Mel Gibson....Crazy Christian Crusader!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Did anyone catch Diane Sawyer's interview
with Mel Gibson re: "The Passion of the Christ" last night? Holy Smoke
is the man a crazed ZEALOT!! Apparently he had some wild epiphany
thirteen years ago, and is now a rigidly traditionalist Catholic. I
dare say I don't think I'll ever be able to watch one of his films the
same way again. And oof were his reactions to Diane's questions ever unnerving.


Religion sucks.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 14:47 (twenty-two years ago)

13 years ago = 1991 = Lethel Weapon 3? = never more than 1 sequel! Please!

Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

mel gibson is a scary loony.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd heard that he'd become really devout, but I HAD NO IDEA he was this far gone.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

oh yeah--just ask his dad!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

If only he wore a cape as well.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)

oh yeah--just ask his dad!

And how about THAT for a mind-bending story development? Why didn't Diane wait until the last five minutes of the show to ask about him? (Did you notice Mel's dead-eyed warning...."Ya gotta leave it alone, Diane!"....as if to suggest he'd whip out his vorpal Scottish broadsword and liberate her head from her neck if she continued her query?)

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

whoops, that should've been why DID Diane wait...blah blah blah

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

did she ask him about the pope thing?

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

(the "it is as it was" thing)

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

What's the thing about his dad? Are there any links? Alex -- Mel's new film has been in contention since it went into production because of its anti-semitism.

ENRQ (Enrique), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

his father is a fairly loony holocaust denying pre-vatican II traditionalist catholic.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm aware of that, ENRQ. I just hadn't heard the man wax rhapsodic so zealously before.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, he's a zealot alright. One of my co-workers invited me and my girlfriend to a showing for free, his church rented out the whole damn theater. Don't think I'll be taking him up on that one, but it made it clear that the movie is going to do pretty well on the strength of that sort of thing alone.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Yikes, Yikes and thrice Yikes!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

wow! I woulda gone...

hitchens's rant piece about this in the new vanity fair is actually pretty good

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Ach, damned VF and their anti-interweb tightwaddity.

ENRQ (Enrique), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

it's angry-letter-to-graydon-carter time!

(it is the hollywood issue you know, you might wanna pick it up, it's like a phone book! coupla decent articles)

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Ah, that time of year is it? I might well get it in that case. Still have some residual fondness for the Hitch.

ENRQ (Enrique), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Theres a scary buttload of spam going around places like LiveJoural lately about this. Some mental xian fundies are spamming people with exortations to go and see this "very important film" with links and stuff. Its giving me the fear.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)

i have enjoyed two of his more recent films probably more than I should've (Payback and Signs)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:20 (twenty-two years ago)

"GIVE ME BACK MY SON (of God)!!!!"

nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Theres a scary buttload of spam going around places like LiveJoural lately about this. Some mental xian fundies are spamming people with exortations to go and see this "very important film" with links and stuff. Its giving me the fear.

They did the same thing with Left Behind and The Omega Code and I expect there will be some sort of turnout on the weekend, sure. And unless the film has some sort of further appeal it will tank.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:33 (twenty-two years ago)

You know, when this whole bullshit started I thought I could never watch a Mel Gibson movie the same way again, too. I saw Tequila Sunrise for the first time recently though, and damn if he wasn't amazing in that (the whole film is a classic anyhow). I'm sure knowing about all this will make his shittier films feel all the more shitty but it didn't affect me as much as I thought it would.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

nate i dare you to shout that out at the cinema if you see a trailer for this film

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I really hope someone gives the two-word review "holy shit."

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

These cuffs are made of high tensile steel. It would take you ten minutes to hack through them. If you're quick, and if you're lucky, you can hack through your ankle in five.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Monica Bellucci goes from a ten-minute rape scene to this. (With a stop in the Matrix for her Breasts of Doom club scene.)

