KILL BILL Volume One (SPOILERS YO)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This is the new thread for general discussion of Kill Bill V.1 for those who have already seen the film and politely prefer to keep possible spoilers away from the unfortunate eyes of those who haven't. Whoop.

TOMBOT, Monday, 13 October 2003 01:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Anyway I thought it was a lot of fun. When the credits started rolling I was kind of surprised, it certainly didn't feel like I'd just sat through 120 minute film. I think Tarantino just watches lots of genre schlock and reads silly magazines with a notepad beside him and writes down all the goofy schtick things he wants to have in a movie and then writes whatever he can to tie them all in together, to be honest.

I thought the 5,6,7,8's (the Japanese girl band) should have stuck around for the Yakuza fight scene. Did anybody else get a vision of Phil Two wearing the Crazy 88 uniform after they saw this movie? I did. I imagined him just standing in the corner posing with his sword while the fight went on and trying not to get hurt, with a big grin on his face.

If Volume 2 doesn't have a robot in it I don't see how it can possibly match up to Volume 1. There's only so much to be mined - maybe he'll rip off some Bollywood next?

TOMBOT, Monday, 13 October 2003 01:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Does anybody else think Vivica Fox's daughter is going to play a role in the second half?

TOMBOT, Monday, 13 October 2003 01:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I read the script, so unless QT has drastically revised it the daughter will not be in it. However, there is already talk of a sequel so maybe she will figure into that.

I want to be a Crazy 88 for Halloween! I just loved that outfit.

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 13 October 2003 01:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Sexy Yakuza!! etc.

I think Kill Bill outfits are going to top Underworld and Matrix outfits this year for Halloween. Should be interesting.

TOMBOT, Monday, 13 October 2003 01:38 (twenty-two years ago)

the opening credits were kinda lame (i.e. "The 4th Film by Quentin Tarentino" - fuck you buddy!), but this is the only movie of his I've enjoyed.

hstencil, Monday, 13 October 2003 01:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Darryl Hannah was so great as the bitchiest of all the assasins. And that outfit she was wearing when she strolled into the hospital! Yikes. I can't wait to see what her segment's like in Vol. 2. And I'd love it if they find some way to resurrect Go Go.

http://actionadventure.about.com/library/graphics/chiakiKB1.jpg

Arthur (Arthur), Monday, 13 October 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)

http://actionadventure.about.com/library/graphics/chiakiKB2.jpg

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 13 October 2003 01:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Wasn't that girl in Battle Royale?

Joe (Joe), Monday, 13 October 2003 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)

yep.

hstencil, Monday, 13 October 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~alexward/beijin2.jpg

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 13 October 2003 02:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Man what is up with people dissing the fucking Okinawa scenes!? Take for instance the first part in the bar, the interaction between Hanzo and his assistant was some endearing shit! Genuinely funny and authentic feeling and stuff. And hey, what is wrong with the part upstairs in the sword room? That sword figures very prominently in the plot that's why they spent so much time on it jeez do you not see!! Fuck!

Dan I., Monday, 13 October 2003 02:40 (twenty-two years ago)

The only problem with the Okinawa scene is that pacing-wise it comes off some pretty exciting stuff. It may have worked out better placed before O-Ren's origin story, I think. You got 15 minutes of anime bang-bang and then abrupt switch to seemingly aimless chatter that turns into a major plot point just a little too late. I guess I'm saying the Bride's japanese lessons could have been a little abbreviated?

TOMBOT, Monday, 13 October 2003 02:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't want to say that the movie was a complete suck-fest, but it was really a deeply unsatisfying way of spending nearly 2 hours (and it feels more hurtful because I was pretty amped for it). Maybe if the ending(?) didn't feel so totally abrupt I would have been less blah about it, but as it was I felt like the time JUST dragged which seems almost impossible for me to believe given HOW exciting and fun the movies which Tarantino's borrowing from are to me (and I really liked Jackie Brown a lot, his other two seem a little more dated to me, but they are still pretty well done.) Am I only one who thinks Thurman was really poorly cast for the fighting scenes (she's not a great actress either, but I guess that's sort of besides the point)? She's so frail looking (and frankly unathletic) that the big fight scenes both look just silly awkward (which might have been the point actually, ick.) Great soundtrack though and it's nice to see Sonny Chiba in an American flick NOT starring Roddy Roddy Piper.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 13 October 2003 03:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, I loved it to *bits*. It was absolutely insane in kind of a cartoon way -- and so nice to see the 5,6,7,8's, too. The violence was stunning, but so over-the-top as to not be disturbing (at least for me), even with the spurting-like-a-sprinkler decapitations. LOVED the anime inset, LOVED the old sword-maker and his bar assistant, LOVED Uma Thurman regaining all her dexterity from a 4-year coma in 13 hours laying in a car seat... Silly as hell movie, and just what I was hoping for.

Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Monday, 13 October 2003 03:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I love Uma Thurman and I despise Lucy Liu. Uma Thurman chopping off the top half of Lucy Liu's head: something I've always dreamed would occur. I love Quentin Tarantino.

Fuck some two parter bullshit though.

Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 13 October 2003 04:17 (twenty-two years ago)

(i.e. "The 4th Film by Quentin Tarentino" - fuck you buddy!)

come on you love it!

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 13 October 2003 04:28 (twenty-two years ago)

also that "Old Klingon Proverb" title card was hilarious!

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 13 October 2003 04:28 (twenty-two years ago)

That was put in there "just for the ILXors in the house".

adaml (adaml), Monday, 13 October 2003 04:29 (twenty-two years ago)

The only part of the movie that I couldn't take was the scene where she was slamming that dude's head in the door, partially because it was the only violent scene that looked real to me and, coming relatively early in the film and knowing the reputation, I was waiting for his eyes to pop out and his brains to shoot out of the top of his head. The way they handled that (plus the fadeaway from when she pulled out her rapist's throat) set my expectations for the rest of the movie, so when they had the disembowling scene I was completely shocked and didn't quite believe my eyes. Fucking excellent fakeout.

The anime sequence fit in pretty seamlessly because much of the rest of the movie was a live-action anime flick. The silhouette battle scene is one of the most gorgeous fight sequences ever filmed, matching the drunken battle outside of the restaurant in "Drunken Fighter II" and the Michelle Yeoh/Zhang Ziyi showdowns in "CTHD". I will be interested to see if I like Vol. 2 as much because I'm just not as into westerns.

Other notable sequences in the movie:

- Elle walking through the hospital split-screen w/ comatose Bride. BEST COAT EVER.
- O-Ren's backstory. Can't say enough about how fantastic the anime section was in general.
- O-Ren dismissing The Bride as a silly white girl playing samurai after she just took apart a hundred people. One of the funniest lines in the movie (and underscores another point, namely that while the characters weren't particularly deep they were well-drawn).
- PUSSY WAGON

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 October 2003 12:46 (twenty-two years ago)

This was a pretty good movie. I've read a lot of reviews saying that it relied on style at the cost of "depth". Complaining that it has no depth is like complaining combo fried rice from Happy Wok Chinese take-out isn't authentic. Either you are down with a filmmaker getting off on some cool visual and stylistic shit, or you aren't.

dleone (dleone), Monday, 13 October 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

In other news, this movie was #1 for the weekend, but with a relatively low $22 million. Where I saw it, the theater was practically empty. Is this going to die a quick death?

dleone (dleone), Monday, 13 October 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

uggh, "depth," the tired refuge of the shitty movie critic

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 13 October 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

What kills me is that the same critics probably big upped Linklater's stylistic masturbation epic Waking Life because of its "depth" (read: shit culled out of essays from second year philo students at Sarah Lawrence)

Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 13 October 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Ally so so OTM

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 13 October 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Where I saw it, the theater was practically empty. Is this going to die a quick death?

most of my friends, not movie buffs, thought it looked stupid from the previews. so who knows. im not sure how many non-movie buffs will react to it. both crowds i saw it with laughed at the decapitation scene, so who knows.

ryan (ryan), Monday, 13 October 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I said this to Tom, it was pretty cool for me to see it in a theatre in suburban Maryland instead of in NYC. I've been in this artwankerhell for so long that I've become so accustomed to leaving a movie and hearing ridiculous chin-stroking discussions on the higher truth being expressed by, you know, Shaft that I forgot that outside of NY, people go to the movies because they have nothing else to do that weekend, so, hey, wtf. No one does that here so you get nothing but wanky discussion post-movie. In a place where people go just cos they're bored, you get to leave and hear soccer moms shrieking at their too-young-to-be-at-this-movie kids "That was the stupidest movie ever!! Eeewww! I'm never watching it again, don't ever let me see something like this again!" in abject confusion and it's brilliant.

THis is possibly the most elitist post I've ever made!

Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 13 October 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Having the sword next to her on the plane leaving Okinawa was the best joke evah.

Dale the Titled (cprek), Monday, 13 October 2003 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)

No, the best joke evah was the sword next to the person siiting across the aisle from her!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 13 October 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

haha i didn't notice!

Dale the Titled (cprek), Monday, 13 October 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah everyone in first class gets a sword!

hstencil, Monday, 13 October 2003 19:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Did the folx who did the anime part the same folx who did the Personal Best segment in The Animatrix?

Leee (Leee), Monday, 13 October 2003 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)

My expectations (for this to suck beyond all comprehension) were so completely wrong, I can't believe it. I think it was messy, and some parts didn't work (the trunk scene made Uma look like a fucking Mighty Morphin Power Ranger)

What amazes me is the delicacy of some scenes - like the slow pan left when Black Mamba is checking out the swords.

Oh, and the RZA score - HOLY SHIT.

The people in the row behind us who brought their pre-teen daughter should be shot, though. I'm not one for overprotecting young'uns, and the first movie I remember seeing with my parents was T2, but this little girl was freaked out.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Monday, 13 October 2003 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

The soundtrack was excellent.

Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 13 October 2003 23:45 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah whatever music was playing when O-ren was gearing up to fight in the garden was awesome. im gonna get the soundtrack

ryan (ryan), Monday, 13 October 2003 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I bought it today! It's good! And also it has weird wiggidy wiggidy sounds as the hidden tracks!

Ally (mlescaut), Monday, 13 October 2003 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)

funny, I don't remember Twiggy from Buck Rogers in the movie.

hstencil, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess I'm saying the Bride's japanese lessons could have been a little abbreviated?

I actually thought it was a well-paced payoff: fronting like she hardly knows Japanese, then busting out "I have vermin to kill". I dug that.

I mentioned this in another thread, but I gotta say it again: the detail of Vernita hiding her gun in a box of KABOOM cereal was pop-art hilarity.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)

how could she miss!?!?

ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)

well if she hadn't missed, the movie would've been over, no?

Reminded me of the similar scene in Pulp Fiction where the dude misses Travolta and Jackson from close range. A big continuity error exists in Pulp Ficiton, though, as you can see the bullet holes in the wall before the guy comes out to shoot at them.

hstencil, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:32 (twenty-two years ago)

well if she hadn't missed, the movie would've been over, no?

No, not really. I mean, nothing much in Vol. 1 happens chronologically after that point.

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:37 (twenty-two years ago)

but everything in the next part happens chronologically after that! Volume 1 and Volume 2 were filmed at the same time, were the same movie, until Harvey Weinstein decided it'd be better to release it in two parts.

hstencil, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:40 (twenty-two years ago)

how could she miss!?!?

A marshmallow got in the way

nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:42 (twenty-two years ago)

You said the movie. I define that as what you can see in the theater this week. Hey, if Quentin's gonna be a dick and split the two, he's gonna have to deal with each of them being evaluated/seen as an individual movie, even if they are part of a larger structure. Same as any LoTR, Star Wars, or Matrix films, just to name a few.

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:42 (twenty-two years ago)

In fairness that was not his decision.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Reminded me of the similar scene in Pulp Fiction where the dude misses Travolta and Jackson from close range. A big continuity error exists in Pulp Ficiton, though, as you can see the bullet holes in the wall before the guy comes out to shoot at them.

That's not a continuity error! That was intentional! There's an entire dialogue about it afterwards where Samuel L. JAckson takes that as a sign form God to get out of the enforcement racket.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

but Girolamo has a point. and we don't know how much of it was or wasn't his decision.

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

that was an xp by the way

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)

No I agree with his point, I mean I'm not evaluating it as anything but what I saw, but I'm just saying that it's not entirely fair to use it as a blasting point if it's not entirely the director's decision to make such a move. I find it kind of irritating and the nonsequential scene thing is a conceit of Tarantino's that I find kind of obnoxious.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Dan, I thought he takes that the guy missed as a sign to get out, not that the bulletholes are there before the guy shot. Unless it's totally different from what I remember and the characters remarked on the bulletholes being there before they were shot at.

