Sven Goran Eriksson c/d

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Great results - seven wins in succession, only one competitive defeat (vs World Champs) - but not exactly the higher level we'd hoped for. His reputation is so going to hinge on the Turkey result, but what's your overall opinion?

Daniel (dancity), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Given what he's replaced, not dud, but not classic. The boy can change the way his team plays (lots of come back victories) but has his favourites and persists despite obvious problems and the team tends to play at least one utterly insipid half out of three.

However, he gave me Munich, he gave me Sapporo, for which I am truly grateful.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)

What Dave said. I also don't understand that despite all this left-side stuff, he has never once tried playing Ashley Cole in front of Wayne Bridge. And he still persists in playing Owen Hargreaves.

But still, if you asked any England fan who'd just seen us crash to the Germans in Keegans last game - "would you be happy with beating Germany 5-1, beating Argentina in a World Cup game and then going out to Brazil in the Quarters?", what do you think the answer would be?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:29 (twenty-two years ago)

As a neutral, I'd say classic as a club manager, but verging on dud as an international manager. Eriksson has always had his set way of playing football, and at club level, he always fitted the players around the formation. You can't do this at international level, and that's why, when Euro 2004 comes around, the 2nd round will be the best that England can hope for.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:31 (twenty-two years ago)

But Eriksson has changed formation about four times in this qualifying campaign alone!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:34 (twenty-two years ago)

and often within the same game!

Daniel (dancity), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Well I'm not saying for definite, but have you seen his hairline?
http://www.dallasnews.com/cardstock/pix/halloween/vampire.jpg

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Irrespective of formation changes, Eriksson does have a set "Eriksson" style of play that is identifiable with pretty much any team he's ever managed, surely that's obvious?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:45 (twenty-two years ago)

True.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Supporters of his appointment, including myself, were trumpeting his continental know-how. Yet his raw material is English. How has he fared? England's football is not, as I said in my question, on that higher plane that we'd hoped for.

One friend of mine likens his disappointment with Eriksson to that of his disappointment with the Blair government. I tell him to look at the results in both cases! But inside I know my friend has a point.

Daniel (dancity), Friday, 3 October 2003 09:57 (twenty-two years ago)

The way we kept the ball near the corner flag against macedonia was a testament to some improvements he has made. However, his club teams have tended to be workmanlike and efficient. Obv, I want England to win the World Cup every time and to do it playing just like Brazil 1970. Eriksson has not delivered on this, so may I be the first to say:

IN THE NAME OF GOD, GO!

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 3 October 2003 10:16 (twenty-two years ago)

What would an England manager have to do NOT to be considered a disappointment?

(Obv the answer to this is to win a major tournament and as far as I can see Euro2002 is the only real opportunity we'll have to do that and even that depends on Italy and France fucking up probably).

(x-post - D'oh!)

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 3 October 2003 10:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Euro2004, even.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 3 October 2003 10:19 (twenty-two years ago)

We won Euro 2002 in the alternate dimension where Henri Delauney started his tournament in 1962 and Jules Rimet got Uruguay 1928 off the ground. In this universe, Denmark won Euro 2002.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 3 October 2003 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)

i think an england manager would have to win a major championship whilst finding a cure for cancer and sorting the railways out to not be considered a disappointment...

i like sven for all the reasons listed above

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 3 October 2003 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)

He's quite a stickler in training apparently so maybe he'd make the trains run on time too?

chris (chris), Friday, 3 October 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

England played better under Hoddle (shockah)

stevem (blueski), Friday, 3 October 2003 10:58 (twenty-two years ago)

in the current qualifying campaign - just as with brian kerr since he took over ireland - the results have been solid, but the performance level has been below par. i've always felt that he'll get the draw in turkey too (although i still think the turks are a better footballing side). i have a feeling england might come unstuck at the tournament itself, though.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Friday, 3 October 2003 11:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm reasonably happy with him. It does occasionally trouble me when the team lack spirit, but I think Beckham has grown into his captaincy role and may be the leader to solve that. I am inclined to think that he may be sound at beating the lesser sides and providing a pretty good showing generally, but the worst memory is the second half against Brazil: a man up, a goal down, desperate need - and no ideas against a high class side. That makes me think that we will get qualifications and respectable showings, but not win anything. Apart from '66, that is hardly below par, but it is a little uninspiring.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 3 October 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)

five months pass...
Classic now surely, if only for wrongfooting the hysterical shrieking UK press?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)

but now we're stuck with him until 2008! actually considering the alternatives (esp. English coaches) it's just as well.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 29 March 2004 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

... unless England fuck everything up in the summer of course, in which case the Sun will be calling for his severed head on a spike in Soho Square.

