Having a crush on someone for an extended period of time but never having the guts to say anything - c or d?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
And how long is too long? A week? A month? A year?

Fugs, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)

both

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, trite as it sounds - both

Classic because it's quite an interesting, safe state to revel in.

Dud because they'll probably say no if you ever ask them because after all that time you'll make a pig's ear of it and also dud because it indicates that you are a thinker and a dreamer and not a doer and as a result your youth will always be a bit crappy and you'll end up looking back and think 'hmm - that was a bit rubbish'.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Totally dud. And the result of quite a bit of bad poetry across the ages.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

dud, this is the area of my life I can't sort out really. Not that this has happened me in ages, thank god, but relationships in general, tricky business.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Dud, because you'll always look back and ask yourself "what if...? " and without ever getting a satisfactory answer.

Vic (Vic), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

argh i always mess up my posts by editing, cross out the "and" in the last one

Vic (Vic), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Classic because it's quite an interesting, safe state to revel in.

Dud because they'll probably say no if you ever ask them because after all that time you'll make a pig's ear of it and also dud because it indicates that you are a thinker and a dreamer and not a doer and as a result your youth will always be a bit crappy and you'll end up looking back and think 'hmm - that was a bit rubbish'.

Hah! My life in a nutshell!

Person one: five years, at a stupid age, longing. Eventual answer = "No" (as delivered to proxy asker-outer; "He's a pervert"; what is a pervert age 15?)

Person two: two years longing. Eventual answer = "No" (different proxy asker; no reason given)

Person three: two years longing. Eventual answer = "No" ("Not even if you hadn't been so drunk")

Person four: two years longing. Eventual answer = there wasn't one, I didn't bother to ask. She was twenty years older than me, and married. But I still think I would have had a good chance.

Person five: three years wanting. Initial answer = "No". But there was cause to believe it wasn't as simple as that. Two more years longing. Final answer = she disappeared.

So, classic. I have not given up on any of these.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Wot about getting the person youve fantasised about, deamt about, whacked off over etc etc for ages and then finding it out she's a pain in the arse?

Fugs, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

if you hit ten years you should move on [/voice of experience]

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

in the meantime it's much better to imagine they have a crush on you too and you're both in a state of suspended animation.

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Daniel Johnston to thread

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Completely and utterly dud. Waste of time and energy. Romanticization of this in hundreds of poptunes notwithstanding, it's an absurd position to be in and will drive you insane. If you like someone you should just do something about it or move on. Thumb up ass is no way to go about living.

TOMBOT, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)

either that or don't say anything and just put it on complete mental hold and move on. Then check back in a few years. who knows? But yeah, do not do the long term friend thing with the person while you are in love with them. That sucks!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Tombot = OTM, as usual.

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

From a strictly Darwinian POV, this is an ultra dud, since you never get to pass along your genes and fall by the wayside as just another junker parked on the apron of the Great Highway of Life.

Remember the Darwin Cheer:

Sperm and egg! Sperm and egg!
Ram 'em! Cram 'em! Let 'em mate!

Aimless, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)

ok, seriously, how do you STOP having a crush on someone if you'd just prefer to move on?

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe pretend she's a Creed fan?

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Is not exactly like you have any choice in the matter now,is it?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Charlie Fuckin' Brown to thread.

http://www.unitedmedia.com/comics/peanuts/meet_the_gang/images/meet_charlie_brown_big.gif

Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, my hero! Well, one of them.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Wot about getting the person youve fantasised about, deamt about, whacked off over etc etc for ages and then finding it out she's a pain in the arse?

Well obv. this is a tremendously good sign. Thank your lucky stars you don't instead start falling in love with her paininthearseness.

ok, seriously, how do you STOP having a crush on someone if you'd just prefer to move on?

Hypnotherapy?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

As I suggested before:

how do you stop having a crush on a person you emphatically DO NOT want to have a crush on?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)

These threads should be helping me, but they're not.

Fuck you guys.

ModJ, Monday, 6 October 2003 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.osric.com/~jeremy/lambertpost.jpg

Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah. sucky sucky. But I have talked to him, I have!... but I am leaving in a week for 6 months so i figure i can say or do whatever i like and it won't matter.

