Peep Show (now with added Mitchell & Webb Look)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Anyone watched this yet? Fridays after Sex and the City. I think it's very funny.

Sam (chirombo), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Tried to, went to bed instead!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I really wanted to see it. Is it being repeated on E4 or anything?

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Pretty funny yeah.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I like it. Their voices make me laugh. And the accidentally Nazi post-it was genius, I'm not sure why.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)

"Brown toast for first course, white for pudding."

Sam (chirombo), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i saw the second ep on video last night, mainly from behind my fingers, the excrutiation (sp?) factor was as high as the good episodes of the office, fortunately the laugh content is too.

truly a marvy show.

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, it's excellent. Possibly the nerdy one is too short of malice to match the Office, in some ways.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought that this would be about the comic. :(

adaml (adaml), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, that was the bad thing!

The opening montage featuring a lovely 360 shot of Crouch End (spiritual home of ILX) confuses me.

marianna, Monday, 13 October 2003 08:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Mmm yes, was going to start a thread about this myself. Saw my first episode on Friday - excellent stuff. Best Brit-com since 'Black Books'?

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 13 October 2003 08:46 (twenty-two years ago)

It's nasty and squirmworthy, but it also somehow manages to be very funny, and also vaguely sympathetic, in that you do identify with the characters despite their total patheticness, they're somehow still loveable.

Oh no, THAT was the bad thing!

kate (kate), Monday, 13 October 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Best Brit-com since 'Black Books'?

Damn straight. It's fantastic, I loves it, it's gleefully unafraid of tackling the most outre subject matter but fucking funny with it, and I'm a kinda horrible blend of the two main characters which makes it doubly scary. More please.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 13 October 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)

soon EVERYONE will been claiming to have been watching this since the first ep, but we are the true early adopters etcetc

bad thing...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 13 October 2003 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)

>Best Brit-com since 'Black Books'

Isn't that almost exactly what the Guardian called it?

Best Britcom since "French Fields"!

Tag (Tag), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:00 (twenty-two years ago)

caught it for the first time last Friday - pleasantly surprised by how good it was

on ahd Tag, let's not go nuts huh? (Anton Rogers is the don)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Tag, are you accusing JtN of nicking all of his ideas from the guardian? or for writing for the guardian?

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)

which is worse?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Haven't seen this yet but one of the writers is a friend.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)

The bit in the last one where he thinks "Look at me, being friends with a big black businessman like it's the most natural thing in the world! was hilarious, I thought.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 13 October 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh really, I know someone who knows someone who knows BOTH of the writers MAYBE.

Me and RickyT watched the third ep on Friday and LARFFED LIKE VERY GURGLY DRANES the entire way through, I must admit I missed the second ep though. Has anyone else taped it percharnce? I am 85% sure it is the best new programme since Delia but sadly it has no vampires.

Sarah (starry), Monday, 13 October 2003 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, that's it, I officially don't like it any more.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 07:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Er, wasn't it the fourth episode Stars?

Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.imperialyt.com/peeps_animation2.gif

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 11:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Sarah the second ep has a goth in it. And bowling.

Sam (chirombo), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah, it must have been the THIRD I missed. Confusing my Peep Show! I am not 4 REAL!!!

The goth bonking moment was TOO CRINGEWORTHY. I was watching it too sober and too tired whilst doing laundry. All other parts of the show were great.

Tell you what, that Sophie chick is EVERYWHERE at the moment! In the Lotto advert... in er... well Lixi says she's in another advert... I'm surprised the rest of the Britcomedy mafioso haven't turned up - where are the scientists from Look Around You ect ect.

Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 19:53 (twenty-two years ago)

> well Lixi says she's in another advert...

she's in the 'bev and kev' car insurance thing. she plays 'bev'.

andy

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 16 October 2003 16:51 (twenty-two years ago)