Also the repeated doubts cast over his loyalty and commitment strike me as a very thinly veiled "See? We told you we can't trust these foreigners managing our national team!"

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Matt OTM - there's sections of the English press who've been waiting for this; results meant they couldn't say 'told you so' so this is the excuse they've been waiting for. They appear to have forgotten Don Revie in their condemnations of Sven's treachery.

If he did leave - no change really. Still no English candidate, as since he took over, there's been no change at a big club. Although there are good English managers out there, none have been tested at the highest levels and so the problem still remains. Until one of the big clubs take a chance on an English manager, I can't see the FA trying someone from outside the charmed circle.

Look at Scotty Parker - mjoving to Chelsea as it'll improve his international chances. The same is true of managers. But those big clubs are even more unlikely to take a punt on someone who has the air of the untried, as they don't have a patriotic notion informing their managerial chocies.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Obsessed with playing long ball. And wierdly loyal to that lumpen oaf Heskey. And is defecting to Chelski. And is semi-responsible for screeching bonkers Nancy Dell Olllio getting taken seriously by Heat and being interviewed about her drag queen style tips. And he lied about Ulrika. Dud. I am too disappointed in him to be charitable.

badger Kitten (badger Kitten), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:16 (twenty-one years ago)

England can't do worse than they did in the last European Championships surely - must at least get out of the group and then I think Sven would be spared (espesh given the opposition is likely to be the hosts Portugal in the quarter-final).

Interesting that Steve Mclaren may well be in the unusual position of his next job being most likely to be either as manager of England's biggest club (still seems the logical successor to Ferguson but who knows really) or as the England manager itself.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:18 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, ooops, so he's not defecting to Chelski. Still dud though.

badger Kitten (badger Kitten), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Badger are you Jimmy Greaves?

Steve McLaren to England at this point in his career is mentalism... see how he does at Manyoo or wherever first, if they'll have him.

Surely part of the problem with Engerland over the past decade or so is that Hoddle, Keegan, Venables, Taylor were all untried at the top level. Boyler OTM I think.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:24 (twenty-one years ago)

but Wilkinson won the league with Leeds and is considered to have been a failure at managing England (the one or two FRIENDLIES he actually took the reins)...maybe he would've done well with them in the long run - why was there no faith shown in him? Or was it just felt that he fluked it with Leeds in the first place? Unlikely considering the FA did consider him good enough to fulfil a Technical Overlord Of Supreme Excellence role at Lancaster Gate/Soho Square.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:28 (twenty-one years ago)

He is the most boring man alive. I have never heard him say anything interesting at all. And his missus is a bit of lamb mutton while I'm at it.

Yesterday Garth crooks said that Svenm had been flirting with other employees. I think, and hope, he meant to say employers. Who knows. I have an image of him perched on the end of a secretary's desk in Soho Square saying 'Yes, you type in a beautiful way, for sure'.

My thesis will be born out because some hack will push the cause of Venables again. I betcha.

The real issue with any successor (assuming here that people are with me in the view that he'll not be with England for long) is that international football is still having a battle with the clubs; twas ever thus. But which manager would become an international manager without part of it seeming to be a pre-retirement winding down? Most people who want to achieve things want to do it in club football. The interesting thing for me is the viability of international football in the modern age. It garners the highest ratings by a long long way, yet is perennially in some form of crisis, and is beseiged by powerful forces within and without the game. It endures though, in the same way those who prophecise the end of the nation-state turn out to be somewhat premature. The issue isn't an all of nothing one, but what the nation-state turns into; the same questions need to asked of international football.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah but Wilkinson's trumph at Leeds was eight or nine years before he got the caretaker England role and there was the small factor of a Mr Eric Cantona involved as well. Might as well be advocating George Graham for the job.

The rest of the time Leeds were mid-table or pushing for a UEFA place at best, and lets not forget the Sunderland debacle. Technical Overlord = we want to shuffle you quietly to the sidelines without you throwing too much of a strop about it.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Sergeant Wilko's appointment was, it seemed to me, a halfway house. Having a role like that in the game - classic. Giving it to an out of work manager in some sinecure fashion - dud. It was one of the appointment made at the fag-end of the Kelly era, as they try to do the modernising schtick that Crozier ended up doing. Like much of late Kelly, they almost got it right; that touching distance of successful policy implementation was a common theme, which showed that kelly wasn't the committee drone he was made to be, nor could he ever deliver the reform needed in the time frames required.

