― dave q, Sunday, 30 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I think this is my idea of education up to about 12, it should be 60% practical and 40% fun.
It's like providing the foundations, you can build whatever house you like on top.
― jel, Sunday, 30 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― keith, Sunday, 30 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I would use that term to refer to "faith schools", Tony Blair's latest big idea and one which, if applied in some parts of the north of England, would only reinforce an already terrible situation of polarisation, social division, warlike attitudes towards other people in the community ... those in the Lib Dems and in Blair's own party who have questioned the wisdom of this policy have my unqualified support.
So "faith schools" = DUD. Private education = DUD. The National Curriculum in its original 1988 form = DUD, though it is not so duddish now that it is more flexible. Comprehensive education as believed in by the 1960s Labour governments = CLASSIC.
― Robin Carmody, Sunday, 30 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Josh, Sunday, 30 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Maria, Sunday, 30 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― duane, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Kate the Saint, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Here's a solution: Separate the process of "education" (ie learning to think, learning to learn, growth as a person, all that stuff) and the far simpler - more specific - process of "skill-learning".
There should be no compulsory schools, where children have to go and "teachers" are legally responsible for their behaviour and success/failure. Except perhaps for the very young to learn to read, write and count.
Current schools (of all types) are just holding camps for the young. We waste enormous talent and human resource, squishing the best and worst kids in the same place to get bored or boil over with frustration.
Instead there should be a range of drop-in social and educational resource centres for children to begin to make choices about what they wish to become skilled in. After that, once those choices are developed, it should be a process of apprenticeship, workshopping and earlier work-ages. Qualifications, such as they are, should be entirely devoted to specific abilities to do certain trades. So a car mechanic or hairdresser is specifically tested in relevent skills.
The "growth as a person" stuff is separated, becoming part of social life.
Meanwhile universities should go back to being elite academic institutions for those who choose further learning for non vocational reasons. They shouldn't be (falsely) seen/used as a route to a bigger pay packet or three years drunk.
Hmm, too much but you asked.
― chris, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ed, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I don't like how college seems to be required to get a good job, not just to be educated. My mother said it's not really a conscious decision in today's world. Not conscious? It's FOUR YEARS! I think that most kids who come out of high school and go straight to college don't appreciate the learning aspect. I bet I won't. I'd rather take time off to get bored first and then go back on my hands and knees in desperation (or do it on my own).
― maria, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― the pinefox, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Kerry, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mike Hanle y, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sunjay, Sunday, 18 April 2004 18:34 (twenty-one years ago)
repeal section 28! teach gayness!
― non-u, Sunday, 18 April 2004 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)
I think apprenticeships are a better way of teaching some things than 'plumbing 101', 'a degree course in yoga instruction', 'plant identification' or 'animal husbandry'. I don't understand that appretenticeships necessarily mean indenture without choice.
― isadora (isadora), Sunday, 18 April 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Sunday, 18 April 2004 22:35 (twenty-one years ago)