Angels in America, the HBO Movie

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Surprisingly good. Saw a review that suggested that it lost a lot from the plays - but as I haven't ever seen/read the plays, I didn't really have to deal with that.

Weakest link is Pacino's constant hamming it up. Goddamit, man, can you fucking stop with that shit? Ever since his voice went gravelly it's been like he's been in Godfather III-mode and no one remembered to switch him off. Don't get me wrong, when he hits, he hits hard, but it's very hard to forget that it's not only Al Pacino there, but it's Al Pacino acting. And I just feel that this effortless standard huffing and puffing essentially eviscerates a lot of the greatness of Kushner's dialogue for Cohn. It's a shame, really it is.

Most everything else was exceptional, though. I really liked the actors who played several characters - that was nice for a reason I can't quite fathom. Jeffrey Wright, as per usual, knocks his roles out of the park with what seems like the slightest of effect or effort. How he isn't the biggest thing since sliced bread is beyond me, but my indie pretentions aren't terribly disappointed, since it means that his general hit-miss ratio is very high. Mike Nichols did a very good job putting the whole thing together, and of course more praise to Kushner for not only writing the original plays, but making them cohere damn well in the film as the screenwriter.

Other memorably great scenes:
Cocteau references
Hallucination/dream meeting
Emma Thompson suddenly launching into Hebrew
Meryl Streep telling a psychotic to get it together
The confrontational scenes crosscutting into each other - I nearly wept
Michael Gambon and Simon Callow as the grebtest ghosts yet
James Cromwell (but not Pacino in that scene, although the dialogue is great).

I patiently await Perestroika.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 8 December 2003 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)

This is one of those things I probably SHOULD have watched, but chose not to, thanks to a strange facination with my own mortality.

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 8 December 2003 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Well believe me, should you change your mind, you will have more than ample opportunity to see it. I think HBO's gonna repeat the shit out of this one.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 8 December 2003 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I really want to see this! don't believe you about pacino though!

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 8 December 2003 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw the play years ago and liked it a lot. It was very theatrical, which makes me wonder whether it would be any good transferred to screen.

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 8 December 2003 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

So I'm the only one who saw this?

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 8 December 2003 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw it. On the one hand I thought it was really let down by being much more of a televised play than a movie, but on the other hand many of the performances were out-and-out stellar (Meryl Streep, Mary-Louise Parker, Jeffrey Wright, and Justin Kirk).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 8 December 2003 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Took me a while to warm up to it, but by the end (of the first installment) I was pretty hooked. Agree about Pacino to an extent, although Roy Cohn somewhat merits the overheated treatment. And I like the rest of the cast -- Justin Kirk is especially great. It is inevitably stagey, although Mike Nichols does one of his epic-zoom tricks every once in a while to remind you it's a movie (all Mike Nichols' movies are stagey, really -- it's his specialty). Reviews say the second half has some gloopier bits, but I'm looking forward to it anyway.

spittle (spittle), Monday, 8 December 2003 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Mary-Louise Parker is my favorite cinematic schizophrenic of the year. The utter GLEE with which she dove into her delusions was breath-taking.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 8 December 2003 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Loved it, though I, too, was expecting something a bit more cinematic from the reviews I've read. I agree with you completely about Jeffrey Wright, Girolamo. Best performance in the whole thing. Also, I think I love Emma Thompson again. She's got range, I forgot! Though I was a bit put off by the kooky casting for the bum and rabbi roles. And Al didn't bother me, I like the idea of a hammy, over-the-top Roy Cohn. His creepiness seemed more subdued in real life.

Arthur (Arthur), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 01:13 (twenty-one years ago)

*passively watching this again, as I am taping it for my gf who is in class at the moment and fell asleep midway into it last night*

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw the play two different times and have no excuse for putting myself through the agony. I HATED the play. Or at least the two performances (different cities) that I saw.

The HBO thing is much better, though it's a little long. The comments about Pacino are OTM.

don weiner, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

you saw the play, hated it, saw it again, hated it, and then actually sat through the whole tv movie? you are crazy!

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

(Half the TV movie. Which still is an impressive 3 hours straight.)

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)

especially for somebody who already knows he hates it!

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 06:32 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
"boy, what kind of homosexual are you? that's not purple, mary. that color up there...is mauve"

i kind of get don's antipathy (knowing who don is anyway) since kushner/AinA is rosenberg-apologist...

these have been playing on hbo lately; my previous contact was limited to harold bloom's opinion of them (yeah yeah i know) which is that the plays posit that we are all, in some sense, similar, but fails in this position cos the play only "has life" when its malvolio character has the stage.

