― Mark, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I thoroughly appreciate the efforts of the team members, but throughout NYLPM's lifetime I've provided the bulk of material. If I'm not writing, the site doesn't get updated much. And I'm not writing: I don't feel like I have very much of value to say about music anymore. I'm not contributing much to ILM either - I'm not even reading that much music criticism online, though I still read ILM quite avidly.
The forums have made a big difference - debate here is immediate and funny, and also takes away a lot of the responsibility running a weblog/site imposes on you. When ILE came along it was a real breath of fresh air. The decline of NYLPM makes me sad though and I'm thinking about just closing it until my excitement at revamping it comes back. If it does.
So I'm sorry to respond so gloomily, and I'm sorry to have kept the talented people who want to write for a new NYLPM in limbo, but that's the situation, alas. I don't think it's fair to launch a new site until I'm confident I can do stuff for it regularly.
― Tom, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
But seriously, I ask only because the 'blog has been so entertaining since its inception, and I can honestly say it (and FT, and the forum) have been huge influences on me. Not really trying to rail on the contributers. I just sensed that it seemed adrift. Good luck sorting through this stuff, Tom, and I selfishly hope it turns out I get to read more of your writing (& the other team members, too.)
I think there is a bit of a decline (brought about by the IL* bitches), but I don't think it should be shut down for lack of interest. IL*, ideally, would complement NYLPM, with the posts being a springboard for discussion. I'd say the addictiveness of real-time discourse offered by these forums puts a crimp in that plan, though, as Tom notes.
And, of course, I second, third, and fourth everyone's thoughts and concerns and well wishes regarding Mr. Ewing. Hope you're well, Tom.
― David Raposa, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― shed, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― DG, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― ethan, Thursday, 11 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― DG, Friday, 12 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim, Friday, 12 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― your null fame, Friday, 12 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― james, Friday, 12 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
The veiled digs wear a bit thin.
― Nicole, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Updates have been at a reasonable rate over the last couple of days so fingers crossed we can keep it up.
― Tom, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― David Raposa, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)