Pursuing career goals while at university, classic or dud? (possibly a writing question)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well? I am at a point where I feel if I was aggressive about things I could be getting more stuff in print. This is quite daunting though and would require lots of phonecalls and also the annoyance of writing stuff which may not be used.

Part of me feels I should take what work I am commissioned and spend my own time enjoying myself and blogging to keep me on my toes, with the odd submission here and there.

I guess I feel I'm 20 and published and it's 2 years until I finish Uni, and I've managed to get myself printed. I'm inclined feel there's no need to break my neck to be in my ideal position yet, ie having some level of artistic freedom and authority and the first shot at interviewing big artists or giving attention to smaller ones. That said when I think about this I feel guilty and lazy, and imagine the good I could be doing for the music I love and the extent to which I could spread my ideas around.

It's a question unique to something like journalism maybe. Is there a point where I can say I've achieved this much, and take a break for a while, given it is very difficult to motivate myself to hassle my editor and bombard them with stuff.

I feel I have achieved more than most of my classmates but I haven't worked hard really, unless you consider buying albums and loving music for ages hard work. Which it is in some weird way but not really.

I sometimes feel it would be nice not to care about being printed for a while, a holiday from it all or something.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 20 October 2003 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Let's be honest:

Trying hardish without letting on = classic
Appearing to try hard = dud
Trying hard to detriment of social life = dud

I'm 2 years out of uni, I wrote my arse off there, and to be honest most of the writing time was wasted: I can't even remember the great bulk of it. It's good practice of course, but yer actual careerists are a pain, and it usually affects their writing for the worse (I did this for a while). Anything written to last/impress editors is ususally suspect.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 20 October 2003 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)

My uni writing got me a leg up in that it ontroduced me to people who are now v. helpful and supportive, as well as givig me an in when it comes to sometog the places I want to submit work to, but that all happened kind of organically. I certainly didn't push the guys in question. This approach may not necessarily apply to something like journalism tho.

However (and this is U&K) Well? I am at a point where I feel if I was aggressive about things I could be getting more stuff in print. This is quite daunting though and would require lots of phonecalls and also the annoyance of writing stuff which may not be used.

This does apply to my personal experience, the only thing I can say that might be of any use is writing's a grunt job like any other. If you don't put the work in you aren't going to see any results. Getting in print by your age is a fantastic achievement, but I've seen too many writers start to sit back and before they know it five years have gone and nothing. I'd say keep at it.

Matt (Matt), Monday, 20 October 2003 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think my social life is in any danger of getting put on the backburner, far from it sadly/happily. I just figure I have to do a certain amount of slog work I don't necessarily care about to get in a position where I can do good stuff I do care about.

x-post, I know what you mean Matt. It's not the work of the actual writing, more the being a dick on the phone part that I find daunting. It's very difficult to deal with the eds assistant and sell myself as it were, when the phone isn't ringing especially.

On another tangent, is it better to keep plugging away at the one magazine, knowing they know who I am and I've been printed there, or does a point come where you go for a more rounded approach on a few mags, sacrificing some of the impetus of what you've achived with the first, but also being less at their mercy if you eventually succeed.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 20 October 2003 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm still trying to figure some of things out myself.
But I would say, don't go too ballsout, but try to pick up stuff wherever you can, so long as you can easily manage the workload. Keep yourself near the front of editors' minds.
Then when you're ready to go wholehog or whatever, you won't have to remind them that three years ago you wrote a really great piece on a band that people are embarrassed to have liked now.
Or something.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 20 October 2003 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm confused a bit - student eds or non-student eds?

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 20 October 2003 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh non student eds, it's an Irish mag.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 20 October 2003 18:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Ronan, pitch to them by all means. Anything you can do to get ahead of your fellow classmates (and future competitors -- remember that!) that's legal and career-enhancing is good. You show initiative if you have a raft of cuttings and at your age you'll probably get some nice mentors out of it (you may have a bit of 'he's a dick' from people not doing jack shit themselves, so consider the source). Like I keep telling you, the quality of writing in Irish newspapers is not what it could be. You're certainly not going to make that any worse, right?

