I'm thinking of seeing it tonight.
I didn't like any of Clark's other films.
― amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― adaml (adaml), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)
Bully had a profound effect on me, but I always tend to qualify my feelings about it and am still not sure whether or not it is a "good" film or not.
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)
it's opening night and the lines were too long anyhow. also, i feel sick as a dog.
larry clark is in seemingly every french magazine and newspaper this week.
anyone who sees it, please post their thoughts here.
― amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 21:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― ron (ron), Thursday, 9 October 2003 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)
Bully bothered me bad. maybe i couldn't really relate to the small town characters as much. maybe killing is a little weirder to me than drugs and sex. i left with a big knot in my stomach. almost as bad as the knot i got from watching Requiem for a Dream the first time.
i haven't heard much about Ken Park yet. what's it about?
my best friend was Clark's personal assitant during the shooting of Another Day in Paradise. he said he smoked $1000 of heroin a week.
― JasonD (JasonD), Thursday, 9 October 2003 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Thursday, 9 October 2003 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― ron (ron), Thursday, 9 October 2003 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 9 October 2003 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)
(x-post)
haha suzy to thread!!
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 9 October 2003 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 9 October 2003 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 9 October 2003 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward, Thursday, 9 October 2003 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)
his photography was also the object of considerable controversy. i find in it the same troubling things i found in "bully."
there was an interview in "liberation" which i found embarrassing, the interviewer nodding along to clark's repeated insistence that he loves his actors, he loves teenagers/skater punks/etc., he is one with them, etc. etc. which may be true as far as it goes but all this insistence on "love" as some sort of transcendent state of being that will put his films beyond criticism bugs me....
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 9 October 2003 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward, Thursday, 9 October 2003 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 9 October 2003 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)
i'm remembering now that i have already talked about this subject on ILE! some thread about most disturbing movies. i probably said really brilliant things on there so i will shut up. i hate repeating myself.
― scott seward, Thursday, 9 October 2003 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)
Trust an eyewitness. Guy deserved to get hit; you don't hold a dinner in someone's honour and then spend it drunkenly baiting that person.The consensus among those who know the distributor in question is how surprised they were that nobody had clocked him before.
Ken Park is great because unlike Clark's other films, you see where the adults fit in.
― suzy (suzy), Thursday, 9 October 2003 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sean (Sean), Thursday, 9 October 2003 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward, Thursday, 9 October 2003 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)
I think that the graphic sexual content didn't fit in well with Bully. Some was reasonable, but some felt pointless and show-offy ("Here's some young, sweaty, nubile bodies!")
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 9 October 2003 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward, Thursday, 9 October 2003 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 10 October 2003 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 10 October 2003 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)
Amateurist: see the film, it's pretty interesting but pretty graphic.
― suzy (suzy), Friday, 10 October 2003 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)
Hang on - is Tiffany Limos not the greatest name in the history of the world?
― Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 10 October 2003 13:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 10 October 2003 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Friday, 10 October 2003 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 10 October 2003 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)
Wait. L=Larry? Isn't Tiffany Limos like 20 years old?
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 10 October 2003 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)
and she is no longer with larry.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0510814/http://www.tiffanylimos.com/pages/910049/
― spanky brown, Saturday, 11 October 2003 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dada, Saturday, 11 October 2003 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Helltime Producto (Pavlik), Saturday, 11 October 2003 05:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― francesco, Saturday, 11 October 2003 15:59 (twenty-one years ago)