Charles DeGaulle - classic or dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
One of the greatest statesmen of the 20th century, or a silly man who embodied the pretensions of his nation - you decided.

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

For inpsiring "The Day of the Jackal," at least, classique.

Nemo (JND), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

he rallied the vichy remnants/free french and helped get the allies to reinvade france rather than helping out the russians with any other new front and rode the wave to power in france for years. when you consider where france was during that period, its a pretty incredible feat.

i really know little about his character and personality, but hey, hes french.. < /stereotype>

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)

what is very flash about him is the way he manages by force of will to transform France from being an abject victim state in 1944, to being sufficiently in at the kill in 1945 to getting a chunks of Germany & Berlin to occupy and a permanent seat on the UN.

I also admire his pragmatism regarding Algeria and decolonisation, and the fact that he actually did step down once he lost an election.

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

(mmm, obviously a political leader should always step down if they lose an election. Why I like it in this context is that it gives the lie to suggestions that DeGaulle was another Bonaparte or Boulanger).

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)

He's absolutely fascinating; possibly he believed he was the reincarnation of Joan of Arc, he was obsesssed with her at least, and with the idea of France which he believed he embodied.
Ive seen a lot recently on his relations with Churchill and Roosevelt, which adds to this myth of the 'stubborn frenchman' who did things his way, though the truth is if Churchill had had a little less tolerance of De Gaulle's mood-swings (and listened to the president's advice to leave him hanging) he might not have ended up in the triumphant position that he - and France - ultimately did.

pete s, Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:00 (twenty-two years ago)

one of my high school history teachers referred to him as "Ol' Banana Nose," so for that reason alone, I vote classic.

hstencil, Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Didn't he once say that it was impossible to govern a nation with 300 varieties of cheese? That's classic.

Is there a good biography of him?

Nemo (JND), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:07 (twenty-two years ago)

classic for this genius quote alone: "britain, being an island, is quite insular."

Eisbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:08 (twenty-two years ago)

He's absolutely fascinating; possibly he believed he was the reincarnation of Joan of Arc, he was obsesssed with her at least, and with the idea of France which he believed he embodied.

apparently Petain was also obsessed with Joan of Arc, and would drone on about her at any opportunity.

Ive seen a lot recently on his relations with Churchill and Roosevelt, which adds to this myth of the 'stubborn frenchman' who did things his way, though the truth is if Churchill had had a little less tolerance of De Gaulle's mood-swings (and listened to the president's advice to leave him hanging) he might not have ended up in the triumphant position that he - and France - ultimately did.

I'm not sure. He might not have got France a permanent seat on the security council or a share in the occupation of Germany, but no matter what the British & Americans thought of him he would still have been the man who in 1940 embodied the willingness of some French people to continue the struggle against Hitler. That would always count for him in post-war French politics.

I always got the impression he and Churchill got on reasonably well, albeit with a mutual understanding that their interests and goals were not always the same. However, the Americans in WW2 seem to have had it in for DeGaulle to an extent that was almost pathological, and were always looking for completely unconvincing bozos they could put forward as alternative leaders of Free France. Did the Americans have any convincing reasons for their dislike of DeGaulle?

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Well compare the US military leadership style against DeGaulle's pomp. Here are eisenhower and patton grinding through north africa and spanking the nazis and then heres this French guy with no state, and barely any man power trying to tell them how they need to save France's bacon.

I can see Churchill and DeGaulle having alot in common in regards to their ideas of their roles within their respective countries.. both being amazing status seekers/leaders.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Most of my perceptions of his character come from Dougal in The Magic Roundabout.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Well DV i can't provide solid facts on here right now but *both* had pretty good reasons for disliking, even abandoning De Gaulle. Even Churchill toyed with this idea himself on several occasions; as we know from his private correspondence De Gaulle often appeared unstable and unreliable to him. Of course Churchill didn't share De Gaulle's zealous French religio-patriotism though he had cautious admiration for him for that, aswell as his other limpet like qualities. But he desperately wanted to support De Gaulle in full, to invest full faith in him and his leadership, and to recommend his faith to Roosevelt (which he did). De Gaulle hardly seemed to care about this, taking Britain's help for granted. He upset people who were trying to help him, went over Churchill's head, neglected to pass on tactical information (tho admittedly not it seems with malice), and went public with things Churchill wanted him to keep between them. He believed his office in Whitehall (i believe) was a part of the French state, not subject to British law. He was, as Churchill exasperatedly confessed in writing, a pain in the backside.

But absolutely, as you say, his position as France's legendary figure-head and rescuer from 1940-45 is unchallengable, and i wouldn't contest that. A difficult man, much like the others charge of the major powers at that time, but a great man, with this magical charisma that endeared him to every frenchman who dreamt of and finally saw a free France.

pete s, Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I did like the way the conservatives voted for him thinking that he'd get tough on the North Africans and instead he gave them independence.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Well compare the US military leadership style against DeGaulle's pomp. Here are eisenhower and patton grinding through north africa and spanking the nazis and then heres this French guy with no state, and barely any man power trying to tell them how they need to save France's bacon.

yes indeed.

does anyone know if any politicians in any of the other occupied countries made their name through uncompromising opposition from afar to the Nazis?

DV (dirtyvicar), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I know there was at least a Czech government-in-exile, in London. They plotted and carried out the Heydrich assassination. But I don't know what happened to them after the war.

Nemo (JND), Wednesday, 11 February 2004 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Jan Masaryk fell victim to the fourth defenestration of Prague and the Communists took over.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 12 February 2004 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)

dud, if only for blocking Britian's early entry into the EEC

Ed (dali), Thursday, 12 February 2004 00:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I guessed that it probably wasn't a happy ending!

Nemo (JND), Thursday, 12 February 2004 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)

dud, if only for blocking Britian's early entry into the EEC

I'm beginning to think there is a lot to be said for his stated reason for blocking British EEC membership - that Britain is too much of a client state of the USA to truly engage with Europe. Although of course, maybe if Britain had joined in the early 1960s the UK would have stopped being America's catspaw.

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 12 February 2004 00:21 (twenty-two years ago)

He made it legal to marry dead guys: CLASSIC!!!

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Thursday, 12 February 2004 02:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Wilson and Heath could have steered Britain away from the US with public support in the late 60s and early 70s

Ed (dali), Thursday, 12 February 2004 10:13 (twenty-two years ago)

They could have if they'd wanted to defy the city and further fucking the pound.

does anyone know if any politicians in any of the other occupied countries made their name through uncompromising opposition from afar to the Nazis?

Made name, and were promptly offed by the Soviets -- yes, in Poland. Oh hang on, I meant offed by Churchill off Gibralatar. The point is that France almost saw civil war -- De Gaulle in no way represented 'free France' -- the resistance movement, itself divided, was broadly left wing, a continuation of the Popular Front impulse that the Brigadier was no keen on. The OSS had huge issues with arming large parts of the resistance.

he rallied the vichy remnants/free french and helped get the allies to reinvade france rather than helping out the russians with any other new front and rode the wave to power in france for years.

It still happened a year too late--and in any case British public opinion wanted a second front, not just De Gaulle.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 12 February 2004 10:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Wine and War is a great book about WWII, and gives very good insight about deGaulle

Orbit (Orbit), Thursday, 12 February 2004 10:24 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.