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I really hope someone gives the two-word review "holy shit."

but what if it actually is a GOOD movie?

birthofanationbär (llamasfur), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:43 (twenty-two years ago)

she was also in Under Suspicion, another giant dungheap of no fun.

Tad, if BRAVEHEART was shit (and it was) I can't see him taking genius pills before this one.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Under Suspicion, another giant dungheap of no fun.

actually it does have some amazingly bad lines coming from Gene Hackman & Morgan Freeman (who have no excuse for being in such a shitty film because they were the EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS!). My favorite is when police chief Morgan Freeman tells his hot-headed partner to "go home! put on a funny hat! do whatever it is morons do!"

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Bigotry against Christians

The last frontier for "open minded liberals" (translation: "fanatical zealous secular humanists")

yawn

kiwi, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 03:43 (twenty-two years ago)

People like kiwi don't exist in the real-world, do they? I've never heard one of those "liberals=" wacky things in everyday conversation.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 03:49 (twenty-two years ago)

being horrified by Mel Gibson's new movie and the mindless allegience some folks have to it (I probably know more about what's in the film than any pamphleteer does) = bigotry against christians?

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 03:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Have you actually seen it yet?

I'm gonna see the movie no matter what. It's going to be interesting to watch, whether or not it's a good movie.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 03:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I've read tons of articles about it and the contents within. Call me cynical, but I doubt the people who decided months ago to walk down the street praying house by house for people to see it have.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)

and if they have and STILL are doing this, than that might piss me off just as much.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 03:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Understandable.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 04:00 (twenty-two years ago)

im a christian and i think that this looks like this is full of super scary fucked up badness

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 04:23 (twenty-two years ago)

"xtian fundies" getting riled up.

It's just that it's quite rare for a famous star to do a movie that is so religious. The question is: how good is the movie (in terms of turthfulness and on terms of artistic quality)? or will it be a Battlefield-Earth?

A Nairn (moretap), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 04:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't realize that Kiwi came back. He's so cute when he gets all impassioned about people putting Christians down.

Yeah, it sounded like it might have been kind of interesting (good actors anyway) until I started reading the reviews (and learned EVEN more about Gibson and co.) and now I'm absolutely convinced that this is a horribly misguided, ugly sort of film (and I think a lot of Christians are gonna agree.) Really there are good points about Christianity (although I tend to focus more on the awful points--sorry folks, it's a function of living in America) but this movie really seems to paint Catholics/Christians in the worst (blood/sacrifice/torture/sin obsessed) possible light (not to even mention the anti-semiticism.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 04:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Btw I don't think this film is REMOTELY as gross as Gibson's father's comments or what conservative groups are doing in California to nullify gay marriages. I just think it's really grotesque sounding.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 04:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm betting it'll suck, but still some Christians will feel obligated to like it.

A Nairn (moretap), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah, I mean clearly they ALREADY have!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 04:45 (twenty-two years ago)

But I don't think it's gonna be a great converter or anything (I guess we can be sort of thankful for this.) I think it'll alienate far more people than it will appeal to.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 04:46 (twenty-two years ago)

One thing to remember here is that ticket sales account for a small fraction of the revenues a successful film generates. US free/pay TV rights, DVD/Video, foreign DVD, TV, rights, etc. are where films actually make money. So, all artistic merit considerations aside, this film will only make money if it appeals to a general audience, which is to say a TV/DVD audience the world over. Chances are very good that it won't because of the subject matter. In some parts of the world it will offend, in many regions it will simply fail to interest. Doubt it will make (big) money no matter how many people rally out to see it the first weekend. Depending on the distribution agreement, Mel could still, of course, recoup his investment.

Skottie, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 05:27 (twenty-two years ago)

But DVD sales will be great. That's how the Left Behind movies make their money - every rabid Christian feels the need to buy a copy at $29.95.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 05:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Apparently the dude who plays Jesus is also a devout Catholic. He made a big deal about them having Jews working on the film (apparently Mary Magdalene is played by a Jew) - like, who cares?

