Indignant Bicyclists (and pedestrians!)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What the fuck.

They swing way wide on a right, grazing you, and then give YOU hell for 'hogging the road' when you were minding your own business in your own lane.

They're crossing the street. More accurately, they were thinking about crossing the street when they were 3 blocks away from you. You were trying to make a right but it was gridlock so you're kind of caught in the crosswalk. You didn't see them coming. They finally amble up to you, pause, and give you the most exasperated look as they overdramatise the simple act of walking around you. I'm sorry, but I have crossed the street before, and it's NOT THAT DIFFICULT TO WALK AROUND A CAR.

Do you get annoyed by people who treat you like an impure, spoiled yuppie for having a job that requires an auto commute? Do you ever get the feeling they'd want to burn you at the stake if you happened to be driving an SUV?

Dancing Queen, Wednesday, 12 November 2003 05:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, "boiled in oil" is my SUV-driver fantasy of choice.

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 06:18 (twenty-one years ago)

mine is "run over by a Fiat 500 on monster truck wheels"

nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Preferably by a woman with this exact same hairstyle

http://www.klassiskebiler.dk/museum/indhold/italy/fiat/500/500.jpg

nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 06:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Cities are no places for cars. Away with the lot of you into tunnels underground, or even lower into the bowels of the earth, where you can mainline directly into the layers of crushed dead animals that power your killing machines.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Hi Momus!

Bicyclists can be some of the thickest people around. Thick as in mental sense. Thick as in the "you bloody idiot, why the hell don't you see that there's a perfectly good sidewalk for you to ride your bike on?" sense. Thick as in the "Hey, you dillweed, look at the disabled vets riding around in those motorized wheelchairs -- do YOU see THEM taking up the whole bloody lane here? Why is it that they can ride around in their bulky wheelchairs and people can still drive on the outer lane and you and your skinnier ass take up half the lane?" sense.

*revs up Orpheus* I'm gonna get me some idjits.

Pancakes For Breakfast! (Dee the Lurker), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)

'You and your skinnier ass' -- so it's not just the car-drivers against the bike-riders, it's the fat against the thin and the unfit against the fit?

One thing I do agree with Dee about is sidewalks. Both Tokyo and Berlin are bike-friendly cities where people ride on the sidewalk, and it works out really well. You feel safe as you cycle, it puts the pleasure back into it knowing you're not going to die at any moment. Pedestrians get used to the friendly sound of bicycle bells behind them, and make way with grace. Try that in London and people will curse your mother and cast aspersions on your chosen sexual orientation.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 08:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Bikes belong on the road not on the pavement, cars belong in the skip, at least in urban situations. To be fair there are a lot of bad cyclists on the road out there but also to be fair they can do that much damage compared to even something tiny in the automobile world like a Fiat 500. The difference with berlin and Tokyo is that every on some pavements there are delineated cycle lanes, but otherwise bike belong in the road and cars should show them a little respect.

Dee your post is ignorant and offensive.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

The voice from Courier Central! I remember leaning out of Ed's window and filming a flock of cycle couriers getting up from sitting on the middle of the road with their beer and spliffs to let a Mercedes go down the lane. One of them shouted 'Car!' and it sounded like 'Caw!' so they all started cawing like crows. The car eventually got by, but the driver must have been psyched by 'the glare'.

Ed, Berlin has demarcated cycle lanes, but Tokyo doesn't.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 08:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Where a bicycle can break a pedestrian's arm or leave a little scratch or dent I no where I'd prefer the bike. Demarcated lanes are best but it ought to be at least half the road, the buses can have the other half.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 08:39 (twenty-one years ago)

But the diesel fumes in your face!

Berlin cycle lanes are amphibious. They route on and off sidewalks, they snake around according to context.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 08:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Indeed they do, I got told off by a german fried for standing in a cycle lane on a sidewalk ( it was 2 in the morning and there was not another person for miles, I thought that was a little ridiculous under the circumstances).

