― Fugs, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)
Classic because it's quite an interesting, safe state to revel in.
Dud because they'll probably say no if you ever ask them because after all that time you'll make a pig's ear of it and also dud because it indicates that you are a thinker and a dreamer and not a doer and as a result your youth will always be a bit crappy and you'll end up looking back and think 'hmm - that was a bit rubbish'.
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)
Hah! My life in a nutshell!
Person one: five years, at a stupid age, longing. Eventual answer = "No" (as delivered to proxy asker-outer; "He's a pervert"; what is a pervert age 15?)
Person two: two years longing. Eventual answer = "No" (different proxy asker; no reason given)
Person three: two years longing. Eventual answer = "No" ("Not even if you hadn't been so drunk")
Person four: two years longing. Eventual answer = there wasn't one, I didn't bother to ask. She was twenty years older than me, and married. But I still think I would have had a good chance.
Person five: three years wanting. Initial answer = "No". But there was cause to believe it wasn't as simple as that. Two more years longing. Final answer = she disappeared.
So, classic. I have not given up on any of these.
― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fugs, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)
Remember the Darwin Cheer:
Sperm and egg! Sperm and egg!Ram 'em! Cram 'em! Let 'em mate!
― Aimless, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.unitedmedia.com/comics/peanuts/meet_the_gang/images/meet_charlie_brown_big.gif
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Well obv. this is a tremendously good sign. Thank your lucky stars you don't instead start falling in love with her paininthearseness.
ok, seriously, how do you STOP having a crush on someone if you'd just prefer to move on?
Hypnotherapy?
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)
how do you stop having a crush on a person you emphatically DO NOT want to have a crush on?
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
Fuck you guys.
― ModJ, Monday, 6 October 2003 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nellie (nellskies), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)
No guarantees about the direction in which this humanization occurs, but no matter how it occurs, you won't have a crush any more. Either you'll develop a realistic relationship, or you'll suffer revulsion. Hurrah! No more crush.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Five years. And dud X 10. Especially dud if one drunkenly confesses said crush and the object of affection decides that they do not want to be one's friend anymore.
Sadly, humanizing is only possible when the person in question is not screening your calls.
― mouse, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 06:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 06:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fabrice (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)
Unless, like, you enjoy the angst of it all. Which I generally do. And you know what? The crushes that went on the longest were actually the ones that *were* returned. And, sort of five years later, the bloke in question would say something like "Dammit, I thought you were hot, why'd you never say anything?" or, erm, "You were hot but I thought you were a psycho or something. You just had a CRUSH on me?"
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:11 (twenty-one years ago)
Jason Pierce to thread!
Oh, and it's gotta be both; really it's a question like 'breathing - c/d' or 'drinking water - c/d'. Isn't it?
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)
I am just playing, BTW!
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Ah! Yes. When I was a lurker I think I saw something along those lines; but if you were presumably you'd be having money burnt on you, not ILXing.
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)
next time a pretty girl i know IRL appears in the sylvan mists of surrealism and brutal psychology that is a dream of mine, i shall attempt to put grimly's advice into effect.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago)
how the fuck is it only 2:45 in the afternoon here
― El Tomboto, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:43 (seventeen years ago)
LJ out. jol to get poppage.
aim uglier next time, it works eventually.
― darraghmac, Monday, 22 October 2007 20:23 (seventeen years ago)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ZKX8WDEGL._SS500_.jpg
Louis you should totally buy this book, it's both an awesome piece of literature written by a one of the most empathetic authors living and a fantastic piece of advice that will pay off immediately.
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:43 (seventeen years ago)
oh man the goldmine of classic posts to be uncovered in lj's application of 'the game'
― deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:45 (seventeen years ago)
that book has already provoked one insanely long thread, but fuck it, why not two.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:56 (seventeen years ago)
I already know about 'The Game'. Who do you think I am, some pig-ignorant shut-in who has no idea about current cultural trends? (Don't answer that one.)
Such books, especially those teaching the secrets of salesmanship, are totally and utterly soulless, and I refuse to touch them with a bargepole.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:20 (seventeen years ago)
but pretty girls are soulless, dude. you're gonna end up popping mingers
― ken c, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:23 (seventeen years ago)
Louis I, and i imagine at least twenty other ILXors, will paypal you £10 if you spend one month applying all of Strauss's techniques to the women on your course.
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:26 (seventeen years ago)
Day 1: Buy gold watch Day 5: Employ permanent wingman, who must be short and ugly but quite funny Day 8: Nose job Day 13: Start turning nice girls down; who wants them? Day 24: Rohypnol
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:33 (seventeen years ago)
you should have written in the letter that you wanted to kiss her "sweet wet cunt"
― elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:54 (seventeen years ago)
seemed to work for robbie
haha! the thought actually crossed my mind. but...nah.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:55 (seventeen years ago)
it has to be a parapraxis, see. can't be sending those off on purpose.
that only matters to lit critics, not girls you want to bone
― elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:56 (seventeen years ago)
but it's time to move on. are there any cousins visiting?
― elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:58 (seventeen years ago)
sorry it didn't work out, louis. but there will be other girls. i am not sure these first move letters ever work for anyone. i can't think of a single instance when they have helped. girls read them aloud to each other and either die from laughter or say sadly, 'he's really nice but....' don't ever send one again. i say this as friend, not foe.
― estela, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:58 (seventeen years ago)
-- deej, Monday, October 22, 2007 5:45 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link
oh man
― and what, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:59 (seventeen years ago)
also estela is right, basically you have to make friends w/ girls & let them think they're seducing you
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:00 (seventeen years ago)
well ok, she's not a poncy literature student who'd take the outburst as a pure expression of passionate lust rather than a vulgar turn-off.
xpost
cousins? nah. plenty more gravel in the driveway.
cheers estela! i honestly think my letter wasn't that laughable, but 'tis true i could (yet again) have come across as 'sweet' rather than sexy. 'sweet' is generally code for 'not in a million years'. no, i will not send one again. tete-a-tete from now on.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:01 (seventeen years ago)
ethan, i've played the ultra-long game before, but the downside is, i'm really bad at knowing when to make a decisive move.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:03 (seventeen years ago)
(getting there, though! my main problem is the continual obsession with finding the right girl. today's incident isn't one i'll regret, because i've at least shown myself not to be compromising. PLUS, i know to avoid sending love-letters.)
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:07 (seventeen years ago)
its not the ultra-long game, im just saying spend a couple nights playing board games or some shit before you bust out the sonnets
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:08 (seventeen years ago)
ya second-move letters work wonders
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:09 (seventeen years ago)
-- and what, Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:00 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
so very very OTM. I don't think I've made the first move in literally years, and believe me, it's better for everybody involved. do be prepared to go for long periods without sex tho.
― will, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago)
if you spend like two weeks drinking & chilling out every couple days & she still doesnt want the dick shes never gonna
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago)
so you either move on or stay 'just friends' either way you dont end up looking like some poncey tard w/ a lonely hard-on
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:11 (seventeen years ago)
have you stopped to think that if you find the right girl now you'll miss out on all the wrong girls.
― estela, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:12 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, ethan is right to a degree, but i do think (in this culture at least) it's generally best to at least ask the girl to dinner. this i've done successfully a few times. it's the next bit that i find tricky. maybe board games really are the answer; been getting back into chess recently...
again, this has been the case in previous times. i'm prepared to be far more proactive and decisive nowadays, hence why i acted on this one. didn't act in the right way, but you live and learn.
formal dinner with a ladies' drinking society this thursday, i'm prepared for all sorts of wrong. :D
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:15 (seventeen years ago)
(in this culture at least)
http://www.ozebook.com/copeland.jpg
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:17 (seventeen years ago)
one offer's one's horse to the lady, and one walks tenderly beside, picking dandelions and braiding them into a wreath for her hair.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:19 (seventeen years ago)
-- estela, Monday, October 22, 2007 7:12 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
ha this is great
― deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago)
-- and what, Monday, October 22, 2007 7:00 PM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
this is so tru they pretend u are supposed to make the first move, but youre supposed to make the first move the way they expect you to make the first move
― deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)
xpost: dorothy parker-esque wisdom be droppin'
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)
crushes mean very little in the grand scheme of things people get over it (them)
― youn, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:25 (seventeen years ago)
I want a determining condition a classifying restraint in my life.
my dumbass kind of fucked up a crush situation recently that i had the upper hand on initially, she was into me but ... i showed my cards a little too soon. but it happens, roll w/ the punches etc
― deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:32 (seventeen years ago)
i think the letter was a mistake
― omar little, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:36 (seventeen years ago)
tbh i'm feeling pretty much over this one already, so it was a damn good thing i did something about it, regardless of whether the medium was an error (which it was).
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:39 (seventeen years ago)
i think letters work in fanciful theory and rarely if ever in actuality.
― omar little, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:41 (seventeen years ago)
who writes a letter? send a text
― deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:02 (seventeen years ago)
much better to sharpie a dick on her forehead whilst she slumbers
― elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:03 (seventeen years ago)
you gotta know when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em bro.
― ken c, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:04 (seventeen years ago)
xpost or "<your name> woz ere" on her ass amirite
― ken c, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:06 (seventeen years ago)
true dat, gotta be discreet
― elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:07 (seventeen years ago)
like they say, discretion is the better part of modassty
― elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:09 (seventeen years ago)
Ah Louis, I went out and got hammered for you last night. Didn't pull, like.
― Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 11:32 (seventeen years ago)
girls read them aloud to each other and either die from laughter or say sadly, 'he's really nice but....'
or -- and i wish i could find a link to the story, 'cos this happened to some poor fucker a couple of years ago and was all over the UK news for a day or so, but i don't have time -- pass them on by e-mail until suddenly half the world's getting "heh, look what this dude sent to some lass he met at a party!" dropping into their inbox.
so yeh, good work on not e-mailing, louis! just in case ...
― grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:06 (seventeen years ago)
never put anything in writing, that's just some 'advice' from a 'concerned associate'.
kapeesh?
― darraghmac, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:25 (seventeen years ago)
follow max r's advice: one phone for bros, one for hos.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:27 (seventeen years ago)