the aesthetics of sex

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

I don't like it when sex is baroque (role playing, hair dragging over skin, etc etc). I would rather stick to the most minimal of acts. This is the kind of thing it can be very difficult to explain to the hypothetical other person. Who can justify baroque practises to me? Do other men feel they have to please the woman or they're refusing to let her take part? It is important if 'man's relationship to being is aesthetic.'

― kasimir malevich, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I want my sex to be as complex and baroque as possible.

― anthony, Wednesday, 26 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I want my sex, I want your sex, I want your love, explore monogamy...amazing how much George Michael got away with.

― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Even when its a simple it always ends up getting complicated. And Im not talking about where to put that damm arm that keeps getting in the way.

― Mr Noodles, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Sex is great because you notice the places on your body and your lover which are aesthic and those which are pleasurable. For example the clavicle is one of the most elegant and rarely seen body parts. Or that half circle between the belly and the cock. Or the pinkish pernuim which looks like the mussel connective tissue. All details which you do not notice unless the boy you love is standing in front of you naked.

― anthony, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I enjoy sex on teh run. Steal chickens and its never fun. Sex on th erun, sex in a gun. But seriously, I like to kiss your name.

― Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

umm, not sure us thebans worry about pleasing the woman.

― Geoff, Thursday, 27 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.