― hmm, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 13:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― hmmm, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― thomas de'aguirre (biteylove), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― hmmm, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kingfish Beatbox (Kingfish), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― hmm, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― $$, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 20:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 20:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― luke'''', Tuesday, 17 February 2004 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― ;uke, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Greig (treefell), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 13:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)
'Love All The People' is rilly rilly good, but - because it's mostly just straight transcripts of his gigs - you do get to read the same jokes over and over again in just a slightly different way. Like, if I read the 'Here's an egg. Here's your brain on drugs' routine once more (it's there about five times in the first 50 pages and another couple of times throughout the rest of it), I will .
And, re: the 'transcripts of gigs' thing - if you've heard 'Arizona Bay', 'Flying Saucer Tour Vol 1' or 'Shock & Awe', or seen his videos, then be aware that repeats of these take at at least five chapters of the book.
The best stuff in it is the proposal for the 'Counts of the Netherworld' TV show. Anyone know if that actually got made? Cuz I remember seeing something dead similar on Channel 4 late one night at some point in the early-mid 1990s.
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
quoting reams and reams of routines on paper = dud. i know, because i did exactly this for the intro to my piece on Hicks for this week's Kerrang!, and it reads badly. Hicks was as much about delivery as material.
― stevie (stevie), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:01 (twenty-two years ago)
my one grouch about Hicks, though (and it doesn't even reflect on Hicks himself) is that all the fanboys proclaim him to be brilliant because he 'spoke the truth'. when in fact, his opinions etc were, for the most part, simple humanism (war = bad, ignorance is hell, bigotry holds us all back) that shouldn't have been obvious and apparent to anyone with a brain. what made Hicks so great was that he was insanely *funny*.
― stevie (stevie), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― hmmm (hmmm), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― hmmm (hmmm), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)