Nellie (nellskies), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Heavens, Justyn! The best cure for a crush is to engage with the object of it. Often. As often as possible. Any way you can. Said crush-object will humanize before your very eyes.

No guarantees about the direction in which this humanization occurs, but no matter how it occurs, you won't have a crush any more. Either you'll develop a realistic relationship, or you'll suffer revulsion. Hurrah! No more crush.

Aimless, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I've had a crush object now for four years, one I do converse with regularly. I've talked with her for hours on end, humanizing you, and now I'm stuck with a crush object who seemingly represents all I despise.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)

how long is too long?

Five years. And dud X 10. Especially dud if one drunkenly confesses said crush and the object of affection decides that they do not want to be one's friend anymore.

Sadly, humanizing is only possible when the person in question is not screening your calls.

mouse, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Screening your calls? Yeah, that's a common one. Worse than that: blocking you over MSN and only unblocking you when none of her other friends are online. That kinda lets you know your place.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Some of the people on this thread have got serious problems. Holy shit.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, poor Charlie Brown should have tried a new psychiatrist at some point.

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 06:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Classic. I heart agony.

Dave M. (rotten03), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 06:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Classic thread!
Hmm my experience is that you can humanize all you want, it's not necessarily gonna appease the crus. Once, I shared a flat with one and things didn't really change. The only solution for me is to completely avoid any contact for 3-4 months.

Fabrice (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Dud. You should get the inevitable rejection and heartbreak over with as soon as possible and get on with your life.

Unless, like, you enjoy the angst of it all. Which I generally do. And you know what? The crushes that went on the longest were actually the ones that *were* returned. And, sort of five years later, the bloke in question would say something like "Dammit, I thought you were hot, why'd you never say anything?" or, erm, "You were hot but I thought you were a psycho or something. You just had a CRUSH on me?"

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)

As Dom says, aimless's assurances are sadly not to be relied upon.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Kate's email address brings me to say:

Jason Pierce to thread!

Oh, and it's gotta be both; really it's a question like 'breathing - c/d' or 'drinking water - c/d'. Isn't it?

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

What?

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Spacemen 3 = Sonic Boom + Jason Pierce. Actually, did it? I can't remember the non-Jason Pierce guy's name. But I thinkit was Sonic Boom. And JP's 'L&GWAFIS' is the Classic extended period of time crush soundtrack.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Harrumph.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)

?!?!?!????!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Extremely dud. You need to say something & if you get a knock back, you can move on & if not....

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

What? seriously though? Have I been taking crazy pills?

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

N.'s first post on this thread is awfully wise.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, it's just funny to me to have someone explaining Spacemen 3 things to me. Next you'll be asking if I'm Kate Radley! Heh heh!

I am just playing, BTW!

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Frighteningly so. But this is putting me in mind of a famous and actually quite trite Orson Welles quote that crops up in (I think) 'Lady from Shanghai' about a frog and a scorpion (or something) and the immutability of character. Trite as it is, I can't help (ooh, subliminal) thinking it true.

Ah! Yes. When I was a lurker I think I saw something along those lines; but if you were presumably you'd be having money burnt on you, not ILXing.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)

in that I think the kind of people who get long-term crushes represent a kind of fundamental personality type - Pinkpanther and Tombot's advice is very sensible and I quite agree with it rationally but emotionally and practically it makes as much sense to me as sinners vs winners man does, it seems like a person who could just "move on" much less "talk to somebody and move on" would have basically different brain wiring to me.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Long-term unrequited crushing serves a very important purpose for some people. Like Tom said before, that if you have a crush on someone, it's usually because you wish to be them, or wish to incorporate some aspect of them that you wish you had - or words to that effect (sorry if I'm paraphrasing). The Courtly Love aspect, where you try to make yourself better in order to prove yourself worthy of them can be quite good for those who otherwise lack the motivation for self improvement. But those aren't necessarily crushes that you *want* requited.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Tom OTM (I can't be the first to see the anagram). What if both people involved in this are passive-aggresive (which cd be the proper term, dunno). If they both enjoy New Order's 'Bizarre Love Triangle' too much, if you know what I'm saying? Then maybe it = classic. Spoiler - this is sort of the premise for the new B-Kno film.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:50 (twenty-one years ago)

allow me here to say how much I absolutely loathe the term "move on" - it's so dreadfully overused, all the time. DUD. as if its the only phrase available to describe this action, whether it be by political candidates referring to the irrelevancy of a scandal (this recently happened), or a psychiatrist giving direction to a neurotic patient, to perhaps a struggling artist describing what she did in regards to a failed project. we need new phrases to desctibe "leaving a situation behind." really, the english language just seems so limited at times

