― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 25 February 2004 23:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 25 February 2004 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 25 February 2004 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 25 February 2004 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 25 February 2004 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― D Aziz (esquire1983), Wednesday, 25 February 2004 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 25 February 2004 23:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 25 February 2004 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)
To answer the question, to a certain extent yes. The health service fo one has had a real problem limiting itself in what it treats, cf the current debate over how many rounds of IVF should be free on the NHS. Some people see somethings essential where others might see them as a luxury.
In other areas, it's up to the social contract between government and people where the limits are drawn. The notion that, for example, ready and availible unemployment benefits and income support discourages people from working exists more in the mind of the rightist forces of reaction than in reality.
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 26 February 2004 00:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 26 February 2004 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― D Aziz (esquire1983), Thursday, 26 February 2004 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 26 February 2004 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 26 February 2004 00:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 26 February 2004 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Allyzay, Thursday, 26 February 2004 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 26 February 2004 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― ENRQ (Enrique), Thursday, 26 February 2004 11:25 (twenty-two years ago)
So, the choice seems clear enough. Do you want a welfare state or a police state?
― run it off (run it off), Thursday, 26 February 2004 13:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 February 2004 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)
The welfare state is a victim.State the success of the victim.Its welfare is a success.
Own the victim. Its a success.Success: a victim of its own.
― Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 26 February 2004 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― ENRQ (Enrique), Thursday, 26 February 2004 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)
Remind us again where your vision of the universe was the standard everyone automatically agreed on?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 26 February 2004 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― run it off (run it off), Thursday, 26 February 2004 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/us/even-critics-of-safety-net-increasingly-depend-on-it.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/02/12/us/entitlement-map.html
american politics in one sentence:
Support for Republican candidates, who generally promise to cut government spending, has increased since 1980 in states where the federal government spends more than it collects. The greater the dependence, the greater the support for Republican candidates.
― iatee, Sunday, 12 February 2012 16:41 (fourteen years ago)
Would like to rub many relatives' noses in this article.
― Steamtable Willie (WmC), Sunday, 12 February 2012 16:51 (fourteen years ago)
i love how "utica" is a major city on that map
― diln (k3vin k.), Sunday, 12 February 2012 17:05 (fourteen years ago)
bobby fischer seems alive and well ("glad I ain't your age")
― diln (k3vin k.), Sunday, 12 February 2012 17:09 (fourteen years ago)