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 08:57 (twenty-one years ago)

The only thing I hate worse than bicyclists is cars. However, I hate bicyclists fairly extremely. Especially when the fuckers decide to cycle IN THE BUS LANE. So you have this bus, during rush hour, confined to toodling along ITS OWN LANE at about 5mph because this stupid annoying crap cyclist WON'T GET OUT OF THE WAY.

Don't get me started on cars in the City. The Congestion Charge should be more like £500. Or perhaps a finger.

Citizen Kate (kate), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 08:58 (twenty-one years ago)

No cars in the city may be a fine idea for london, but it just wouldn't work in the city that I live in. I have to get from one end of town to the other & out the other side to get to work & the bus service to this particular area is less than reliable. I could take the A14 which surrounds Cambridge, but then it would take me about an hour and a half to get to work due to too much traffic and numerous accidents. I do not drive wrecklessly & am usually patient with cyclists (for which Cambridge is designed quite well) but I have to say that I missed the page in the highway code where it says cyclists are allowed to jump red lights & run pedestrian crossings. Cyclists are the most infuriating things in Cambridge. If they adhered to the rules of the road then fine, but in my experience (in a city that has the highest population of cyclists) this just isn't so.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)

The harder it is for car-drivers, the better; perhaps they'd then consider whether they really need to pollute the air with their vehicles. So I call for all the pedestrians and bicyclists: do block the roads, make it as hard as possible for drivers! (The bus lane is an exception, obviously.) All city centres should be banned for private cars, except those of the disabled.

Oh, and I agree with Kate: the smugness of pedestrians and cyclists is nothing compared to the smugness of the drivers, who think they own the roads just because they have the bigger, scarier vehicle.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Tuomas, can you ice skate to work in the winter? I know you can in some swedish cities, but not sure about Helsinki.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:19 (twenty-one years ago)

We have a good, working public transport system here in Helsinki. I mostly use a tram.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:20 (twenty-one years ago)

(But that's mostly because my bike is a mess, and I can't afford to buy a new one right now.)

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I am perfectly aware of what a dangerous machine i am using and drive accordingly. when there is an adequate publice service route to where i work, i will use it, in the meantime i have to use my car. I am not smug & I do not think I own the road. I also need to my car to see my family. It takes 1 1/2-2 hrs for a journey that takes only 30 mins, in which time i feel incredibly sick due to the bus. I cannot get the train as it does not go directly to where i need to get to. I basically would have to go to London at the cost of £15 (an hour) and then go to where i need to get to at the cost of another £15 (another hour) and then when i get to the station i need to go to, I have to walk for half an hour to get a bus where i then have to spend half an hour on the bus. Do not tell me I am smug or do not think about the effect of the environment. Maybe you live in a perfect little world, I however, do not.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sorry, I wasn't talking about you particularly. I agree that it's a shame that there's not adequate public transport in every city, that's something that needs to change.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway, this thread isn't about hating car-drivers cause we all know what the problems with cars are. It's about hating bicyclists. Bicyclists are WAAAAAY smugger than Peds. It's OK when they have their own lanes, but when they don't, they take over everyone else's.

About a month ago, HSA and I were trying to cross a street with a bike lane, and this cyclist was coming, so we tried to step out of the cycle lane back onto the curb, but the bastard cut around BEHIND US (going the wrong way down a one-way street I might add) forcing us out into the traffic lane (fortunately there were no cars coming) and SHOUTING AT US to add insult to injury.

I wish I had a big metal hook thing with a loop on the end of it, to pull cyclists off their bikes when they behave like that. Grrrrr.

Citizen Kate (kate), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Well then you should have thought about that before insinuating what you did. There are alot more things wrong with my city that need to be addressed before the public transport issue. The public transport around the main part of the city is adequate and I use it whenever possible and am not in a rush, but this is not the case to more rural areas. In the meantime I will use my car and will not be made to feel guilty by you or Momus.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, silly question, having looked at the maps of Stockholm and Helsinki you really have to live in just the right place and have a waterway between you an your workplace for this to be a possibility.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:34 (twenty-one years ago)

oh yeah and another thing cyclists consistently do is go the wrong way down a one way street and expect the car to pull over when it is the car that is obeying the rules of the road. I will be all for cyclists when they learn how to use the road properly.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)

It's OK when they have their own lanes, but when they don't, they take over everyone else's.