two months pass...
Wonderful show... and tucked away late, late into to Channel 4's schedules, where I caught the recent repeat run. Perhaps a shame that it hasn't been so publicised, but I'm sure it will catch on, though it's edgier even than 'The Office'. This show can go places... would be quite a coup I think to do say one episode without the first person approach... A second series could show how things in a contrastingly neutral way; the characters are now quite firmly established. Though admittedly at times I would have liked them to push areas of writing further, this was a 'sitcom' that really did create credible and amusing characters - and with the current and palatable fashion for melancholy. There's a lovely and rather grim inevitability to the failure and humiliation of the characters... Mark seems a stronger creation than Jeremy, though they fit together so interestingly. Some of the others are very sketchy and act as representatives of different things - Alan Johnson (the actor's performance and the writing really had laughing uproariously :)) representating an oddly flashy nerdism and business-obsession, for example. That episode was probably the best of those I've seen; all sorts of frissons and insights into the characters. Johnson has a marvellous way of speaking that obscures and then amplifies the character's one-note oddity; he exists more as a symbolic figure, spouting a feelgood mixture of tough straight talking and elaborate repartee. The scene where he's sitting with Mark and speaking in terms of pure functionality, and then cliched masculinity about Sophie, is a key one... for a brief time, one feels dragged away from the confused, jittery perspective of Mark, and presented with a certainty and bluntness of phrase that is chastening.
I like that Sophie character too; she acts as the object of Mark's desire, yet is perpetually out-of-reach and diffident - all seems in a stasis, as she never really commits to Mark, yet always seems willing to sustain the chance of that. She is possibly thinly-drawn, yet we get the sense of her as a nice, normal person with realistic if vaguely brought out imperfections and contradictions. She could be used with much more depth, but is a fine comic foil in general.

Hopefully we'll get a well promoted second series in the not too distant future. Really heartening, thoughtful stuff it was... and balances the darker elements with the amusing better than many, many comedies. Maybe even tonight's first 'Office' special, which while a very good, was awkward in its changing of a palette that worked. That made the documentary format much more of the focus, with the depictions of a celebrity Brent, and was an effective, but not very funny deviation from the original mise-en-scene. Imagine say if things got self-reverential with PS' characters drawing undue attention to their thoughts being on voiceover, verbally rather than in subtle reactions... "Peep Show" is very, very promising; some of the gags went into slightly dubious areas (shades of "Jam"... occasionally a propensity to go for shock at what-we're'-getting-away-with-on-National-TV) while adding really rather little and things can be patchy, but it had a fine success-failure ratio. Character and dialogue really have to be at the centre of these things, and the perspective filming I felt was largely entirely appropriate for the basis of this show. A really unexpected, hidden gem this... here's to the next series! :)

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 27 December 2003 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)

ugh.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Not a convert to this show, then? :)

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:04 (twenty-two years ago)

my problem w/ this show=I know someone called the same name as the guy in the show that looks like the guy in the show and he is a bit of a dick+it isn't funny.

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:17 (twenty-two years ago)

'+...' = u&k.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I will watch anything that Robert Webb and David Mitchell are in.
They are brilliant. First saw them on 'Bruiser' on BBC 2(which also had the woman who plays Sophie and Martin Freeman and Charlotte Hudson rwrorr) and then in their superb one-off 'Daydream Believer' (it was a Comedy lab episode). 'Peep Show' is a good vehicle for them
but i think it would probably be even better if they'd written it themselves. Incidentally Mitchell's character in 'Daydream' was obsessed with fascism/Mussolini - compare his Stalingrad fantasies in 'Peep Show'. They said recently the writers based the characters on them, which they found disturbing.
Hopefully it come into its own in the next series.

pete s, Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:33 (twenty-two years ago)

'will come into it's own..'
sounds slightly filthy

pete s, Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

it's the funniest British thing to have been on Channel 4 since...

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:41 (twenty-two years ago)

'Pornography:the Musical'.

pete s, Saturday, 27 December 2003 02:45 (twenty-two years ago)

ten months pass...
This returns for a second run, by the way, on Friday of next week, Channel 4.

High expectations, anyone?

I must say I rated it very highly last time; only caveat being the obtrusively 'edgy', malcontented camera work. The material needed a more classic sitcom approach in this way; while I accept a lot was based around interior monologues, did the visuals have to be as self-conscious? A moot point, perhaps... I do feel it harmed it slightly but not irrevocably.

But yes: good actors (that's the key! nothing they do is stand-up mugging or 'routine') are the main pair, and gratifying underplaying in the wider ensemble - though I loved that rather exaggerated businessman grotesque, Johnson. Looking forward immensely to this returning. The new Peter Kay show is on before it in the schedules, also.

Tom May (Tom May), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.peepsshow.com/intro.html

j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I clearly couldn't have been paying attention as I could have sworn that the first run had three main characters.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Friday, 12 November 2004 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

well if you count the love interest there sort-of is. I think this is pretty funny but at the same time i don't like it. weird.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 12 November 2004 23:24 (twenty-one years ago)

i think it's because i don't like the blonde guy - he gives me the creeps but not really in the was he is supposed to, i don't think. He's a terrible actor and signposts the humour too obviously. ugh.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 12 November 2004 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

"I'm Louis Theroux. I'm Louis Theroux."

