Time Out Top Ten Worst Directors List

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
As a response to the Guardian Top 40 list, Time Out's Nick Bradshaw suggests a better project. A worst directors list, directors whose ineptitude can sobotage the best casts and crews. And it is:

10: Kevin Smith
9: Guy Ritchie
8: Luc Besson
7: Adrian Lyne
6: Penny Marshall
5: Peter Chesolm
4: Mel Smith
3: Ismail Merchant
2: George Lucas
1: Joel Schumacher.

Personally I would put Mel Smith higher, and no-one should be on this list unless they have made 5 films. But talk the way you do. Not a very international list is it...

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

as one who knows, it was compiled on the STRICTEST SCIENTIFIC GROUNDS!

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a feeling it conducted much like this weeks top one hundred best albums ever, ever, ever list will be done.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:41 (twenty-one years ago)

years of research went into this!

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Luc Besson has never made a bad film!!

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

fuckin a!

erm, are you insane?

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

wtf luk besson is godlike!!!

ah xpost

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

They must have meant Francois Ozon

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah she sucks

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

ADRIAN LYNE!!!!!!!!!!!?

dave q, Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

besson! where to start!! sheesh!!! ozon almost made the cut, but i dunno maybe 'under the beach, the paving stones' pulled him up.

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

hell yes lyne! have you seen his 'lolita'?

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

have you seen his 'lolita'?

Is that an euphemism?

Miggie (Miggie), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

(actually now that I think about it, Don Simpson deserved the credit, not Lyne)

dave q, Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Wot no Winner?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Too many of these people have made at least one decent movie, really. Well, 4 of them

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

at least lyne's lolita is better than kubrick's! (haha and nabakov's)

(this thread will pain anthony deeply when he reads it!!)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

winner: also on the noms list. he's on a separate 'bad brit directors list' i think. anyway, none of these directors have done much to love.

it's still monstrous mark!

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)

No THREE of them, I hated that stupid 'Clerks' movie!

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

who doesn't love the fifth element?!?!

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I hated that stupid 'Clerks' movie

Aw. But Andrew, he'll make it up to you on "Jersey Girl," where you'll see J.Lo *and* Ben Affleck together again!

Miggie (Miggie), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Last time I started a thread defending Joel Schumacher it got 2 one-line responses, so it's not like I'm going to bother starting another one!

dave q, Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

who doesn't love the messenger!!?? i larfed non-stop and so did fernand braudel

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

who doesn't love the fifth element?!?!

sure, it's got a grebt 'father, are you sure she's the supreme being' line... but someone's gotta take a stand. my list wd have had spielberg, besson, bay, moodysson...

i re-watched 'nikita' recently. that's how scientific i can roll.

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah I'm going to be all turned around on Smith soon, definitely! I like 'Falling Down' a fair bit, don't know much of whatever else JS has done

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

'phone booth'
'batman and robin'
'flatliners'
'st elmos fire'
'carwash'
'tigerland'
'flawless'
some grisham films

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)

'batman and robin'
'flatliners'
'st elmos fire'

that's 3 classics right there

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

"Flatliners" is great! He's so off the list now

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Is Danny Boyle on the Brit list? (ok, so Shallow Grave was good)

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

did you not like 8mm

dave q, Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

danny boyle! 28 days l8tr roxxxxor

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

OK JS is no Von Trier, but I'm starting to like him almost better than Verhoeven

dave q, Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

28 Days Later : Worst Film Evah!

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i am as kneejerk as merchant/ivory as anyone but i do vaguely wonder if ALL if their films are bad (i haven't seen them all) (the editing is in a clumsy pre-edison leagues of its own, matched only by ken russell's!!) (i am kind of fond of russell though)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

it's funny how all the really bad directors whose names we'll never know aren't on the list.

i can't stand kevin smith, but penny marshall;)? they're definitely putting down people who have at least tried something different

possible m (mandinina), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again
i must not get into an argument about how poor 28 days later is again

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

luc besson should do a remake of LAIR OF THE WHITE WORM!

