Triplets of Belleville

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Anyone else see this? I must admit I was a little disappointed. From everything I'd heard about it, I went in prepared to love it. But it just didn't floor me in the way that I was hoping it would. The opening sequence in the jazz club was my favorite part. It had an energy and edge to it that the remainder of the film never quite recaptured. Maybe I'm a victim of hype here. If I'd just stumbled upon it without hearing anything about it, I probably would have liked it a lot more. I'd still recommend it, though.
I don't know. Any other thoughts?

Prude (Prude), Monday, 29 December 2003 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought this thread was going to announce that Derrick May, Juan Atkins and Kevin Saunderson had each had a child.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Monday, 29 December 2003 22:57 (twenty-one years ago)

i loved it. the opening is fantastic, but i think it would have been wearying and distracting if the entire film had maintained that pace. as it was, i felt like i was missing out on the intricacies of much of the animation as things moved along.

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 29 December 2003 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)

i was v disappointed by it - it felt like it lasted for over 2 hours rather than one.

toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 09:43 (twenty-one years ago)

That's a good point, Lauren. If it tried to maintain that energy all the way through it would have been Moulin Rouge. But the spirit of the opening got lost, I felt. The inventiveness of it. I kept waiting for more music, too.

Prude (Prude), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought it was enchanting! I loved the animation, and there was something very dream-like about it all.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

is it very frenetic and fast paced? because that bugs me in full length animation in a cinema, makes me jittery. so, while the trailer looked cool, it didn't look like something I could sit through without getting a headache. If it slows down at some point that would be great.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

no, it's not all. the trailer is very misleading.

lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 30 December 2003 23:52 (twenty-one years ago)

When the frenetic, fast-paced "short" segues into the deliberate main style of the movie it's just too delicious, like mmm settle in, get yr hot drink ready! Like sliding into a bubble-bath or something. The slow pace lets you really examine everything, in a way i can't remember doing since looking at picture books as a kid.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

You're not talking about Belleville Rendezvous, are you?

the bellefox, Wednesday, 31 December 2003 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

yes.

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

who wrote the music for this film? it was fantastic, the best bit about the film no less, especially when she's playing her hoover. I heard it was the director. Is this the case?

daNNYBOY, Wednesday, 31 December 2003 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Come on! Answer me!

dannyboy, Wednesday, 31 December 2003 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

arr need to see this but it's in french here and i worry i'll miss things. is there a lot of dialogue?

amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Next to none.

cis (cis), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)

The ultimate part-animation film-without-dialogue -- Svankmajer's Conspirators of Pleasure. One word said in the entire thing, and even that was inside the brain of one of the characters.

Heard about this triplets film from my sister and am intrigued...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 17:08 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a fantastic piece of Tati inspired dialogue free existetialist art

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

also dynamiting frogs

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

And frogsicles.

Prude (Prude), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Are we talking actual frogs or is this slang?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, cartoon frogs...

Prude (Prude), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I loved it too.

Amateur!st: you don't have to worry about it being in French. I think there were two lines that they actually translated into English. The rest doesn't even matter. You'll definitely be able to follow along.

Aaron W (Aaron W), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 19:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Actual frogsicles. You think I'm joking.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 3 January 2004 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

It was good! Better than all that anime rubbish.

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 4 January 2004 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't wait to see this.

sucka (sucka), Sunday, 4 January 2004 03:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw this today and it was fab. I relate to dogs and grandparents. I like how Champion remained elusive. His eyes.

youn, Monday, 5 January 2004 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sure the one I saw on telly was just slightly different to the one I saw at the cinema.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 5 January 2004 10:39 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
it's on bbc4 again tonight (2004-01-24) at 23:30.

also on bbc4 tonight is a film by aki kaurismaki 'The Man Without A Past' (21:00) which looks good and 'Etre et Avoir' (19:15) that great french documentary about the french schoolteacher.

andy

koogs (koogs), Saturday, 24 January 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

also on bbc4 tonight is a film by aki kaurismaki 'The Man Without A Past' (21:00) which looks good

WATCH THIS IT IS ONE OF THE BEST THINGS EVER!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 24 January 2004 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)

time to ressurect the 'WRONG' meme.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)

:(

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i have a problem w. 'quirky' scandinavian cinema ('all' modern scandinavian cinema) tho.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Fair enough. I guess that stuff is kind of my bag.

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Although I would say that SOME of the stuff Kaurismaki does transcends "quirk" IMHO, maybe on another thread....

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:13 (twenty-one years ago)

it's my bag, too. "the man without a past" is one of the more beautiful new films that i've seen in the past ten years, i think.

lauren (laurenp), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)

did you two see 'noi albinoi', 'songs from the second floor', 'together' etc etc etc... gah. sorry.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm gunna watch it again tonight now.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)

did you two see 'noi albinoi', 'songs from the second floor', 'together' etc etc etc... gah. sorry.

Yes! I liked them...

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 24 January 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

...It's funny because "quirk" for its own sake is a major turn-off for me, but at the same time, most of the films I like could potentially be dismissed in that way.

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 24 January 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
I think I might buy the DVD of this. We watched it last night and I felt like I missed a hundred little things.

TOMBOT, Monday, 7 March 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)

I like the tati poster in the old womens' house.

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 7 March 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)

I should've known that this thread wasn't going to be about Uncle Tupelo.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 7 March 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

Didn't this movie end on a very sad note? I can't recall exactly what happened (and I wouldn't spoil it if I did recall), but something about the ending is making me wary about ordering the DVD, like even though the film was good, I wouldn't want to have to see that ending again.

