http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/dsldrive/60/id105.htmFrench director Bruno Dumont's road, sex and sulk movie, "Twentynine Palms", features strong performances from David Wissak and Katia Golubeva and even stronger sex and violence which noisily punctuate long periods of emotional aridity.
Shot in the California desert, Dumont's film was roundly booed at a preview screening, from which many critics had already walked out. It premieres in the competition for the Golden Lion on Wednesday.
― Skottie, Monday, 22 September 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)
Desert residents angry over portrayal in film
BY CARLA WHEELER AND MIKE SCHWARTZTHE PRESS-ENTERPRISE
When French filmmakers arrived in Twentynine Palms last year to make a movie, townsfolk said they understood it would be a light romantic comedy.
But less than a week before the premiere of director Bruno Dumont's thriller "Twentynine Palms" at the Venice Film Festival, the movie's Web site shows a film with sex scenes, nudity, vulgar language and violence -- including a sexual assault in the desert. Now some people who live and work in Twentynine Palms are concerned that the image of the desert community on the edge of Joshua Tree National Park has again been tarnished.
"Oh, that's great," said an unnerved Gary Daigneault, news director at KCDZ (107.7 FM) in Twentynine Palms, after viewing a photo of a sex scene posted on the site. "We were told it was a romantic comedy. They fooled us." Based on what he understood, Daigneault's station agreed to broadcast a call for movie extras during filming. The film is about a tempestuous young couple's visit to the desert, and a movie trailer on the Web site appears to put the town in a bad light, said Mike Collins, a civic leader who owns Collins Computers and Innovations.
In one scene from the trailer, a grizzled man in a passing truck yells, "This is our street! Get the hell out of the way!" as the couple, played by Katia Golubeva and David Wissak, are standing well out of the truck's path. In another scene, the terrified couple's SUV is thumped from behind by a another pickup in the desert, where the two are attacked.
"I'm disappointed," Collins said by phone. "We have war heroes and they pick on a few (bad apples)," Collins said. Twentynine Palms houses a large Marine base. "One of the first things people go for about the desert is they want to depict desert characters as unsavory," said artist Chuck Caplinger of Twentynine Palms. "But they're not like that at all. Anyone coming here to visit would be safe. This is really a safe place." Caplinger did a poster for the film of two actors standing naked and holding hands.
Producer responds Darren Goldberg, associate producer of "Twentynine Palms," said the three assailants in the desert scene are "not townies, but vagrants." A fight takes place between the bad guys and the couple, and there is a rape.
Goldberg, speaking by phone from his New York office, said the movie "was never billed as a (romantic) comedy, but as a drama." "I know they're sensitive," Goldberg said of the town's residents. "And we were concerned about that in the filming, but the actors really didn't interact with many people in town." The town has previously been stung by negative publicity generated by the book "Twentynine Palms," based on a true story of the killings of two young women by a troubled Marine. No connection exists between the book and movie, except in name. The film is also not related to "29 Palms," a direct-to-video movie currently available. The movie was shot last October and November. Filming was done in both San Bernardino and Riverside counties, including Twentynine Palms and Whitewater near the wind turbines, said Sheri Davis, executive director of the Inland Empire Film Commission. Ken Patel, manager of the El Rancho Dolores Motel, said the crew used six rooms and stayed about seven days -- two days to film a parking lot scene and five days for a pool scene. "In the pool scene they had a high camera -- maybe 40 feet up on a truck. The young couple was romancing in the pool by themselves," Patel said. "They didn't let anyone see it except the crew, but some said it was a nude scene. "I told them if something bad was going on, take our sign down. They said it's not a bad movie -- so I said, `If it's not bad, put my name in,' " Patel said. Goldberg said there were sex scenes at the swimming pool, in the desert and in a motel room. "Nudity and sex is definitely a part of it. Dumont is very well known for the way he expresses sex," he said.
Eye on a prize "Twentynine Palms" will vie with 19 other international films for a coveted Golden Lion award, Venice's equivalent of an Oscar. It will show there on Sept. 4.
Dumont's films are not widely distributed in the United States. Even if some residents disagree with a film's content, the U.S. Constitution protects a filmmaker's right to free speech, said the film commission's Davis, who helped Dumont's crew obtain permits in unincorporated areas.
"I never even asked for a script on it," said Davis. "I was told by the California Film Commission you can't turn down any project based on content. It's a First Amendment right."
Judy Burns, professor of screenwriting at UC Riverside and former professor at the UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television, said the film's producers would have a problem if they misrepresented what they were doing. "But I would be very surprised if the fine print of the contract didn't say `what we're doing is our business,' and if the locals signed it they would have no right to squabble." Jay Corbin, development director for Twentynine Palms, said he never asked to see a script before he issued the permit. "We want to know the nature (of the movie)," he said, "but we don't get into reviews or passing judgment."
Daigneault, speaking by phone from the radio station he owns, said he was unaware that Dumont is known in film circles for making controversial movies such as "Life of Jesus," about anti-Arab racism in France.
"We didn't know that. We're small-town folks," he said. Collins said he will watch out for the next French film crew in town. "If it turns out they portray Twentynine Palms in a negative light and they come back to make another movie, then we might run them out of town."
― Skottie, Monday, 22 September 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Monday, 22 September 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Monday, 22 September 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
I really do wonder, tho', if anyone else has seen this film, what it is it's supposed to be telling us. Is it some kind of allegory? I search for meaning.
― Skottie, Monday, 22 September 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 00:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 23 September 2003 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Saturday, 8 November 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 8 November 2003 13:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 8 November 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Saturday, 8 November 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Skottie, Saturday, 8 November 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Herbstmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 8 November 2003 20:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 9 November 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 9 November 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)
although i (snob alert) like better his earlier films which don't take ennui as their reason for being. they have stories to tell.
― amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)
the ending of the eclipse is a miracle, where the camera revisits the scenes of their rendezvous
― amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike nyc, Thursday, 8 April 2004 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― dean! (deangulberry), Thursday, 8 April 2004 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 04:12 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 04:13 (twenty years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 05:01 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 15:37 (twenty years ago)