thinking of holden caulfield, yes, whiny teen etc, but before the concept of teenager a reality. when assessed today, treated as a contemporary of todays teenagers, to an extent, compared to, but is this possible?
other depictions of *teenagers* pre their 'invention',,,, what do you think?
― Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Thursday, 12 February 2004 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)
Why here it is!
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 12 February 2004 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― ENRQ (Enrique), Thursday, 12 February 2004 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amity (Amity), Friday, 13 February 2004 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 13 February 2004 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 13 February 2004 00:59 (twenty-two years ago)
Bilbo Baggins is sorta reffered to as a teen though I can't remember the year The Hobbit hit the press.
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)
(Even more pedantically, in fact neither Bilbo nor Frodo are 33 at the start of their respective quests, though Frodo is 33 the first time he is encountered in LOTR.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)
there's something i read about numerology, the whole 111 - 33 thing.
help us out ned.
― gygax! (gygax!), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Friday, 13 February 2004 01:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Friday, 13 February 2004 02:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amity (Amity), Friday, 13 February 2004 04:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Amity (Amity), Friday, 13 February 2004 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huckleberry, Friday, 13 February 2004 05:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huckleberry, Friday, 13 February 2004 05:21 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not sure pre-1900 narratives count here, especially Dickens when quite often we aren't shown the transition from childhood to adulthood. Possible exception = Prince Hal - how old was he? Did Shakespeare help invent the literary teenager?
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 13 February 2004 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Friday, 13 February 2004 13:36 (twenty-two years ago)
If you look at other early 20th Century US writers (Fitzgerald, Hemingway, Faulkner sometimes), they're writing about twentysomethings and above - perhaps something that happened in the 50s caused the central focal point of youth to jump back 5-10 years?
I think the two world wars play a part in this as well, especially outside the US.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 13 February 2004 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 13 February 2004 13:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:00 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't think this has much to do with the original question, though, just thinking aloud.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)
The Teenager qua demographic qua consumer worth marketing to, however, didn't arise until the late 40s.
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― ENRQ (Enrique), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― ENRQ (Enrique), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kerry (dymaxia), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Friday, 13 February 2004 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)
Maybe, but I would look at Romeo and Juliet as the key text.
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 13 February 2004 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 13 February 2004 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Friday, 13 February 2004 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Madchen (Madchen), Friday, 13 February 2004 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Friday, 13 February 2004 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 13 February 2004 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)
I have been reading Kermode's reviews of Salinger!
― the bellefox, Saturday, 26 November 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)
What did you think of Kermode's reviews of Salinger, pinefox? For that matter, who is Kermode? My ignorance is boundless, so any form of answer would be a benediction.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 26 November 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)
If they don't, they could read, post to, or revive other threads.
I was referring to Professor Sir Frank Kermode, who writes on Salinger in his collection Modern Essays. He seems sceptical. I could read more and report back.
― the bellefox, Saturday, 26 November 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)