Er, what else can they do? Fly in the air?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:40 (twenty-one years ago)

BE FUCKING CONSIDERATE OF THE PEOPLE AROUND THEM. That's not too much to ask. I mean, I don't walk down the middle of the street and get mad at cars for being in my way. Why do cyclists?

Citizen Kate (kate), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I will use my car and will not be made to feel guilty by you or Momus.

Guilt is constructive and soul-forming, though. Your guilt will make you a better driver. It's arguable that lack of guilt makes cyclists worse road-users and even kills some of them. 'How can I die when I am morally superior?'

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)

You don't know anything about me or my driving, who are you to say that if i feel guilty about driving the car it will make me a better driver. What complete rubbish you do speak.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:44 (twenty-one years ago)

It's taken you how long to realise that Momus speaks rubbish, Pink?

Citizen Kate (kate), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh I have always known, it's just never been directed at me before & I have always avoided his stupid preachings on many threads.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Everyone should feel a little bit guilty about using their cars. Think of all that burnt oil. One of the best sources of engineering materials we have an we burn it to get around, it's madness.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Also I'd say that one thing that enrages cyclists is their calculation and projection of how guilty car-drivers should be (ie very), and when the driver does something that proves lower levels of guilt, the cyclist becomes enraged and tries to induce guilt by shouting 'Cunt!', thus restoring the appropriate level of guilt and the consideration it should entail.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm totally in support of bicyclist rights in every way possible. I've even participated in Critical Mass a few times (and they are always, perhaps surprisingly, very courteous, very concerned with abiding by the law and biking responsibly).

But there is this certain breed of hardcore biker that are just complete fucking assholes! They will, for instance, place themselves in blatantly dangerous positions and then cuss out the car that had to swerve or slam on the brakes to avoid hitting them. I just want to shake them and be like "stop being such a fucking dickhead!!!"

Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)

It's OK, Pink he's not actually directing it at you. You are just kindly symbolically standing in for some archetypical bugbear he is battling in his aesthetic head. Don't take offense. ;-)

Citizen Kate (kate), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, I don't walk down the middle of the street and get mad at cars for being in my way. Why do cyclists?

Because they have the moral right to do so? But seriously, we seem to have another example of cultural differences at work here. Bikers really aren't smug in Finland, but drivers still often get mad at them because they use the car lane and slow the cars down. There isn't much alternative, however, because it forbidden for someone over 12 to ride a bike on the sidewalk, and there aren't bike lanes everywhere. I wish there were.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Jesus do you ppl never listen? I have explained why I need to use my car & I will not feel fucking guilty about it cos my fucking city council haven't improved public transport to the point where i am able to use it. What a bunch of pretentious arses.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:50 (twenty-one years ago)

You have a moral right to behave like this:

But there is this certain breed of hardcore biker that are just complete fucking assholes! They will, for instance, place themselves in blatantly dangerous positions and then cuss out the car that had to swerve or slam on the brakes to avoid hitting them.

Replace "car" with "pedestrian" and this is some of the behaviour that I've experienced. Their moral high ground is completely soggy.

Citizen Kate (kate), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:50 (twenty-one years ago)

In that case, yes, because pedestrians are morally superior to drivers.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:52 (twenty-one years ago)

See but I don't think you do have a moral right to endanger yourself and then try to put it on someone else's conscience if it can be avoided. And in the circumstances I'm talking about it can be avoided.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:52 (twenty-one years ago)

There is no moral right to behave like a cunt, and there are far to many cunts on bikes, however there are far more cunts behind the wheels of taxis, vans and cars.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)

that's true.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

This is actually a litmus issue when it comes to looking at how different cities deal with inequality. Obviously cars, bikes and pedestrians represent different degrees of vulnerability and danger to each other, and where cars are not penalised by the city authorities, you feel a strong sense of political injustice as soon as you step out of yours.

