my friend has a paid membership to suicide girls and she loves it. so far i'm not too impressed. it is not: very hot, very radical, or very artistic.
if you know anything about the site - your thoughts?
― black plastic (black plastic), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Texas, Biyatch! (thatgirl), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:40 (twenty-two years ago)
If they'd said that Suicide Girls was collectively owned and everyone shared in the profits and blah blah blah (porno commune-stylee), then it becomes interesting. As it is, just another fetish. "Punk" women instead of "fat" women or 38DDs.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― black plastic (black plastic), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)
(xp)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:43 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.cpinternet.com/~lellis/mdwawl2.jpg"Tell me more."
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― black plastic (black plastic), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:48 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.onlyundiesclub.com
very twee. very underage. not very naked
― JasonD (JasonD), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)
'50s pinups?
It never occurred to me before that twee is the geeky little brother to the greaser aesthetic. The Beaver v. Marlon Brando in the Wild One.
(Ignoring the twee greaser contingent - paging James Dean)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Texas, Biyatch! (thatgirl), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:00 (twenty-two years ago)
'Nuff said.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:02 (twenty-two years ago)
However risque pinups might be, I can get by wearing one of my shirts with a Varga-style image on it. I couldn't wander around town wearing a shirt with penetration or "hot girl-on-girl action."
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:04 (twenty-two years ago)
But you'd have a hard time finding any era in American history to recreate that wasn't hell for a lot of people.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:05 (twenty-two years ago)
well yeah, less- rather than non-
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Texas, Biyatch! (thatgirl), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:10 (twenty-two years ago)
In her thong.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:17 (twenty-two years ago)
(the said person, who Phil does not like very much, is also an SG member. This is what he told me about it once.)
― caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 6 September 2003 09:09 (twenty-two years ago)
but the point is, by and large it seems guys get turned on by looking at girls and girls get turned on by guys looking at them. i mean the 'post-feminist' phenomenons of female sexual expression doesn't seem to be naked guys or new pornography, but stuff like suicide girls and burlesque and madonna. when women are in control they don't switch it and make guys grovel naked on the floor, they just seem to want people to look at them. it's so egocentric though and i can't imagine how it's anything but a big bore to every other (heterosexual) lady.
― lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Sunday, 7 September 2003 02:30 (twenty-two years ago)
http://suicidegirls.com/words/Emma+Forrest/
― Wyndham Earl, Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)
I've got a friend who subscribes to suicide girls and she gets a lot out of it.
Also, I know another girl who subscribes, and she is hotter than most of the models. I need to ask her why.
― mei (mei), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 07:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 08:02 (twenty-one years ago)
So, do guys get off on girls getting off on guys looking at them naked?
― Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)