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

well, it's bad as in 'their whole project is bad' rather than, 'they are inept' or whatever. schumacher is there probably becuz since 'tigerland' some ppl have actually shown him love.

'28 days later' is no classic -- but it is far from the worst film evah, jeez.

i dunno, pete, it's an odd one to get worked up about. 'lilya 4 evah' is 28 times worse.

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah I like '8mm' too, so yeah

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Michael Haneke should do a remake of 2001: A Space Odyssey

dave q, Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I was sold a pup with 28 Days Later. I wasn't with Lilya-4-Ever (which I liked anyhoo, just for the Ta-tu on the soundtrack).

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

(i've never seen 'tigerland' - good?)

dave q, Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)

McG - Directed the two Charlies Angels movies. he gets my vote:)

possible m (mandinina), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

besson shd do 'au hasard balthasar'

mcg got my vote, but in a sense he is a pioneer.

enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

He gets in just cos of his stupid fucking "name", tho I liked CA1 quite a bit.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post

McG should be on the list by virtue of his name alone.

Once again -- Besson...?!?!?

Andy K (Andy K), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

(Yeah my first x-post)

Andy K (Andy K), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

i liked charlie's angels 2 a lot and i like his name because it makes me think he's like a character out of glamorama or zoolander or something

pete b. (pete b.), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Ben Stiller, THAT'S a director!

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

McG = flame-broiled Flavor Flav

Andy K (Andy K), Thursday, 27 November 2003 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't see Welles tolerating Godard much after Breathless -- he was weaned on a certain tradition that JLG never heeded.

didn't see Best Films Written By Actors feetch

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 14:48 (fourteen years ago)

The Welles-Bogdanovich book is a gold mine of insights and expanded remarks on filmmakers; best, I get the impression that Welles wasn't familiar with most of the directors' work and just made up some mellifluous shit.

a 'catch-all', almost humorous, 'Jeez' quality (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 14:50 (fourteen years ago)

that wd be very much in character, tho his criticism of Antonioni jibes with Kael's.

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 14:52 (fourteen years ago)

there's more of that in the bognaovich book iirc "the scene is over. call cut already,"

zvookster, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:00 (fourteen years ago)

Would love to hear him on, like, Hou or Tsai. "The scene hasn't even started! Why are you filming?"

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:09 (fourteen years ago)

he calls Buñuel the "most supremely religious director" in the history of cinema or some such thing, which is otm. ("What a superb person he must be! Everyone loves him!").

On the other hand, he scoffed at the existence of a certain director named Mizoguchi.

a 'catch-all', almost humorous, 'Jeez' quality (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:12 (fourteen years ago)

he was directed by Pasolini, I imagine he followed some of the new European directors.

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:28 (fourteen years ago)

i get the impression that before a certain point (when dedicated art-house movie theatres began to run euro films as they came out) that you saw eurofilms in whole festivals-worth (ditto japanese etc): i can easily imagine OW taking in a whole bunch of em when the fad for them first hit the US, getting bored very quickly, and not bothering with a second bite

of course this theory depends on him being in the US at the relevant time, which he probably wasn't

("getting bored very quickly" <-- but this applies wherever he was, and whenever)

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:34 (fourteen years ago)

Welles admitted in the Bogda book that during film festivals he had "a lot of time to kill."

a 'catch-all', almost humorous, 'Jeez' quality (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:38 (fourteen years ago)

you had art cinemas in NY in the '20s–'30s, though i can't remember reading of OW's tastes in those years. japanese movies not really on the agenda till a while later tho. imagine him seeing them in between lunches at venice by then.

HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:40 (fourteen years ago)

I remember this from an old Book of Lists and was able to find it online:

Orson Welles's Favorite Films (circa 1952):

1.City Lights (Chaplin)
2.Greed (von Stroheim)
3.Intolerance (Griffith)
4.Nanook of the North (Flaherty)
5.Shoe Shine (De Sica)
6.Potemkin (Eisenstein)
7.La Femme du Boulanger (Pagnol)
8.Grand Illusion (Renoir)
9.Stagecoach (Ford)
10.Our Daily Bread (Vidor)

clemenza, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:43 (fourteen years ago)

'pretty standard stuff really'

HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:44 (fourteen years ago)

Here's the page--there are a lot of directors' lists from '52, which I guess was the first Sight & Sound poll.

http://www.listology.com/dgeiser13/story/recommendations-directors-favorite-films

clemenza, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:45 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.cinescene.com/reviews/images/chimes15.jpg

"I could eat this Kevin Smith kid under the goddamn table"

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:46 (fourteen years ago)

From context, Welles' comments on Godard seem to be from 1970. It happens in the Bogdanovich book right after the two of them are watching Welles' two appearances on the Dick Cavett Show. At one point Bogdanovich asks him who his least favorite American director is, and Welles' response is: "censored" in brackets. Doesn't say who censored it; could've been either person, the way they collaborated on the book.

Josefa, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:48 (fourteen years ago)

you had art cinemas in NY in the '20s–'30s: sure, but "art cinema" meant something else before sound, and foreign-made movies didn't have the same kind of language-barrier -- there was a palpable post-war shift among the US cognoscenti to valuing "world cinema" over hollywood, it wasn't a smoothly running permanent feature, and the screening market presumably reflected this

also of course welles valued a lot of elements in american film -- or haha mankiewicz did *kaelzing* -- that the post-war europhiles tended to scorn

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)

i like godard, and he has an interesting approach to sound (i saw king lear athe london film festival yay me] but he could NOT have made his name in radio drama

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:56 (fourteen years ago)

the welles in 1952 one is from brussels, which sort of prompted the S&S poll.

elia kazan picks four pagnol films; dmytryk picks one; he and wilder also go 'grande illusion' with welles.

HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:00 (fourteen years ago)

Alfred Hitchcock
Smokey and the Bandit (1977) - D: Hal Needham

No source...something he blurted out once while nodding off in front of the TV?

clemenza, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:03 (fourteen years ago)

this is a hitchcock top ten from 1939

John S. Robertson Sentimental Tommy 1921
De Mille Forbidden Fruit 1921
De Mille Saturday Night 1922
Rex Ingram Scaramouche 1923
Maurice Tourneur The Isle of Lost Ships 1923
John S. Robertson The Enchanted Cottage 1924
Charles Chaplin The Gold Rush 1925
E. A. Dupont Variety 1925
Josef von Sternberg The Last Command 1928
Mervyn LeRoy I am a Fugitive… 1932

i don't think he was joking necessarily, but it's kind of perplexing

HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:27 (fourteen years ago)

John S. Robertson Sentimental Tommy 1921 <-- i totally want to see this

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:34 (fourteen years ago)

he loved j m barrie
more than eisenstein

HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:35 (fourteen years ago)

or murnau

HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:35 (fourteen years ago)

No, I didn't take it a joke, just weird. I was trying to think of who Hitchcock might have liked through the '60s and '70s, and past maybe Kubrick, or something like The Manchurian Candidate, I'm stuck. Hitchcock was just so odd, I don't have a clue. He might have liked Gidget movies.

clemenza, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:35 (fourteen years ago)

i don't think masculin-feminin was filmed in sweden was it? some of it definitely wasn't

The "movie within the movie" that the kids go and see was shot in Sweden. Furthermore, this little movie was conceived as a parody/homage to Bergman and IIRC, Through A Glass Darkly.

Adding to the intrigue, back in the Cahiers days, Godard was a big Bergman booster, writing a festival report from Cannes declaring something along the lines of "Bergman now world's best".

Status Update...in my Seether? (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:37 (fourteen years ago)

He might have liked Gidget movies.

only when she wiped out

the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:38 (fourteen years ago)

barrie is weirder than eisenstein, this doesn't surprise me at all!

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:40 (fourteen years ago)

I was trying to think of who Hitchcock might have liked through the '60s and '70s, and past maybe Kubrick, or something like The Manchurian Candidate, I'm stuck. Hitchcock was just so odd, I don't have a clue. He might have liked Gidget movies.