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)

next time a pretty girl i know IRL appears in the sylvan mists of surrealism and brutal psychology that is a dream of mine, i shall attempt to put grimly's advice into effect.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

how the fuck is it only 2:45 in the afternoon here

El Tomboto, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:43 (seventeen years ago)

LJ out. jol to get poppage.

aim uglier next time, it works eventually.

darraghmac, Monday, 22 October 2007 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ZKX8WDEGL._SS500_.jpg

Louis you should totally buy this book, it's both an awesome piece of literature written by a one of the most empathetic authors living and a fantastic piece of advice that will pay off immediately.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:43 (seventeen years ago)

oh man the goldmine of classic posts to be uncovered in lj's application of 'the game'

deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:45 (seventeen years ago)

that book has already provoked one insanely long thread, but fuck it, why not two.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:56 (seventeen years ago)

I already know about 'The Game'. Who do you think I am, some pig-ignorant shut-in who has no idea about current cultural trends? (Don't answer that one.)

Such books, especially those teaching the secrets of salesmanship, are totally and utterly soulless, and I refuse to touch them with a bargepole.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:20 (seventeen years ago)

but pretty girls are soulless, dude. you're gonna end up popping mingers

ken c, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:23 (seventeen years ago)

Louis I, and i imagine at least twenty other ILXors, will paypal you £10 if you spend one month applying all of Strauss's techniques to the women on your course.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:26 (seventeen years ago)

Day 1: Buy gold watch
Day 5: Employ permanent wingman, who must be short and ugly but quite funny
Day 8: Nose job
Day 13: Start turning nice girls down; who wants them?
Day 24: Rohypnol

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:33 (seventeen years ago)

you should have written in the letter that you wanted to kiss her "sweet wet cunt"

elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:54 (seventeen years ago)

seemed to work for robbie

elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:54 (seventeen years ago)

haha! the thought actually crossed my mind. but...nah.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:55 (seventeen years ago)

it has to be a parapraxis, see. can't be sending those off on purpose.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:55 (seventeen years ago)

that only matters to lit critics, not girls you want to bone

elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:56 (seventeen years ago)

but it's time to move on. are there any cousins visiting?

elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:58 (seventeen years ago)

sorry it didn't work out, louis. but there will be other girls.
i am not sure these first move letters ever work for anyone. i can't think of a single instance when they have helped. girls read them aloud to each other and either die from laughter or say sadly, 'he's really nice but....'
don't ever send one again. i say this as friend, not foe.

estela, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:58 (seventeen years ago)

oh man the goldmine of classic posts to be uncovered in lj's application of 'the game'

-- deej, Monday, October 22, 2007 5:45 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

oh man

and what, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:59 (seventeen years ago)

also estela is right, basically you have to make friends w/ girls & let them think they're seducing you

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:00 (seventeen years ago)

well ok, she's not a poncy literature student who'd take the outburst as a pure expression of passionate lust rather than a vulgar turn-off.

xpost

cousins? nah. plenty more gravel in the driveway.

xpost

cheers estela! i honestly think my letter wasn't that laughable, but 'tis true i could (yet again) have come across as 'sweet' rather than sexy. 'sweet' is generally code for 'not in a million years'. no, i will not send one again. tete-a-tete from now on.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:01 (seventeen years ago)

ethan, i've played the ultra-long game before, but the downside is, i'm really bad at knowing when to make a decisive move.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:03 (seventeen years ago)

(getting there, though! my main problem is the continual obsession with finding the right girl. today's incident isn't one i'll regret, because i've at least shown myself not to be compromising. PLUS, i know to avoid sending love-letters.)

