Bill O'Reilly: "Bush sucks"

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

ha, not really. But here's a section of this article:

Popular conservative television news anchor Bill O'Reilly, usually an outspoken Bush loyalist, said on Tuesday he was now skeptical about the Bush administration and apologized to viewers for supporting prewar claims that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

"I was wrong. I am not pleased about it at all and I think all Americans should be concerned about this," O'Reilly said in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America."

― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)

best lie-filled thread title of the week

― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)

He actually apologized for the WMD misleading thing, which unfortunately is about 6 months too late.,

fucking asshole. he can keep bush for all i care.

― bill stevens (bscrubbins), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:50 (twenty-one years ago)

but was his face blotchy or unblotchy when he said this?
blotchy = real o'reilly
unblochy - robo'reilly

― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Dunno much about O'Reilly (an opinionated late-night right-wing blabberpot?), but is this a bit like Rupert Murdoch saying Sun readers should be concerned that we bombed the shit out of Saddam for spurious reasons?

― pete s, Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, this IS evilly entertaining. Sure he's a prick, but this is very nice to see.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)

how hard is the shit about to hit the fan when guys like O'Reilly start showing contrition?
Serously.

― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone with half a fucking brain would have known the likelihood of Iraq having these weapons was far from a sure thing (esp. after they didn't use a single one in the "war"). I always felt that Saddam might have been crazy and a little stupid, but not so stupid as to produce WMDs whilst the US was seemingly waiting for any excuse to bomb the shit out of Baghdad. I always felt like he was trying to save face at home by playing the "I won't do what they tell me" card, while doing just enough to NOT provoke a war. Obviously he failed miserably.

― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 19:58 (twenty-one years ago)

how hard is the shit about to hit the fan when guys like O'Reilly start showing contrition?
And I can't wait.

― Prude (Prude), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)

...whilst the US was seemingly waiting for any excuse to bomb the shit out of Baghdad...

Y'know, Clinton bombed the shit out of Baghdad many a'time while in office. He just didn't invade.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Just to be pedantic.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Er, I'm being pedantic, not Clinton while he was bombing Baghdad.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Duh.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:03 (twenty-one years ago)

you're right, this is true (and the funny part is, didn't Kay say that he thought one of the Clinton-ordered bombings effectively killed Iraq's WMD possibilities? that whipping boy Bill actually put Iraq out of commission?)

― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)

That would be REALLY pedantic.

― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Best part is! No one cares. Really.

― dean! (deangulberry), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)

ok does anyone else start to feel this weird sense of retrospective empathy for saddam hussein sitting in his palace insisting he has no wmd and everyone is like "no, we know you have that shit, tell us where it is and we won't kill you" and he's like "no, i haven't got any" etc????

i mean yeah it's sort of a boy who cried wolf scenario but still

(obv i think bush and his cronies and their policy is shit, do not take this post to mean anything to the contrary)

― amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

not with pressing issues like "racism on the P&J poll"

― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah I feel this weird empathy. I mean if you think about it, if he was telling the truth, and we invaded for reasons that did not exist, then he is technically in the right. He's obviously evil, but I always felt that those who snickered about him hiding like a coward in a hole forgot the fact that he was essentially hiding out from an huge army that invaded and overwhelmed his country, and he had no hope for victory or escape.

― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"a huge"

of course Saddam Hussein is evil and I feel little sympathy, the fact that I feel any is interesting. I felt bad for him when his sons were killed and their bodies shown on TV (even more despicable if you consider that they were just on the run from an army that invaded their country for non-existent reasons!!)

― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

how will this affect his trial?

― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)

will Bill O'Reilly testify in Saddam's defence?

― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)

it's just like,

has anyone ever harped on you for doing something you didn't actually do? and they won't believe you? how fucking frustrating is that?

it's the reason there are so many movies about people who are wrongly confused

― amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)

ooo-hoo-hoo yesss wake up the fucking echoes!

― Kerry (dymaxia), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Picturing O'Reilly groveling out an apology should have been
TiVo-ed....then linked to a website in perpetual loop.

does anyone else start to feel this weird sense of retrospective empathy for saddam hussein.....?

Empathy for another whipped-ass dictator? Maybe, if I wasn't enjoying his punishment so much.

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)

The moral argument re: Hussein is increasingly the strongest argument that BushCo has to stand on in this situation -- and Don, Stuart and myself already hashed that over enough so I won't restart it here, but my belief that it's an extremely weak argument for BushCo to rely on given BushCo's own inability to argue it persuasively -- beyond flag-waving BS and claims at standards that few believe the administration actually is willing to consistently stick with -- stands. That Bush himself now is only finally demonstrate a sense of nuance, even obliquely, with some of his comments is far too little, too late.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:19 (twenty-one years ago)

George Bush in Boob-flashing shocka!

