Given the opportunity, Would You "Sell Out"?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well, define "Sell Out" however you like, as this is not a thread about qualifying what "selling out" means.

Basically, this question comes about from HSA's long-standing bitching about artists who sell their work to Saatchi. Yet, I bet that given the opportunity, he would, too. Why? Because in similar cases where similarly selling-out-suggestions have been made to me (f'rexample, penning choons for a chartpop girl group) he has ENTHUSIASTICALLY ENCOURAGED ME to "go for it".

So imagine those of you who are artists (or musicians, or writers or hacks or whatever) finally offered a shedload of cash, or even just enough cash by an Evil Entity (Saatchi, a Major Label, ::insert yer bugbear here::) - would you do it?

Would the amount of money make a difference, i.e. would there be an amount you couldn't refuse?

Would there be mitigating factors? i.e. the phantom of "artistic control" or whatever? The idea that you could "change the system from within"?

What would it take to make you "sell out"?

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

(I have a funny feeling I've asked this question before, but I searched and could not find it.)

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, but i dont really believe in the concept of 'selling out', unless it refers to some kind of moral code, or line that you wont cross. in this case, probably no, but i suspect that i would cross those lines too, if the terms were right

charltonlido (gareth), Friday, 5 December 2003 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, that's not good enough. What are the lines that you wouldn't cross? And what would the terms be to make you cross them? I want examples, dammit!

(And not because I'm secretly Satan and trying to buy all your souls, really, I promise.)

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Almost certainly. However: I haven't called back the agency who asked me if I wanted to appear in a BT ad. Should I?

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I have frendz who write for the Torygraph, and despite my politics I'm sure I would if they let me: there's nothing noble about being poor and mostly unpublished. Also, nowhere is clean in this respect: certainly in arts journalism the papers are all much of a muchness. I've written for left wing mags who've treated me badly and paid me nothing -- it's an old sob story, but it still holds.

That said this is very hypothetical, since I've never been asked to change my stuff much. That would make a difference, I think -- and I'd have issues writing for the Times more than the Telegraph. But ultimately to pay the rent you have to sell out -- there's no way you could survice on what leftish publications pay.

N-Ri-K (Enrique), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not sure really. I don't think I've got much sale-able. In terms of moral codes, I think growing up fairly comfortably means I don't value money as much as I maybe should, so I doubt I'd betray anyone for cash or try to swindle them or anything like that.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Go for it Mark!

It would all depend on the company/entity. For example, if it were Wal-Mart I could not do it because of their treatment of employees, use of sweatshops, union-busting, etc...

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)

This is what often really winds me up about HSA's "anti-elitist" (read: anti-Saatchi) stance. Having the monetary luxury to be able to turn down or not seek out elitist collector money is the luxury of someone who has an independant income. (Which, basically, I think you already have to have in order to persue fine art, but whatever...)

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I've still never written for the Torygraph (and won't pitch to them 'til they nuke Barbara Spamiel) but will give them fair dos for being the only one of the broadsheets to recognise the NUJ.

suzy (suzy), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder sometimes if the very idea of having "Ethics" of this kind is a kind of luxury in itself.

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I feel -- more justifiably! -- like Tico -- I don't have much to sell. As it is I work hard for shit-all because I work for a quite good philanthropic blah company. I'm getting tireder and tireder of that. My dream job = reviewing films for Heat.

I'm biased but the Torygraph's film section is well on point. Fuck the rest of it obviously.

En-Ri-K (Enrique), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i technically feel like i'm selling out in my current job, since i'm helping to propragate something that i hate(suburban sprawl, etc), however this job pays well enough so that i'll eventually be able to move to a better place and get a better job, one that i more identify with.

