what else would be a good surprise Nightmare on Elm Street movie?
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 05:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 05:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― antexit (antexit), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)
"Okay, then..."
X-Men 3 is actually Krueger vs. Wolverine.
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lynskey (Lynskey), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 16:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
"NOOOOOOOO!"
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― dur hur coffee is good (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
Also every M. Night Shyamalan movie (this would actually be great, as long as I didn't have to watch them).
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 8 January 2004 06:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 8 January 2004 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 8 January 2004 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 8 January 2004 20:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:25 (nineteen years ago)
― josh in sf (stfu kthx), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Sunday, 19 March 2006 03:54 (nineteen years ago)
It really was. The movie would have been so much better had this been the actual plot.
― My Psychic Friends Are Strangely Silent (Ex Leon), Sunday, 19 March 2006 03:57 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:15 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:25 (nineteen years ago)
― gunther heartymeal (keckles), Monday, 20 March 2006 04:04 (nineteen years ago)
― tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Monday, 20 March 2006 04:10 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 20 March 2006 04:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 20 March 2006 20:31 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.moviemusicplastic.com/freddy-fat_boys.jpg
― and what, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 01:11 (seventeen years ago)
i had that 45
also the fresh prince song
― jeff, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 01:16 (seventeen years ago)
Flight of the Navigator
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 01:21 (seventeen years ago)
what dreams may come
― omar little, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 01:38 (seventeen years ago)
episode of Dallas with JR inthe shower
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 01:41 (seventeen years ago)
once again i forgot this thread ever existed
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 05:18 (seventeen years ago)
in the opening posts i think you can see me shedding capital letters and becoming the laid-back lower-case dude you all know and love!
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 05:19 (seventeen years ago)
I was surprised to see this appears to be the only Elm Street post. I would have thought there would be a thread.
I was invited to see the Elm Street reboot at midnight tonight by some friends, and I accepted, because I am a fan of the original and wanted some visual fun.
Let me put it this way: 34 of 38 critics quoted on Rotten Tomatoes said it sucked, and this time, they are right.
Jackie Earle Haley is surprisingly not menacing, and his makeup looks bad. Yes, he does look more like what a real burn victim would look like, but the cartoonish look of Freddy's original makeup was more menacing and eye-catching. Besides, the dude appears in dreams, how realistic is he supposed to look?
I can't fault the bad acting or dialogue, those were present in the original too. But the visuals weren't very entertaining, and there were a few shot recreations that seemed pointless (the bathtub fingerknives one was botched). While the original was a surrealist nightmare, the surrealism was largely muted and absent from this one, and the tension very muted.
Like Zombie, Sam Bayer spent too much time concocting more of a backstory for Krueger and it is just SO BORING! The deaths are unimaginative too. Whereas Freddy pursued his victims through various fantasy settings, way too many of them occurred in the same damn industrial warehouse, and instead of milking them, they were very abrupt and unimaginative.
This is horror gone retarded. I'll never pay to see another horror reboot again, and my gal is going to laugh at me when she finds out I went.
― Pippi Longstockings (Brad Nowell's Soiled Undergarments), Friday, 30 April 2010 06:58 (fifteen years ago)
Its kinda hard to top the original, and Robert Englund is just a freaky, freaky motherfucker.
The Onion article had a funny bit about this - it stated that with this and his performance in "Little Children," Jackie Earl Haley confirmed his place as the go-to guy for child molester characters.
― Clerk all KNOWIN (B.L.A.M.), Friday, 30 April 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
Haha, that's great and very true. Honestly it's sad when you're barely beating Furry Vengeance in terms of critical reception...
― Pippi Longstockings (Brad Nowell's Soiled Undergarments), Friday, 30 April 2010 23:24 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.ryanjbell.net/intersections/images/2007/12/28/once.jpg
to answer the original post. great thread though!
― jed_, Friday, 30 April 2010 23:41 (fifteen years ago)