The Stirling Prize for Architecture

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I don't think there's been a thread on this... ???

So the Candy Floss Coloured dance centre won. Was Bed-Z robbed?

(This will have fewer answers than the other thread I started today, I bet.)

kate (kate), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 09:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I make no apologies for my poor spelling.

Let the ignoring begin! (Except maybe Ed.)

kate (kate), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 09:31 (twenty-two years ago)

wind me up, ed!!!

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Anything with Michael Craig-Martin involved > anything with Brighton station involved.

Shortlist here: http://www.architecture.com/go/Architecture/Also/Awards_2869.html

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 09:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Finsbury Square is downright hideous. The best people could come up with was "Well, I never noticed it..."

The Great Court was a bit "Yeah, it's nice but..."

I liked the material used in the Plymouth thing (the bronze weave was very nice) but overall it was uninspiring.

Tiree was a joke, a glorified bus shelter, I mean, who goes to Tyree to look at the ARCHITECTURE?

The Dance Centre was OK, but feckin' hell, arts centres are just arse, really.

Bed-Z was wonderful because people actually *live* in it, so they interact with it on a far more fundamental level, so it's more important that it be beautiful and functional. Plus, encouraging ecologically aware multihousing is an important thing. IT WUZ ROBBED!!!

kate (kate), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 10:01 (twenty-two years ago)

alex dR = dr vick's brother

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 10:09 (twenty-two years ago)

ACtually, come to think of it, I like the Great Court better than the dance centre, as well. (But probably only cause it looks so cool from the roof of my house.)

kate (kate), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)

finsbury square's main visible feature = ripped off an idea that xenakis worked on for corbusier while x wz still an architect, except x did it prettier

(architects w.only one working eye CoD: x and le corb = both monoculars!!)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)

(Sssshhhh! Don't give Momus new career ideas!)

kate (kate), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 10:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Too late, Kate, he's already wanting to be Shigeru Ban.

I think I'd have liked the Laban centre better if it hadn't been designed by Herzog and DeMeuron. but it's a good winner, you could see the judges carried along on a wave of their own drool looking at the thing. Also looks like something David Adjaye would make himself, no wonder he liked it.

BedZED didn't win because although worthy, judges felt it looked like Brookside Close. Foster didn't win because the marble didn't match the other marble, and well duh it's Norman Foster, he gets the money, not the prizes. Finsbury Square didn't win because it wasn't all that good (Frischmann said it was fascistic). Tyree thing didn't win because, well, there was a provincial winner last year I think.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh Mark, can Dr. Vick's brother rescue a v. disgruntled but v. talented Norman Foster employee? Seriously.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)

it doesn't look VERY like brookside

http://www.viewpictures.co.uk/makda/001.jpg

(except like ppl are going to be living in it and it's not in london)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)

If Brookside looked like that, I might watch it!

kate (kate), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 11:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Don't argue with ME, argue with THE JUDGES.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)

re rescue: i don't know, tho i guess they'll be quite busy aftet this, so may be hiring

it may mean moving to holland

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 11:51 (twenty-two years ago)

it's time we had a uk soap set in an architectural ecotopia

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)

"Lust at the Eden Project? I don't Adam and Eve it!"

(Mark, he'd likely commute like our friend Ant who teaches arch in AmDam two days a week, has practice/teaching in London and consultancy in Bruxelles. Anyway don't they have a branch office in Lahndahn?)

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 12:10 (twenty-two years ago)

well i only met alex once, and that was on a march. so my best suggestion is he writes the firm a compelling letter

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I'd have liked the Laban centre better if it hadn't been designed by Herzog and DeMeuron.

is very funny but I am not laughing.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
Revive, as I am watching this on TV right now. We've had Liebeskind's War Museum, now we have a fabulous museum in Graz, Austria - I went to a lecture about this by its architect, Peter Cook (on staff at UCL) some months ago, and absolutely love it, so I rather hope it wins - but there are more buildings to look at yet.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 16 October 2004 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)

The Bexley school should and probably will win. I had en extreme aversion to the Gherkin and, to an extent, the Museum in Graz too.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 16 October 2004 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)

oh for fucks sake.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 16 October 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I like the gherkin a lot, and don't mind at all that it has just won.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 16 October 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

It's far too regular in Shape for London. London is fairly unique in capital city terms in having a mediaeval street plan at it's heart. By it's nature a pure right angle or a curve is incongruous.


