Spin Dr. UK-stylee

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
A little story appeared in to-day's "Guardian" newspaper. Several Members of Parliament from our rulin gLabour party have spoken out against a/ our involvement in the assault on Afghanistan and b/ said conflict in general. Perhaps predictably, certain types have compared such folks w/the appeasers of a hitler from the 1930's. MP Paul Marsden was called before the Labour party cheif whip (IE strongarm party boss) thee other day after he spoke up in our houses of parliament. He evidently recorded the ensuing conversation, and was consequently pissed enough to break protocol and release it to thee press. The transcript is below, on the off-chance you might find it interesting. I find it fascinating. At the moment, sources withing the labour party are putting it about that marsden is unpopulaw w/his colleagues, and is "close to a breakdown". Our government is a bunch of pitiful fuxing lamers. Now read on.

Hilary Armstrong: Paul, we are all comrades together in the Labour party and we are all supposed to be on the same side. I want to improve your communication skills.

Paul Marsden: What do you mean?

HA: I want you to join the mainstream of the party.

PM: What do you mean by the mainstream?

HA: Look, Paul, let me put it another way, those that aren't with us are against us.

PM: Name names.

HA: We don't really know each other do we? We haven't had a chance to speak properly in the last four years.

[Marsden mentioned three previous meetings.]

HA: Oh yes, I remember now.

[She picked up an inch-thick brown file and waved it in his face, opening it to reveal articles written by Marsden for his local Shropshire Star newspaper; speeches he had made; transcripts of radio interviews he had given.]

HA: I want a guarantee that you will not talk to the media unless you speak to me first.

PM: I won't do that. I believe it is my right to speak to whoever I choose.

HA: I have been looking at your file, you are clearly very inexperienced and your attendance record is poor.

[Between 1997 and 1999 Marsden had spent a lot of time away from the Commons. His wife was seriously ill and had given birth. Ex-chief whip Nick Brown gave him compassionate leave.]

PM: I take great offence at that. I am not inexperienced and my attendance record is certainly not poor. My wife was being cut open in the operating theatre and Nick Brown kindly allowed me extra time at home. You must know all that. What the hell has it got to do with all this?

HA: Your attendance record was not good last year either. You missed more votes than most others.

PM: That is not true. We were fighting a general election and you lot told us to go home and campaign to win it.

HA: You made a complete fool of yourself the other day when you got up in the Commons.

[Armstrong was referring to Marsden's question to Blair in the October 8 emergency Commons debate, when the MP said the decision to go to war should be approved by a vote of all MPs, not by the prime minister alone.]

HA: You just don't understand the rules here, you're too inexperienced.

PM: There's no need to insult me. I know the rules, I consulted the Speaker's clerk about voting procedures.

HA: In fact we may well hold a vote, but if we do, it will be whipped.

(Norman note - "Whipped" = UK parliamentary procedure whereby party members are TOLD WHICH WAY TO VOTE)

PM: That is outrageous. You won't even give us a free vote on whether we go to war - it is an issue which should be a matter of conscience.

HA: War is not a matter of conscience. Abortion and embryo research are matters of conscience, but not wars.

PM: Are you seriously saying blowing people up and killing people is not a moral issue?

HA: It is government policy that we are at war. You astound me. We can't have a trusting relationship if you keep talking to the media without permission.

PM: It would help if your deputy didn't send me snotty letters disciplining me.

HA: I did leave a message at your office on Monday night saying to call me.

PM: Are you sure?

HA: Yes. Why?

PM: You couldn't have phoned the Shrewsbury office because you didn't leave a message on the answer machine. You can't have left a message in London either, because I was in the office and there was no voicemail left there.

HA: But I spoke to someone and left a message with them.

PM: You didn't. I checked the telephone log and there are no messages left.

HA: Er, perhaps I got the wrong number.

(nORMAN NOTE - THIS IS QUITE INCREDIBLE, DON'T YOU THINK?)

PM: Let's get this straight. You did not call me.

HA: Anyway, you must stop using the media.

PM: That's a bit rich coming from people like you and Downing Street when Stephen Byers's spin doctor Jo Moore says September 11 is a good day to bury bad news.

(nb THIS REFERS TO A RECENT MINOR SCANDAL IN WHICH THE AFOREMENTIONED mS mOORE SENT OUT AN EMAIL NOTING THAT THEE AFTERMATH OV THEE wtc BOMBINGS WOULD BE A GOOD TIME TO LET OUT NEWS DAMAGING TO THE UK GOVT. SHE GOT AWAY W/IT TOO!)

HA: Jo Moore didn't say that.

(Norman note: Oh yes she bloody did)

PM: That is exactly what she said in her email.