**%@, Saturday, 13 November 2004 00:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess 'the two main characters' = the two whom we are given internal monologues from, at many points. We aren't given Sophie's thoughts, generally, though they gestured towards this by having Mark infilitrate her e-mail. She is bound to be more of a stooge and coordinate around whom Mark revolves, but is always made just a little more than that: rather a plausibly naturalistic figure actually.

Friday's episode did impress me; a good deal of tenderness, and a commendable avoidance of obvious moves: unlike the preceeding "Max and Paddy's Road to Nowhere", which I hoped would have something of the Tinniswood Uncle Mort & Carter Brandon radio-travelogue about it... but that was sadly rather tired with its irrelevant 'parodies', 'ironic' musical telegraphing. It had potential, but lacked the poetry required; how much better those silhouetted "Dirty Dancing" parodies would have worked with the Ingmar Bergman, or Mike Leigh, silence behind them? Nothing too deep was wrung out of the situation; not enough absurdity, not enough muted feeling. Maybe it'll improve, but I'm skeptical.

"Peep Show" is sharper with the non sequitur, and actually manages to surprise a bit; 't plays often as an onanistic "Bottom" crossed with "The Office". Admittedly, I do have to agree with Jed that the Mark actor is the more skilled... v. good supporting cast; must say that Olivia Colman is right for that role.

An episode without the inner-monologues could be a masterstroke, actually; like moments in the "Office" Christmas Specials where inter-relations appeared so differently without the 'docu'-framing. Being so used to the show's conceit would make such an edition a different take on things, and add a bit more complexity: maybe change how we view the main characters, not being given their innermost thoughts, once in a way.

Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 13 November 2004 23:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Having only watched Peep Show intermittently (but being pretty impressed, admittedly), do they mention in the show how much the guy that looks like Richard Littlejohn looks like Richard Littlejohn?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 14 November 2004 00:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Mark character, presumably? No, I don't believe so, though maybe Mark's discussion of the bad and good things arising from the '60s sexual revolution could be read as Littlejohnian. ;) paraphrasing: "Okay, I can take the romantic side, "I have a dream", the *Colours*... but not the... *Squalor*!"

Tom May (Tom May), Sunday, 14 November 2004 00:19 (twenty-one years ago)

do they mention in the show how much the guy that looks like Richard Littlejohn looks like Richard Littlejohn?

not sure who you mean at all here, but it was a good episode and v funny at times (certainly more than Max & Paddy)

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Has anyone bought/seen the DVD of the first series yet? Any good extras? I'm almost wishing I had a TV, just for Peep Show. If there was a way I could make it only receive Peep Show (and maybe The West Wing), I would do it.

Archel (Archel), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)

It was very funny indeed. Having found Max And Paddy funnier than I possibly should have I was physically hurting by the end of Peep Show.

RickyT (RickyT), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)

What a superb friday eve, Max & Paddy (how dare you!) being really funny (I was worried that it might not be.) & then Peep Show. Perfect!

PinXorchiXoR (Pinkpanther), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Max & Paddy was roundly panned by the Late Review - surprising as i would've expected it would totally be Tom Paulin's bag.

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Monday, 15 November 2004 10:48 (twenty-one years ago)

not sure if it's been mentioned but RW's book is the number 1 selling non fiction hardback book in the Uk.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJWN7jgX0AAoxRp.jpg

piscesx, Saturday, 16 September 2017 13:03 (eight years ago)

well, look at the fucking state of that lot. You can only read a finite amount of books in a lifetime, folks. Choose wisely!

calzino, Saturday, 16 September 2017 13:11 (eight years ago)

Circa - yeah I was wrong. This has grown on me

Week of Wonders (Ross), Saturday, 16 September 2017 16:41 (eight years ago)

I generally have an instant annoyance of animal-related storylines in sitcoms. (Same with Mummy the dog in Peep Show). So I'd rather it did without that, or maybe I'm just dead inside.

kinder, Saturday, 16 September 2017 18:01 (eight years ago)

I loved the Mummy plot.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 16 September 2017 18:43 (eight years ago)

https://i.imgur.com/6ECdo6p.png

Wichita prepares for totality (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 19 September 2017 00:09 (eight years ago)

three weeks pass...

