http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/proven/
GO AND READ IT!
(The rest of the October updates including Geeta's intro article and Steve M's TOTP write-up will be put up over the weekend)
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 October 2003 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 3 October 2003 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 3 October 2003 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Possible future blogs
Travel BlogHome and GardensPolitics Blog (Ph34r it)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm taking a Biology Lab course, I have been asked to bring the following itmes that may be required for each session:
Ruled PaperPlain PaperIcm graph PaperClear plastic rulerPencilSimple CalculatorRubberUser name and Password*Scissors, Forceps and Permanent marker pen may also be useful especially for 'wet practicals' but these are not essential.White coast are not essential, but are useful for protecting clothes.
....and for looking professional I say!
― marianna, Friday, 3 October 2003 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)
NUDIE BLOG NOW!
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― marianna, Friday, 3 October 2003 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 3 October 2003 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 3 October 2003 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Friday, 3 October 2003 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Friday, 3 October 2003 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 3 October 2003 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Friday, 3 October 2003 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Saturday, 4 October 2003 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Saturday, 4 October 2003 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
The other day they had this picture, and in the text they linked to an article on skateboarding!
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap031001.html
― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 October 2003 17:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Saturday, 4 October 2003 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)
staffers who haven't yet posted should do so, lest they meet the wrath of SCIENCE!
― geeta, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 11:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)
alan yr post on the dancing bear was great!! i once tried to derive g through a bunch of inclined plane experiments for an intro physics class -- i used a wooden board and slid stuff down it, but the coefficient of friction on the board was so high and uneven that it kept throwing off my results!! so i buttered the incline plane. i'm not kidding -- putting butter all over the board got rid of a lot of the problem but i still had like 14872% error
g = 9.8 m/s^2 approx obv
― geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)
(ie every time yuou have to cram something new into the space, you eat some of yr flatmate's food)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Apparently a lot of Galileo's experiments with pendulums and balls rolling down planes and in vertical semi-circles were also fudged. And Millikan just made all his results up "A bright white spec moving upwards at .2 ms-1" my arse.
(g is 10 to a better approximation than is wholely natural.)
― Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)
While doing so two years ago, I realised that I'd forgotten what the other one was about :(
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)
I always thought the Millikan experiment as performed was bobbins. IIRC Feynmann wanders off into a digression about it in The Nature Of Physical Law. Apparently some other chaps tried a superior experiment not long after that got a far better result, but fudged it so it was much closer to Millikan's. Subsequent experiments gradually homed in on the better result as it became more reasonable to doubt the result of the initial experiment.
― Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)
"She rocks! I'm sending this to every scientist I know."
Thought you'd like to know.
― Anna (Anna), Monday, 13 October 2003 11:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 13 October 2003 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)
those of you who signed up to be contributors who haven't posted yet -- science is calling you!! ricky how's your fridge experiment going? sarah the world needs to know abt your crystal radio!!
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Monday, 13 October 2003 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)
also when i click a PBS post's link it takes me to the FT main page, is this meant to happen?
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)
Dear Idiot. Three sips of lavander oil a morning and repeat the mantra My Feet Are Impervious To Pins fourteen times a day. And send me a cheque.
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 24 October 2003 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 24 October 2003 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Saturday, 25 October 2003 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Saturday, 25 October 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 25 October 2003 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 28 October 2003 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 13 November 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 November 2003 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 13 November 2003 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Thursday, 13 November 2003 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)
"The world's greatest singlerepository on the subject of weird, gimmicky,extinct forms of communication!"http://www.deadmedia.org/
NYT: High-Tech Daydreamers Investing in Immortalityhttp://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/01/arts/01AGE.html
Foresight at Pop!Tech 2003. Foresight President Christine Peterson's talk atPop!Tech 2003, a conference held Oct. 16-19 in Camden, Maine, on "The Impact of Technologyon People",presented Foresight's view on the "Sea Change" to be brought bytechnological transformationover the coming decades.http://nanodot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/31/0930244&mode=nocomment&threshold=
Enough Already By Ronald Bailey at Reason Online. A leading environmentalistmakes a foolishcase against technological innovation.http://www.reason.com/0310/cr.rb.enough.shtml
The Physics of Extra-Terrestrial Civilizationshttp://www.mkaku.org/articles/physics_of_alien_civs.shtmlTheoretical physicist Michio Kaku wonders what the physics of extraterrestrialcivilizations must be like, and argues that alien civilizations may be able toharness the energy of galaxies and travel through the universe using wormholes.
Should We Be Scared of Superintelligence?http://www.usnews.com/usnews/nycu/tech/nextnews/archive/next031024.htmThe theme of out-of-control, supersmart computers has become a pretty commonstaple of science fiction, says James M. Pethokoukis, but that hasn't stoppedspeculation about the ramifications of such technology. Oxford philosopher NickBostrom and artificial intelligence researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky are twothinkers who take both the threat and promise of superintelligence veryseriously.
What Does it Mean to Be Me?http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2003/10/29/ecfme2\9.xml&sSheet=/connected/2003/10/29/ixconn.html"Science, having done away with the soul," says Paul Broks in the Telegraph,"has lately been turning its gaze to the soul's secular cousin: the self. Thereis no ghost in the machine, it is agreed, just a machine." Indeed, where in thebrain our sense of self is born is a riddle that still vexes scientists.