...which is fairly counter-argued by these films cos (as said above) jeffrey wright is so so good and pacino is so so bad. and i coulnd't read the theme of "similary" that bloom is strawmanning either, fwiw.

politically tricky in its vilification of mormonism. i agree that the LDS is repugnant, but then, i did already, get me? the gay lawyer dude telling louis to "accept the irredeemability of the world" or whatever seemed phoned in (the writing i mean, the actor was ok). as a "soaring paean to gay survival" yes, absolutely... as an "evisceration of conservativism and its miseries," no, i think it's missing something. Kushner simulates his compassion for that world but but but. i don't know what to say abt what's wrong with it, but since i've brought up malvolio, he threatens revenge and exits left, Kushner's baddies are redeemed or killed, how nice.

g e o f f (gcannon), Sunday, 24 April 2005 01:17 (twenty years ago)

plus, cohn and the lawyer from justice gushing abt reagan's "new uniquely american political personality" and chortling abt the "death of liberalism" must have been quit a titter during high clintonism, but now, ouch.

g e o f f (gcannon), Sunday, 24 April 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
From Wikipedia:

"The first part, Millennium Approaches, was commissioned and performed at its world premiere in May 1991 by the Eureka Theatre Company of San Francisco..."

So assuming the Reagan Justice guy's lines weren't added subsequently, I wouldn't tie them to High Clintonism. (Clinton's two terms are as symptomatic of the Death of Liberalism as anything.) I think Louis speaks for Kushner when he says "I hate the Democrats too, but..."

Finally saw the Nichols film on DVD. Pacino just fine (Ron Leibman and F Murray Abraham did a lot more spitting and screaming as Cohn on Broadway -- partly cuz they could), Streep and Wright also brilliant.

I though the intentionally anticlimactic Heaven scene actually worked better than onstage, as did the rabbi's opening eulogy. I'm really not sure how Kushner wants us to think/feel about Joe Pitt -- is he the character he has the least compassion for, even less than Cohn?

They cut one of the biggest laugh lines from Broadway:

BELIZE: New York's biggest closet queen just checked into my ward...

PRIOR: Koch?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 May 2006 13:21 (nineteen years ago)

four years pass...

As awkward and ungainly as a lot of this is on screen, it's also terribly moving in places, now that I'm watching it a second time. Patrick Wilson, Jeffrey Wright, and Al Pacino (his last great hambone performance) -- all fine. The only one I don't care for, as usual, is Streep, but only because she, curiously, is the most uncomfortable and stagebound.

My mom is all about capital gains tax butthurtedness (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 16 April 2011 01:13 (fourteen years ago)

Pretty much feel the same--some of it was a mess, but it stayed with me, and I felt like I'd really seen something. I'll watch it a second time somewhere down the road. I thought the Cohn-Rosenberg scenes were effectively weird.

clemenza, Saturday, 16 April 2011 01:42 (fourteen years ago)

eleven months pass...

the play is being revived at the court theatre in chicago! chicago folks, go see it and tell me i should come see it, too!

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 00:00 (thirteen years ago)

if you've only seen the miniseries and you live in chicago, you should really check it out. the play is magic.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 April 2012 00:02 (thirteen years ago)

Charles Newell, guy directing the Court production, is a pretty great minimalist.

the hairy office thing (Eazy), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 02:24 (thirteen years ago)

('shoe, are you back in town? I bet we could get a group together to go.)

the hairy office thing (Eazy), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 02:27 (thirteen years ago)

plus, cohn and the lawyer from justice gushing abt reagan's "new uniquely american political personality" and chortling abt the "death of liberalism" must have been quit a titter during high clintonism,

because "high Clintonism" was "Reaganism unleashed"?