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:07 (seventeen years ago)

its not the ultra-long game, im just saying spend a couple nights playing board games or some shit before you bust out the sonnets

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:08 (seventeen years ago)

ya second-move letters work wonders

deeznuts, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:09 (seventeen years ago)

also estela is right, basically you have to make friends w/ girls & let them think they're seducing you

-- and what, Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:00 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

so very very OTM. I don't think I've made the first move in literally years, and believe me, it's better for everybody involved. do be prepared to go for long periods without sex tho.

will, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago)

if you spend like two weeks drinking & chilling out every couple days & she still doesnt want the dick shes never gonna

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago)

so you either move on or stay 'just friends' either way you dont end up looking like some poncey tard w/ a lonely hard-on

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:11 (seventeen years ago)

have you stopped to think that if you find the right girl now you'll miss out on all the wrong girls.

estela, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:12 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, ethan is right to a degree, but i do think (in this culture at least) it's generally best to at least ask the girl to dinner. this i've done successfully a few times. it's the next bit that i find tricky. maybe board games really are the answer; been getting back into chess recently...

so you either move on or stay 'just friends' either way you dont end up looking like some poncey tard w/ a lonely hard-on

again, this has been the case in previous times. i'm prepared to be far more proactive and decisive nowadays, hence why i acted on this one. didn't act in the right way, but you live and learn.

have you stopped to think that if you find the right girl now you'll miss out on all the wrong girls.

formal dinner with a ladies' drinking society this thursday, i'm prepared for all sorts of wrong. :D

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:15 (seventeen years ago)

(in this culture at least)

http://www.ozebook.com/copeland.jpg

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:17 (seventeen years ago)

one offer's one's horse to the lady, and one walks tenderly beside, picking dandelions and braiding them into a wreath for her hair.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:19 (seventeen years ago)

have you stopped to think that if you find the right girl now you'll miss out on all the wrong girls.

-- estela, Monday, October 22, 2007 7:12 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

ha this is great

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago)

also estela is right, basically you have to make friends w/ girls & let them think they're seducing you

-- and what, Monday, October 22, 2007 7:00 PM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

this is so tru
they pretend u are supposed to make the first move, but youre supposed to make the first move the way they expect you to make the first move

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)

xpost: dorothy parker-esque wisdom be droppin'

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)

crushes mean very little in the grand scheme of things people get over it (them)

youn, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:25 (seventeen years ago)

I want a determining condition a classifying restraint in my life.

youn, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:25 (seventeen years ago)

my dumbass kind of fucked up a crush situation recently that i had the upper hand on initially, she was into me but ... i showed my cards a little too soon. but it happens, roll w/ the punches etc

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:32 (seventeen years ago)

i think the letter was a mistake

omar little, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:36 (seventeen years ago)

tbh i'm feeling pretty much over this one already, so it was a damn good thing i did something about it, regardless of whether the medium was an error (which it was).

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:39 (seventeen years ago)

i think letters work in fanciful theory and rarely if ever in actuality.

omar little, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:41 (seventeen years ago)

who writes a letter? send a text

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:02 (seventeen years ago)

much better to sharpie a dick on her forehead whilst she slumbers

elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:03 (seventeen years ago)


my dumbass kind of fucked up a crush situation recently that i had the upper hand on initially, she was into me but ... i showed my cards a little too soon. but it happens, roll w/ the punches etc

you gotta know when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em bro.

ken c, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:04 (seventeen years ago)

xpost or "<your name> woz ere" on her ass amirite

ken c, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:06 (seventeen years ago)

true dat, gotta be discreet

elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:07 (seventeen years ago)

like they say, discretion is the better part of modassty

elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:09 (seventeen years ago)

Ah Louis, I went out and got hammered for you last night. Didn't pull, like.

Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 11:32 (seventeen years ago)

girls read them aloud to each other and either die from laughter or say sadly, 'he's really nice but....'

or -- and i wish i could find a link to the story, 'cos this happened to some poor fucker a couple of years ago and was all over the UK news for a day or so, but i don't have time -- pass them on by e-mail until suddenly half the world's getting "heh, look what this dude sent to some lass he met at a party!" dropping into their inbox.

so yeh, good work on not e-mailing, louis! just in case ...

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:06 (seventeen years ago)

never put anything in writing, that's just some 'advice' from a 'concerned associate'.

kapeesh?

darraghmac, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:25 (seventeen years ago)

follow max r's advice: one phone for bros, one for hos.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:27 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.