Maybe I'm confusing it with another film, tho.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:21 (seventeen years ago)

Osamu Tezuka's Metropolis is pretty sad.
Neither this nor Tekkon Kinkreet are sad though IIRC. Can't think of what else that isn't some overhyped ghibli production or pixar work that's been notable recently

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:27 (seventeen years ago)

not sad in my opinion.

of the animated flicks i've seen, "grave of the fireflies" is the most depressing by a long shot. well, that's not recent. hmm.

msp, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:30 (seventeen years ago)

wings of honneamise also pretty sad
and basically every UC era gundam, body counts be like damn

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:34 (seventeen years ago)

Iron Giant makes me cry BUCKITS when he says, "I.m Superman"......

Abbott, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:37 (seventeen years ago)

IIRC Triplets of Belleville did not have a sad ending at all!

Abbott, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:37 (seventeen years ago)

I only buy DVDs of shit that depresses me and makes me cackle hollowly at the hopelessness of all human endeavour so by that rule this must be a happy movie because I never did go get a copy

El Tomboto, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:40 (seventeen years ago)

this movie rules btw

deej, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:42 (seventeen years ago)

IIRC Triplets of Belleville did not have a sad ending at all!

It didn't? My failing memory must be early onset senility (not so early, maybe).

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 03:48 (seventeen years ago)

By the way:

Director's next film (which I predict will get a title change, at least in the U.S./U.K.):

"The Illusionist" is the second animated feature film by Sylvain Chomet, the director of The Triplets of Belleville, expected to be released in 2009. It is being made at his Edinburgh film studio, Django Films by an international group of animators. It is estimated to cost around £10 million and is being funded by Pathé Pictures.

The film will be based on an unproduced script that the French mime, director and actor Jacques Tati wrote in collaboration with famed screenwriter Jean-Claude Carrière between Mon Oncle and Playtime. The script was passed to Chomet by Tati's daughter, Sophie Tatischeff, when Chomet was seeking permission to use a clip from Tati's 1949 film Jour de fête in Les Triplettes de Belleville. Tatischeff suggested an animated film as she did not want an actor to play her father.

Savannah Smiles, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 09:09 (seventeen years ago)

The film will be based on an unproduced script that the French mime, director and actor Jacques Tati wrote in collaboration with famed screenwriter Jean-Claude Carrière between Mon Oncle and Playtime.

omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:02 (seventeen years ago)

i am shitting myself! shit! is on myself!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:03 (seventeen years ago)

Bruno is in my top five animated dogs.

I love everything about this movie, including the granny's lazy glass eye.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:32 (seventeen years ago)

It's an outstandingly conceived and designed film, right down to the very smallest of details. I have to admit to feeling slightly so whatish at the end though, even though it certainly never bored me. I suppose I was a bit nonplussed at the amount of effort that gone in to producing something with no real emotional content.

chap, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:36 (seventeen years ago)

> no real emotional content.

We disagree. Also, you are a crazy, crazy, crazy person.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:39 (seventeen years ago)

I think the crux of it is it's hard to feel anything for the grandson, as he's such a completely neutral and passive character.

chap, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:43 (seventeen years ago)

Can't explain it, can't defend it, probably shouldn't even admit it, but I can't stand this movie. It actively annoys me.

Je ne sais pas.
*Gallic shrug*

kenan, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:56 (seventeen years ago)

three years pass...

this movie is legit insane

ice cr?m, Sunday, 12 June 2011 04:55 (fourteen years ago)

eight months pass...

This movie is fucking Lynchian. Wouldn't be surprised if I have nightmares tonight - the triplets are terrifying. Loved bits of it, the dog's dream in partic, and it looks like nothing else on earth, but the story is hardly gripping.

ledge, Saturday, 10 March 2012 22:10 (thirteen years ago)

eleven months pass...

As with so many movies, I didn't see this until last night, long after all the hype had ended and everyone else moved on to newer, bigger, better things. I was happy I did see it. Both the sound design and the animation were amazing. Also, it made my wife and I burst out laughing at least half a dozen times. Bruno and the granny were very exactly conceived and realized.

The best trick in the movie was that, in spite of the fact that nothing in the plot made much sense and none of the characters said anything clearly enough to understand, I could follow what was happening at least 98% of the time. That is cartooning at its best, imo.

Aimless, Sunday, 24 February 2013 19:18 (twelve years ago)

i still love the track where they use a hoover and bicycle wheel. played that out as part of a techno set at a rave once and people went mental.

dog latin, Monday, 25 February 2013 01:33 (twelve years ago)

ten years pass...

right now i’m watching Triplets of Belleville at last (in honor of current TdF), which i thought would be odd to my eye and is a bit odder still.

the granny wheel truing/tensioning by tone and then raising a posse is funny to me as a 30 yr wheel builder. i def wouldnt build or tension by ear fwiw.

and ok the cabaret scene is mental and awesome. and also yes the grandkid is a cipher and i’m just “what does that mean about granny”?

OMG IT’S ABOUT ZWIFT

rick james, critical moralist (Hunt3r), Friday, 14 July 2023 05:34 (two years ago)

Saw it for the first time as well earlier this year. Think that was good just for the hints of Tati and the like which I wouldn’t have understood at the time.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 14 July 2023 05:49 (two years ago)

yeah at release i didn’t have tati and many other refs. i plan to re-watch now, after grabbing more commentary, i think it would help a lot.

first trailer song is pretty fire lol.

rick james, critical moralist (Hunt3r), Friday, 14 July 2023 05:59 (two years ago)

I read Amerika by Kafka long after watching this and think now, much later, that there might be an affinity but it is based on memory and perhaps not accurate.

youn, Friday, 14 July 2023 15:03 (two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.