Kingfish Beestick (Kingfish), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Would anyone here work in the arms or oil industries if it meant loads of cash?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

we were offered this record by this band (i dont remember their name) and it was pretty decent, sort of kitschy squelchy toytowny pop stuff, but we couldnt decide if we wanted to do it or not it was cute and fun, but a bit cold. the thing that decided me in the end was that they had a song that was an a to z of stuff they thought was cool, and g was golden grahams and golden grahams are nestle and im not having anything to do with anything that says anything nestle have ever done is good in any way, shape or form, at fucking all, ever. if something like that came up with someone we already work with (never has: quite the opposite, guy mknights inspired rants about that twat from the vines and his mcdonalds promotion being a case in point) i dunno whatd happen...

emsk, Friday, 5 December 2003 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Loads of Nestle's sweets are great - there'd be no need to boycott them if that wasn't the case, they'd just go bust.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Nestle bought out After Eights and I didn't realise until after I'd already bought three boxes of them. :-(

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

the only one of the broadsheets to recognise the NUJ.

this sounds familiar.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Also... which would be harder for you/more preferable?

Selling out aesthetically or selling out ethically?

From this thread, I'm guessing that the majority of the major issues would be with the latter.

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the latter because I find the idea of selling out aesthetically to be a bit odd - it's hard to think of an aesthetic choice which couldn't be right under some circumstance or other.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I certainly can. Or rather where the circumstance is wrong.

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Would anyone here work in the arms or oil industries if it meant loads of cash?

Are you offering? I can get you my resume before the end of the day.

Fuck ethics, Papa's got bills (Dan Perry), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I've been published by HarperCollins, prop. Rupert Murdoch, so I've already sold out ethically. I'd prefer that not to have been the case, but unless you're wildly successful I simply don't think a writer can pick and choose these things very easily. As for aesthetically, yes I do a lot of hack work purely for the money, and I also do other work because I want to do it, and I'm quite happy being able to compartmentalise things in this way.

Jonathan Z., Friday, 5 December 2003 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Artistically speaking, if I had that type of voice that people wanted for commercials, I would be there in a HEARTBEAT.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Apparently Spencer and I have that voice, so why aren't we rich and famous?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I sold out recently - needs must etc. - i didn't make that much tho, which in a twisted way kinda balances things out

stevem (blueski), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Alright, I would like to ask other opinions rather than just bitch about HSA. Is the scenario that I posited in the question hypocritical?

I.E. that HSA says he would never ever ever sell any work to Saatchi because Saatchi is tainted with Toryism and therefore evil. Yet, when I was asked to pitch to be a songwriter for a Chartpop Girlgroup (and I object to Major Labels coz they're evil and I object to Girlgroups coz they perpetuate sexist stereotypes, etc. etc. etc.) HSA's only comment was "WHEN DO I BOOK THE HOLIDAY IN THE SOUTH OF FRANCE?!?!?" completely ignoring the fact that I might have an ethical *AND* aesthetical problem with doing so.

In the end, it came to nothing, so it doesn't matter anyway. But it did give me pause to stop and think about it. I decided that the benefits of the money (if it had happenned) and the contacts it would bring me would be worth selling out. (Even though I would refuse to do it under "my name" so no one would find out it was me.)

So was HSA being hypocritical?

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Not really. It's a perspective thing more than anything else; recognizing where your personal lines lie is not the same thing as understanding where someone else's are.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 5 December 2003 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

response to thread question:

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAA
HEE HEE HEE

I am posting this from a computer owned by Lockheed Martin and I am wearing a shirt and tie

HAHAHAHAHAHAAA

TOMBOT, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder about emsk, refusing the band because of one mention of a nestle's product.

Could have just asked the band... or is that like assuming they must be thatcherite traitors for even thinking of mentioning golden grahams?

ow ow ow stop throwing stones in a john cleese voice.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan OTM -- it's so personal. I mean Saatchi stands for x y and z -- but all buyers are rich and they don't make their money by being nice guys.
So if it was: write for Phil Collins or something, then that might be similar.

Nu-En-Ri-K (Enrique), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I have made and left a job primarily due to ethical reasons, but it was more about treatment of unpaid workers and the companies attitude towards said workers than any global thang.

Perhaps I work in the public sector to try to avoid such problems. I have a pretty loose code of ethics. But I think there is some truth you ethics being something you can only have if you can afford to have them. Sometimes these ethical choices are less about facts than our perception of a world order we have believed in for quite some time.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I sold out years ago when I stopped auditioning for theatre and started working at an evil empire. It's cool, the whole "film star" thing was never going to happen for me anyway. That's just me personally though, I am all about the instant gratification.

Allyzay, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I worked in the public sector and felt compromised, partly because I was being overpaid. It's quite a personal thing: now I feel more exploited I feel less compromised.

