However a search yielded nothing and I couldn't find anything by looking in the appropriate categories either.
An ex has proposed an-on-the-sly sex-only arrangement to me.
Tell me of your own experiences in this arena.
― A Girl Named Sam (thatgirl), Saturday, 29 November 2003 09:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil, Saturday, 29 November 2003 09:32 (twenty-one years ago)
Be careful.
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 29 November 2003 09:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 29 November 2003 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)
I think it's more keeping it on the sly to keep it from our large circle of friends. He's not proposing any sort of reunion (nor would I want that) and I suppose wouldn't others to perceive that.
― A Girl Named Sam (thatgirl), Saturday, 29 November 2003 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Saturday, 29 November 2003 09:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Saturday, 29 November 2003 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil, Saturday, 29 November 2003 10:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil, Saturday, 29 November 2003 10:16 (twenty-one years ago)
It was never worth it, either. The "sex-only arrangement" is a Utopian ideal.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 29 November 2003 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Saturday, 29 November 2003 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Saturday, 29 November 2003 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Saturday, 29 November 2003 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)
But whatever the specific circumstances are, it's always risky bidness.
― spittle (spittle), Saturday, 29 November 2003 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Saturday, 29 November 2003 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)
You're worth more than a few quick fumbles with your ex, IMHO.
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Saturday, 29 November 2003 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Saturday, 29 November 2003 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― hellbaby (hellbaby), Saturday, 29 November 2003 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― katharine (katharine), Saturday, 29 November 2003 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Saturday, 29 November 2003 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 29 November 2003 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 30 November 2003 00:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 30 November 2003 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dada, Sunday, 30 November 2003 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― justin s., Sunday, 30 November 2003 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Well it was really hot. . .hmm.
We've been broken up about 18 mths. It wasn't pretty then and it took me awhile to get over him. But I am and have been for quite awhile (I'm very serious here, no bullshit.) I was surprised and flattered when he told how much he still thinks about me etc. etc.
Bottom line is I do *not* want a realtionship with this person. We were not good as a couple. I really can't think of anything that would make me want to get back with him. However in the past few months we've become friends again and I enjoy his company on that level.
As far as no-strings sex. . .I'm done with one-night stands and casual sex. I don't have time for a relationship right now. I figure it might be better to revisit old territory than to blaze new ones.
So anyway, it was pretty good. There was almost no kissing. When I was finished, I dressed and left. That's it. If we hook up again, cool. But I really don't expect to be thinking of him beyond that.
If I even start to feel inklings of that. . .well I'll shoot myself in the foot to keep me restrained to the house and then beat myself daily. I don't think even *I'm* that stupid.
― A Girl Named Sam (thatgirl), Sunday, 30 November 2003 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Sunday, 30 November 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Girl Named Sam (thatgirl), Sunday, 30 November 2003 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― somebody, Sunday, 30 November 2003 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)
I suppose I understand that no-strings sex is a potentially fun thing to do, but taking it to such a level of matter-of-factness would turn me off completely.
― Markelby (Mark C), Sunday, 30 November 2003 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)
probably pretty good, if it was hot again.
i'd have said go for it, but you already did, so i'll say "woo! sounds like fun!"
― colette (a2lette), Monday, 1 December 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
most of the english guys i've talked about this with have been unenthusiastic about it.
the subject came up when i broke up with a guy and made plans for 'break up sex' and he STOOD ME UP.
american guy friends thought this guy was an idiot and couldn't understand it. english guy friends thought this made sense.
i don't understand this. where i come from, if a girl's offering, a guy is accepting...
― colette (a2lette), Monday, 1 December 2003 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 1 December 2003 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)
(nb this is entirely untrue)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 1 December 2003 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spinktor the Unmerciful (mawill5), Monday, 1 December 2003 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)