― Speedy Gonzalas (Speedy Gonzalas), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

The comparisons of Bush and co. and the war to a lynching party are pretty accurate. They string him up because "hey he's about to come after us, he's got the guns and everything!", then they search his house and don't find any guns, but "well he was a piece of shit anyway, right guys? right? guys?"

Even if they do find WMDs now, it's still obvious that they didn't necessarily think for sure that he actually had them (as the CIA stated) and it sets a dangerous precedent. Which is perhaps the bigger issue here. Bush and his cronies have destroyed any trust other countries has in us, which is a cliche at this point but a true one.

― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i think we're all caught in some fritz lang nightmare scenario and this really brought it home

― amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Bush and his cronies have destroyed any trust other countries has in us, which is a cliche at this point but a true one.

Absolutely, but other countries were losing faith in the US long before Bush entered office. Clinton slowed the process down a bit, but the rot had already started.

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I hope that they do find WMDs now (instead of just planting them). Because then the US may have been justified in their actions but either way the Bush administration looks like bumbling fucks.

― dean! (deangulberry), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:42 (twenty-one years ago)

this is like in Superman comics, where Lex Luthor is president and the good guys have to figure how to be loyal to their country and its ideals when the Commander-in-Chief is a big fat lying scumbag!

― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Extremism in defense of stupidity is ALWAYS a vice.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

JUDGE ROY MOORE FOR PRESIDENT!!!

I'm sure Georgy likes hearing about that one.

― earlnash, Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, this IS evilly entertaining. Sure he's a prick, but this is very nice to see.
Considering this nitwit used to be a host of a tabloid entertainment show (essentially he was Maury Povich without the charisma or John Tesh without the musical talent*) it's amazing to me that anyone takes him seriously...as if he had a doctorate in sociology or political theory or somesuch.
Besides, he didn't flash his nipple-stud covered man-tit to the universe. Ergo == boring.

* == I'm being sarcastic about this part.

― Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 20:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Regarding the Saddam sympathy:

Two points I found interesting: first, the month's worth of ration the Iraqi government distributed to the people on the eve of the US bombing; second, if he was such a paranoid tyrant, how come he allowed SO MANY guns to be held by private citizens? That country is crawling with weapons of all sorts, not very common in repressive autocratic societies. He must not have been TOO afraid of his people (unlike Castro, who is very iron-fisted about any weapons.).

Iraq was a fairly unified country a year ago... only now are we seeing the sides being drawn for the coming civil war.

― andy, Tuesday, 10 February 2004 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I think your second point works better as evidence of how an armed populace can't do much to stop a money hording military dictatorship. Sort of squashes some of the silliness over the second amendment debate.

As for this rewriting of Saddam as some sort of misunderstood humanitarian, excuse me while I vomit. The whole WMD issue was so much of a power struggle. Saddam knew the more reign he gave to inspection teams, the weaker he'd appear to Iraqis, to Arabs, to the rest of the world. So he tried to maintain some semblance of his defiant stance towards the West. And this time, he got squashed for it. Whether he had had weapons or not, I think his posture would still have been the same.

― bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Extremism in defense of stupidity is ALWAYS a vice.

Damn skippy.

― Maimonides Tha Funkee Rabbi (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not arguing he's such a great guy or anything. Only that he was definitely the leader there (like Tito) and that strongman leadership may have kept the people together... he was able to successfully portray the US as villains, with the sanctions and all.

In short, he didn't fear the Iraqi populace as much as the US would have you believe, though he might have hid from Kurdish or US plots.

― andy, Tuesday, 10 February 2004 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I question the value of keeping a populace together through oppression. It seems like saying a family with an abusive father is better off getting beatenevery night b/c at least they are still together.

― bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)

That's a tough call. The hatred in Iraq runs nowhere as deep as my Balkan analog... that was a case where Tito merely repressed the seething hatred in sort of pressure cooker that blew it's top in the 90's.

What about the US / CSA conflict though? 'Twas violence that kept us together... the burning of Atlanta, et al.

― andy, Tuesday, 10 February 2004 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)

bnw made my point while I f'd around trying to remember tags, but:

Anyone with half a fucking brain would have known the likelihood of Iraq having these weapons was far from a sure thing (esp. after they didn't use a single one in the "war").