I'll see it. But I saw Battlefield Earth, too!

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 06:29 (twenty-two years ago)

monica belluci is jewish?!?!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 06:31 (twenty-two years ago)

that's awesome, now it's okay for me to go out with her!

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 06:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Satan rocks out on ProTools:

John Debney, who composed the music for “The Passion of the Christ,” says he did battle with Satan while scoring the flick.

Debney had written music for a number of movies such as “Liar, Liar,” “Spy Kids,” and “I Know What You Did Last Summer” — but he says he was visited by the devil while writing the score for the film about the last hours of Jesus Christ.

“I had never before subscribed to the idea that maybe Satan is a real person, but I can attest that he was in my room a lot and I know that he hit everyone on this production,” Debney said, according to a lengthy interview that ran on Assist News Service, a Christian news agency.

He went on to say, "I had all these computers and synthesizers in my studio and the hard drives would go down and the digital picture that lives on the computer with the music would just freeze on his [Satan's] face. Then the volume would go to ten and it would happen all the time.

"The first time it happened, it scared me," Debney said. "Once I got over the initial shock of that, I learned to work around it and learned to reboot the computers and so I would start talking to him.

"There was one day when I had been on the movie for about four months when it really became bad that day and a lot of things that were causing doubt in me and I had had enough. The computers froze for about the tenth time that day and it was about nine o'clock at night and so I got really mad, and I told Satan to manifest himself and I said, 'Let's go out into the parking lot and let's go.' It was a sea change in me. I knew that this was war. I am not a physical person, but I was really angry on this occasion.

"...I had booted everything down and saved it and I was walking down the stairs and I was verbalizing and saying to Satan, 'Manifest yourself right now.' As I am walking out and saying, 'Come on, let's go now,' I looked over and I could see someone looking at me and I realized how silly I must have looked. He didn't manifest himself, but I wished he would have. It changed for me after that."

morris pavilion (samjeff), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Poltergeist activity is funny like that.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:49 (twenty-two years ago)

If this guy had actually beaten up Satan in the parking lot of the studio, I would have been MAD IMPRESSED. Take that, Charlie Daniels!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the tech-support-type details of how to deal with a Satan-infected PC.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks to Mel Gibson, I am no longer talking with my father.

hstencil, Wednesday, 3 March 2004 23:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Dare I ask, Stence?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)

och, sorry stence, I fear that's the real legacy of this movie.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)

it's a good idea to remember that if you're gonna insult Jews, you might want to make sure your son isn't dating one.

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:03 (twenty-two years ago)

:( (meaning i can imagine the conversation that took place)

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)

So sorry, Stence:< Parental insensitivity par example.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)

That really sucks, man, I'm sorry.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)

"I had never before subscribed to the idea that maybe Satan is a real person, but I can attest that he was in my room a lot and I know that he hit everyone on this production,” Debney said, according to a lengthy interview that ran on Assist News Service, a Christian news agency.

And this is a Hollywood veteran? Satan runs a major part of the studio system, as it is. How else to explain Adam Sandler's popularity?

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Little Nicky: A Documentary?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)

stence, to try and play devil's dad's advocate here, did he say those insensitive things because he already knew you were dating someone Jewish? Or did he just start a rant against the Jews just as some sort of blind outrage and obsequiousness to Mel's little epic, which in turn offended you (reasonably, of course) and then you told him who you were dating?

Neither case excuses your father's comments, from what I can gather. So you very much have my sympathies, regardless.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:52 (twenty-two years ago)

And I'm not entitled to get an answer to my question. If you want to talk no more about this, obviously, you don't have to.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Thank you, Mel Gibson, for letting people seethe and hate. AGAIN.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:54 (twenty-two years ago)

But Ned, wasn't What Women Want enough?

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Well that was seething and hatred at one goon's follies -- this lets seething and hatred from bigoted fucks at a whole bunch of people flourish, and what joy that is!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 4 March 2004 00:58 (twenty-two years ago)

x-post back to Hstencil.