Also - Leeds under Wilkinson - went from winning the League to almost relegated the next season. Worst defence of the title ever.

I think Wilko got lucky - he took a team that 2 years earlier had been in Division 2 and got a great blend of players - the old and wise and the young and hungry - to play a great season. It was the last old-style title win in my book, and arguably, Manyoo choked as much as they won it. It's often the case that teams choke, and that doesn't take away the fact that they were there with the points on the board.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I love how it feels like we are all arguing even tho we all agree about the same issues more or less.

looks like Svenm has got his Midwinter break wish in exchange for pledging alleigance - I have no problem with the idea myself. Plus with FIFA pushing for more frequent World Cups, the Confed Cup and for countries to take the friendlies more seriously it seems that international football is as healthy as ever really, despite the rise of the Superclub undermining the international cause.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)

No no no no no!

Actually, yes. Agreement sucks ass.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:43 (twenty-one years ago)

More frequent World Cups would ruin international football. Is this another ridiculous FIFA pipe dream?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:44 (twenty-one years ago)

But yeah, if a winter break is the best thing to come out of this other than Eriksson's payrise then it's worth it after all.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

In non-Sven football news, this week saw Chesterfield draw 4-4 in front on 4444 spectators. Sadly, it was not next weekend, which would have been amazing. But there you go.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Also Eriksson's decision means that Chelsea look more than a little silly over the Ranieri situation at the moment, especially if a couple more managers turn the club down. I'm sure they'll buy their way out of this one but its hardly great diplomacy is it?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 09:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Paul Wilson was very good on this in yesterday's Observer; said that everyone (Chelsea and Real madrid) wants Wenger, but none will get. Eriksson is second choice for both.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the one bad example Eriksson has set is in the friendlies. 11 substitutions and Phil Neville picking the captain's armband off the turf with a twinkle in his eye. It is an honour to captain your country blah blah etc etc. Misjudged management.

Conversely, I think he has a great understanding of English football. Apart from Michael Ricketts, natch. But even then, the guy was in form, so why not?

There is not a single English manager who could step into his shoes at present.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Also was it Wilson who raised the possibility of Ranieri to Spurs? That got me quite excited.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Spurs caller to 606 on Saturday evening, "yeah, like why's he playing three up front, it's stupid, Pleat is rubbish, Doherty is sh...rubbish, YID ARMY, Redknapp, what? Yeah, Kanoute went to Mali, we're going to finish about ninth."

Presenter: "What is your point?"

Spurs Caller: "YID ARMY, YID ARMY"

And that was one of the more eloquent ones.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread has remidned me of the post-Denmark WC2002 celebrations. I was outside a pub near Spitalfields market where an impromptu brass band was pied-piper stylee marching down the street getting a train of people together. I joined in singing 'Sven-Goran Eriksson, la la-la la-la' to the tune of Brown Girl in the Ring, which is by some margin the worst football song ever.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I made my mum tape it off the radio for posterity... (xpost)

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 10:09 (twenty-one years ago)

ha ha

stevem (blueski), Monday, 29 March 2004 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)

The Sven-as-foreigner question is fair point. I don't recall quite the same outcry when Bobby Robson announced before Italia 90 that he was off to PSV afterwards.

Japanese Giraffe (Japanese Giraffe), Monday, 29 March 2004 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Only France, Italy, Spain, England and possibly Germany would be that bothered about having a manager not of the same nationality I think.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 29 March 2004 11:50 (twenty-one years ago)

There would be a national outcry in Italy if someone were even to suggest such a thing. If England can have a foreign coach, I don't see why it would be such a wrench for France or Spain though...

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 11:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I've yet to see any press speculation linking Berti Vogts to the Chelsea job.

Jonnie, Monday, 29 March 2004 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Carlton Palmer is now favourite for the Chelsea job.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Monday, 29 March 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Ranieri must be fucking loving this.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 29 March 2004 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Wouldn't a better indicator of "maybe he was working out strengths and weaknesses of potential the opposition e.g. from france, and what positions they play in" be watching them in the actual tournament?

(And of course I don't want England to win)

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

Wouldn't a better indicator of "maybe he was working out strengths and weaknesses of potential the opposition e.g. from france, and what positions they play in" be watching them in the actual tournament?

lol he'll be too busy in the actual tournament shagging the german ladies innit. won't be watching any games.