Also, doesn't Vernita Green spin around really quickly before the shot? That could be reason enough for the miss.

hstencil, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 00:48 (twenty-two years ago)

was it the "silly rabbit" line sean?

jones (actual), Sunday, 19 October 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

lucy liu alternated between great and just more lucy liu - she was better in charlie's angels. if the line you're thinking of is where she apologizes for ridiculing the bride (oh, REALLY annoyed by qt having the characters say her name but then just bleeping it out - "clever") I thought her reading was ok but if it had been wow great it coulda added ALOT to the movie.

cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 19 October 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Sean: she must have been a student of the world's greatest kung-fu master or something.

Dan I., Sunday, 19 October 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, REALLY annoyed by qt having the characters say her name but then just bleeping it out - "clever"

maybe not "clever" but perhaps a Bunuel reference? Surprised that hasn't been posited yet.

hstencil, Sunday, 19 October 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the word is "cute"

(btw when it first happened I was really startled because I thought something was wrong with the audio track)

s1utsky (slutsky), Sunday, 19 October 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Is her name going to turn out to be something we'll "recognize" (from real life, another movie) -- or is it just bleeped for suspense? (Was it orginally bleeped, before the movie was cut into two parts?)

I like how she's still driving the Pussy Wagon once she gets back from Japan.

Sam J. (samjeff), Monday, 20 October 2003 01:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I was a little let down by the final showdown with Lucy Liu too, but there was no way to top everything that had come before that, so I guess it had to be slower and sort of anticlimactic.

I was just wowed by Uma's acting throughout. And I thought Lucy Liu was really good, too (I've always been sort of blah about her in the past).

Sam J. (samjeff), Monday, 20 October 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)

How did the Bride get all these martial arts skills, btw?

Haha yeah I liked the fact that the most believable badass (Her name is O-Ren Ishii and she is YAKUZA OVERLORD, durr) gets a big story to explain why she can kill the shit out of people without breaking a sweat - meanwhile Uma & Vivica, well, you know, they can just, uh, they learned it in high school! American high schools are violent, right!

TOMBOT, Monday, 20 October 2003 02:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe it'll be explained in KBv2?

Dan I., Monday, 20 October 2003 06:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not posting this on the anticipate Kill Bill thread where the reviews were already being discussed earlier, since I refuse to deal with Momus-bullshit, but did no one else think these lines in Ebert's review were a dig/reference to Mr. Limbaugh's recent gaffe ?

To see O-Ren's God-slicer and Go-Go's mace clashing in a field of dead and dying men is to understand how women have taken over for men in action movies. Strange, since women are not nearly as good at killing as men are. Maybe they're cast because the liberal media wants to see them succeed.

Sorry if this was already brought up; I didn't really feel inspired to parse through 1,300 posts to find it

Vic (Vic), Monday, 20 October 2003 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)

according to the trailers included on the soundtrack disc, there'll be a training scene with Uma & a white-haired sifu...

Imdb reports that the name Vivica Fox spoke in that scene was "Beatrix".

Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 20 October 2003 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)

BEATRIX!!!

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 20 October 2003 15:27 (twenty-two years ago)

"Beatrix Kiddo", yes. Has nobody in this bitch read the script?

Herbstmute (Wintermute), Monday, 20 October 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

har har apparently not! (read the other thread for details)

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 20 October 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

OH NO IT IS A PORTMANTEAU OF "BEAT" AND "DOMINATRIX"!

nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)

four weeks pass...
is 'VASELINE' really 'VASALUBE' in the states ?

is this another one of those in-jokes i'm not getting ?

piscesboy, Monday, 17 November 2003 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't notice it, but I assume it's part of QT's habit of making up brandnames. CF Red Apple and Green Apple cigarettes.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 17 November 2003 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)


yeah agreed (and o course the red apples feature again in KB briefly)
but i thought why not just call it someting totally diffferent as opposed to something similair and looking exactly the same.

piscesboy, Monday, 17 November 2003 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Possibly a joke about lubrication being the number one use of it?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

also: lawyers

cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
the opening credits were kinda lame (i.e. "The 4th Film by Quentin Tarentino" - fuck you buddy!), but this is the only movie of his I've enjoyed.

ew, i know! and all the different (ugly) fonts and different schemes for the credits, it was a mess.

this film appealed to me very little, it was like a bad ile thread or something...a pastiche of lots of different things of course, but very little that was genuinely strange or inspired (to my reckoning). except:

No, the best joke evah was the sword next to the person siiting across the aisle from her!
-- Dan Perry (djperr...) (webmail), October 13th, 2003 1:43 PM. (Dan Perry) (link)

that i really liked. it was like some other cycle of revenge was taking place in the world, more or less parallel, like oh y'know happens all the time, why *shouldn't* they be sharing a flight back from tokyo?

otherwise i found it amusing but kind of turgid (i felt like yawning a few times)--like all the "crazeeee" stuff was a bit too rote and expected, decapitation included.

