To Whom it may Concern

They all begin with the Mrs. Sheila Ethel Molly Hukson and Mr. Joseph HuksonSON have no intention of ever...
- listening to that noise those kids listen to these days
- trusting a politician
- watching television as it's all trash
- having sex again...

I don't know. It was even funnier when I thought SON was underlined, but now I'm thinking that's just part of the crossing of the T in 'intention.'

It's not HicksonSON. It's [Joseph] Hickson SON. It's telling you he's the son of Sheila Ethel Molly Hickson not her husband, although it's not clear why that should need to be stated.

I thought SON was underlined, but now I'm thinking that's just part of the crossing of the T in 'intention.'

It's a bit of both. The crossing of the second 't' in intention almost intersects with the underlining of SON. If you compare it with the first 't' in 'intention' (or the 't' in 'future') you will see that the crossing in all cases* is detached from the upstroke and points at a slight upward angle. The long horizontal line underneath SON, although close to that crossing, is clearly a separate thing. Apart from anything else it is much nearer to being horizontal.

* oddly the 't' in 'Ethel' is formed a little differently. However the 't' in 'it' has the same upward angle although it is attached to the upstroke.