"back" is pretty enjoyable so far

Week of Wonders (Ross), Friday, 13 October 2017 07:09 (eight years ago)

that was the last one, wasn't it? (the cancer test one).

koogs, Friday, 13 October 2017 08:18 (eight years ago)

four years pass...

This is pretty brutal https://t.co/e0SFKXAQol pic.twitter.com/2whBIrMgZG

— Tom Gara (@tomgara) March 7, 2022

I wonder how much of this is just bluster and how much reflects how people would actually act in that situation, it reminded me the Peep Show episode where Mark and Jez talk about whether they would have joined the resistance had they been in nazi-occupied France

Mark: I dunno, Jeremy. It would have been a terribly difficult time, but I would probably have kept my head down.
Jeremy: You're kidding! I totally would have joined up.
Mark: That's very easy to say, Jeremy, but you would have risked death not just for yourself but for your family.
Jeremy: I'd probably have just got on a train to Berlin and taken Hitler down. Boof, the whole thing's over.
Mark: Well, I guess we'll never know for sure.
Jeremy: Oh, I know. I definitely know. No question about it.
Mark: Well, congratulations. You would have been a brave, brave man.
Jeremy: I can't believe you wouldn't be in the Resistance with me. I'm really disappointed in you.

obviously Jeremy is not any braver than Mark, he's just has a more conceited, less realistic self-image - but maybe the person with the deluded self-image is more likely to actually do the heroic thing when the moment comes because they've rhetorically backed themselves into a corner, whereas the self-critical person is more likely to not do the heroic thing because they're already prepared to do that, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy? Being constantly self-critical can make you a bad person because you have a ready made explanation/excuse whenever you do bad things?

(I guess the difference is that joining the resistance would have been unarguably the morally right thing to do, but whether staying to fight for the US would be the right thing to do is more ambiguous?)

soref, Monday, 7 March 2022 23:14 (four years ago)

jeremy would, of course, have run like hell and/or become an informer

i cannot help if you made yourself not funny (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 12 March 2022 15:56 (four years ago)

one year passes...

relaxing video of los dude bros coming to life:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnshhIWdEfk

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 14 December 2023 19:18 (two years ago)

It's so weird, my first reaction was, huh, Peep Show is still on? Then my second reaction was to look up when it stopped airing. Then my third reaction was to try and determine if we've seen every season, and ... I don't know! It's been so long I can't remember if we ever finished it, but reading the episode descriptions is no help at all. Maybe we did? Maybe we didn't? Were there really *9* seasons? No idea! I could have sworn we stopped at 5, which for some reason I thought was the end, but scanning the summaries I think we went past there, but no idea how far. Might have to start over. Or maybe just pretend we finished and thought it was all very funny.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 14 December 2023 19:28 (two years ago)

I feel like the 'Mark and Jez eat a dog' season is where a lot of people understandably jumped off the train but it's worth hopping back on because it did quickly and admirably redeem that epic misstep imo.

Great-Tasting Burger Perceptions (Old Lunch), Thursday, 14 December 2023 19:34 (two years ago)

It's solidly funny all the way to the end imo

nate woolls, Thursday, 14 December 2023 19:36 (two years ago)

There’s a lot of great episodes from the later seasons, like when Mark finally publishes Business Secrets of the Pharaohs—a rare example where Jez is the (relatively) sane one and Mark is unhinged. Or "Chairman Mark", which has a great election speech from Mark as he tries to become chairman of the freehold committee (tho as an American, I’m not really sure what that means… like being on a condo board, maybe?)

blatherskite, Thursday, 14 December 2023 20:13 (two years ago)

It's a shame people remember the dog eating episode mainly for the dog eating, this scene from the same episode has one of the series greatest ever lines

"Unfilled?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkjeorS12F0

nate woolls, Thursday, 14 December 2023 20:34 (two years ago)

good timing, I decided to watch Back this week. it starts off really badly imo. was really jarring to see them basically playing the same characters in what starts off as quite a lame trad sitcom with trad sitcom jokes. it gets better after about 3 episodes, but apparently because it got cancelled they never resolve anything, but am going to finish it anyway

Colonel Poo, Friday, 15 December 2023 03:05 (two years ago)

re Peep Show, I did have the impression it started sucking after about series 5 but I rewatched it last week before watching Back and it's actually still quite funny most of the time and some of the episodes I don't like are in the early seasons - I think my least favourite one is the one in the gym where they accuse that guy of shitting in the pool and touching up Mark.