Nu-Enrique (Enrique), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

he said "overpaid!"

TOMBOT, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Enrique and Suzy OTM... I hate the rest of the paper, and its sister paper Daily Mail even more, but I freelanced for the Evening Standard for a couple of years on a pretty regular basis, writing music features and working on the Going Out pages. In my 'defence' i can say that I managed to write about acts whose backgrounds and cultures were pretty much the antithesis of the paper's political outlook - features on Roots Manuva, on garage and UK hip-hop in general, a large piece on the injustice of banning live music from Notting Hill Carnival a couple of years ago - and also managed to get the first UK interviews with White Stripes (same week as NME ran their first interview with em) and Alicia Keys, and am proud of the stuff I did there.

That said, I hope I'd never chide anyone for 'selling out', as people's morals are their own business, and being a freelancer who has to beg plead and threaten to get paid every day I understand the demands of rent and 'real life' can juxtapose idealism pretty fucking harshly sometimes.

Confidential to John Darnielle - got the new Mountain Goats CD today and it is brilliant, BRILLIANT!!

stevie (stevie), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

never being asked to sell out, but still bragging about not selling out, c/d?

I think I sold out. I'm not sure, cuz I'm still broke, but, uh, I work for the man.

Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)

When I was a young and naive teenager, I used to go on at length about how I would rather be exploited myself than ever exploit anyone else. But by being exploited, you're contributing to the entire exploitary system, and still being compromised.

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean The Man.

Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

x-x-x-post...

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

mark g > well, we were dithering over whether or not to do it. chris wasnt that into the music but thought it was ok, i liked it more than she did but wasnt like blown away by it or anything. i certainly couldve enjoyed working on it but it wouldnt have taken over my brain and made me as obsessed as i usually tend to get with whatever im working on, taking over my life and invading my head and stuff. i cant imagine obsessively playing it at everyone who came within a 50metre radius, which i do kind of tend to do. and, yknow, it wasnt like we *needed* the work.

in the end the golden grahams thing was what tipped the balance for me: took the decision out of the aesthetic realm and into the ethical one. chris laughed at me (not in a nasty way, in a kind of wtf way) when i said it, and said she didnt think that would really help much to bring nestle down, so i said maybe not, but i dont have to join in with them, do i?

we probably could have asked them to change it (i think it was more a sort of one man/woman art project with guests than an actual band) but who am i to fuck with their creation?

oh, ive remembered the name. it was zap the world.

emsk, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

he said "overpaid!"

And I meant it. I was doing very little work, and felt guilty. That said, there was no clear sense of what I was supposed to be doing.

N-Ri-K (Enrique), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

never being asked to sell out, but still bragging about not selling out, c/d?

I'm pretty sure that is, like, everyone who says "I haven't sold out!"

Allyzay, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I once sold out of cookies, when I was a Girl Guide, does that count.

Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

"working for the man" is such a tired, stupid phrase. Frankly there are two options on this planet: you are either "working for the man" in some capacity or you are unemployed. Ultimately "The Man" is whoever's face is printed on your currency of choice and you're never going to get away from that.

From a dream I had not that long ago:

random passerby: "Conan, why are you in this hectare, instead of that hectare?"

Conan: "This hectare has more gold."

NB my dreams are awesome, except the one I had last night about getting in another drunken shouting match with my mom at a family gathering. But then it was cool because I was on the phone with my girlfriend for some reason and she handed the phone off to her dad without warning and he started quoting Indiana Jones movies to me (except I do not think that there is any point in the Indy movies where he sings the phrase "I wish that I had been at Bomb Run, instead of World War Two")

TOMBOT, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, but if you have a genuine concern, it would be wiser to raise it than refuse to let the band 'compromise their artistic integrity' just that small amount on some point they prob hadnt even considered.

Did you tell them it was the GG's that did it?

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha can you tell that we had a meeting this morning where my team was told to be "More productive?"

TOMBOT, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

There is also getting paid by the man and not actually working, as the existence of ILX daily proves.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I just packed in a perfectly good and well-paid job on a point of principle. I like to think this makes me the kind of person who wouldn't sell out for money(I was asked to reconsider and stay on after I resigned, and refused) , but ask me again in a couple of months when I've been eating beans on toast and watching bob-stop daytime TV and my brain has rotted to mush.

