― Tom, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Pete, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sarah, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I'd like to consider the SWP thing in theory, but in practice, there's something about SWP memebers that irks me. maybe just a coincidence. In Mark Steel's recent book he makes it sound OK. Anyone else read that?
― Alan Trewartha, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Bill, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
also he recently appeared on NEVER MIND THE BUZZCOCKS
i know several swp-ers, inc. two quite "important" ones, ie they have written books (they are hackney near-neighbours: i have oft-times — well twice — seen paul foot dropping in for tea). as ppl i pretty much like them, but i think the gap between their hopes and intentions and their tactical-strategic instincts is super-vast
― Mark Morris, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― james, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― DG, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
My parents used to dream of grooming me for a career in politics but I keep telling them I'm not interested in being diplomatic, thats why I'm a journalist. I would love the spin side of politics though.
― Ronan, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
A similar thing happened to me. I joined in prolly about 1995 or so and then wanted to leave but they wouldn't let me. I had to send them loads of letters, at first polite and all but gradually getting increasingly irked until finally they released me into the wild where I could run amongst the daisies and be apolitcal. Admittedly, I've not quite got round to running amongst the daisies yet...
― jamesmichaelward, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― anthony, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― toraneko, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I half agree with you (well a quarter). He is repetitious and does indeed only have the one comedy "trope" which does get on your nerves some. I obviously disagree with you about his political thinking, but then i don't fully agree with Mark Steel either. which brings me back to what I was saying about not really identifying with any political group.
To be honest i'm too mimsy is what it comes down to. One of the usual liberal crowd who wants to do well, but can't say too precisely what it is i do want. A sort of Belle and Sebastian approach to politics.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Geoff, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
As to Mark's q' re the SWP, the US SWP is not related to the UK SWP. UK SWP = SU was capitalist. US SWP = SU is still communist(!). UK SWP used to = US ISO (International Socialist Organization) but they had a spat last year over who got to be the big shot, & they split with the UK taking most of the international sections. UK SWP now playing footsie with french LCR, which used to (then wasn't, then was again, then wasn't again) be with US SWP.
Also, UK SWP != democratic centralist. Rather, = anarchic incohate but nonetheless strictly regimented and commandist. Worst of both worlds, rilly.
Get it? Got it? Good.
― Encyclopedia Sterling, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Kris, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I prefer not to claim formal allegiance with any political party, because I see myself as an independent left-of-centre thinker and I don't want to be trapped by dogma. I think most people here know what I think, and that I feel closer to the Lib Dems than any other mainstream UK party, but I find it interesting that the most intelligent and informed thinkers on political newsgroups, from what I see of them, are those who don't associate themselves with any one particular party above all others.
― Robin Carmody, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ed, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― stevo, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Maria, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
In reply to the above stuff, trots are the same the world over, even the ones that won't admit they're trots. Lots of the trot parties around the world are affiliated and there are rival affiliations between trot parties that are virtually indistiguishable to outsiders.
― hamish, Friday, 19 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― hamish, Saturday, 20 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dan Perry, Saturday, 20 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Sunday, 21 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― toraneko, Sunday, 21 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Sunday, 21 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
And here it's the reverse ... the slavish followers of King George the Turd.
― hamish, Sunday, 21 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Luke, Sunday, 21 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― I R political fatnick, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)