I looked up the guy that wrote Back when I was hating it and he also wrote the Peep Show episode where Mark gets raped which was another low point.

What I did notice was both Peep Show and Back have the same bullshit nonsense about tracking people's IP addresses which just isn't how this works but strangely the Back guy didn't write that episode.

Colonel Poo, Friday, 15 December 2023 03:08 (two years ago)

one year passes...

Curse These Metal Hands

nightly repeats on 4extra have been useful. mostly for the band names and superhans' asides about crack being moreish and that glue would take the edge off.

and it's odd how not-odd the filming technique is, the direct to camera thing that gives it its name, you don't see it anywhere else and yet it's fine

koogs, Friday, 14 March 2025 11:51 (one year ago)

Cally: "I got a call from Super Hans, he's having an ego attack. He's driving to Festivus with all the windows down shouting his own name. Reckons he's gonna make a super group out of Hard-Fi and Kaiser Chiefs."
Jez: "He's talked about that before."

my opinionation (Hamildan), Friday, 14 March 2025 12:40 (one year ago)

This came up on my facebook today - decent effort!
https://www.tiktok.com/@finlaycomedy/video/7481319586051214614

kinder, Friday, 14 March 2025 13:11 (one year ago)

Any East London people - I'll be hosting a Peep Show quiz night at the Lord Napier Star in Hackney Wick on Thursday the 10th of April 8 pm.

chap, Monday, 17 March 2025 18:24 (one year ago)

there's a radiator shelf in the kitchen that appears to be full of disposable lighters

series 8 now and there's lots of dobby

while things starts again from the beginning on apr 01

koogs, Thursday, 27 March 2025 11:36 (one year ago)

(whole thing)

koogs, Thursday, 27 March 2025 11:51 (one year ago)

seven months pass...

Peep Show festive Bake-off...

with Olivia Colman, David Mitchell, Dobby, Superhans and Big Suze

(repost as this thread is more recent)

koogs, Friday, 21 November 2025 09:40 (four months ago)

I thought, for a long time, that this show finished with S5! I did love this show, but it was the stretch of episodes where they set fire to a barn, eat a dog and one of them pisses himself in church where I assumed it had completely jumped the shark, and so got off the wagon. Are the latter series worth a dive?

Now read it backwards. (dog latin), Friday, 21 November 2025 10:16 (four months ago)

If you didn't like s5 then probably not, that's generally considered the peak

giving you schtick (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Friday, 21 November 2025 10:37 (four months ago)

Maybe I'm a terribly undiscerning viewer but I never really thought there was *that* much of a decrement in excellence as the seasons progressed. It may be significant however that I'd likely find any old nonsense featuring Dobby worthwhile!

It’s a powerful boat for a powerful mind. (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Friday, 21 November 2025 10:43 (four months ago)

S5 was a significant dip imo, that dog episode in particular stands out as one of the worst. But it definitely has lots of brilliant episodes after that. Well worth watching imo.

LocalGarda, Friday, 21 November 2025 10:48 (four months ago)

those episodes are all S4, not S5

Colonel Poo, Friday, 21 November 2025 10:53 (four months ago)

S5 is not "generally considered the peak"

It was all downhill from 1 & 2!

Number None, Friday, 21 November 2025 10:59 (four months ago)

(with occasional returns to form)

Number None, Friday, 21 November 2025 10:59 (four months ago)

those episodes are all S4, not S5

― Colonel Poo, Friday, 21 November 2025 10:53 (thirty minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

Yes, good point

S5 is not "generally considered the peak"

It was all downhill from 1 & 2!

― Number None, Friday, 21 November 2025 10:59 (twenty-four minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

Not my opinion but that's the consensus online. S2 is my favourite too - for me the nadir is Season 3 episode Jurying.

giving you schtick (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Friday, 21 November 2025 11:58 (four months ago)

It’s all good

ok (D-40), Friday, 21 November 2025 15:33 (four months ago)

Maybe I'm a terribly undiscerning viewer but I never really thought there was *that* much of a decrement in excellence as the seasons progressed.

