Someone mentioned on the 24 thread that they were recording the programmes to watch them without ads. Someone on another thread was complaining about the volume of advertising on US television, and someone responded to them that complaining about advertising was "so 1972".
Is there a point at which your enjoyment of a programme *does* become seriously hampered by ads, or does it not make a difference to you? (You may or may not wish to discuss annoyance at programmes being cut in different places for US or UK TV?)
How have ads, or the lack thereof, affected your TV viewing habits?
― The River Kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
But when the ads seem to comprise 50% or more of the bulk of the programming, I start to get irritated. But what irritates me most of all is programmes, like, for instance, Buffy, where the writers PROGRAMME IN cliffhangers for the ad breaks, and UK TV just splices them in different places! Grrrrr!
― The River Kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:53 (twenty-two years ago)
Does US TV really just jump suddenly to random single commercials every so often rather than having proper commercial breaks? If so, that would annoy me hugely.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― The River Kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:58 (twenty-two years ago)
Kate, I think this could apply to Corrie as well.
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― The River Kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 12:01 (twenty-two years ago)
most ads don't bother me over here, although i tend to tape shows and watch them in one big bunch without ads.
although i agree with matt, i've noticed that the last few films i've seen on tv have had SO MANY ad breaks. i think for films it should be every half hour, rather than 15 mins.
― colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)
1. Ads for meds, lawyers and debt consolidation. I really object to meds ads for some reason.2. That Seinfeld slap-bass thing they've got going on most adverts, especially the ones that are supposed to be for 'happy' companies. 3. Eight minutes of ads per 30 minutes of broadcast time.
Here is why what's on between the ads is vile:
Half of programmes have awful 'fuzak' soundtrack.The way they all look and speak. Botox ahoy!
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)
I wonder if Sky were to show it ad-less it would give them great publicity, or whether it would just set a precedent that other producers would start demanding?
― Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)
I've been going through 'The Sopranos' on DVD (for about a year) and I swear to God that the first series had no specifically designed 'ad-hangers' but that the third series much more obviously does. Marone! Apparently writers are told to get in a climax after 18min, 36min, etc, on UKTV.
― ENRQ (Enrique), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 14:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― chris (chris), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)
OTM Suzy, this annoys the sh*t out of me for some reason. Here in the states, different networks (or even shows) seem to have more ads than others, but I don't watch much tv so I could be mistaken. Also, I usually watch shows on HBO which are ad free.
― webcrack (music=crack), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)
that's because they had no idea how the first series would go over, and since it was made for HBO (which has no ads), they didn't worry about it. By the time of the third series, when they knew it would wind up in syndication and on foreign networks with ads, they started putting them in. it's made the show much more TV-like than it was originally which kind of sucks.
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― NRQ (Enrique), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― mei (mei), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 20:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 20:43 (twenty-two years ago)
I most frequently get angered at commercials when the show I'm watching isn't the typical scripted drama, like Survivor's reunion shows, which have not only more commercial breaks, but they last in excess of 4 minutes as opposed to 2.5 to 3 minutes.
But in any event, my typical break is necessary. I remember the first episode of this season's 24 where I was squirming for 45 minutes because of my overactive bladder.
― Leee Majors (Leee), Thursday, 12 February 2004 00:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 February 2004 01:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 12 February 2004 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)