(oh yeah)

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

jesus christ. it's quite plausible that Eriksson watched Man U v Liverpool so as to observe the tactics deployed etc. - rather than assess who was playing. critics really are clutching at straws here.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

it's arsenal-boro, dude! man u liverpool would have been fine with all them fine english players innit.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

whereas it's an outrage watching asnl boro.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 24 January 2006 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think I get Sven's departure. I don't get whether he's been fired, and if so, what for. I don't think he can have been fired for talking about the existence of bungs, as Boyle seems to suggest.

But then, Boyle perhaps, or indeed presumably, knows football today better than I do.

Really, I don't get it - I don't think I see what has happened.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 25 January 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)

I love the way he says, "if I win the World Cup".

I have not followed the bung revelations.

Why doesn't Tord Grip take over? Presumably he's not a rampant shagger, and the team will play the same brand of exciting football.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 26 January 2006 09:58 (nineteen years ago)

Eurosport are showing the Cameroon quater final from Italia 90 at the moment; England are shockingly bad and amazingly lucky. It's also amusing to see the haircuts, tiny shorts and knee-high lunges that don't even get a yellow card, but that's by the by.

In that world cup England only managed to beat one team in normal time — a 1-0 squeeze past Egypt in the first round. We drew 1-1 with the Republic, got a goalless draw with Holland, beat Belgium 1-0 with a 118th minute wondergoal by Platt, were getting caned by Cameroon until a soft penalty got us a late equaliser leading to a 3-2 extra time win, then lost to the Germans on penalties.

Plus we crashed out of Euro 88 early doors, and lost to the eventual winners of Mexico 86 in the quarter finals.

And yet there are still some people saying we should get Robson back as manager because he was so much better than Sven could ever manage. It's absurd.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 13:22 (nineteen years ago)

the mad thing about the last World Cup was how the two finalists got there by winning every knockout game beforehand in normal time, with just one goal conceded between them (Owen's goal against Brazil). this really flatters both teams as neither even played that well (or at least as well as they're usually expected to).

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 31 January 2006 13:30 (nineteen years ago)

Another way of looking at the 90 World Cup is that we didn't lose a single game, except on penalties to the eventual winners who only took the game into extra time because of a flukey deflection off Paul Parker's leg. Also I'm pretty sure we had a Stuart Pearce goal disallowed right at the end against Holland, and at the back of my mind I have an image of John Barnes having a perfectly good goal incorrectly ruled offside (but I can't remember who this was against, or even which tournament it was).

Also, in the 86 World Cup, after a shaky start Lineker went on a goalscoring spree and we only got knocked out (again by the eventual winners) because of the most blatant bit of cheating in the whole history of cheating.

Tehrannosaurus Rex at work, Tuesday, 31 January 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)

three months pass...
Yes, and what in blue blazes is Wenger doing buying Theo Walcott?

Little did Vicious Cop (about 8 posts up) know that Wenger's master plan was groom Walcott for the 2006 World Cup, as opposed to 2010 and beyond.

Daniel Giraffe (Daniel Giraffe), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:16 (nineteen years ago)

He a big dull dud, but he doesn't know it

-- Onimo (gerry.wat...), September 8th, 2005

I've changed my mind.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:34 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

Oh, he's classic, at least for today anyway.

Billy Dods, Sunday, 19 August 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

Immense

Dom Passantino, Sunday, 19 August 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

hee hee hee where's matt dc

Dimension 5ive, Sunday, 19 August 2007 14:38 (eighteen years ago)

Immense

Massive.

Just got offed, Sunday, 19 August 2007 14:48 (eighteen years ago)

eight months pass...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/7370698.stm

crazy

Herman G. Neuname, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 10:44 (seventeen years ago)

At least he's not to be tortured

Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 10:46 (seventeen years ago)

great news for Newcastle

blueski, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 10:52 (seventeen years ago)

He's great at making huge amounts of money for doing nothing - get fired here and he still gets paid off the £5m for the last two years of his contract?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 10:52 (seventeen years ago)

He'll be quids in, for sure.

It's an absolutely potty decision. Blues fans have been really pleased with the progress under Sven, despite the poor second half of the season. He talks sense, the football was good when he got it right. Now there's a danger Thakin's City are going to turn into Hearts.

Dreadful.

Daniel Giraffe, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 11:27 (seventeen years ago)

great news for Chelsea

blueski, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 11:32 (seventeen years ago)

OH FFS

King Boy Pato, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 11:50 (seventeen years ago)

Man City are now Hearts as Daniel says.