I went to Thailand and was completely appalled by the way traffic wasn't controlled. It could take 20 minutes -- and a lot of courage -- to cross a road like the ring surrounding central Chiang Mai. Pollution was awful. In Bangkok things were better: the sheer volume of traffic just brought everything to a total halt, one gigantic traffic jam. The air was awful, though.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I wasn't talking about the morality of putting yourself in danger, I was talking about the morality of getting angry at cars for being in the way.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Umm... I know it's quite trendy to crap on Momus and all, but he seems to be making rather rational, basic points in advance of an argument... not directly taunting or provoking anyone in particular. So what's up, Kate?

I bet he wouldn't garner as much abuse as he does if he weren't, to quote some ILX post written ages past, "a minor indie celebrity".

But I digress.

I have friends who do Critical Mass every time it happens, and they're the nicest people I know. This morning I also saw a cyclist cut off a couple, with a baby, no less, while they were crossing on a walk signal on 14th Street. Very annoying. But in the current state of things the tension between angry cyclists and angry drivers is bound to continue, at least until the public transportation system is straightened out (in NYC, speaking for myself) or until Gleeminex becomes mandatory. Whatever happens first.

justin s., Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:57 (twenty-one years ago)

not directly taunting or provoking anyone in particular. So what's up, Kate?

He's MOMUS. He exists to exert his pomposity on this board and project his own fears onto other people. Go look for any of the Vice or Kill Bill threads. This is what he does, and I'm frankly sick of it.

I'm leaving this thread now because I'm starting to get annoyed.

Citizen Kate (kate), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Justin - I am not 'crapping on momus' as you put it. I really couldn't give a shit who he is. I disagreed with his point about the fact that 'i should feel guilty for driving a car'. I don't really know what point you are trying to make about this.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Momus on ILX = cyclist in London, apparently!

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Why does everybody assume that feeling guilty is something one should never do? It's the basis of civilised conduct!

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, dude, WTF, Momus didn't do anything wrong on this thread. In fact, I missed this statment: "It's arguable that lack of guilt makes cyclists worse road-users and even kills some of them. 'How can I die when I am morally superior?'" but it's exactly what I was trying to say earlier.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Only I prefer to think of it as "not being a total asshole" rather than "being a bit guilty" , but they're much the same, really.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 10:05 (twenty-one years ago)

As someone that's come very close to melding with the grilles of several Excursions, Escalades, and even Hondas during my time spent running, all due to motorists not paying any fucking attention to the potential pedestrian traffic that may await them at the end of their alley or at the parking lot exit or at a red light, I can't say I blame any peds for giving skeevy looks for impatient drivers who decided it was worth their while to drive in over-trafficked areas of their metropolis. When you run, you really do notice how little attention a lot of drivers pay when making a right turn on red or coming out of a parking lot -- it's gotten to the point where I now have to jog a good 5 feet into the street or politely tap on their hoods as I pass by, since they're looking only to their left or right and completely oblivious to the 150-pound man whose hip they're about to break into 50 pieces.

That said, I've seen plenty of dickheaded moves from bike messengers in downtown Chicago to last me a lifetime. That's hard to defend.

Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone who goes anywhere by any mode of transportation is an asshole. That's why god invented the internet.

NA (Nick A.), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

a simple "on your left!" is all you need to say.

haha, when, as a pedestrian, I hear this behind me I tend to panic. I'll be like "on my left!? left.. left.. MOVE TO THE LEFT!!!" and then I almost get run over.

Dan I., Wednesday, 12 November 2003 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan, that's why cyclists prefer to ride in the street where we belong. Cars, for the most part, are predictable. Pedestrians, rollerbladers, skateboarders, dogs. rollerbladers with dogs and 20 foot long leashes (my personal favorite), and 5 year old kids are not.