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 02:35 (thirteen years ago)

minimalism is not a partic good fit for AiA

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 05:06 (thirteen years ago)

He staged Caroline, or Change a few years ago, and Kusher was crazy about it. More an essentialist than a minimalist--gets to the heart of the play, likes sparse playing space.

the hairy office thing (Eazy), Wednesday, 11 April 2012 18:41 (thirteen years ago)

Here's more on the Newell/Kushner working relationship and the new Angels production:
http://timeoutchicago.com/arts-culture/theater/15235886/court-theatre%E2%80%99s-revival-of-tony-kushner%E2%80%99s-angels-in-america

the hairy office thing (Eazy), Thursday, 12 April 2012 20:53 (thirteen years ago)

maybe we shd shorten the thread title someday

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 12 April 2012 21:20 (thirteen years ago)

four years pass...

epic oral history

Tony Kushner: During that rehearsal period, someone on the board gave me their spider-infested cabin on the Russian River, and I went away for 10 days—it was early April—and I sat down, and I started writing. And I wrote 700 pages of Perestroika in 10 days—three times as much as would ultimately be in it, all by hand. And it was literally like The Red Shoes—I could not stop writing. If I tried to go to sleep, I would wake up two minutes later and just go. And a lot of the best stuff that’s in the play now was in that first draft. I got in the car to drive back, even though I hadn’t slept in 11 days, and I was literally shaking from exhaustion. I didn’t have a computer—it was just a big stack of legal paper. And I thought, if I go off the cliff into the Pacific Ocean, no one will ever know what happened, so I have to be really careful.

David Esbjornson: It was like Moses coming down from the mountain! We went out that night to celebrate with champagne. I said, “Tomorrow we’ll read Perestroika.” So we started at 10, and 6:30 came and went and we were still reading it.

Tony Kushner: In this 700-page, really long version, there was a lot of shit. I mean, something with a homeless kid. ... A chauffeur? One of the reasons that I could write for 10 days without stopping is I was just, “Nobody ever has to know what I’ve done here.”

David Esbjornson: I did finally just go, Oh, shit. There was no money. It’s not like you can just throw bodies and cash at it, you just have to do it.

Robert Hurwitt (theater critic in San Francisco): As with any theater community, there were people who were saying “Oh my god, they are going to fall flat on their face.” This thing has gotten blown all out of proportion and the second part isn’t even ready yet!

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/cover_story/2016/06/oral_history_of_tony_kushner_s_play_angels_in_america.html

helpless before THRILLARY (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:37 (nine years ago)

Great. Thanks for the link!

Acting Crazy (Instrumental) (jed_), Thursday, 30 June 2016 00:53 (nine years ago)

this is an extraordinary piece of writing, I really wish I'd seen a theater production, but the HBO version is amazing too.

akm, Thursday, 30 June 2016 07:28 (nine years ago)

six months pass...

Watched this for a second time the last couple of nights. The performances are so good. I'd give honours to Justin Kirk and Meryl Streep, but everyone's close to perfect. (All I know is the movie, so nothing to compare them to.) Loved the music, too--going to seek out the soundtrack. And get Citizen Cohn out of the library.

clemenza, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 05:38 (eight years ago)

two weeks pass...

Upcoming London revival of play has Nathan Lane as Cohn; strange.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 18:50 (eight years ago)

four years pass...

just watched the first episode and it was fantastic. i'll skip the thread until i finish it. i have to say, almost everyone is giving standout performances, and it makes mary-louise parker's (imo) badness stand out. it's too bad, because, so far, she's really the only female presence in the story, and her story is interesting and i would like to maybe see someone else give it a shot.

Z_TBD (Karl Malone), Thursday, 22 July 2021 21:15 (four years ago)

episode 2, the part near the middle and end where the people who deeply care extricate themselves. that was written by someone who knew that.

Z_TBD (Karl Malone), Friday, 23 July 2021 05:03 (four years ago)

that is everything, maybe even the fundamental decision we all face, in different ways. we face cruel inujustice, and soon after, whether to give it a name and acknowledge it, or not. but either way, we all face it

Z_TBD (Karl Malone), Friday, 23 July 2021 05:04 (four years ago)

One thing that disappointed me in the HBO version was that Justin Kirk as Prior was pretty flat, to the point that Louis felt more like the lead character.

I got to see the play with all of the original cast except Ron Leibman, and Stephen Spinella as Prior was the absolute standout.

Hideous Lump, Friday, 23 July 2021 06:32 (four years ago)

I remember Morbs raving about Adam Driver as Louis in an off-Broadway production before Driver had even done Girls.

... (Eazy), Friday, 23 July 2021 10:03 (four years ago)

It really has held up, and reading the recent Nichols biography made clear to what degree he poured everything he knew about theatre, theatre acting, and how to adapt theatre for film.

So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 23 July 2021 10:04 (four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.