― Donna Brown (Donna Brown), Thursday, 4 March 2004 05:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 4 March 2004 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 4 March 2004 05:54 (twenty-one years ago)
I'd read a bunch of negative reviews of this - heck, add to that the not-so-A-plus King track record with TV - so I was completely convinced that this would turn out to be two mockeries of a sham. Instead, all I got was one great series opener. Not so much that the episode itself was spiffy. It's certainly quite fine, but a bit slow and meandering. What makes this great news is that this is precisely the way that the original started out, and there are not-so-subtle indications that this is going to be an extremely faithful rendition of Riget. If that holds true (and there is absolutely no reason to think it won't, seriously), this will be the bee's knees.
― Joshua Houk (chascarrillo), Thursday, 4 March 2004 08:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― prima fassy (mwah), Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― prima_fassy (mwah), Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Donna Brown (Donna Brown), Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― the vicar, Thursday, 4 March 2004 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 4 March 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)
(that is key)
― dean! (deangulberry), Thursday, 4 March 2004 18:25 (twenty-one years ago)
what do you mean by this? you mean von trier's little speeches at the end of each episode?
― vahid (vahid), Thursday, 4 March 2004 18:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 4 March 2004 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 4 March 2004 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)
We haven't gotten to the Udo Kier portion yet. For a moment there, I thought they got rid of the excellent sarcoma plotline, but later I realized that they've set it up by introducing the father of the sleep study guy.
― Joshua Houk (chascarrillo), Friday, 5 March 2004 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 10 May 2004 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 10 May 2004 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― ..., Monday, 10 May 2004 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)
Didn't realise that it's a remake of an original - please don't spoil it for me!
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)
The priest/second coming one that was on this week wasn't quite so good.
Every week it makes me laugh with the 'STARRING: ANDREW MCCARTHY' splash at the beginning. They might as well as announce it as 'LARRY FROM WEEKEND AT BERNIE'S AND THE DAD FROM HARRY AND THE HENDERSONS, TOGETHER AT LAST...'
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 00:44 (twenty-one years ago)
We might finally get to figure out what happens in Riget 3.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 20 July 2004 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Mostly, it makes me want to re-watch the original.
― caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― dean? (deangulberry), Tuesday, 20 July 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)