It was a personal principle not an ethical principle, btw. Though I imagine my ex-employers may have had some slightly unethical background goings-on, I wouldn't care to speculate.

ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)

What scared me was the ease and speed with which my conscience made the decision that "Woo, yeah, selling out, well, I suppose it's OK!" and feeling all guilty and compromised, and then in the end it didn't happen anyway, so I had to experience all the guilt and wotnot of selling out, BUT I DIDN'T GET THE GODDAMN MONEY, DAMMIT!!!

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)

bob-stop = non-stop = proof that two days off work and my brain has already turned to mush.

ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, Tom, but how many of us wasting all day on ILX actually work for worthy bodies, like, oh, say, the NHS or wotnot?

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

This is what I mean Tico -- I was surfing all day. Now my alibi is working insane overtime (=time in lieu on ILX).

xxxxpost

N-Ri-K (Enrique), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah but at least he wasn't imposing his viewpoint on you.

Although he was willing to accept the rewards by proxy, hmm.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I get paid every week!

$$$$$$$$$$$

TOMBOT, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

And i woz at the nhs.

N-Ri-K (Enrique), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, on the remote off-chance that Saatchi ever comes knocking, I will accept the check for him and tell HSA IT'S FOR THAT HOLIDAY IN THE SOUTH OF FRANCE THAT YOU KEEP TRYING TO GET MY SELL-OUT TO PAY FOR, SUCKAH!!!

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"Sell out each other!!" holiday y'self fitter..
"Sell out each other!!" holiday y'self fitter..

mark e smith grout (mark grout), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

There is also working for the Man and not getting paid.

ouchy.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

In the next couple of months I have to decide if I'm going to apply for a job at C1ear Chann31 or another one of the huge radio groups.

teeny (teeny), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

which I guess I will unless the noncommercial radio job I have my eye on is really great, which is doubtful. I'm seriously feeling awful about this.

teeny (teeny), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd work in the oil industry but not the arms industry. Right now, having not got the job I applied for yesterday because "I'd get bored", I feel I'd happily spin doctor for George W Bush if it meant a comfortable salary. I would then of course use my position to kill him slowly with heavy metal poisons hidden in his daily rusk.

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)

i still cling dear to the pipe dream that Skadden Arps or Cravath will call me and say "come on board." so yes.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll have the luxury of a little extra time to decide if I need it because mr teeny will be pulling down some decent money at a law firm defending polluters and cigarette companies and such. :(

teeny (teeny), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

mark g > yeah, i think we probably did mention it. but like i said, we might not have done it anyway, even if g had been something ultra lefty. i cant imagine that if g had stood for guevara id suddenly have been champing at the bit to work on the record... i assume they found someone else to do it, who hopefully had more passion than we did for it. weve worked on stuff with the same people since, cause they have some fucking awesome bands.

emsk, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Ohh, Mark - that sucks. The only good answer to 'you'll get bored' is 'not as bored as I'd be sitting at home and scouring the fucking job listings, I won't.'

Stevie, we need you over on the Bored Freelancer thread.

Every April Fools' Day I fancy ringing ES Magazine and asking if they want a feature on how hard it is to find good help these days (by Naomi Campbell).

suzy (suzy), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

(Ha ha, Ems, you "I'm never going to post, ever!" you are so hooked now, aren't you?)

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)

(I'm also so incredibly glad I have the chance to sell out. I really like getting paid.)

teeny (teeny), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)

she handed the phone off to her dad without warning and he started quoting Indiana Jones movies to me (except I do not think that there is any point in the Indy movies where he sings the phrase "I wish that I had been at Bomb Run, instead of World War Two")

It's like you've known my dad for years, I swear.

I am wanting to take back all of my posts because my life has just been severely fucked up the ass all of a sudden because of my selling out four or five years ago. Holy shit. I'm at a crossroads now to deciding between selling out again or foolhardly refusing to be part of the Man's infrastructure or whatever we're talking about. I feel guilted into selling out and also $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ + near free apt.