Only one US expert on Iraq, Scott Ritter, agreed with you. His recent CSPAN interview was good. I'd like to see him get the recognition he deserves. He was pilloried.

yeah I feel this weird empathy.

Even as an avowed Bush-hater and full term opponent of the war (which I felt was an obvious set-up, tho I figured they'd find at least trace WMD somewhere), I think your empathy is badly, badly misplaced. Feel empathy or sorrow for Iraqis, before and after, would be my sanctimonious sounding advice.

unlike Castro, who is very iron-fisted about any weapons.

With a lower per capita gdp, at least Castro can point to high literacy and relatively good healthcare. According to ye old almanac, Iraq had only 58% literacy and vastly inferior child mortality rates. This is not intended as a defense of Castro.

...I always felt that those who snickered about him hiding like a coward in a hole forgot the fact that he was essentially hiding out...

Agreed, so meaningless.

― Hunter (Hunter), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, check out that graphic- based on child mortality, Cuba's health care is equal to the US! I bet they have a lot fewer breast augmentations and stomach staples, though.

― Hunter (Hunter), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 22:53 (twenty-one years ago)

"According to ye old almanac, Iraq had only 58% literacy and vastly inferior child mortality rates..."

Wait a minute... that Almanac is for 2001, the height of the sanctions... Iraq was very honest about it's problems during this time, it's poor health care, etc. Before the first Gulf War, it was relatively prosperous and even moderate compared to some of the neighbors. Whether you blame the lack of good health care on Saddam is besides the point (he spent everything on palaces, etc.)... most folks agree the net effect of the sanctions was very bad for the average Iraqi citizen. Cuba receives most of it's medial supplies from Europe, who has no sanctions.

I can't speak about literacy, except that many people don't go to school for a variety of reasons.

― andy, Tuesday, 10 February 2004 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes the sanctions were extremely hard for Iraqis, I hadn't thought of this (pretty fundamental) factor. I'm looking at the CASI site for more info on pre-Gulf War conditions. Gotta go to class now tho.

― Hunter (Hunter), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Looks like 1989 would have 5 year survival rates at about 950/1000, better by a lot but not as good as Cuba. Projected improvement would put 2000 at 970, much better, but hypothetical?

― Hunter (Hunter), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i knew this shit would degenerate quicklike

i want to distance myself from any statements that imply that saddam was anything but awful

i was just saying that despite this fact i found myself with this weird spontaneous and very basic human empathy for *that one particular situation he found himself in*

― amateur!st (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

A gracious quote.

"What do you want me to do? Go over and kiss the camera?"

Sure thing, Bill.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Way to stay partisan, though, laying the blame at Clinton-appointed Tenet's feet.

― Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

He'll cling to what he can.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 22:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Skipping 92 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

he used a vibrator on himself!

― sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

My favorite part is when he confuses loofah and felafel.

― Nemo (JND), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)

i was just going to post that!

― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 20:30 (twenty-one years ago)

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0060544244.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

the thing that got me was that i had zero trouble at all picturing him saying those words.

― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 20:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Unnnnghhhh!!!

― Bill O'Reilly (Baked Bean Teeth), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know if I'll ever be able to eat falafel again.

― Nemo (JND), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"University of Missouri...what I would've done with you two."

Moo Moo Mizzou!

― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

ok when I first saw the hyperlinks on the smoking gun page I was like OH SHIT THEY HAVE SOUND SAMPLES OF HIM SAYING THIS ON THE PHONE??!?!?!?!!?!

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I was relieved when I saw that the "carribean fantasies" link didn't end with a ".mp3"

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)

my god he uses the phrase "modus operandi" when making naughty phone calls. my god my god.

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

frankly, I'm a little turned on by that.

― Remy (x Jeremy), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

You want to sleep with Bill O'Reilly?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Your search - bill o'reilly sexy - did not match any documents.

― Remy (x Jeremy), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)

The time is now to create the webpage.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I just want him to felafel my back at the spa.

― Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

You guys seen Witches Of Eastwick? Picture the scene where a shirtless Nicholson seduces Cher. Now put Bill O'Reilly in his place.

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)

81. During the course of Defendant BILL O'REILLY's sexual rant, it became clear that he was using a vibrator upon himself, and that he ejaculated. Plaintiff was repulsed.

― sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

O'reilly claimed he received a massage in a cabana in Bali and the "little short brown woman" asked to see his penis and was "amazed."

― sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.newsmaxstore.com/nmstore/images/books/wlofy.jpg

― sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)

O'reilly claimed he received a massage in a cabana in Bali and the "little short brown woman" asked to see his penis and was "amazed."

