South Dakota Lawmaker OKs Abortion Ban Tue Feb 10,10:22 PM ETBy JOE KAFKA, Associated Press Writer PIERRE, S.D. - The House passed a bill Tuesday that would outlaw most abortions in South Dakota, but opponents said it would do nothing but cost taxpayers money if it becomes law. Related LinksHouse Bill 1191 (sd.us)The bill, passed 54-15, would outlaw abortion unless a mother's life is in danger. It makes no exceptions for rape victims or women who could suffer permanent serious health problems by having babies. "When we're considering an innocent life, the health of the mother is not a substantial enough justification to take the innocent life," said Republican Rep. Matt McCaulley, chief sponsor of the bill. Opponents argued that if the Senate approves the bill and it becomes law, it will be thrown out in court because it runs counter to U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) decisions that have found abortion to be legal. They noted that courts have rejected state abortion restrictions twice in recent years. The cost of another legal challenge could be $1 million, Democratic Rep. Mel Olson estimated. He blamed the legislation on "a lot of goodhearted people from other states who are frustrated with the Supreme Court, looking to ride the horse of our South Dakota taxpayers to the Supreme Court." The bill would punish those who perform abortions with up to five years in prison and $5,000 fines.
PIERRE, S.D. - The House passed a bill Tuesday that would outlaw most abortions in South Dakota, but opponents said it would do nothing but cost taxpayers money if it becomes law.
Related LinksHouse Bill 1191 (sd.us)
The bill, passed 54-15, would outlaw abortion unless a mother's life is in danger. It makes no exceptions for rape victims or women who could suffer permanent serious health problems by having babies.
"When we're considering an innocent life, the health of the mother is not a substantial enough justification to take the innocent life," said Republican Rep. Matt McCaulley, chief sponsor of the bill.
Opponents argued that if the Senate approves the bill and it becomes law, it will be thrown out in court because it runs counter to U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) decisions that have found abortion to be legal. They noted that courts have rejected state abortion restrictions twice in recent years.
The cost of another legal challenge could be $1 million, Democratic Rep. Mel Olson estimated. He blamed the legislation on "a lot of goodhearted people from other states who are frustrated with the Supreme Court, looking to ride the horse of our South Dakota taxpayers to the Supreme Court."
The bill would punish those who perform abortions with up to five years in prison and $5,000 fines.
To borrow from Mark Twain, we need another Flood. This time, no Ark.
― Kingfish Beatbox Botox Funktion (Kingfish), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Bryan (Bryan), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)
I never really thought of S. Dakota as being that right-wing.
― andy, Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)
MAYBE THERE'S A CONNECTION?!?
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
My mother and her whole family are from there, but they're from the reservation, which doesn't count. I suppose they could still do abortions there.
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
Wyo. May Make Littering Via Urine Illegal
CHEYENNE, Wyo. - Urinating in a bottle and tossing it alongside the road would be made illegal under a bill introduced Wednesday in the Senate.
The practice, lawmakers say, has become problematic in some areas. A measure that passed introduction would classify it as littering, a misdemeanor punishable by up to nine months in prison and a $1,000 fine.
"For those of us who look at the beautiful scenery of Wyoming, we should now start looking at the shoulders of our roads," said a tongue-in-cheek Sen. Bill Vasey, D-Rawlins, the bill's sponsor.
Admitting it would be hard to enforce, Vasey said the measure is still needed to address an increasingly pungent problem, especially among highway cleanup crews.
"I think it's beyond their scope to pick up someone's bottle of urine, to be honest with you," he said.
The Senate Judiciary Committee (news - web sites) will now consider the measure.
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfish Beatbox Botox Funktion (Kingfish), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 12 February 2004 19:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Viva La Sam (thatgirl), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)
In other words, we're pro-life for everyone except slutty women who happened to get knocked up...
― Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:29 (twenty-two years ago)
I can't believe that I'd never thought about this. If the SC struck down Roe v. Wade, this would not be true though, right? Anyone know Tribal Law?
― Hunter (Hunter), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Hunter (Hunter), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfish Beatbox Botox Funktion (Kingfish), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― My Huckleberry Friend (Horace Mann), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kerry (dymaxia), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)
Get a pair of dice and scrubs at reception, but see the fine print before you sign.
Ridiculous.
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 12 February 2004 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 February 2004 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)
In other words, they are breaking a sweat over having to do their jobs.
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 12 February 2004 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfish Beatbox Botox Funktion (Kingfish), Thursday, 12 February 2004 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 February 2004 22:16 (twenty-two years ago)
Yes it is.
― Kingfish Beatbox Botox Funktion (Kingfish), Thursday, 12 February 2004 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 12 February 2004 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfish Beatbox Botox Funktion (Kingfish), Thursday, 12 February 2004 22:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 12 February 2004 22:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Baked Bean Teeth (Baked Bean Teeth), Thursday, 12 February 2004 22:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― martin m. (mushrush), Thursday, 12 February 2004 23:21 (twenty-two years ago)