 August 2003 22:32 (twenty-two years ago)
Scabarous pirates, yahr!
― Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Sunday, 31 August 2003 22:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Sunday, 31 August 2003 23:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― badgerminor (badgerminor), Monday, 1 September 2003 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)
EC actually did do a line of Pirate comics in the 1950s... I read reprints of them a few years ago. They were good fun. But obviously they were a sideline to the more normal BLOOD AND GUTS EC fare.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 08:54 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyone else pick up the not-for-profit book on Moore for his 50th. He's retiring apparently.
― Alan (Alan), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)
WHO WATCHES THE AUTHOR OF WATCHMEN?
(haha "free to decide so hmmm what shall i call call him, why OZYMANDIAS no hints there...")
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)
No. As I said, the last line of the comic is "I leave it entirely to your hands", and then the fat bloke maybe picks up Rorschach's diary or maybe something else, it's up to the reader to decide. But Moore, being an anarchist (at that point) obviously wasn't able to leave all the moral judgement up to the reader, so that's why there's the pirate story, the name Ozymandias etc.
Mark, I think Watchmen is overrated too. I hated the "alien" ending, it simply isn't credible, and the "brain of a psychic" part makes it even more ludicrous. Otherwise, it's a fine comic, but definitely overrated.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)
isn't he always retiring? or always announcing that he will never write another superhero title?
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:38 (twenty-two years ago)
He put the matter back in the hands of fools, is my view of the last panel.
Or are you saying that the existence of this alien/the fact Ozymandias's plot was credible to him and believed by the world is no more ridiculous than world nuclear war?
I'm saying that's what Moore's saying, yes. More the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction, which is insane, rather than Limited Nuclear War, which is just stupid.
Was Watchmen before or after the V for Vendetta collection with the foreword where he says "I appear to have given the impression that nuclear war would be survivable. Sorry about that"?
Also complaining about the use of a psychic in a comic that features Dr. Manhattan is on the face of it a little strange, except that part of the set-up is the fact that Dr. Manhattan is completely unlike anything else ever and is immediately the elephant in the living room.
x-post: Toumas, why do you assume the cold war would re-assert itself in a few decades?
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 September 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)
I wasn't complaining about the psychic, I was just saying that I thought Moore came up with the psychic's brain bit only after he realized that the whole "alien-equipped-with-a-psychic's-brain-will-scare-people-off-the-war" solution was kinda cheap and not truly plausible.
Because people forget. If fear forces folks to make a solution, that solution won't last that long unless there are other reasons to back it up. Of course you could argue that the peace between USA and Soviet Union would make them forget their differences, but it'd be just as likely that cold war would eventually continue. Remember, in the real world all the treaties between USA and SU weren't enough end the cold war, it took the fall of the latter to do that.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 11:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 1 September 2003 11:08 (twenty-two years ago)
I think the V For Vendetta collection didn't come out until the late '80s. but most of V For Vendetta was written and published before Watchmen, in Warrior comic.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 1 September 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Monday, 1 September 2003 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 1 September 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)
C/D: Jumping into a thread almost 9 months after the fact?
― Josh Davis (josh_anomaly), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
I watched this online today and would say it's the most violent cartoon I've ever seen. Totally fucking awesome.
― Nate Carson, Friday, 20 March 2009 10:23 (seventeen years ago)
Bought the DVD the other day and had to watch the cartoon twice in a row! Really gruesome stuff. Haven't seen the Under The Hood documentary yet.
― dog latin, Tuesday, 12 May 2009 08:48 (sixteen years ago)