Alex T's companion to reading Adorno continues, with special guest stars The Thrills!
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 8 September 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 04:13 (twenty-two years ago)
This sentence is fascinating: This latter step must be a repetition in order to distinguish it from the merely aesthetic freedom postulated by the Romantics against a neoclassical art based on imitation of prior models, and supposed to enable us to transcend a mundane world also characterised by mere repetition.
This latter step must be a repetition in order to distinguish it from the merely aesthetic freedom postulated by the Romantics against a neoclassical art based on imitation of prior models, and supposed to enable us to transcend a mundane world also characterised by mere repetition.
I don't understand these sentences: If we assume that Adorno has a similar opposition in mind to Kierkegaard, with a bad repetition opposed to something like a good repetition, rather than some kind of easy escape into another world, his complaint about the repetition of the same in the culture industry becomes not so much a fact as a critical given. Because the impetus of the culture industry is always towards novelty, the ‘new’ is already compromised, no matter which actual product we examine.
If we assume that Adorno has a similar opposition in mind to Kierkegaard, with a bad repetition opposed to something like a good repetition, rather than some kind of easy escape into another world, his complaint about the repetition of the same in the culture industry becomes not so much a fact as a critical given. Because the impetus of the culture industry is always towards novelty, the ‘new’ is already compromised, no matter which actual product we examine.
Are the Thrills appreciated ironically? I have a feeling that the aesthetic of the Tyde is very similar, but I don't think they're just a rehash of the Beach Boys. Nor are they entirely ironic about the myth of the west coast.
I think Alex has said somewhere on these boards that he considers indie fundamentally conservative. I wish he would elaborate on this in his next article.
― youn, Thursday, 25 December 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)