― Kricky Hansen, Wednesday, 31 December 2003 08:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― may pang (maypang), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 08:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― may pang (maypang), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 08:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 08:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― may pang (maypang), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 08:33 (twenty-one years ago)
oh god am I quoting elton?
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 10:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)
i hate schematics like this, true as they may be
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)
/twee
― Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.socialphobia.org/
...or do a google search under 'social anxiety'.
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 11:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 12:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 12:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― sgs (sgs), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 12:53 (twenty-one years ago)
That site's a good recommendation, the music mole, and since I seem to disagree with you, have I missed something somewhere?
― sgs (sgs), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Wednesday, 31 December 2003 22:24 (twenty-one years ago)
I think that was ken's point, and if it was, I agree with it; though I think you're right, sgs, when you say that what we call social anxiety is way, way more extreme and debilitating than common-or-garden shyness.
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Thursday, 1 January 2004 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)
the trick is distinguishing the one from the other. and being a prick is a good way to get 'general' confidence up; you can say whatever the hell you want to people you don't care about. it's good practice.
― Ian Johnson (orion), Thursday, 1 January 2004 06:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 1 January 2004 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)
And if you can find something you're really opinionated on, care a lot about, and get to talking on that, it's good practice at letting your voice be heard and you'll have something you /want/ to get across.
― cis (cis), Thursday, 1 January 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 1 January 2004 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 3 January 2004 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Saturday, 3 January 2004 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)
it might be a bit of a trade off you didnt envisage, a paradox you never predicted, you could easily go from a person that was nice, but no one ever noticed that nice-ness, to a person that everyone likes, but that very nice-ness is gone because you had to obliterate it in order to get anyone to notice it
it can be a very strange thing that to get people to notice the things that are good about you, you have to remove them!
― gareth (gareth), Sunday, 4 January 2004 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)