David Beckh0u5e (Dave Beckh0u5e), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 22:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Congratulations, Dan, everyone does that 'oh shit, which is left?' dance all couriers call the Funky Chicken.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan, that's why cyclists prefer to ride in the street where we belong. Cars, for the most part, are predictable. Pedestrians, rollerbladers, skateboarders, dogs. rollerbladers with dogs and 20 foot long leashes (my personal favorite), and 5 year old kids are not.

that's fine, but y'all still need to sloooowww down.

atomic horseradish (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)

as a bicyclist, I find nothing more annoying than other bicyclists riding on the sidewalk. It's called a SIDEWALK, not a SIDERIDE, it's for people to walk on.

I cycle on the pavement all the time. I go on the road as well, but if it gets too crazy I'm off it.

Anyway, when I'm on the pavement I obey the following self-imposed rules:

1) I don't go too fast, even if the way ahead looks clear.

2) Even if the way ahead looks clear, I remain totally aware that someone can come walking out of a doorway/driveway any second.

3) If there's a pedestrian ahead of me, I'll go wide round them, onto the road usually.

4) Also: I'll be ready for pedestrians getting all panicky and unpredictable. I'll be going wide round them SLOWLY.

5) If there are a few people on the pavement, I'll go SUPER-SLOW. I'll cycle at walking speed or less.

Does this make me an asshole? I'm pretty confident I will never hurt any pedestrian through cycling on the pavement. I am ridiculously careful.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Thursday, 13 November 2003 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)

people need to learn HOW TO SHARE THE ROAD__THIS MEANS EVErYONE~~ this bothers the f*ck out of me. unrest. btw, i have been run down by a bike!! knocked to the ground by a 90lb man on a tenspeed & have been hit by an autobile while biking

kephm, Thursday, 13 November 2003 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't read all this shit now.

cycles ideally in the road. i would never ride my bike on a sidewalk when there were people walking on it. i probably would if it were wide open.

at least in seattle there is PLENTY of room for a bike AND a car in the same lane, side by side. in other words, people generally are overly cautious and should just get used to riding/driving with each other around. if you're driving, just pass the damn bicyclist, you don't need to slow down to a crawl, or pull all the way into the oncoming lane (though if it's clear, sure, give a little extra room). if you're the cyclist, ride as tight to the right as you can (yes, opening car doors are dangerous but that's why you are paying attention)

pedestrians vs. cars, i am honestly torn. it is usually nice to stop for people crossing streets etc. but where i get conflicted is that i HATE for cars to stop for me. when i am walking, i will take 100% responsibility for my movements, and i don't want anybody stopping for me. what i would like them to do instead is please drive as fast as possible and get out of here already! what i generally do in practice is drive on through if there's going to be a nice break in traffic for the walker to move through, but stop if it is a busy street where they honestly could use help getting across the street. people with kids or older folx, etc. deserve extra courtesy.

in general, i guess i give a higher priority to practicality than legality. i think people should drive fast because then you move more cars per time unit. i think you should let those 10 cars go by and then cross, because more people move through the intersection faster that way.

if you are commuting in a big city to an office job, you probably ought to be riding the bus or subway or something. if you are tinkering on your laptop making musics and hopping around to art galleries, by all means do the same. i generally need to go to the shop, pick up parts at various businesses around town, and head to the jobsite which is in a suburb 15 miles away where there is no public trans, with my toolboxes and whatever cabinets or furniture i might be working with that day. so i guess i'll be driving my pickup then.

i figure my vehicle costs me about $15 a day in terms of hard cash (not figuring for downpayment or depreciation, just loan pmt, insurance, gas). so it's not exactly cheap, but i still am supportive of more realistic gas prices, (3-4$ per gallon??) which everywhere besides the US seems to pay anyway.

ron (ron), Thursday, 13 November 2003 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh crap can I ever pick a thread to start then abandon mid-day.

