Some Informationhttp://www.progress.org/banneker/cw.htmlhttp://www.corporations.org/welfare/http://www.commoncause.org/issue_agenda/corporate_welfare.htmhttp://www.ccsi.com/~comcause/news/corwel.htmlhttp://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105-9.html(Fuck! When even the right wing pseudo-Libertarian knobshiners in the Cato Institute find this behaviour egregious...)http://www.nader.org/releases/63099.html(And of course, Ralph Nader weighs in.)http://www.csun.edu/CommunicationStudies/ben/news/welf.htmlhttp://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/1998/11/02/corp.welfare.htmlhttp://www.free-market.net/directorybytopic/corporatewelfare/http://www.mackinac.org/depts/ecodevo/article.asp?ID=5389
Your opinions, please.
― Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Wednesday, 10 December 2003 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)
But on the actual question. The idea of giving local companies grants to be competitive seems to be a bit of a paradox. However on the political scheme of things the balance is obviously being made on a number of fronts: iethe amount of money that would be paid out if people were made unemployedthe amount of money lost from direct taxation of said previous taxpayerscorporation taxesthe value of keeping money in the country rather than seeing it go out via imports(and possibly most importantly unfortunately)political kudos.
― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 10 December 2003 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)