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 26 December 2003 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

all i'm not really terribly thrilled by this endless series of knock-em-out set pieces, even the shadow fight had that quality of a conceit. there was no gasp of awe just a kind of dutiful checking off of t he "cool things in 'kill bill'" list you know?

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 26 December 2003 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

the sword joke i mention above was also one of the f ew things that actually rewarded intense concentration, seemingly every other gag/conceit was front and center, highlighted with several markers, and then circled.

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 26 December 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

hah by "intense concentration" i actually mean "paying attention"

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 26 December 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

just saw "the man who knew too much" (1956) and while it's hardly a perfect film (the beginning and the very end are lumpy to say the least, the ending is even a kind of betrayal), it offers so much to the audience...it becomes, in a way, a kind of test of perception and attentiveness, not least from switching modes from a fairly routine bit of suspense/intrigue to--in the film's best scene--a heartbreaking story of a family sundered. it dares the audience to sympathize from the heart as well as follow closely with the head.... "kill bill" seems to do neither.

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 26 December 2003 18:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I dug this film once she got to Japan and QT was only giving a homage to ONE type of film. But the earlier Kitsch & Ass stuff was still pretty engaging if not necessarily "good."

I came to Kill Bill knowing it was just gonna be a bunch of superficial flash and kicking and that ANY of the film went further than that (which I think it did) and that the kicking was SO fun still impresses me. If Tarantino mixes the character work of Jackie Brown and the visual skill of the second half of Kill Bill his best work may be ahead of him.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 27 December 2003 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)

i didn't find it particulary fun.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)

My grandma said she liked it. (I think)

Aja (aja), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah there were a lot of older people in the theater when i saw it which was interesting

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't see it.

Aja (aja), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

'I think that Tarantino is exploiting his audience's lack of cinema culture. All his films (including those which he only wrote) are directly inspired by (copied from) B movies he saw while working in a video club. I have the same culture, we are same generation and I saw the same films. I didn't enjoy Reservoir dogs when it came out because I had seen the original film 10 years earlier. I understand the interest such films can arouse in people who don't know the originals, but I can't help but see Tarantino's talent reduced by the existence of these films, the too-obvious copy spoils my pleasure as a viewer and makes me angry as a director. The only personal film he's made to this day remains 'Jackie Brown', which is also inspired by Blaxploitation and Seventies films, but which keeps a very personal colour with a real scenario, well-structured -- a traditional cinematography, but, what touches me more, a human violence and strong characters anchored in a reality which I can relate to. As for 'Kill Bill', it's really the result of a life of cerebral cinephilia, without ANY personal inspiration, stuffed with gratuitous violence often directed at or around children. It's trendy, fashionable, without interest, I slept half the time, the rest I was extremely irritated. It plunders a bunch of Japanese and Asian cinema in general without any inspiration. It is empty, idiotic, and wicked. The worst is that the originals are so much better. They didn't cost $55m and never pretended to be trendy, they were honest, violent films because they told stories. A history, something to tell, a subject, that's the basis of a film (even if it's not necessarily good). KB isn't a patch on the originals and not only steals but fails to respect the force and the major beauty of the hundreds of B films which also forged my tastes in cinema. Quentin is a manipulator, dishonest towards the cinema which he claims to respect because he doesn't have, apparently, the intellectual ability to create his own universe. Because the 'Tarantino universe' is not HIS universe, it's the universe of other people.'

Mathieu Kassovitz, director of 'La Haine'

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

my universe?

cozen. (Cozen), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm not sure i agree with that particular assessment. i doubt it from the beginning because kassovitz's films are likewise boring and callow. i also doubt it because many of the films from which tarantino has borrowed are not, to my mind at least, unimpeachable masterpieces. collectively they are barren of many of the things i, for one thing, go to the cinema for. i also doubt it because i think tarantino does a bit more than pastiche, but his film still didn't excite me because it is not generous enough, not loving enough.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

but i appreciate your having translated (!) and posted that!

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

hm i have to think about this more...i'm not sure if i agree with this last (major) point...

