2. I'm mentally exhausted from trying to rein in my emotional neediness, and trying to understand how I must appear to others.
3. Can anyone say anything in defense of neediness?
― j.lu (j.lu), Saturday, 20 December 2003 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)
theres nothing wrong with needing people emotionally, it only becomes a pain to other people when their 'boundaries' are being trampled on.to me, it becomes an issue if someone is constantly begging / bugging me for my attention / time / ear / love. without giving me any space for myself or my own 'stuff'.....oh i just described my son, but hes not 2 yet.
how do you mean 'reining in' yours?
― donna (donna), Saturday, 20 December 2003 06:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tenacious Dee (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 20 December 2003 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 20 December 2003 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Melly E (Melly E), Saturday, 20 December 2003 21:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Melly E (Melly E), Saturday, 20 December 2003 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Melly E (Melly E), Saturday, 20 December 2003 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)
Ok, point taken. No relationship, no matter what the type, can survive without an equal amount of give and take and keeping in mind the needs of the other. However, one must expect to find a certain, reasonable level of requiring the assistance of others absolutely necessary, and should not think oneself as some sort of failure for having those impulses.
(Please let me know if that wording's too awkward for you, BTW.)
― Tenacious Dee (Dee the Lurker), Sunday, 21 December 2003 00:52 (twenty-one years ago)
i still think its cool with s/o's though, to a certain degree, to demand (and give) more.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 21 December 2003 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 21 December 2003 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)
as in its in the s/o rulebook that you have a sympathetic ear for your shitty day.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 21 December 2003 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't like the idea of a relationship where one party approaches it from the perspective of "fill my emotional void" rather than "I really enjoy being with you".
However, one must expect to find a certain, reasonable level of requiring the assistance of others absolutely necessary, and should not think oneself as some sort of failure for having those impulses.
You cannot rely on soemone else to teach you that you are not a failure though, especially if their attempts to do so consistently fail resulting in them feeling like a failure too. I've posted something very similar to this before and it still holds. I guess emotionally I'm pretty right-wing in terms of the fact that I think people should take more responsibility for themselves, i.e. I would encourage emotional self-reliance to a (larger) degree.
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Sunday, 21 December 2003 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)
I agree that it is important to have a degree of emotional self-reliance so that you can deal with your everyday life and problems without overwhelming your friends. It is very true that others can't teach you that you're not a failure. That knowledge has to come from within dr. phil>.
I generally feel flattered when people confide their problems to me. I'm happy to listen and try to help, and I want to be a person that friends can depend on. Some have taken advantage of this and become emotional vampires. That seems to be the difference--the line between relying on your friends to a reasonable degree and being overwhelming with neediness. People have different boundaries in regards to that, so it tends to be a very individual thing.
(someone has probably said all of this upthread somewhere, but I just thought I'd respond to Nick's post)
― JuliaA (j_bdules), Sunday, 21 December 2003 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)