The reason why I ask is because my family (and thanks to probably genetics and being raised by then, myself) is very rant-prone in a similar way to the latter case I hypothesized above.

I've learned to curb myself early on in my college days, thanks to more discriminating friends... but my family (specifically, my mom and grandmother) will still tell me really offensive things about certain types of people when they're on the phone with me, because they'll see something on TV (because they are ALWAYS watching TV, no matter where they are in the house and what they are doing), and will interrupt our conversation with something like "Oh, those Mexicans are at it again, murdering people" or other equally ignorant and venomous rants like that.

Point being, I don't want you to lose contact with your father because of an ignorant mistake he made... something that's a little more forgivable (to me) than targeting you for dating someone who is of the "wrong" type.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Remember that scene in 'Braveheart' where Mel speaks in Latin and French to the king, basically saying, 'ah you thought I was a thickheaded lunk, but look, I am learned and serious.'
That's basically 'The Passion' but with some Aramaic to go with yer Latin.

pete s, Thursday, 4 March 2004 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)

db - this came about as a result of me calling him about some non-relationship-related troubles as of late. He basically shrugged them off and started talking about the movie, to which I replied that I didn't want to talk about it. When he pressed me further, I said I thought Mel Gibson's an anti-Semite and I didn't want to talk about it, and that I would never spend money on it. He then kept pressing and pressing - to the point where he actually stated "I think the Jews are thugs because of how they treat the Palestinians." Mind you, I've never heard him speak of the plight of the Palestinians, nor have I ever heard him speak in an overly broad or anti-Semitic way about the Jewish people. At that point, I reminded him that my girlfriend is Jewish (which he knew previously) and that I was really offended, and that if he equates the actions of Israel with the Jewish people, he doesn't really know any Jews at all. He then, not getting my point about what it means to "know" anyone, brought up my brother's godparents - the only Jewish people that he knows on any kind of social level - stating that he's known them "since before I was born." At that point, I was just like "this conversation is finished" and when he calls again I feel I have no choice but to not answer.

Even if I wasn't dating a wonderful girl who is Jewish, or lived with two great guys who are Jewish, I'd still be disturbed by what he said. However, the fact that he said what seemed to me to be a very thoughtless and insensitive thing knowing full well what religious and ethnic backgrounds some of the most important people in my life happen to have, I am not seeing any other choice but to cut him out of my life. Based on other comments he's said lately, it seems he's going through another one of his "religious" periods, in which he becomes very difficult to talk with in general. I've dealt with this stuff before (as has the rest of our family), but now it's gotten even more personal and I refuse to let him dictate the terms of our relationship anymore. If he can't respect the choices I make in my life, when I've done everything to respect his (I didn't bring up the movie - nor would I), then I don't see why he should be a part of it. It's really kinda sad, but what can I do?

hstencil, Thursday, 4 March 2004 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)

more power to ya stencil, and i'm very sorry to hear about that.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 4 March 2004 04:57 (twenty-two years ago)

stence, I could write a book about how my granfather (now R.I.P.) pretty much terrorized my immediate family for practically my entire life in a similar way.. though not religious, just highly delusional and aggressive. I know exactly how you feel. And I'm sorry you have to be dealing with this shit right now.

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 March 2004 07:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Article in Archaeology Magazine starts out with brief discussion of whether or not The Passion claims to be historically accurate; moves on to religious/historical tourism.

Another article speculates (pretty blindly, citing "rumors flitting around" and interview material that sort of says completely different things) that Gibson might make a movie about the Maccabees. (And a burning bush might fly out of my butt.)

Tep (ktepi), Sunday, 7 March 2004 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Where archaeology fears--or is unable--to tread, however, Hollywood has always displayed a willingness to rush in and, despite the lack of evidence relating to Jesus's life and ministry, his story will continue to capture the imaginations of filmmakers.