1. I think Momus made some great points and yes he seems to be unfairly singled-out for mockery.

2. I hope I didn't come across as anti-bicycle as I am an avid mtn. biker, though I do the majority of my riding on trails and backcountry. I dislocated my shoulder last year (embarrassingly enough while riding with my French professor who is a 90-pound slip of a woman) but plan to go hardcore come spring. I was trying to get across my frustration at bikers who use the moral high ground to be jerks, but Kate did that much better than I could.

3. Suzy, I drive, and I did mention thinking "oh get over it" at people who freak out when met with a car in an intersection but I meant only instances when the driver was pulling out of a blind downtown alley or parking lot AFTER checking for pedestrians, being met with much traffic and getting 'trapped', and subsequently being glared at for not being able to see into the future. As for banging the hood of a particularly glaring offender, I'm all for it, but be very careful, as a few months ago I heard of that happening and the male passenger getting out and punching the female hood-banger square in the face. Supposedly an angry crowd surrounded the passenger but when it became evident the passenger was happy to fight every last bystander, the crowd chickened out and the poor lady was left with nothing but dental bills.

4. Ron is very reasonable, and I wish I would have mentioned the "people being overcautious" thing first. Somehow seeing a bike on the road triggers an optical insecurity in people that makes them overly space-conscious drivers. And excellent point, Ron, about necessity: if you work in contracting for instance you cannot make a living without your toolbox and sadly we don't live in the utopia where worksites are mere blocks apart and toolboxes can be shoved in fannypacks. It's true that people whose lifestyles are conducive to portability (primarily urban-centred art lifestyles) are unfairly critical of people who need to drive to make a living.

Dancing Queen, Thursday, 13 November 2003 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll join in the SUV-bashing, though.

I have an acquaintance that makes a decent living prep-coaching and co-managing at an upscale restaurant. He's been living in a pretty shabby basement suite for the past two years but has saved up enough to downpay a really nice loft my friend scouted out for him. He seemed very enthused about the idea, but what does he do? Drops his load on a Cadillac Escalade and puts himself back to square one living-space-wise. For what? For impressing materialistic gold-diggers enough with his truck to have them come back home with him whereupon they will sneer "um, no way" after seeing his bsmt suite? Genius.

Dancing Queen, Thursday, 13 November 2003 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Um yeah of course gold-diggers are materialistic. Ugh.

Tautology Queen, Thursday, 13 November 2003 04:46 (twenty-one years ago)

There a few cases where its fine to ride on the sidewalk; you need to go a block (or even two) the wrong way up a one way street, or you're riding to the end of the block to get to the curb cut. If you do it slowly enough its fine. But bikes are basically more like cars than they are different.

David Beckh0u5e (Dave Beckh0u5e), Thursday, 13 November 2003 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

No it isn't, you are a vehicle & you should be on the road. That's what pisses me off about bikes, cyclists always think it is ok to break the rules of road because they are cyclists.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 13 November 2003 09:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm just about to go for a ride down to Regent's Park, and I'll be on the pavement most of the time. Stay out of my way, fuckers! I might inflict minor bruising on your shin!

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't let me meet you when I am in my car, because i couldn't give a f@#k about what a cycle could do the front of my car!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Riding on the pavement in UK = quite possibly illegal, and downright stupid whatever the legality.

chris (chris), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)

= round them up with cattle prods and set hunting dogs upon them!

(I'm sure that's a blood sport everyone could get behind!)

Citizen Kate (kate), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

It is illegal for a bike to be on the pavement. In my younger naive days I was told to get off the pavement by a policeman.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Looked! I have solved the Hunting Crisis in a way which is equitable for all! Leave the poor foxes alone, and have them chase bicyclists who use the pavement! A person on a good bike might be as fast as a fox, but I wonder if the smell of the rubber tyres will put the dogs off the scent...

Citizen Kate (kate), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Who cares, it's a great idea!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

That country chef Hugh Fothering-Thomas bloke did it in exchange for hay for his pigs, so it must be good!

I mean, talk about Extreme Mountain Biking... it's not really extreme unless you have a pack of hounds and a hunt club on your tail, is it?