And it Lurks in a very sinister way.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 16 October 2004 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)

speculative office developments shouldn't win architectural prizes.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 16 October 2004 19:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Ed, are you suggesting that it's more regular than most large buildings? Like almost any office blocks built in the last several decades? And Jel, this isn't a business judgement, it's an assessment of innovative architecture, and I think the gherkin qualifies very well.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 16 October 2004 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

i think that architecture should be about people not technology or capitalism. thats why the school should have won.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 16 October 2004 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm saying it's more regular that the city of London can support. Compare it to Tower 42 next door. It's just as assertive and distinctive but is more broken in form and a stranger shape which means it fits much better with the city's street plan and general feel. Building have to really break the mold to work in the city.

Ed (dali), Saturday, 16 October 2004 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Erm, Ed, Tower 42 is shaped like the NatWest logo.

I am glad the Gherkin won. Will let y'all know how the food is after I have dinner there at the end of the month. Have already seen the stupendous view.

suzy (suzy), Saturday, 16 October 2004 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry for calling you Jel, Jed! My point is that the prize is spefically about innovative buildings, with no notion of their purpose or usefulness to the community. I'm as doubtful as you about the value of another office block, but it's really not what this prize is for.

Ed, my feeling is that the gherkin makes the London skyline look considerably less regular, in that it is very different from anything else there. I've not been around and about it, so I don't know what its ground level is like or how it works from the street. You may be right from there, I don't know.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 16 October 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

ah yes but what makes a building innovative? the school is certainly innovative on a social level but how exactly is the Gherkin innovative? The country has been tied, since the early 80's, to this view of innovation in architecture as being tied to some kind of hi-tec movement but what's innovative about that? technology isn't a very good measure for innovation now and it hasn't been for a long time. If "the prize is spefically about innovative buildings, with no notion of their purpose or usefulness to the community." how exactly do you measure innovation? Because Arup worked out the Physical tolerances of the steel perfectly or because a new school has made a real impact on students as well as a whole community?

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 16 October 2004 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

of course it's made all the more confounding by the fact the the one i love on the list and the one i loathe both came from the same office.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 16 October 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm no expert on architecture in general or the gherkin in particular, but there are innovations in environmental terms, I believe, and as an overall design it certainly strikes me as innovative. I liked the school a lot too - I actually thought it was the strongest Stirling shortlist I've seen. I think you're right that they probably do think do much in technical terms when assessing innovation (and frankly I don't think that innovation should be the major criterion for our leading architecture prize anyway).

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 16 October 2004 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Innovation has to be at the hear of the criteria for the stirling prize, it's about driving the profession to new heights. The gherkin is not terribly innovative in the technologies it uses, the fact that these technologies have finally made it into a big building in London is a big deal though.

As for the design the shape is a rehash of an unbuilt gaudi hotel, covered with glass in place of mosaic and Enric Miralles has realised (posthumously) a much better gherkin in Barcelona. It does add hugely to the London skyline how could it not, but it is a dull and sinister form. And at the end of the day it's just an office block, lot's of impact on the people who work there, very little impact, other than visually, on society as a whole. Yes it incorporates a few clever environmental technologies, but this only allows the A/C to be off 40% of the year (a big improvement), but a truly innovative building, and something that is perfectly buildable today is a high rise glass fronted office block with no A/C at all.

Ed (dali), Sunday, 17 October 2004 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.imomus.com/barcelonagherkin.jpeg

That Barcelona gherkin in full...

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 17 October 2004 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)

See, much better gherkin, still wrong for London but more interesting. Mixed residential and commercial which is also good.

Ed (dali), Sunday, 17 October 2004 08:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Apologies, the Torre Agbar is by Jean Nouvel.

Ed (dali), Sunday, 17 October 2004 08:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I saw the Barcelona one several months back, but I didn't like it as much as the London one.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 17 October 2004 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I prefer the London gherkin to the Barcelona one as well. I don't understand why it's 'sinister' though, and I love the way the light glints off it on sunny days.

I don't think it especially out of place in a skyline that already includes Tower 42 and the Barbican. One of the things I like about the view from Waterloo Bridge is the way that the Gherkin, St Paul's and Tower 42 are all positioned so that they look the same height.

