― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― @j@ (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 8 January 2004 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 8 January 2004 00:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 8 January 2004 00:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 8 January 2004 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 02:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 8 January 2004 02:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfishee (Kingfish), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:41 (twenty-two years ago)
It's not an urban legend, the movie was made without humane society or whoever it is's certification.
― sucka (sucka), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfishee (Kingfish), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:48 (twenty-two years ago)
But that doesn't equal animal slaughter.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 8 January 2004 04:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:25 (twenty-two years ago)
(and FWIW most real life domesticated pets do worse things to themselves at least once a month for god's sake)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:33 (twenty-two years ago)
I dunno Ally, this looks like a mighty fine pussy steak to me...
― ModJ (ModJ), Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfishee (Kingfish), Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:48 (twenty-two years ago)
The fact that they're my previous girlfriends should tell you something without having to look very far, right?
Previous, meaning they aren't around anymore, inferring that I did something, perhaps because along the line they discovered my habit of making crass remarks like "pussy steak," etc.
http://www.grilling-recipes.com/images/grilling-steak.jpg
Deal. Wut.
― ModJ (ModJ), Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)
This is the worst thread ever, poor Milo and Otis.
― Allyzay, Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)
This movie has that special magic of something you haven't seen since first-grade but remember fondly. Someday I'll have to inflict it on my children.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 8 January 2004 05:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Thursday, 8 January 2004 08:35 (twenty-two years ago)
I had no idea this movie was Japanese!
― and i don't even care, similar to how a badass would respond (Abbbottt), Monday, 9 April 2012 20:42 (thirteen years ago)
It is?!
― wolf kabob (ENBB), Monday, 9 April 2012 20:43 (thirteen years ago)
#100,000,000 in the series "threads I have no recollection of starting". I must black out a lot when I am on ILX.
― Shitschnitzel (admrl), Monday, 9 April 2012 20:43 (thirteen years ago)
Didn't Dudley Moore narrate it?
It was because of this movie that my parents first bought a pug. Fact.
― wolf kabob (ENBB), Monday, 9 April 2012 20:44 (thirteen years ago)
Initially filmed as Koneko Monogatari (子猫物語 A Kitten's Story; alternate English title: The Adventures of Chatran) in Kitakyushu, Japan, the film was completely revamped, trimmed and westernized with added narration by Dudley Moore (Shigeru Tsuyuki narrated the Japanese version). Director Masanori Hata and associate director Kon Ichikawa edited the film together from 400,000 feet of footage (which is roughly 40.3 hours), shot over a period of four years.
― and i don't even care, similar to how a badass would respond (Abbbottt), Monday, 9 April 2012 20:46 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-31zLWwP41A
― and i don't even care, similar to how a badass would respond (Abbbottt), Monday, 9 April 2012 20:50 (thirteen years ago)
The part at the end where milo and otis get ladyfriends and the ladyfiends have puppies/kittens is soo cute.
― wolf kabob (ENBB), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:15 (thirteen years ago)
Kon Ichikawa??? I had no idea
― Shitschnitzel (admrl), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:15 (thirteen years ago)
iirc, they killed something like 40 kittens to get the waterfall shot
― preternatural concepts concerning variances in sound and texture (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:18 (thirteen years ago)
Wait, what? That's not very cute at all. :(
― wolf kabob (ENBB), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:21 (thirteen years ago)
rumors, hearsay, no one seems to know for sure. you hear stories.
― preternatural concepts concerning variances in sound and texture (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:22 (thirteen years ago)
sorry, sort of a bummer
― preternatural concepts concerning variances in sound and texture (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:23 (thirteen years ago)
seems likely to be an urban legend:
http://msgboard.snopes.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=print_topic;f=74;t=000778
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:31 (thirteen years ago)
erm OK that didn't work, but google "milo and otis snopes" and it should be the first answer that pops up.
tbh the online pervasiveness of this rumor kind of reeks of 'those creepy foreigners, can't trust them not to torture and kill animals.'
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:34 (thirteen years ago)
i don't know. the snopes messageboard discussion leaves it an open question, as do most other investigations.
― preternatural concepts concerning variances in sound and texture (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:37 (thirteen years ago)
maybe, but the movie is kind of unique in the threats to which it at least seems to subject its animal "actors". thing is, these questions come up wr2 to just about every movie in which animals are involved, but they are usually quickly and decisively answered. it's the absence of a clear answer here that's disturbing.
― preternatural concepts concerning variances in sound and texture (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:40 (thirteen years ago)
also, it's worth noting that the american version cuts some of the film's more obviously cruel footage, and that objections to the treatment of animals on set were (allegedly) first raised by japanese animal rights organizations
― preternatural concepts concerning variances in sound and texture (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:44 (thirteen years ago)