CBS apologizes for Jackson’s breast-baring end to halftime show, MTV contriteNEW YORK (AP) — CBS and MTV both say they had no idea that their Super Bowl halftime show would wind up with singer Justin Timberlake tearing off part of Janet Jackson’s costume, exposing her breast. Timberlake blamed a “wardrobe malfunction.”“CBS deeply regrets the incident,” spokeswoman LeslieAnne Wade said after the network received calls about the Sunday night show.The two singers were performing a flirtatious duet to end the halftime show, and at the song’s finish, Timberlake reached across Jackson’s leather gladiator outfit and pulled off the covering to her right breast. Her nipple was covered by a pastie.The network quickly cut away from the shot and did not mention the incident on the air.The Super Bowl halftime show, which also featured P. Diddy, Nelly and Kid Rock, was produced by MTV, CBS’s corporate cousin in Viacom.“We were extremely disappointed by elements of the MTV-produced halftime show,” said Joe Browne, NFL executive vice-president. “They were totally inconsistent with assurances our office was given about the content of the show.“It’s unlikely that MTV will produce another Super Bowl halftime.”MTV issued a contrite statement in which it also apologized, saying the incident was “unrehearsed, unplanned, completely unintentional and was inconsistent with assurances we had about the content of the performance.”Timberlake said he did not intend to expose Jackson’s breast.“I am sorry that anyone was offended by the wardrobe malfunction during the halftime performance of the Super Bowl,” Timberlake said in a statement. “It was not intentional and is regrettable.”Wade said CBS officials attended rehearsals of the halftime show all week, “and there was no indication any such thing would happen. The moment did not conform to CBS’s broadcast standards and we would like to apologize to anyone who was offended.”
And doesn't the fact that she was wearing a pasty indicate that this WAS planned. Or do women often wear pasties under their clothes anyhow, just in case?
Anyway, this thread is about lame and and ridiculous excuses.
― Huck If I Know (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.alanrichards.org/images/pasty4.gif ???
― robster (robster), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck If I Know (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)
I dunno. I think something was definetely supposed to happen (i.e. why else would Justin have reached out to grab'n'rip), but perhaps more came off than was expected. Why would MTV deliberately dabble in such shenanigans on network television during "family time". It's one thing to do that on the MTV Awards or something, but the Superbowl ropes in a larger, Bible-bangin', flat-earthin', slackjawed, ultra-conservative, creationist audience, and OF COURSE said demographic would get up in arms at the sight of some exposed naughty bits. I know MTV style themselves as all about "shakin' things up", but that seems a bit too foolhardy. I dunno. Jury's still out. But once agian, B.F.D.!
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck If I Know (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck If I Know (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)
Holy Milli Vanilli, surely not a piercing? I mean, that's one poking pastie, but I would have thought it was only stuck on. The boob covering has come off very neatly though - Maybe they _were_ both supposed to come out. Nothing like asymmetry to enrage a conservative audience, after all.
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)
mtv didn't necessarily need to be involved
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck If I Know (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)
The FCC. Michael Powell has vowed that there will be a thorough and swift inquisition investigation.
― j.lu (j.lu), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)
I already made the grassy knoll joke elsewhere dammit. KEEP UP.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)
grassy knoll? what is that?
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― *sorry, Monday, 2 February 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)
The fact that MTV Networks for all intents and purposes owns the lives of every pop star in America is getting kind of depressing.
― TOMBOT, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Damn well said, Tom.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Did she perhaps pull this stunt to draw attention unto herself and away from her brother (of whom she's always been protective and supportive, "pervert #2" anyone?)?
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
Can't wait to argue piercing v. pasty with my mom.
― suzy (suzy), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)
I choose not to explain her explanation here.
Anyway this is basically the only part of the game I remember, hooray teams no one gives a shit about and by no one I mean me.
* nor was the nipple, uh, actually covered, being as the shield goes AROUND the actual nipple.― Allyzay, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
(sorry about the small tag, I was trying to brush my teeth and type at the same time)
― Allyzay, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)
A) The top wasn't supposed to come off at all but they were miming this for some reason and Justin, uh, did it wrong.B) Part of the top was supposed to rip and he took off all of it.
Either way the "malfunction" here is Justin Timberlake, which is pretty much a good way to look at Justin Timberlake in general I think.
― Allyzay, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)
Tom yr email isn't working, I'm not going to retype everything 40 times but I'll try later ok? Sorry to disturb everyone with this personal message. Carry on.
― Allyzay, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)
*As opposed to armadillos in their natural state: dead on the side of the road.
xpost: Thank god for that.
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
The point of which is WTF exactly? It just seems like a lot of expensive fuss over such a non-important-event.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
haha...xpost?