I agree; although the latter series with Business Secrets of the Pharoahs, life coaching etc are far more forgettable. I don't like anything involving Saz either. Or that storyline with the gym trainer. Sober Hans getting married is ace though.
I hate the dog-eating bit of the stag one (that is definitely the lowest point) but liked the wedding one.

kinder, Friday, 21 November 2025 17:45 (four months ago)

feel like the dog eating was a silly way to end what had been a decent episode which has one of my favourite quotes - "Jeremy, there are many things I would do to help you, but digging a hole in the wintry earth with my bare hands so that you can bury the corpse of a dog you killed is not one of them."

giving you schtick (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Friday, 21 November 2025 17:51 (four months ago)

Peep Show is at its best when the situations they're in are at least close to plausible or somehow relatable. Eating the dog was neither.

Now read it backwards. (dog latin), Saturday, 22 November 2025 00:23 (four months ago)

Funny, I thought I'd seen all of S3 but I don't recall anything of the synopsis of Jurying

Now read it backwards. (dog latin), Saturday, 22 November 2025 00:25 (four months ago)

Y'all prompted me to immediately re-watch the oft-maligned season 8 (life-coaching, Business Secrets of the Pharaohs, paintball, bathroom fittings, lots of Dobby) before going to bed last night. (Barely the length of a feature film in total, conveniently.) If this alleged (by the interweb) 'worst season' ranks below average in terms of hilariousness and crucial "life is futile" vibes it's not-super obvious that the margin even reaches statistical significance, as it were. I guess I should immediately refresh my memory of seasons 1/2...

It’s a powerful boat for a powerful mind. (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Saturday, 22 November 2025 01:13 (four months ago)

"not super-obvious" rather o_O

It’s a powerful boat for a powerful mind. (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Saturday, 22 November 2025 01:23 (four months ago)

Do the Brits now call it “Season” instead of “Series”?

Remo Palmieri: The Adventure Begins (Boring, Maryland), Saturday, 22 November 2025 03:48 (four months ago)

LOL. I've just added a whole bunch of 'seasons' to the thread (I think I both use pretty much interchangeably) but the UK is not responsible for those instances. :) A text search suggests that 'series' has appeared more than five times as frequently as 'season' if we ignore those...

It’s a powerful boat for a powerful mind. (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Saturday, 22 November 2025 04:46 (four months ago)

I agree with D40 here, I've rewatched it all about five times and I don't think there's a huge dropoff apart from the odd dud episode like the dog one. Even very late there are some amazing characters, like the bloke obsessed with orthodox churches or whatever.

LocalGarda, Saturday, 22 November 2025 07:35 (four months ago)

I'm so used to hearing "Seasons" with regard to US TV that I end up defaulting to it sometimes. But yeah it's usually "Series" when referring to UK shows.

That said "Series" is annoying as I'm never sure how to emphasise if I'm speaking in the plural or not. Keep wanting to say "Serieses" which is bonkers

Now read it backwards. (dog latin), Saturday, 22 November 2025 10:08 (four months ago)

I'm going to have to rewatch this whole programme, aren't I? It's my partner's favourite show and she puts on random episodes to go to sleep to. Don't know how she doesn't cringe herself to sleep

Now read it backwards. (dog latin), Saturday, 22 November 2025 10:11 (four months ago)

LOL (re: sleeping to it.)

I've now re-watched series 9 too. (In addition to 8 last night, I mean. I don't really need all *that* much encouragement it seems.) It certainly doesn't feel like it desperately needed to be killed off when it was. Far from it. LocalGarda OTM about the addition of pretty solid characters right to the end.

Basically the best sit-com evah. Maybe.

It’s a powerful boat for a powerful mind. (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Saturday, 22 November 2025 11:04 (four months ago)

yeah, do it DL.

https://img.gifglobe.com/grabs/peepshow/S07E05/gif/6ruw4aya3h72.gif

kinder, Saturday, 22 November 2025 17:28 (four months ago)

The final series is really really good

chap, Saturday, 22 November 2025 22:11 (four months ago)

OTM. eg. Olivia Colman's final few scenes have been haunting me anew for a couple days now lol.

It’s a powerful boat for a powerful mind. (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Monday, 24 November 2025 06:38 (four months ago)

With any episode anybody describes as weak I just immediately think of at least one thing that's indispensably good about it. Matt Townsend gym episode has one of the single best jokes in the series ("what's a novel?"). Jury episode has Mark's big spiteful lecture about consumer capitalism as he reclaims the apartment. Jeremy's "you've ground down my self-worth" thing as he wets himself on the church balcony is fantastic and probably emotionally necessary as a lead-in to the ceremony itself. You have to get a lot closer to the end before reaching any where I just think eh, yeah, that one's not great.

ን (nabisco), Monday, 24 November 2025 22:55 (four months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.