Religious Opposition to Cloninghttp://www.jetpress.org/volume13/bainbridge.htmlReligion is among the most powerful factors shaping attitudes toward humanreproductive cloning. William Sims Bainbridge of the National Science Foundationexplores this influence with both quantitative and qualitative data from a majoronline questionnaire study. The interpretations offered by Bainbridge are basedon the New Paradigm theory of religion, which stresses the strength of religionto resist the secularizing influences of science, revealing the possibility ofheated future conflict between religion and science.
Zillions of Universes? Or Did Ours Get Lucky?http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/28/science/space/28COSM.html"Those who favor taking the anthropic principle seriously don't really like it,"says cosmologist Steven Weinberg. "And those who argue against it recognize thatit may be unavoidable." Why is the theory that the universe is finely tuned forintelligent life so controversial? Leading scientists explained and demonstratedrecently at "The Future of Cosmology" conference.
On the Importance of SETI for Transhumanismhttp://www.jetpress.org/volume13/cirkovic.htmlIn this Journal of Evolution and Technology article, cosmologist andtranshumanist Milan Ćirković argues that astrobiology and the search forextraterrestrial intelligence may be of vital importance to future humanity andthe transhumanist endeavor. Aside from the scientific import of discoveringalien life, Ćirković believes, extraterrestrial intelligences could provide uswith strategic information about how to live, survive and create value in theuniverse.
The Berlin Declarationhttp://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.htmlAs a subset to the Conference on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences andHumanities, and in light of the radical potential for the Internet, a number ofindividuals and institutions have compiled and signed The Berlin Declarationinisting that that there be greater open access to knowledge in the sciences andhumanities. The declaration promotes the Internet "as a functional instrumentfor a global scientific knowledge base and human reflection and to specifymeasures which research policy makers, research institutions, funding agencies,libraries, archives and museums need to consider."
Here's some tools that might be of use to proven by science regulars:
Create a google News Alert:http://www.google.com/newsalerts
SCIENCEWEEK STUDENT'S EDITIONhttp://www.scienceweek.com/subinfo.htm
http://www.longevitymeme.org/newsletter/.
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Thursday, 13 November 2003 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)
eg what happens to shapes when you get v.big, what happens to matter when you get v.small, the distance between the biggest and the smallest and the points where they "join up" (black holes)
after all three eps, i maintain (against little opposition) it was fantastically badly organised, made a major boo-boo trying to use history science to clarify content of science, and employed a total complete utter idiot in the visualisation department (ie 9/10ths of the visualisation introduced extra levels of confusion, misapprehension and irrelevance)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 November 2003 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)
I also think that there isn't enough of this stuff on TV and I don't want to be horrible about it in case I hurt its feelings.
Also, brian greene vs carl "beans and beans" sagan. I mean both of them are/were irritating as teevee presenters.
― Sam (chirombo), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)
the rolf thing tells you something a million non-painting critics can't, which the implications of the material act of painting - it's a really bold strike against the idealisation of art (i dobn't think non-painters talking abt painting is a bad thing at all, i just don't think it's intrinsically and obviously better than painters talking abt painting)
ps i haf always fd his huffing-and-humming-while-i-paint v.maddening BUT goya did the same only worse (he used to sing highly operatic obscenities and stamp) so meh
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 November 2003 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 17 November 2003 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 17 November 2003 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 17 November 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)
(i edited the second to three dots)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 November 2003 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Friday, 21 November 2003 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Herbstmute (Wintermute), Sunday, 23 November 2003 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― marianna, Monday, 12 January 2004 11:18 (twenty-one years ago)
(ps. hey marianna! how's it going?)
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 12 January 2004 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 17 February 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 February 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 17 February 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)
― , Thursday, 11 August 2005 02:22 (nineteen years ago)
― wall mounted mail box, Thursday, 11 August 2005 10:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Chirilei, Thursday, 29 September 2005 23:01 (nineteen years ago)
― full, Saturday, 1 October 2005 17:26 (nineteen years ago)
Ruled Paper
Plain Paper
Icm graph Paper
Clear plastic ruler
Pencil
Simple Calculator
Rubber
User name and Password
*Scissors, Forceps and Permanent marker pen may also be useful especially for 'wet practicals' but these are not essential.
White coast are not essential, but are useful for protecting clothes.
-- marianna (mariannamaclea...), October 3rd, 2003 9:08 AM."
Hey marianna, how did the class go?!? I see it was two years ago now, so can you tell us since enough time has passed...what on earth did you use the RUBBER for????? Was it a study in human biology and how procreation works?
― Wiggy (Wiggy), Saturday, 1 October 2005 17:41 (nineteen years ago)
― gangbangers, Tuesday, 11 October 2005 07:06 (nineteen years ago)
This off the grid alien consciousness is devoted to a sober examination and response to advancing human development and preserving the human species.
― Orflin G. Champion, Monday, 14 November 2005 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Norman, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 11:12 (nineteen years ago)
― xmas, Saturday, 3 December 2005 18:13 (nineteen years ago)