Citizen Kate (kate), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)

*nods*

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Plenty of pavements up our way are "dual use" ie divided into 2, 1/2 for bikes, 1/2 for pedestrians.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought you lived in Newcastle, not Finland, Pash!

Citizen Kate (kate), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)

No, (finland sonds k-k00l tho') We have good (by uk standards) cycling provision up here. Not as good as mainland europe by a long way, but still good enough that I read the thread and a lot of it just baffles me. STill, I haven't cycled to work since I got this shitty chest infection (8-10 weeks) so i'm getting a bit lardy again. I must admit, even asshole cycle couriers (who are often dissed in the cycling trade press) pale compared w/people who talk on their cellphones whilst driving. that's a tear-up-your-licence and impound your car on the spot offence as far as i'm concerned.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)

How about cyclists talking on their mobiles? yup, I've seen it.

chris (chris), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)

that i've never seen, i must admit.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm with you on the mobile phone/driving thing. Is that illegal? I know it is in some places, I'm not sure about here. Even worse is those cunts who try to TEXT and drive. Kill them now. The other day I saw a CYCLIST talking on their mobile phone!

Citizen Kate (kate), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)

but obv anyone who does it = fucking stupid.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post

(Cyclists and mobiles must be a London thing.)

Citizen Kate (kate), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder if there's a cycle-courier 'zine, and what it's like? we occasionally get sent this dreadful macho mtb mag called "shred" (they try to get us to advertise in it, like we sell folding bikes and recumbents, and all their editorial is like I AM A MAN SNORT PH£4R MY £1000 SUSPEnSION FORXORZ) so I imagine any courier 'zine is going to be like 21000x worse.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll ask the couriers downstairs; I wrote a piece on the European Cycle Messenger Championships for The Independent earlier this summer - there was a 'zine that was handed out at the event, all about the history of riding the circuit in London, which was pretty funny and had a glossary for things like 'muppet' and 'the funky chicken'.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 13 November 2003 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Some of Cambridge's pavements are divided up between peds & cyclists which is fine, then everyone knows where they are & cyclists arent at risk from drivers. So why then do the fuxors still ignore this beautiful cycle path that has been created specifically for them?

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 13 November 2003 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

How about cyclists talking on their mobiles

Photos of Boris Johnson doing this on Room 101 earlier this week.

alext (alext), Thursday, 13 November 2003 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)

boris johnson = fucking stupid!! qed!!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 13 November 2003 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I would never chat on a mobile while cycling, but I will smoke a fag.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Thursday, 13 November 2003 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Here's a video of the couriers outside Ed and Suzy's place making way for a Mercedes. (10 MB)

Momus (Momus), Thursday, 13 November 2003 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)

What happens at the end? Are you rammed by a vehicle driving illegally through the living-room?

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Thursday, 13 November 2003 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Suzy has to grab me by the ankles to stop me leaping in a 'spontaneous suicide attack' onto the roof of the departing Mercedes.

Momus (Momus), Thursday, 13 November 2003 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

(He likes being dragged around by the ankles...)

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 13 November 2003 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Eyeball Kicks:
5) If there are a few people on the pavement, I'll go SUPER-SLOW. I'll cycle at walking speed or less.

wouldn't it just be easier to get off and walk like you should? especially considering that bicycles are unstable at low speeds.

i understand why cyclists don't want to ride on the roads - it's the same reason us pedestrians don't want cyclists on the paths.

andy

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 13 November 2003 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)

wouldn't it just be easier to get off and walk like you should?

Well, Andy, if it is easier, for me and for the kind pedestrians around me, that's just what I do!

When it isn't (i.e. in situations where the ability to move backwards isn't useful) then, believe it or not, I don't!

I don't understand the phrase, "like you should". Who says I should? The law? I've chirpily overtaken countless members of the police on the pavement, who have made no move to stop me because it was obvious that I was cycling very responsibly and would not hurt anyone. I'm a pedestrian more often than I'm a cyclist. I know what it's like to have some dick on a mountain bike nearly knock me out of my wig, so I don't act like a dick.

especially considering that bicycles are unstable at low speeds

Mine isn't, cos I'm on it. I know people who wobble a little at slow speeds. If I were one of them, I'd have to readjust my strategies.

