---------------------
Sept. 26, 2001 | WASHINGTON (AP) --
The White House press secretary scolded the host of "Politically Incorrect" Wednesday for calling some past U.S. military actions cowardly.
The host, Bill Maher, said on his show last week: "We have been the cowards lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly," Bill Maher said on the show last week.
Then, referring to terrorists who hijacked four jetliners and crashed them Sept. 11, Maher said: "Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly."
Maher later apologized "to anyone who took it wrong," and said his comments were aimed at political leaders.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said he remained troubled by the remark.
"It's a terrible thing to say, and it's unfortunate," Fleischer said. "There are reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do, and this is not a time for remarks like that; there never is."
------------------------
I won't be checking back here for a while, but when I do, I expect this thread to be filled with incredulous ranting.
― Nitsuh, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
But apparently it is a "terrible thing" to have an opinion about the word "cowardly" on television.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The question is not whether Maher is tasteless or unfunny though - it's whether the White House Press Secretary is the right person to be saying so? It strikes me that the world is full of op-ed columnists who would be happy to skewer Maher for his remarks, but that a "Press Secretary" should be limited to correcting factual innacuracies, censuring leaks, and so on.
― Tom, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― keith, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― ogden, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Jesus, with fascist boot-licking weasels like Ari Fleischer around, and people wonder why I'm still angry the fucking election
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
As for all the access bluster, why doesn't he just fuck off to LA and work for Barbara Kingsley?
― suzy, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― bnw, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― hans, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
bnw -- If Fleischer had simply been "defending the military" -- i.e., offering a semantic argument about the relationship of cowardice to the use of cruise missiles -- that would be one thing. But if all he had to say was "You're not supposed to say that," probably he shouldn't have addressed the issue at all. The "watch what you say" part is particularly galling, as if the end result of all of this should be that Americans feel less free to voice their opinions.
― Nitsuh, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Geoff, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Maria, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Samantha, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Pennysong Hanle y, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Timothy Lahey, Saturday, 5 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 5 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Arthur, Saturday, 5 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― reo, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)