Newspapers need a 'news' hook to deal with music (likesay if an Irish band gets a big contract for using their track in an advert, cue article about how much the bands get, chart with Aphex at the top of the scale and yr guys somewhere in the middle, chat to ad agency people and a few artists and bob's yr. uncle). You should also try to write about youth culture generally and be the person they're speaking to that's young and in touch.

Yes it is COMPLETELY tedious but you will have to phone/mail to get yrself on press lists for review copies, you will have to phone editors and navigate past the assistant. It does get easier; you just have to phone up with the attitude that you're a well-informed person and they ought to listen to your ideas. Also if you get a commission, be *scrupulous* about deadlines. Luckily regional press officers need you as much as you need them, so most will be pretty nice. Just do the legwork now and those calls will be easier, because people will know and like you later.

suzy (suzy), Monday, 20 October 2003 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Anything you can do to get ahead of your fellow classmates (and future competitors -- remember that!) that's legal and career-enhancing is good.

That's nice! Competitors [can] = comrades in struggle for whatever it is you want to achieve by writing. You can take getting ahead too far: obviously to make a living as a writer involves a fair amount of hackery (aka professionalism); but it can go too far, to the point where writing is just a job like all the rest, though probably not at the age of twenty.

Suzy's right about the 'hooks', and not just in music journalism. These are tough: it's unlikely that Adorno or Sartre had to seek out 'hooks' for their stuff; meanwhile it's highly likely most of the by-numbers stuff you do read was commissioned by its hook value. Remember that you're more knowledgable than the editor, and that you have to sell them on any story because they are fundamentally reactive, rather than [cough] pro-active.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 07:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Journalism *is* very competitive, yes, but you will have plenty of comrade-type friendships which are fine as long as all are in the same boat. It really is a very 'cronyish' industry; obviously there are some deep friendships - else how would Editor X know to commission Journalist Y about their ongoing hassles with piles?

Anyway Sartre, the founder of (French lefty newspaper) Libération, probably knew all about hooks.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:03 (twenty-one years ago)

adorno wrote music reviews for newspapers about three days a week most of his life (war years excepted): this whole wing of his work remains untranslated, unfortunately

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:08 (twenty-one years ago)

This is what I mean; I'm certainly not suggesting that they ignored the present, far from it; however, they were able to develop their own theoretical projects (to an extent) within the print media, in a way that I don't think anyone could now. The hook thing has gone much further for the reason that print is more in thrall to PR, which barely existed in the '30s.

The cronyism bit I'm less interested in. It's certainly not to be seen as a neutral phenomenon, or one that should be accepted ethically, since it has obvious adverse effects on the quality of work you find in print.

Wasn't Adorno in the states during the war?

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:15 (twenty-one years ago)

yes he was, hence not writing for german newspapers!! (other reasons also poss)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:33 (twenty-one years ago)

ilx = our frankfurt school of social research =>develop insanely complex theory here (rendered robust under withering gaze of sceptics, mentalists, trolls, kittens etc) then unleash w/o pity on unsuspecting soft underbelly of media world

(haha first i wrote "unsuspecting soft underbrolly")

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:36 (twenty-one years ago)

the brolly has removed the gap between high rain and low or dry rain, this is not acceptable.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:41 (twenty-one years ago)

(Ah, in *German* papers - now I see - is it not translated? In the glory days of the Pillbox I'm sure IP was like, ahhhh, Vol 8 is out of the complete Adorno! Etc)
Mark = Marcuse

I dunno if I'm feeling Lukacs or Korsch this morning... Throuble every day. Not sure why I mentioned Adorno (=Ewing) upthread, since he hated fun, but there we are.

Cluster Gang = tourist visit paid by Ishwerwood & Auden

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.