i am on a collision course with the lord.

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

who wants to join me? this will require lots of drinking, not working, and crushing the souls of members of the opposite sex. come on, you know it sounds fun.

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

you don't mean Lord of the Dance do you?

― Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I knew this was going to be an Emily thread! Other than the soul-crushing I'm right there with you.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:46 (twenty-one years ago)

However, I like to think I make up for the not-crushing-of-souls with the absorbinate amounts of horrible things I do to my body above and beyond the drunkening.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)

no, souls must be crushed! hippie!

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)

how about if let nick crush a sole¿
http://www.saveurs.sympatico.ca/portugal/az-fish/sole.jpg

― dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Can I crush this Sole?
http://www.simonsandstein.com/currents/2002-summer/sole/sole.jpg

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)

no, souls must be crushed! hippie!

Man, Emily is mean. Wait, I hate hippies too. Killslaymaim.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)

fine by me.
that + i will double my soul crushing efforts to pick-up the slack.
this also sets nick up as a possible victim. he he.

― dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)

ok, fine. although nick may not be smited by the lord as strongly as the rest of us. loser! but he cannot become a victim! we must remain loyal to each other. solidarity!!!

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

fine.
*glares in nick's general direction*

― dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)

ha! that is so great. division in the ranks. rivalry on our pathway to ultimate destruction!

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)

ive never thought of my soul as a member

― kephm, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder, which is heavier? The soul or the wang?

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm "soulful."

― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

you don’t even have to have rhythm.

― kephm, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I STEP ON THE PEDAL OF COLLISION COURSE ACCELERATION! I AM A CRASH TEST DUMMY IN THE CRASH TEST VEHICLE TESTING MAXIMUM VELOCITY AT WHICH ONE CAN HIT THE WALL OF THE LORD!!! TONIGHT I SLEEP-DEPPEDLY CAFFEINATEDLY DEMENTIATEDLY POUND THE PAVEMENT THAT IS TEH BOOZE AND DEBAUCHERY OF TEH REAPER! WORK TOMORROW, HUH? BRANE CAN SLEEP THEN WHILE STARING AT NUMBERS AND WORDS ON SCREEN, BODY NEEDS NO REST! OMG LOL WTF!!!111!11 BRING ME MY PIMP CUP AND HOOKAH SQUIRE!

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 23:47 (twenty-one years ago)

(I'm amazed at myself. Usually I don't hit caps until I've hit the sauce. Not beer one has gone down the hatch yet.)

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 23:49 (twenty-one years ago)

YET.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)

teh reaper! ha!

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)

TONIGHT TEH REAPER FEARS ME!

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i really worry that i am a little out of control lately. i am considering taking a break from the rabble rousing.

― Emilymv (Emilymv), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Meditate and find peace, Emily. Then you will come back to kick even more butt.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 02:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate fish

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah fuck you reaper yet another morning I awake victorious over you!

I like that within two hours of Emily's "considering taking a break from the rabble rousing" post we were walking into a crowded smoky bar full of rabble rousing.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 13:54 (twenty-one years ago)

emily did you make this thread title up?

because it sounds like the greatest title for a kitschy gospel song ever.

― amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I can help by crushing xtian tv owners

― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)

what's the general procedure for crushing souls of the opposite sex? i'm wondering if this is similar to my uni experience of having a superhero double-identity as 'the feminist avenger' who made evil frat boys cry...

― colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

evil people do not cry. i think in the case of your frat boys(z) you must be confusing evilness with incredible stupidity.

― dyson (dyson), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I first used "on a collision course with the lord" in reference to Emily a couple of months ago and it became a colloquialism among our circle. To my knowledge, I don't remember seeing it anywhere else. It would be a great title for a hesher gospel tune, now that I think about it.

― Dale the Titled (cprek), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)

The crushing of souls is all about finding baiting a potential beau into the promise of a relationship only to do an about-face once the fear of commitment kicks in.

― Dale the Titled (cprek), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm on a collision course with the lord
i'm crash-landing into jesus any day
hope he's wearing a safety belt
cause by me he will be pelt
i'm on a collision course with the lord

my savior is a smoking ball of fire
hurtling through the heavens up above
you all better watch the sky
because he's coming from on high
my savior is a smoking ball of fire

etc.

― amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought the proper m.o. for soul crushing was to reach a verbal (and seemingly sincere) agreement in regards to a committed relationship only to an about face the next weekend and every weekend after for a month - or until you get caught. then you blame said person, mentioning a specific flaw your beau happens to be self-conscious about.

― dyson (dyson), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, that's pretty much what i'd do. get 'em to like me and then dump them in terrible ways to make them cry. (this was only done to guys that had screwed over people i knew, not for random kicks.) (and i wonder why i'm going to the lowest level of hell...)

― colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

then laught it off. being as unspecific as possible about what it is exactly you are laughing off. lines like "you're a very nice girl/boy" "lets stay friends" are fun to throw in aswell. then make out with the first thing you can get your tounge down right infront of them.

― dyson (dyson), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)

(i'm off to the 5th - "twee" - circle of hell)

― dyson (dyson), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:50 (twenty-one years ago)

http://us.st8.yimg.com/store4.yimg.com/I/wickedcoolstuff_1775_7962181

http://store2.yimg.com/I/continuum_1769_561207

― amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

No verbal agreement is necessary for a relationship is necessary. Only an 'implied' agreement derived from a session of kissing and perhaps heavy petting is necessary. Leaving the beau in a state of uncertainity. And there's no mentioning of a specific flaw either. Just pick and leave. Said beau has no idea what was going on or what went wrong -prompting existential crisis.

― Dale the Titled (cprek), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost)

― Dale the Titled (cprek), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)

you must be a relationship expert!

― the angry cowboy (dick), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)

very good, dale. i like.

― dyson (dyson), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree with dale. i found that just 'vanishing' by not returning phone calls/emails etc would cause that person to pursue even more. this has had fantastical results, and since these guys have probably never had this happen to them (since they usually are terrible to women and then never see them again) they just don't get it. ha. best is when i would then run into them on campus and make brief eye contact just long enough so that they would know i recognized them, and then completely blank them.

god, i used to be so evil. it was fun.

― colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.goultralightsgo.com/naoki/elvis/images/weep.jpg

― amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

NOTE: I DO NOT, NOR HAVE I EVER, CONDONED SOUL-CRUSHING.

― Dale the Titled (cprek), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

god, i used to be so evil. it was fun.

Did you grow up? Sometimes, it just doesn't pay to be an adult, I tell you;>

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

i think i have had the opposite "evolution" as colette.
i used to be the sweetest bf type guy ever and then, a matter of years ago, i had quite enough of the opposite sex's crap. (it should be noted i do not blame said gender - boys/girls, straight/gay - whatever you're pursuing is going to fuck you around)

― dyson (dyson), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)

so.glad.i.am.in.a.committed.relationship.

― kephm, Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm not, but right on anyway, kephm.

sometimes this board makes me ill with fear for mankind.

― the angry cowboy (dick), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I think The Vanishing is a completely forgivable breaking-off method as long as it's being employed on a newish person. When used on someone the soul-crusher has been close with for 5+ years is when I believe The Vanishing truly becomes evillainous.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree completely. but i think 5 years is a long time...after you've been with someone for, say, 6 months even, i think you're entitled to their respect and at the very least, acknowledgement.

― the angry cowboy (dick), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Colette - dump him on his birthday. Possibly in front of an audience.

If you want him to hate you forever and go straight to hell, of course. Not that I condone any of the above.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

LESS RELATIONSHIP TALK! MORE COLLIDING WITH DEITIES!

― Dale the Titled (cprek), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I am Satan, busy attempting to harvest another soul. Stop distracting me.

― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)

You're doing a rotten job of hiding, since we all know you're here.

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)

the wowner of the one of the xtian tv stations here said 'bless you very6 much' when I held open the door, I wanted to kick him in the nuts then and there.

― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

me, the lord
http://www.animallogic.com/film/collisioncourse/images/pic10.jpg

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

The Lord is Australia? This explains much.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 8 January 2004 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)

No that's the object of his wrath (praying that's the *right* answer)

― arf, Thursday, 8 January 2004 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

(ok, ok i'll stop with the soul-crushing bit, but want to say that i've dumped on birthdays/anniversaries/valentines/christmas observed/immediately following or during concerts that he either bought tickets to as a gift for me or had been looking forward to for ages. do i win the soul-crushing title?)

i'm much nicer now.

― colette (a2lette), Thursday, 8 January 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Colette, you are the girl every guy is warned about.

― Dale the Titled (cprek), Thursday, 8 January 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

i wish colette would quit crushing me
http://www.autographseek.com/images/Sol%20Campbell.jpg

― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 8 January 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

dude. that's spooky. that's my boy's last name. hope that doesn't mean i'm supposed to crush him!

and thanks, dale, you made me blush.

― colette (a2lette), Thursday, 8 January 2004 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

PLAYDATE WITH DESTINY!

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 12 January 2004 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm on my way-ay. i'm on my way-ay-ee-ee. home sweet home.

― nickalicious filled with the spirit of rawk (nickalicious), Monday, 12 January 2004 07:09 (twenty-one years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.