My favourite on that shortlist is the Manchester War Museum, though. I'd love to see a Liebeskind building like that on the South Bank. That Graz building is insane, it looks like a giant upturned udder.

The Erotic Gherkin - Classic or Dud?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 17 October 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.arcspace.com/architects/cook/1.Graz.jpg

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 17 October 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.arcspace.com/architects/cook/3-Graz.jpg

Its bizarre really - it looks so utterly incongruous amid all those traditional buildings but seems to fit snugly in there as well.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 17 October 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I also like the way it looks like a giant living breathing organism nestling in there.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 17 October 2004 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)

ihttp://www.davideaves.co.uk/Manchester/crw_12704_std.jpg

Manchester War Museum here.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 17 October 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.emersonlakepalmer.com/tarkus.jpg

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 17 October 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

At that lecture I went to, Peter Cook said it was called the friendly alien by locals.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 17 October 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I went to the imperial war museum and it was ok in and a bit shit out.

I am finding it hard to really recall, though.

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 17 October 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

what the hell is that bimorphic thing there, its goregous, and i want one.

anthony, Sunday, 17 October 2004 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)

That's the museum (something like Kustdmuseum) in Graz, designed by Peter Cook, ex of Archigram.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 17 October 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

kunst

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 17 October 2004 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha, I'm glad this was revived already. I was going to revive it when I got into work.

I'm very disappointed that the Gherkin won. It just seemed like such an obvious choice. I actually expected Bexley Business Academy to win.

I don't *hate* on the Gherkin, I just don't think it should have won. Something about it bothers me, and I can't quite put my finger on it. Maybe, like Ed says, it's too regular. Maybe I don't like the way that it usurps St. Paul's dome and makes it go all phallic instead of the feminine sweep of the dome. Maybe I just don't like giant dildos f*cking the sun. Who knows.

Danger Whore (kate), Monday, 18 October 2004 07:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm with jed on all this. give the prize to the school and maybe encourage more people to build more good schools. (we don't need more offices, we can't rent all the space in the the ones that we already have, it seems)

kudos to kevin whatsisface for asking 'do you think this will help you rent out the rest of it?' to woman in charge of letting space in 30 st mary axe (which i will know insist on calling it in some kind of rockist way) (and which i like as a bulding, i just think it's not as worthy as the school) (yes, i know 'worthy' wasn't a consideration. maybe it should've been)

(that barcelona thing above doesn't seem to taper in at the bottom, which is the clever bit of the london gherkin)

koogs (koogs), Monday, 18 October 2004 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I rally liked the school not because of it's intense beauty (although it does have a certain beauty), but because it's a triumph of optimism and hope and although there have been open plan schools before it seems like this one actually works.

Ed (dali), Monday, 18 October 2004 07:38 (twenty-one years ago)

The Grauniad has a long piece on the gherkin today entitled A Fine Pickle. Jonathan Jones got me onside in the first half with pep talk about what a nice shape it is and how London needs skyscrapers. Then he completely lost me by saying that contemporary art has lost architecture's vision of Modernism, and that Modernism and the Renaissance have a lot in common, and modern art hasn't yet been understood and therefore can't be supplanted by post-modern art...

In the end the article just seems symptomatic of the tendecy of Britain to pick up on art movements very, very late and then knock their successors on the head for daring to have evolved somewhere else while the critics were fumbling about, trying to decide whether to jump on the bandwagon or not. When Britain adopts the Euro I fully expect them to start complaining to the European Central Bank 'But why have you changed the design of the notes when the original was so good?'

Momus (Momus), Monday, 18 October 2004 07:40 (twenty-one years ago)

In other words, what I really object to in Jones' piece is his need to propose Modernism as a new Classicism.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 18 October 2004 07:44 (twenty-one years ago)

the gherkin is far from modernist, it's a deeply reactionary building. There appears to be no aspiration to be anyhing more than just a swanky office building. Foster can do modernism look at the bexly business school. That could sit next to unite d'habitation or park hill as a great modernist building. Hopefully it will not go the way of park hill and only work in this time and place.

Ed (dali), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Or in otherword moderdism only exists and the constructable tangible for of Utopian futurism or it doesn't exist at all.

Ed (dali), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah its that old chestnut "hi-tech" rather than modernist innit?

you lost me on the last one tho.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree with Jones in that, if London is going to have enormous multiphallic temples of capitalism, I would rather they were audacious or just plain silly shapes like the Gherkin as opposed to more identikit blocks of the Canary Wharf variety.