Allyzay, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

kate > shit. yes. oh fuck. fridays! fridays will KIIIILL me! since 1.30 ive been telling myself ill get off this thing and go do something productive, but i am suckered. (oh, the catboy called, btw! he was just out of town...)

mark g > just thought, and if wed loved the record and desperately wanted to work on it, wed (or id, anyway, chris could probably have coped) have gone to them and BEGGED them to remove the offending line...

emsk, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha, one of us, one of us, one of us, hooray for Catboy, I am pleased. Remember the lesson of the monkey-molecules!

THAT Kate (kate), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

emsk> That's what I kind of guessed, it wasn't the clincher. Just seemed odd.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I work for @mer1c@n xpress publ1sh1ng. I had the chance to be a staff writer at a music web site that was starting up a few years ago. I considered it. And then decided not to. The site tanked less than three months into its venture. Plus, I like having health insurance and a 401k. I need to feed myself and pay rent and bills and whatnot. As a single woman living alone in NYC, this is a challenge.

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 5 December 2003 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)

i LOVE the lesson of the monkey molecules! even by talking about it you can figure out who is a monkey and who is a cube/sphere/equally dullard geometrical shape! i told london underground natasha about it and she loved it (therefore is a monkey) and she told her coworkers about it and they thought she was weird (therefore are cubes/spheres/equally etc etc...)!

emsk, Friday, 5 December 2003 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

fifteen years pass...

Does the concept of 'selling out' even exist any more?
Growing up in the 90s it felt like my friendship group was obsessed with the idea of bands/artists selling out. To paraphrase a recent article I read the other day which I no longer have a link to: 'You didn't care about what such-and-such celebrity wore to the Grammys. You didn't WATCH the Grammys. Hell, you threw your TV away to get rid of that corporate claptrap'.
In certain versions of history, Kurt Cobain was literally prepared to die on the hill of not selling out.
It seems like a quaint concern now. perhaps a privileged conceit. something old, white, Generation X-ers got needlessly het up about - something closely tied to rockism no doubt.
But is it time to re-embrace the no-sell-out culture once more? Is it possible that the free-wheeling spirit of enterprise in pop culture in some way responsible for a wider acceptance of libertarian thinking, and in turn the political climate of the day - see Kanye's bizarre-but-maybe-not-so-bizarre love-in with Donald Trump from last year?

Selling out - yay or nay?

https://thehardtimes.net/blog/we-tried-to-list-the-pros-and-cons-of-selling-out-but-can-only-think-of-pros/

frame casual (dog latin), Thursday, 1 August 2019 14:04 (six years ago)

wonder if the stigma's gone away in part because we have a better idea of how little these musicians actually make

I remember there being a big backlash to a Modest Mouse song being used in a VW commercial to which Isaac Brock responded "I literally needed to do it to pay the rent" which shocked me at the time

frogbs, Thursday, 1 August 2019 14:07 (six years ago)

i think the pomposity of whatever you were gatekeeping by not selling out is well punctured by now in most cases tbh

phil neville jacket (darraghmac), Thursday, 1 August 2019 14:22 (six years ago)

I'm wondering if 'selling out' was strictly a thing in rock music, or if it also applied to other music.
While rap in the 90s often got accused of being materialistic, there was still an elemental strain of street-level grit. Today, even if trap / mumble-rap seems inaccessible to some ears, and drill rappers present themselves as mean and thuggish as ever, an artist like Future won't shy-away from opening a track by announcing that he's 'here to make some hits'. Or am I drawing too much of a line?

frame casual (dog latin), Thursday, 1 August 2019 14:30 (six years ago)

Oops, I was in the middle of editing that post before posting. I meant to say:

I'm wondering if 'selling out' was strictly a thing in rock, or if it also applied to other music.