In the expanded Hitchcock/Truffaut, Truffaut describes a late 70s meeting wherein Hitch went on about Airport '77, mainly because he thought the concept was interesting and suspenseful.

Status Update...in my Seether? (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:41 (fourteen years ago)

"And Karen Black--now that girl can act..." That's great--and why I couldn't begin to guess with him.

clemenza, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:43 (fourteen years ago)

why would he like kubrick? (ans = he wouldn't, he would be baffled and bored)

i suspect his lists are basically "stuff i could really hitchcock up"

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:45 (fourteen years ago)

also: SFX in manchurian candidate FAR TOO WELL CARRIED OFF for hitch's tastes

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:46 (fourteen years ago)

the DeMille love is not surprising... I think it was Dave Kehr who pointed out recently that the Psycho shower rings popping is 'swiped' from a C.B.dM. silent.

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:47 (fourteen years ago)

"STORY: People and ships trapped in seaweed infested section of the southern Atlantic Ocean known as the Sargasso Sea"

This is wikipedia's attempt at describing The Isle of Lost Ships. That's NOT A STORY (it's not even a sentence). I'm pretty sure I've actually seen it, albeit round the time Hitch made that list. (I've def seen a b/w thriller about the Sargasso Sea...)

(Does the Sargasso Sea still exist, no one ever mentions it any more?)

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:53 (fourteen years ago)

iirc correctly the scavengers who live in the (film version of) the sargasso sea walk around on stilts with big wooden "feet"

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:55 (fourteen years ago)

I think both Hitchcock and Kubrick have been charged with being cold technocrats, so I can see an affinity there. Don't think he'd be baffled or bored by most of the films pre-2001; after that, probably.

clemenza, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:55 (fourteen years ago)

and in both cases, a dopey accusation

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:00 (fourteen years ago)

maaaaaybe pre-lolita

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:03 (fourteen years ago)

on 'the killing' he'd be all like 'someone's put the reels in the wrong order' imo

reckon he'd allow 'the shining'

HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:05 (fourteen years ago)

(kubrick's 'rebecca')

HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:05 (fourteen years ago)

I think the only way to settle this is we dig up the corpse and hope that it's ready to talk.

clemenza, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:08 (fourteen years ago)

he'd hate jack nicholson

haha in kubrick's rebecca there's be zero chemistry pos or neg between mrs danvers and the second mrs de winter, and this would be "the point"

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:10 (fourteen years ago)

and manderley would not catch fire, it would be consumed by a glacier

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:12 (fourteen years ago)

Olivier would be shot in isolation in a Manderley as gauche as Burton's Gotham City.

a 'catch-all', almost humorous, 'Jeez' quality (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:12 (fourteen years ago)

now want to see this even more than "sentimental tommy" <-- which kubrick should also have remade

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:13 (fourteen years ago)

~opinions~

am/sand (Lamp), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:14 (fourteen years ago)

I remeber seeing that Welles called Kubrick "a giant" (I think this was between Lolita and Strangelove)

incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:25 (fourteen years ago)

"it's a bright dirty world"

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:29 (fourteen years ago)

ffs "it's a bright guilty world", too too long since i saw it

mark s, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 17:31 (fourteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/6JDWx.jpg

―  (gr8080), Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:17 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark

i was on an ondemand menu during a promo for Red State where Kevin Smith was all "buy it, rent it, watch it with your friends, it's gonna be great!" and then did that exact thumbs up pose and i'm like jesus is that what this 'snarky cynical 90s guy' thinks is his thing now? or is he trying to do a 'buddy christ' reference?

lil dawg (some dude), Thursday, 1 September 2011 11:41 (fourteen years ago)

seeing the red state trailer made me realize how otm DGG is - because it made me go 'whoa, that almost looks like a real movie' followed by 'look at this, this is all it takes for people to feel like he deserves a gold star'

it is actually a pretty good trailer, though im not gonna see the movie or anything

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i_qxQztHRI (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 1 September 2011 11:53 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.