The possiblity of turning yet another buck and influencing audiences would always be too much for Hollywood to resist. As you already have the Bible to follow as a basic script, how badly could you screw up?

And tourists to the Holy Land will continue to be guided to places where the events of the Bible "actually" took place, because, as Chancey says, that way "everybody wins--the pilgrims get to walk where Jesus walked, and the tourism industry gets the money."

After the Passion's popularity, I can picture a Universal Studios Holy Land where Jesus will serve you the loaves and fishes on a paper plate and tourists can get rides on Noah's Ark for $10.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)

The best movie review I've seen of this comes from former NYC mayor Ed Koch

People who are not anti-Semitic will not become Jew haters as a result of seeing “The Passion of the Christ.” On the other hand, anti-Semites will leave the theater more virulent in their feelings against Jews. That would be particularly true in Europe and Asia where Jews are already victims of violence. The Chief Rabbi of Paris has urged Jewish children not to wear their yarmulkes which identify them as Jews and have caused them to be assaulted by French Muslims on the way to school. He suggested they wear baseball caps.

During this week’s Academy Awards show, the deaths of film artists occurring in the last year were noted. Leni Riefenstahl, who wrote, produced and directed “Triumph of the Will” was mentioned. The objective of her film was to create a worldwide sense of the invincibility of Adolf Hitler’s and Nazi Germany. She succeeded. After the defeat of Hitler in World War II, Leni denied she was a Nazi or anti-Semitic. No one I know believed her. I propose that a new Academy Award be established in her name and that Mel Gibson be its first recipient.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 12 March 2004 00:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Fuck, that's cold.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 12 March 2004 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)

All this controversy surrounding "the Passion" has been blown way, way out of proportion. The movie sucked, but after seeing it I sincerely doubt it will incite more violence against Jews, even from anti-semites. The Jewish high priests/pharisees or whatever were portrayed in a somewhat negative, cartoonishly villainous light but that's really the only thing in this film that could be construed as remotely anti-semitic. The true reason that "The Passion" sucks is because it's a poorly structured, overwrought and melodramatic mess. Gibson should be faulted for being careless in his portrayal of the Pharisees, but his primary sins have been of a cinematic nature.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 12 March 2004 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)

ok i saw it
and i have questions/thots

-why the need for such obv. violence (ie the crows)'
-pilate was a midlevel beurcrat(sp), known to historians of the time as one who executed w/o trial and was fond of torture, by making him the "good guy" or the "morally ambigous" guy makes the jewish authorites seem worse.
-what was with satan watching the flogging with creepy fetus baby
-this might result in the revival of the passion play, w. cbs rebroadcasting the only 2nd part of their 2000 biography, and that i dont think is a good thing. (is this the death of liberal xianty?)
-the idea of mary/eve-jesus/adam that is hinted in the garden of gethsmane is v. bad theology.
-why does satan look like bowie ca station to station.
-it did move me.

anthony, Friday, 12 March 2004 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

"what was with satan watching the flogging with creepy fetus baby"

This is the QUESTION I want answered immediately!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 March 2004 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

the idea of mary/eve-jesus/adam that is hinted in the garden of gethsmane is v. bad theology

Yeah, this is a weird thing to bring out. Still haven't seen the movie, but I saw this mentioned in a review.

Is CBS really only rebroadcasting the 2nd half of their Jesus? (That was the one with Jeremy Sisto, I think?) Geez. (I backspaced both "Jesus" and "Christ" here.)

is this the death of liberal xianty?

I think we need to see how the movie's received in Europe and elsewhere, but boy, this is a really, really bad time for liberal Christians to lose power and respect, and for conservative Christians (particularly conservative Catholics) to gain it.