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

What interests me about Kassowitz's comments (and to be honest I refrained from going to see La Haine for all the same reasons I refrained from going to see Kill Bill) is that they have the same basic shape as the criticism electronica fans made of Radiohead circa Kid A. When 'majors' make a tribute to 'indies', do we thank them for noticing, or do we tell them to leave that stuff alone? Or is it just inevitable, a sign that the 'indie' values (kung fu, spooky ambient) are now mature and have reached the public domain, and that it's time for the indie producers to get back to their drawing boards?

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

(momus, will you take a look at this thread, too: Violence in Japan(ese movies))

cozen. (Cozen), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

momus my objections to the film really have nothing to do with this concern for the plundering (supposed) of subcultures.

maybe this evidences a lack of social imagination on my part (quite probably it does) but it seems like tarantino's budget and kill bill's status as a "blockbuster" (is it really that though?) is incidental. as i suggested on that other thread, i'm not sure i have an especial fondness, collectively, for the films that tarantino has taken as inspiration--i think certain of them have similar problems, smaller budgets notwithstanding.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Tarantino distorted the central channel of his soundtrack to make big Dolby 5:1 cinemas sound like Hong Kong fleapits. Is that a funny joke? Or is it a kind of yuppie sneer?

If Madonna's next album is deliberately made to sound like it was recorded in a bedroom, is that cool, or somehow rather offensive and opportunistic? And what does such 'representation' in the mainstream mean for the guys who invented the tropes? Some will dine with Tarantino, a couple will produce Madonna. The rest will have to move on, try and stay a step ahead.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)

likewise i think your picking out radiohead as a "major" is silly. thom yorke et al inhabit the same universe as you and me; he has as much a right to the musical materials as anyone else, and his using them should be evaluate by the results, not by the nature of what you take to be a gesture. what frustrates me, perhaps because it comes down to the matter of "each to his own taste," is that you (suspiciously) seem to find in those results--in radiohead's records--exactly that which proves your thesis. you won't agree with me, but do you follow my concern?

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)

ok we shouldn't take this into momus-vs-the-world territory, and if it goes in that direction it's my fault. ultimately it's a very different situation because it's a much taller order to explain why you hear certain social qualities in a piece of music than in a film.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:34 (twenty-one years ago)

what about when my friend listen says 'you should only listen to country on overly-trebly, tinny speakers' so it sounds like it's from a lorry? joke, or yuppie sneer, or fondness?

cozen. (Cozen), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:34 (twenty-one years ago)

my friend could be called listen, yes.

cozen. (Cozen), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)

that would make t he world's worst laurel and hardy skit

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 27 December 2003 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's all part of creating an effect for the listener/viewer and making them feel like they're "there", which is kinda the point anyway. Tarantino using lo-fi sound to create a sense of exoticism and nostalgia is just an extension of what everything else in the movie is doing, and I don't think that there's anything inherently wrong with it. I used to like to listen to scratched-up solo Monk records on my friend's old crackly turntable because it made me feel like I could be listening to them in the 50s...it seems much the same, there doesn't have to be any yuppie condescension involved.

Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 28 December 2003 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

it does seem like a rather inane aesthetic decision though. is there something about the poor middle range that tarantino finds interesting aside from its supposed evocation of 1970s grind houses?

amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 28 December 2003 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Telly yesterday pointed out that John Travolta's character in Grease describes his car (in the song "Greased Lightning") as a pussy wagon.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 28 December 2003 20:42 (twenty-one years ago)

who knew telly savalas was such a trivia buff

amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 28 December 2003 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I deserved that.

More seriously, I enjoyed the movie as a fan of the genres he's pastiching. It's nice to see a western director (and still one whose name carries some weight) who can finally match the levels of atmosphere and energy (two woefully over used words, it's true) of the originals. That isn't to say that this directly means a hell of a lot to the culture/industry that produced them, but it is interesting to see them at this size. For example, millions of people paid money to go see a blockbluster, and ended up watching twenty minutes of anime in the middle. That tickles me.

I accept that the majority of people who care about the source will have seen better, but ther a still a lot of people who won't have. I think Momus's Radiohead analogy earlier is apt, though I suspect I'm on the other side to him: I'm happy that this movie will have crossed wires in the heads of maybe a thousand people who weren't into this scene, but might next week pick up a copy of Akira, and maybe ten of them will think about some ideas they used to have (admittedly Anime is a terrible example for this - no-one ever made one in their back yard in a month).

Also it was an entertaining film by a director who's clearly enjoying himself, and I like those in general. I appreciate that others may not get as much out of that side:)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 28 December 2003 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.