― tarden, Saturday, 9 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Michael, Saturday, 9 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― DG, Saturday, 9 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I didn't read it till after I saw the VERY GREAT/QUITE WEIRD film (w.Christopher Walken and Lindsay Crouse) some years later. The book is even odder, esp.considered as pulp lit.
― mark s, Saturday, 9 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Geoff, Saturday, 9 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I tried to think of a way of reporting on this which would make it clear that (as is the case) I was not interested in high-cultural dismissals, hierarchies, etc, but I couldn't be bothered after a while.
On the platform the sun was shining.
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 15 July 2003 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)
then he stopped and said NO MORE but later in life strapped for cash gave in to the publishers' pleas and it ended up being i don't know HOW long...
i think trilogies briefly carried the quasi-serious cachet of being tolkien-esque, but that this was frittered away fairly quickly (death knell = probably the ewoks in star wars three...)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 13:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― adam (adam), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― NA. (Nick A.), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 14:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
I keep picking them up at the library because it's like watching a train wreck. It's not just the books themselves ... the "theology" is so bad. And I don't even mean "evangelical Protestantism is dumb0r." I mean they consistently represent the theologies of other denominations incorrectly in order to try to score points. It's like ... you know those books of "funny things students said in term papers," like "George Washington was the father of our country cause he had so many kids" and whatnot? It's like that. It's horrible and yet you keep reading because you want to simultaneously laugh and slap the fucker.
That said, the first few chapters or so of the first book was not good, but was about on par with what Tom Clancy I've read. Before the religious stuff comes in, it starts out like "The Langoliers"!
As for airport fiction in general, that's what I write. Ideally I like to think of it as escapist stuff that isn't dumbed down, so demanding readers can read it for fun without getting exasperated by being talked down to.
― Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― dave q, Tuesday, 15 July 2003 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Tuesday, 15 July 2003 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)
airprot fiction only good for like porn on the grind
― s-Rite, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 03:30 (thirteen years ago)
You sound like a man of sound judgement and delicate tastes. Have you discovered the sister forum to this one, I Love Books? We need more readers of your kidney. Step around and say cheerio.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 03:34 (thirteen years ago)
tom clancy's fiction for airports
― Lamp, Wednesday, 6 July 2011 05:28 (thirteen years ago)
i once met the guy who wrote that book 'the president's plane is missing.'
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 6 July 2011 06:05 (thirteen years ago)