I'm undecided on the London Bridge Tower, mind you. I think its a beautiful shape but it looks a little excessive in scale for its location. Its, like, twice the height of Guy's Hospital which is not exactly low-rise anyway.

http://www.londonbridgetower.com/images/building/view_from_thames.jpg

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Also the shape of the building means you could easily get the same amount of floorspace into a building half the height so this is clearly a triumph of architectural ego over commercial sensibility here.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Nick OTM about Jonathan Jones - he's the youngtrendy alternative to Adrian Searle - but youngtrendy artists have been engaging with architecture for bloody ages. I reckon if you spoke to Jane and Louise Wilson about the subject, for example, they'd tear him a new arsehole. Especially Jane!

There has been a bit of kerfuffle over the main benefactor to the BBS and cashflow dodginess and that may have kiboshed the thought of giving the prize to the school as a result.

I've been working with 30SMA on an event all summer and it's funny - they are RABID about Not Calling It The Gherkin.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Or the masons.

x-post

Ed (dali), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Or in otherword moderdism only exists and the constructable tangible for of Utopian futurism or it doesn't exist at all.

Cna I quoteq ouy no that, De?

Momus (Momus), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Re: modernism, I liked Ed's musical/architectural analogy on the concrete architecture thread. Brutalism = Kraftwerk, Lloyd's Building = Detroit techno, Gherkin = slick commercial trance.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:26 (twenty-one years ago)

ponly if you keep the typos

Ed (dali), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I will sned ti ot The Grsjsnjniad.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 18 October 2004 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think brutalism = kraftwerk. Kraftwerk are all about retrofuturism, about nostalgia and yearning for a modernist future that never came about. In other words, they're not modernism, they're a comment on modernism, ie postmodern in the literal sense of the term.

Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Monday, 18 October 2004 09:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Modernist future that never came about = Derelict Tricorn.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 18 October 2004 09:59 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't agree with you completely jonathan - although that applies to Autobahn or Neon lights it doesnt really apply to Radioactivity.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 18 October 2004 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't remember Radioactivity very well - years since I last heard it. But look at the cover! It's a 1930s radio set!

Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Monday, 18 October 2004 10:08 (twenty-one years ago)

kraftwerk = italian futurists/bauhaus

Ed (dali), Monday, 18 October 2004 10:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, I'd sort of agree with that Ed, only the difference was the futurists/bauhaus was happening in the 1920s, whereas Kraftwerk were in the 1970s. That makes obviously them not modern but retro - ie as I said before a comment on modernism rather than the thing itself. There's also a fair amount of archness about Krafwerk - you can't always tell how serious they are, and that again is part of the "not-modernism" of Kraftwerk. They're the Gilbert & George of pop.

Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Monday, 18 October 2004 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I think the real roots of Kraftwerk are ironically in German romanticism of the early 1800s, hence their titling of one instrumental "Franz Schubert".

Jonathan Z. (Joanthan Z.), Monday, 18 October 2004 10:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Many people argue that was just looking forward to EMF's Schubert Dip.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 18 October 2004 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)

three years pass...

Heh heh heh. I now have a giant folder on my network labelled STIRLING PRIZE 2008 - shall I have a looksee in it?

Masonic Boom, Friday, 15 August 2008 08:51 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, and post any pictures please.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 15 August 2008 08:53 (seventeen years ago)

Have the nominations been announced yet? because I don't want to go doing anything really naughty (i.e. sackable) if I find stuff anything in there.

(Watch it be a big empty folder with nothing in it yet.)

Masonic Boom, Friday, 15 August 2008 09:05 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.architecture.com/Awards/RIBAStirlingPrize/RIBAStirlingPrize.aspx

It HAS been announced.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 15 August 2008 09:06 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, sorry - got sucked into a meeting. Yes, it's been announced. All that's in there is the shortlist right now, with various gubbins about the projects. I should really spend more time looking at our own website! Ha ha!

Is this the first year in history that Foster hasn't been nominated? no, wait, not nominated in 2006.

Of course, right now our website is down. I might have to go and kick the server, argh, it really is all held together with sticky tape around here. :-(

Masonic Boom, Friday, 15 August 2008 09:15 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.