I know the movie's getting great box office and everything, but I don't have any sense of how audiences are responding to it.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 12 March 2004 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)

George Carlin on the Daily Show last night made a great comment. Stewart asked him if he'd go see the movie and replied (paraphrasing) "i'll probably go see it because i really like violent movies - especially ones that make religions look stupid"

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 12 March 2004 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

is what Chaki said about the ending true? like there's Jesus inside the tomb, resurrected, ready to KICK some ASS? if so, awesome, and if not, Chaki is even more genius than I already thought. Either way, best movie review ever. Meanwhile, my multi-billion dollar project, The Ecstasy of Sri Caitanya, is in preproduction. We will settle for nothing less than double The Passion's opening weekend receipts

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Friday, 12 March 2004 02:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE SATAN AND THE CREEPY FETUS THING!!! ANSWERS!!!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 March 2004 02:31 (twenty-two years ago)

hmm. interesting timing. i was just about to post this from Mr. Filthy's review:
Director/Catholic zealot Mel Gibson has done an admirable job taking a text that is beloved by many and turning it into something so bitter and hateful. He turns the New Testament into more Old Testament. At least it shows that he paid attention when the nuns and priests made him feel like shit. He might be missing the point, though. I thought the big thing about Jesus is that he willingly suffered, and the suffering wasn't the point. I think the point was for folks to go out and be grateful for redemption, that he died for their sins and then he rose from the dead. He rose from the dead, danced around and went up to heaven. I mean, that's so cool. (Who knows where that's from?) The actual death isn't the part we're supposed to dwell on and feel guilty about. We're supposed to feel guilty only in that the guy died for our sins, and our sins are usually stupid crap like stealing porn and letting our dogs crap on the neighbors' lawns.

Although, maybe Gibson is smarter than I think. He's got the option for a sequel in which Jesus rises from the dead, gathers his posse (Baby-faced Luke and Beancounter Matt in the Howwwwwwwse!) and gets a little Hollywood-style revenge with submachine guns. If that dude could turn water into wine, I'm sure he could score some AK-47s...

(xpost)

Kingfish Cowboy (Kingfish), Friday, 12 March 2004 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)

-why does satan look like bowie ca station to station.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, I think Anthony and Chaki's reviews pretty much say it all for me. I kiss you both.

And yes, Mr. Filthy is great. (love the King Missile reference there)

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 12 March 2004 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Chaki's "three apostles out of twelve" really was just about the best thing ever.

Broheems (diamond), Friday, 12 March 2004 02:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Three and a HALF!

What do you do with half an apostle?

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 12 March 2004 02:48 (twenty-two years ago)

That horror-movie Satan in the Passion was the most interesting character in the movie. He/She/it should have their own spinoff like the Rock's character from that Mummy sequel had with the Scorpion King...ok, maybe not.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I think they should do a whole series of spin-offs with Satan and the Creepy Fetus!

Satan and the Creepy Fetus Temp Eve!
Satan and the Creepy Fetus Fuck With Moses!
Satan and the Creepy Fetus Cause the Apocalypse
Satan and the Creepy Fetus Visit Dairy Queen

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Satan and the Creepy Fetus Versus the Predator
Satan and the Creepy Fetus's Bogus Journey
Satan and the Creep Fetus: Through the Portal of Time

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Satan and the Creepy Fetus Check In.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:36 (twenty-two years ago)

See it'll be a bigger hit series than Richard Chamberlain's Alan Quartermain!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Argh. Those are actually two of my favorite bad films ever because my god they're so bad. The Xeroxing of Indiana Jones is just so hamhanded that they become transcendent.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah they are way better than Romancing the Bone and The Family Jewels of the Nile!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Weekend At Bernie's VI/VI/VI : Satan And The Creepy Fetus

donut bitch (donut), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah they are way better than Romancing the Bone and The Family Jewels of the Nile!

Haha. Eddy Grant and Billy Ocean, providing theme songs for a generation.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:47 (twenty-two years ago)

My mom LOVED those movies.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 12 March 2004 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Mel Gibson's the Passion....because the other thread's gotten too long.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 12 March 2004 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Scraping Scary Fetus off the Wheel

Kingfish Cowboy (Kingfish), Friday, 12 March 2004 05:57 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.