― Allyzay, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Do you Do you Do you Saint TropezDo you Do you Do you Saint TropezDo you Do you Do you Saint TropezDo you Do you Do you Saint TropezOn peut marcher pieds nus à Saint TropezPas besoin de costume à Saint TropezUn vieux blue jeans suffit pour s'habiller. yéC'est la tenue rêvée de Saint Tropez
On court dans le ventOn se grille au soleilOn brûle ses vingts ansOn s'amuse on rit on danseOn fait les fousOn chante comme des amis yeh yeh
Do you Do you Do you Saint TropezDo you Do you Do you Saint TropezDo you Do you Do you Saint TropezDo you Do you Do you Saint Tropez
Et quand revient l'été à Saint TropezTous les garçons sont beaux à Saint TropezToutes les filles sont belles a croquer yéAu rendez vous d'amour de Saint Tropez
L'amour c'est comme la mer à Saint TropezÇa change tous les jours à Saint TropezPour un seul de perdu dix de r'trouvés yéOn ne meurt pas d'amour à Saint Tropez
Do you Do you Do you Saint Tropez,Do you Do you Do you Saint TropezDo you Do you Do you Saint Tropez,Do you Do you Do you Saint Tropez
{Solo Sax - Instrumental}
Do you Do you Do you Saint Tropez,Do you Do you Do you Saint TropezDo you Do you Do you Saint Tropez,Do you Do you Do you Saint Tropez.
― Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Allyzay, Monday, 2 February 2004 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)
Lord Hutton's next inquiry?
― Joe Kay (feethurt), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Is AP's KILL message anywhere online?
― j.lu (j.lu), Monday, 2 February 2004 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)
Update: ADDs that calls not returned from Jackson’s representatives, ADDS comment from Jackson’s choreographer from several days ago promising ’shocking moments’ in halftime show, deletes reference to ‘pastie.’See AP PhotosMoves World and EntertainmentHL:CBS apologizes for Jackson’s breast-baring end to halftime show; MTV contriteNEW YORK (AP) — CBS and MTV both say they had no idea their Super Bowl halftime show would wind up with singer Justin Timberlake tearing off part of Janet Jackson’s costume, exposing her breast.Timberlake blamed a “wardrobe malfunction.”“CBS deeply regrets the incident,” spokeswoman LeslieAnne Wade said after the network received calls about the Sunday night show.The two singers were performing a flirtatious duet to end the halftime show, with Timberlake singing, Rock Your Body, and the lines he sang at the moment of truth were: “I’m gonna have you naked by the end of this song.”With that, Timberlake reached across Jackson’s leather gladiator outfit and pulled off the covering to her right breast, which was partially obscured by a sun-shaped, metal nipple decoration.The network quickly cut away from the shot, and did not mention the exposure on the air.Messages left with Jackson’s record company and her personal publicist were not returned Monday morning.The Super Bowl halftime show, which also featured P. Diddy, Nelly and Kid Rock, was produced by MTV, CBS’s corporate cousin in Viacom.“We were extremely disappointed by elements of the MTV-produced halftime show,” Joe Browne, NFL executive vice-president, said. “They were totally inconsistent with assurances our office was given about the content of the show.“It’s unlikely that MTV will produce another Super Bowl halftime.”MTV issued a contrite statement in which it also apologized, saying the incident was “unrehearsed, unplanned, completely unintentional and was inconsistent with assurances we had about the content of the performance.”Timberlake said he did not intend to expose Jackson’s breast.“I am sorry that anyone was offended by the wardrobe malfunction during the halftime performance of the Super Bowl,” Timberlake said in a statement. “It was not intentional and is regrettable.”Wade said CBS officials attended rehearsals of the halftime show all week, “and there was no indication any such thing would happen. The moment did not conform to CBS’s broadcast standards and we would like to apologize to anyone who was offended.”In an interview posted on MTV.com in the days before the show, Jackson’s choreographer, Gil Duldulao, talked about the show, saying: “She’s more stylized, she’s more feminine, she’s more a woman as she dances this time around. There are some shocking moments in there, too.”
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 18:02 (twenty-one years ago)
Paris Hilton spam is out. Janet J spam is SO in...
― andy, Monday, 2 February 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)
a: OK, what do we have?b: We got a 6 year old Diddy song, a 3 year old Nelly song, a 4 year old Kid Rock number, and uh how old is Janet again? Oh yeah, Timberlake, he's current. Sorta.a: Man, we need something newer. Can't Diddy and Nelly do that one... you know, from last summer?b: Sorry, nope, the transition is Diddy riffing on that 20 year old Toni Basil song. a: Yeah, that's important so that the fossils have something they remember...b: Fitty definitely said "no", right?a: Yup.... *snaps fingers* I GOT IT! GET THIS! We. Show. Titties! But...get this...AC-CID-ENTLY!!!b: Brilliant!
― Hunter (Hunter), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 02:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Skottie, Tuesday, 3 February 2004 06:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― jazz odysseus, Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Barima (Barima), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Barima (Barima), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Barima (Barima), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2004/02/03/news/columnists/observer/2_2_0422_09_57.txt
Yes, I think it is.
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 18:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kingfish Funyun (Kingfish), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― ModJ (ModJ), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)