DAEREST MAEN WHITE MAN, WHY YUO HAEV SO ULGY THINIG-A-LING?

― Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I get those messages on friendster all the time

― sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Are you into felafels too?

― Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)

So how come is it that the headline on the AP isn't "O'Reilly Sued for Sexual Harassment", but is Fox's O'Reilly Sues Over Extortion Attempt?

Love that liberal media.

― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 21:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't care what happens with the suit or countersuit, I just want her audiotapes released in .mp3 so I can work them into every mixtape from now until the end of time.

― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 22:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, Drudge tried to ignore the harassment suit for most of the day, unsuccessfully.

(xp)

― why do old people and old users of ILX such bastardos (deangulberry), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Its not on drudge front page

― sometimes i like to pretend i am very small and warm (ex machina), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 23:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, drudge is how I heard about it. It's appeared above the main image all day "O'REILLY HIT WITH SEX HARASS SUIT **WARNING: CONTAINS GRAPHIC DESCRIPTIONS**..." and mostly in red.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 13 October 2004 23:14 (twenty-one years ago)

it's official -- BILL O'REILLY IS A HORSE'S ASS. AND AS HORNY AS A TIN-CAN-EATING GOAT.

― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 14 October 2004 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

If you must, you can hear O'Reily talk dirty in the audio version of his "erotic thriller," Those Who Trespass. I think they've played it on Air America before.

― Chris Marx, Thursday, 14 October 2004 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)

(blount!!)

― g--ff (gcannon), Thursday, 14 October 2004 03:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't care what happens with the suit or countersuit, I just want her audiotapes released in .mp3 so I can work them into every mixtape from now until the end of time.

mixtape ts: yngwie v. o'reilly!

― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 14 October 2004 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)

The small brown woman asked to see his penis and was
cue Pixies "I'm Amazed"

― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 14 October 2004 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)

mixtape ts: yngwie v. o'reilly!

Yngwie: Curses in Swedish before he Unleashes the Fookin' Fury!
O'Reilly: Curses America before he Unleashes the Pasty, Unwashed Vienna Sausage of Horror!

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 14 October 2004 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)

He don't need to fight,
To prove he's right,
He don't need to be forgiven

(Oh, sorry, wrong guy...)

― Joe (Joe), Friday, 15 October 2004 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Pasty, Unwashed Vienna Sausage of Horror!

that's Falafel Of Horror

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 15 October 2004 01:27 (twenty-one years ago)

The real question here is when "it became clear he was using a vibrator on himself" (in the document posted on the smoking gun) was he fucking himself up the ass or just like vibrating his dick?

― now i've seen everything... have you ever seen a man eat his own head? no, well , Saturday, 16 October 2004 03:38 (twenty-one years ago)

The said thing about this is that I can never eat falafel again.

― Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Saturday, 16 October 2004 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Er, sad

― Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Saturday, 16 October 2004 03:46 (twenty-one years ago)

that's Falafel Of Horror
No no no no no no no. The Pasty, Unwashed Vienna Sausage of Horror goes INTO the Forbidden Falafel of Lust!
Which makes the Falafel both no longer kosher but also puts it on the CDC's "Don't Touch Without Gloves" list.

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)

The Edward Said thing about this would claim orientalism on the part of O'Reilly.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:16 (twenty-one years ago)

o'reilly might respond 'i've occidentally stuck a vibrator up my ass!'

― cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Need I remind you that we are at war? At times of war we make sacrifices - I have to have luggage x-rayed, and O'Reilly has to put vibrators up his ass. The woman complaining obviously cares nothing about the lives list on 9-11.

― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:41 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.theexperiment.org/media/ORiellyAlArianLG.jpg

then he sniffs it! EW!

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:46 (twenty-one years ago)

"Just remember, kiddies....every time you 'sit and spin' on the 16 inch Arouser(TM), Allah kills an insurgent."

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:47 (twenty-one years ago)

(no. that wasn't supposed to make sense.)

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:47 (twenty-one years ago)

whoa, there's acually a city in New York named "Fox"?

ya learn sumthin' new every day.

― Sir Kingfish Beavis D'Azzmonch (Kingfish), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)

http://media.collegepublisher.com/media/paper87/stills/nhy608sr.jpg

falafel! falafel! it pleasures me! bring me my pleasures!

― manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Criswell he ain't.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 16 October 2004 05:58 (twenty-one years ago)

add wrongful termination to the list of causes of action that ms. macrkis has against bill o'reilly.

psst: i may know a few good employment lawyers in NYC, andrea!

― Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 16 October 2004 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.