I'm thinking out loud slightly here, and there are probably a whole load of exceptions but.. I guess while rap in the 90s often got accused of being materialistic, there was still an elemental strain of street-level grit. Today, even if trap / mumble-rap seems inaccessible to some ears, and drill rappers present themselves as mean and thuggish as ever, an artist like Future won't shy-away from opening a track by announcing that he's 'here to make some hits'. There's no shame in wanting to achieve super-stardom and flaunting it.

frame casual (dog latin), Thursday, 1 August 2019 14:30 (six years ago)

There was a certain amount of pomposity and privilege around it, sure. But the idea of leveraging your fans for gain still doesn't sit well with being an artist, it makes you complicit in whatever the company does, and art can be spoiled by being overused in a shitty context. Like I loved La Ritournelle but when it became the L'oreal jingle it ruined it. Think there is a genuine socialist moment building now and this is not something which can be ignored forever.

mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Thursday, 1 August 2019 14:37 (six years ago)

Is quitting social media, or possibly even getting rid of your smartphone, the modern example of subversive not-selling-out? It feels less like a statement of cool, and more a genuine concern about one's privacy.

frame casual (dog latin), Thursday, 1 August 2019 14:47 (six years ago)

it's simply not fair, in the streaming era, to hold artists to the same standard. the contract was changed, i.e. the fans love the music and support it by buying it. you can't completely change the behavior on one side and still expect the other to still abide by the social contract.

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 1 August 2019 14:54 (six years ago)

but does the fact it's out there - like in the message of a lot of the music, the idea that the artist is PROUDLY selling out - change anything?

frame casual (dog latin), Thursday, 1 August 2019 15:02 (six years ago)

Is it possible that the free-wheeling spirit of enterprise in pop culture in some way responsible for a wider acceptance of libertarian thinking, and in turn the political climate of the day

I think this is definitely true. culture fully capitulated to capitalism.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 August 2019 15:06 (six years ago)

I'm wondering if 'selling out' was strictly a thing in rock music, or if it also applied to other music.

do you need me to post late 80s/early 90s rap songs dissing sell outs cuz uh there are a lot

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 August 2019 15:07 (six years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JO8BkvmNauw

Did Ice Cube sell out?/you say "hell no"

NARRATOR: Ice Cube sold out a couple of years later

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 August 2019 15:08 (six years ago)

of course within rap the racial politics were at the forefront - selling out meant crossing over to a white audience, ie compromising/changing your product to target a white audience rather than a black one. Still at the root it's the same dynamic, the crime is the betrayal of the community and the culture that the music originated from.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 1 August 2019 15:09 (six years ago)

culture fully capitulated to capitalism

Not in full, but pockets of resistance are even less noticeable than they used to be. Any semblance of antagonism towards the prevailing model gets lost in the unending maelstrom.

pomenitul, Thursday, 1 August 2019 15:12 (six years ago)

Maybe the rulebook of selling-out/not selling-out is quite different now, and more wrapped-up in the individual rather than heavenly notions of the pop culture artist.
Social justice, civic-mindedness, veganism, environmentalism all seem high on (especially) youth agendas. As above, coming off social media seems like a pretty stoic act of rebellion. But that's only partly reflected in pop culture.
It's less about not being seen to be successful, rather achieving success while being seen to not be having a negative impact on the world

frame casual (dog latin), Thursday, 1 August 2019 15:22 (six years ago)

I was going to say that I think people might be asking less of musicians and more of politicians in this regard, or at least I would want to think so?

All along there is the sound of feedback (Sund4r), Thursday, 1 August 2019 20:27 (six years ago)

you'd like to think so, wouldn't you... :-(

frame casual (dog latin), Friday, 2 August 2019 08:15 (six years ago)

and yet..

Mark G, Friday, 2 August 2019 08:46 (six years ago)

to me the problem with the idea of "selling out" is that it implicitly frames the issues with capitalism as being a matter of individual moral choice, sort of the equivalent to treating climate change as being first and foremost a matter of what sort of light bulbs you use. this focus on individual morality as opposed to collective morality hasn't, imo, aged well; also, the puritanism present in such a stance doesn't hold up next to the growth of luxury communism, which holds, like a lot of old hip-hop music, that being "real" isn't something that exists in opposition to living the good life.

Abigail, Wife of Preserved Fish (rushomancy), Friday, 2 August 2019 08:47 (six years ago)

Selling out:

1) Compromising your artistic production to incorporate a direction to which you are not naturally inclined towards

Or

2) Rendering your audience as a deliverable to which you market external product bases towards.

So, John Lydon didn't sell out by doing butter ads, he wasn't implying his audience to switch to Country Life.

Whereas those that sell headphones and/or expensive clothing/makeup/cars could be construed as such, but.