Let me emphasise: the only harm I'm liable to cause pedestrians is when the sight of my trim ass bobbing steams up spectacles resulting in poodle-tripping etc.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Thursday, 13 November 2003 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah, you live in Seattle then.

"ON YOUR LEFT!"

(yeah, left side of my sac, you fluorescent dressed twunt)

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 13 November 2003 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, i don't really hate indignant bicyclists that much. I'm just jealous and biased because i'm clumsy as fuck, and putting me on a bike and expecting me to use it in a real life commute is like asking me to to perform a pole dance in the middle of Interstate-5 after three bottles of Robitussin.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 13 November 2003 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)

But I can't see any decent reason to have a car in the city.

I'm trying to find a regular job right now, and right now I'm temping. For some reason an awful lot of employers with editorial-type employment are either high-tech contractors in Falls Church/Tysons Corner/Herndon/Reston, Virginia, or high-tech contractors on the 270 corridor (Rockville/Gaithersburg/Germantown), Maryland; these places are always located more than a mile away from a Metrorail station. I'd like to find a job in DC or a closer-in suburb (Bethesda or Arlington), but employers are not exactly breaking down my door. I did a bus-rail-bus reverse commute a couple years ago when my car was in the shop; a 45-minute trip became 90+ minutes.

In the meantime, I try not to hate bicyclists as a class, but when I see a bicyclist who is running red lights, or ignoring pedestrian right-of-way, or not wearing a helmet, it raises my blood pressure. And then a couple weeks ago in Georgetown a mother and her two children insisted on pedaling down a crowded, narrow sidewalk (it's legal in DC to ride your bicycle on the sidewalk in certain designated downtown areas), when the safer and more courteous thing would have been for them to walk their bicycles until they reached the uncrowded side street they were trying to reach. Also, the mother was not wearing a helmet.

j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 14 November 2003 02:03 (twenty-one years ago)

In the meantime, I try not to hate bicyclists as a class, but when I see a bicyclist who is running red lights, or ignoring pedestrian right-of-way, or not wearing a helmet, it raises my blood pressure

I'm crazy about red lights. I'm in the desert, the nearest humans are 30 miles away, but some arbitrarily placed red light will hold me for as long as it wants - I am totally obedient. Meanwhile, I'll let pedestrians do what the fuck they like, seeing as how (as I've said) I'm more often one of them than a cyclist.

But I don't wear a helmet! And it raises your blood pressure! What new demand is this? Why does it bother you? It's my skull, my commonplace brain-ball! That's what's involved! But thanks for minding.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 14 November 2003 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Why should you care if they wear a helmet, cycling is only marginally more dangerous than riding in a car. Note, I wear mine 95% of the time I just don't care if others do.

A bicycle at low speeds is not that unstable if you're at all skilled. I usually wait at lights without even putting a foot on the ground (most of the time, sometimes I screw this up). You just turn the wheel like the guy in the picture into the crown of the road. This is really easy if you're riding a fixed gear like he is, but its still possible on any bike.

http://www.63xc.com/gregg/2_hands.jpg

David Beckh0u5e (Dave Beckh0u5e), Friday, 14 November 2003 04:43 (twenty-one years ago)

my brother, who is a neurosurgeon, convinced me to get a helmet after he told me, in graphic detail, about operating on bicyclists who've had accidents.

hstencil, Friday, 14 November 2003 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)

four years pass...

pedestrians, what is it with pressing the pedestrian crossing button and then crossing anyway before the green man lights up?

or with stepping out into the road in front of me BEFORE you look either way?

maybe that mother has the answer, the one i saw with her five year old boy walking out in front of an oncoming car in a car park: "come on, they're not going to run you over"

whatever, Saturday, 8 March 2008 20:41 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.