An all-new version of the ILX code is being developed. You can test and comment at sandbox.ilxor.com.

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

― minna (minna), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:27 (twenty-three years ago)

duekrnn ptsores tkae ntoe

― minna (minna), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy

― Ed (dali), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:29 (twenty-three years ago)

What a swizz. Either Minna and me have friends in common, or that's a common meme. But someone sent that to last week, and v funny it is too. I made a joke about 'spilt infinitives'. Oh how we laughed.

― Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:30 (twenty-three years ago)

opos, srory!

― minna (minna), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:37 (twenty-three years ago)

oh its fairly common alright
there was a times editorial about it

― robin (robin), Friday, 3 October 2003 18:54 (twenty-three years ago)

"it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae."

rlouuidcis artsseion!

NB: For the non-Cambridgian reader the above conveys the words: ridiculous assertion!

― Aimless, Friday, 3 October 2003 19:24 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.