Thesedays, it's not "are they selling out" as much as "to what extent are they selling, and is it way beyond what seems to be appropriate.

Any other subjects I can talk gibberish about?

Mark G, Friday, 2 August 2019 09:51 (six years ago)

i've dumped social media, and i don't think dumping social media makes one "cool", because "coolness" itself is a social construct. mostly i just feel isolated and out of touch, which for me is healthy when i consider the things i'm isolated from and out of touch with. a band that doesn't do social media isn't going to play gigs at la cave or get written up in crawdaddy - there's no underground to oppose the toxic monoculture, just millions of cranky discontents waiting for something to happen.

Abigail, Wife of Preserved Fish (rushomancy), Friday, 2 August 2019 14:15 (six years ago)

Did Ice Cube sell out?/you say "hell no"

NARRATOR: Ice Cube sold out a couple of years later

― Οὖτις, Thursday, August 1, 2019 10:08 AM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

of course within rap the racial politics were at the forefront - selling out meant crossing over to a white audience, ie compromising/changing your product to target a white audience rather than a black one. Still at the root it's the same dynamic, the crime is the betrayal of the community and the culture that the music originated from.

― Οὖτις, Thursday, August 1, 2019 10:09 AM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

this is an extremely blinkered and slanted reading of this "betrayal" if that even exists....hip hop always celebrated wealth and money, for reasons that should be incredibly obvious.

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 2 August 2019 14:48 (six years ago)

Did it ALWAYS though? Run DMC, Public Enemy, Sugarhill, A Tribe Called Quest, Cypress Hill, The Last Poets, Outkast, Nas - I mean, yes, money has been a subject that rappers have often rapped about, but often it was either about struggling to make money, or celebrating the fact you had money, but often now it's 'I'm making this music so that people buy it and I will make money'...? I'm clutching around here trying to express what I mean but I'm doing it badly.

frame casual (dog latin), Friday, 2 August 2019 15:18 (six years ago)

you're right there's a lot there, but i think a lot of "selling out" talk is ppl projecting punk and indie rock values on to other forms of music and other cultures

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 2 August 2019 15:22 (six years ago)

I know I was being a bit flippant ums, initial post is essentially a text version of https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimages5.fanpop.com%2Fimage%2Fuser_images%2F3064000%2F6mm-3064677_469_650.jpg&f=1

if we want to get into this seriously, my point was that there's nuances to what "selling out" meant in the context of the black hip hop community of the late 80s/early 90s. It wasn't so much the pursuit of money/success/fame that was suspect, but the pandering to a white audience to get there that was more suspect. In the indie rock world the different but kinda analogous situation was the "betrayal" of the indie community to cross over to major label rock. Both are essentially *aesthetic* betrayals, changing sound/presentation to appeal to an audience that is viewed as less legitimate. I don't think you really hear much of either argument either in rap or rock these days, just cuz everybody's accepted that musicians are struggling micro-capitalists.

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 August 2019 15:25 (six years ago)

to go back to the specific Ice Cube example, you could say he sold out because hip hop culture as a whole sold out. As soon as gangster rap really crossed over to white audiences (The Chronic/Doggystyle/Ready to Die etc.) and it was clear the rap audience as a whole were moving on from Cube's kind of confrontational steez to a much broader pop audience, he just tried to go with it. He also just became more interested in being a movie star, which I'm sure had something to do with his records getting more and more half-assed over time. But man that Westside Connection record was a real "ok Cube's just on some lame shit now" moment.

Οὖτις, Friday, 2 August 2019 15:29 (six years ago)

that Ice Cube meme LOOOOOL

frame casual (dog latin), Friday, 2 August 2019 15:44 (six years ago)

I'm from the UK so maybe my perspective is different from what's actually happening, but I find it's interesting how swiftly formerly 'underground' rap acts with a few mixtapes can suddenly establish themselves as mainstream artists - Migos, Cardi B, Young Thug, all going from being cult acts to having number one hits or working with commercial pop artists like Katy Perry or Camila Cabello. And this transition seems effortless - one minute they're double-hard lean-drinking mother-effers, next they're on a youth TV charity appeal. No one ever questions it or moans about it either, even if quite clearly this transition has been organised by committee.

frame casual (dog latin), Friday, 2 August 2019 15:52 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.