Herman G. Neuname, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 11:57 (seventeen years ago)

who is going to get the city job? who'd take it?

darraghmac, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:17 (seventeen years ago)

It's all set up for Martin Jol innit

Herman G. Neuname, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:19 (seventeen years ago)

There's a rumour going round work (at least among those who give a toss about football!) that it's going to be Luis Felipe Scolari, Sven's nemesis.

Daniel Giraffe, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:21 (seventeen years ago)

Cruel

Herman G. Neuname, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:21 (seventeen years ago)

McClaren then?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:22 (seventeen years ago)

Mourinho to Barca, Rijkaard to City, Ronaldinho to Newcastle. Eriksson may get whatever club just squeezes out of relegation from the Prem.

onimo, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:22 (seventeen years ago)

Eriksson for the Hammers

Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:23 (seventeen years ago)

Oooh good one.

Is Sven's reputation so shot that an Italian club wouldn't take a punt on him now?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:24 (seventeen years ago)

No no, he'd be welcome back in Italy like a shot, I reckons

Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:25 (seventeen years ago)

Eriksson would work wonders with Dave Kitson.

onimo, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:26 (seventeen years ago)

But who can pay him enough? (xp)

Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:26 (seventeen years ago)

McClaren then?

DON'T give them ideas like that. They might be reading.

King Boy Pato, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:47 (seventeen years ago)

Thaksin only posts on crutisborad

blueski, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:48 (seventeen years ago)

No no, he'd be welcome back in Italy like a shot, I reckons

-- Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:25 (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

F'real. There's gonna be a vacant seat on the Milan bench assuming they don't get their Champs League qualification this year...

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:50 (seventeen years ago)

Tell you what though, just like Randy Lerner has won plaudits by showing his love for and understanding of AVFC traditions, Shinawatra shows a similar love for a venerable old City tradition by getting rid of a half-decent club manager for no real reason at all.

The Boyler, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:13 (seventeen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7373404.stm

Herman G. Neuname, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:17 (seventeen years ago)

Jay-Z in

blueski, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:17 (seventeen years ago)

Say what you want about Shinawatra, I'm sure he'll take all this criticism squarely on the chin.

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:18 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.whoateallthepies.tv/75961861.jpg

"Critics say I'm money, cash, hoes/ I'm from Chiang Mia stupid, what type of facts are those?"

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:19 (seventeen years ago)

"Yes... fingernails... yep... then soles of the feet? Oh you think electrodes on the testicles will be more effective on Gallagher?"

Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:21 (seventeen years ago)

Shinawatra bankrolled eight summer signings at a cost of more than £46m shortly after buying the club....It seems certain that any new manager will have a considerable amount of money to spend in the summer. Shinawatra has hundreds of millions of pounds worth of assets in Thailand frozen as he awaits trial on corruption charges later this year. Yet his former lawyer, Noppadom Pattama, who is now Thailand's foreign minister, told BBC Sport that he expected these assets to be "unfrozen in the near future".

It's been repeatedly alleged in a Man Utd fanzine that Thaksin hasn't actually put any money into City yet - that the transfers were all done on the never-never on the understanding that his assets would be unfrozen at some point.

Nasty, Brutish & Short, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:21 (seventeen years ago)

if you havin' girl problems i feel bad for you Sun Jihai

blueski, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:21 (seventeen years ago)

Purchase of Manchester City Football Club

While Prime Minister, Thaksin offered to buy Fulham F.C. from owner Mohamed al-Fayed. After Fayed rebuffed his offer for the club, Thaksin unsuccessfully bid to buy Liverpool.[155]

On June 21, 2007 Thaksin Shinawatra lodged, and had accepted, an £81.6 million bid for Manchester City F.C. On 6 July he completed purchase of the required 75%[156] of the club's shares to take the company off the Stock Exchange and became Chairman of the club. Sven-Göran Eriksson was appointed the new club manager.[157]

He has caused controversy by apparently sacking Eriksson after only a season, despite the fact that Manchester City had not left the top half of the premiership all season.

Manchester City supporters have nicknamed him Frank, after the singer Frank Sinatra.

In short, Thaskin Shinawatra emobdies everything that is wrong with modern day football.

Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:23 (seventeen years ago)

Somebody start a "Soulja Boy For City Manager" Facebook group.

King Boy Pato, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:36 (seventeen years ago)

three years pass...

well, Leicester's Thai owners obviously think Dud:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3891235/Leicester-sack-boss-Sven-Goran-Eriksson.html

Grandpont Genie, Monday, 24 October 2011 17:29 (thirteen years ago)

three years pass...

still the eighth highest earning manager in the world according to france football

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 25 March 2015 15:47 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.