HA: We don't have spin doctors in Number 10 - or anywhere else.

(Norman notes: h0h0h0h0h0)

PM: (laughing) You aren't seriously telling me that you don't have spin doctors and they don't exist. You are losing it Hilary.

HA: (shouting) You wait until I really do lose it. I am not going to have a dialogue with you about that. It was people like you who appeased Hitler in 1938.

PM: Don't you dare call me an appeaser! I am not in favour of appeasing Bin Laden, I simply disagree with the way the government is going about stopping him. That's the official line now is it? We are all appeasers if we don't agree with everything you say?

HA: Well, what would you do about Bin Laden, then?

PM: I think we should indict him on criminal charges. It could be done very quickly and then the UN should take charge of the military action, not the USA. It would be much more effective. By all means send in the SAS, but let's get the UN onside first.

HA: The trouble with people like you is that you are so clever with words that us up north can't argue back.

(Norman notes - this is an INCREDIBLE statement!)

PM: Do you mind? I am a Northerner myself. I was born in Cheshire. I spent four years at Teesside Polytechnic near where you come from.

HA: You do realise that everything that is said in here is private and confidential, don't you? You cannot go out and tell the media.

PM: I haven't got the media outside and I won't go to them. But if they come to me I will talk to them.

I would love to hear all yr thoughts on this. The curtain torn asunder, eh? So much for the evil media manipulators @ the heart ov our govt. The utter, utter stupidity of some of Armstrong's discourse, makes one think that the Mandelson "Guacamole" stroy might have actually been true. IMO, thee stupidest statement was thee bit abt "us up north" As a northener myself, I find this crassly offensive. WTF, I am cynical in thee extreme abt govt media shenanigans, but some of this flabbergasted even me.

Norman Phay, Monday, 22 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

jesus fuckin christ, aren't politicians THEE DRIZZLING SHITS.

duane, Monday, 22 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This morning's whip-chat.

(south-north thing reversed surely in guacamole story? eg evil spin-ster = poncy southerner unable to fathom blunt northern ways?)

But yes: govt stupidity masquerading as moral righteousness = unacceptable; contempt for basically honest unexpectedly idealistic MP = contempt for those who voted for him; assumptions of superiority — moral AND intellectual — without foundation.

mark s, Monday, 22 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"The trouble with people like you is that you are so clever with words that us up north can't argue back."
I love this bit so much. Lame lame lame! Oh please, dear Labour Party, expel me from your ranks!

DG, Monday, 22 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This should finally lay to rest the Goebbels-esque lie of Labour's 'media mastery', if thought processess like Armstrong's are going into it. Jesus.

dave q, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

What's the trick to emailing parliamentarians again? The lovely Hilary deserves some communication...

chris, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

HA makes a pluperfect arse of herself, plainly. Yes she was only following (a) parliamentary convention (whips are designated party bullies); (b) orders (this is the current govt line):

so also important — if interested in having an effect, and not merely piling in on the current (admittedly selfmade) scapegoat — to make displeasure known to local MP (if lab, ideally); and local lab orgs; and national party chairman; and downing street

mark s, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Doesn't Marsden look like a nerd tho?

dave q, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Who on God's bloody earth would open a conversation with 'I want to improve your communication skills' and expect to get away with it? Marsden deserves to promote this and bugger them to hell. Very amusing that they have no power at all to stop him also. (Unless they take him to Room 101 which knowing Labour is a possibility) But don't you suspect that inside the opposition parties (esp. Tory) there is a growing amount of this rubbish also?

Bill, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Said it all, really. Quite, quite shocking that this can happen. There is a spine-chilling contempt for the intelligence of people (politicians / electorate / humanity itself) and for freedom and independence of thought in much of what Hilary Armstrong says, and Paul Marsden has now become a kind of personal hero for me. As he said on the radio yesterday, at least the Tory government gave MPs a free vote during the Gulf War. The fact that it was the most uninamous free vote in favour of government policy ever (I think) matters not: at least those MPs who *did* oppose action were allowed to say what they felt. I sympathise with what Bill says, but the reason for this disillusionment is that some of us thought (probably foolishly) in 1997 that this level of contempt for the electorate would not exist under a Labour government.

My guess (admittedly Mark S would know this better than me, but I'm in a fairly similar constituency myself) is that Shrewsbury is one of the seats Labour would never have won were it not for Blairite reforms, although admittedly the Tories' self-destruction also plays a part. There's a deep-rooted irony in the fact that Marsden (and Peter Bradshaw, MP for The Wrekin) are both much closer to what I always admired about Old Labour than most of the Blairite toadies who increasingly fill the traditional Northern "heartland" seats.

I'll take Mark's advice in how to get my voice heard. We have to.

Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

love it, democracy in action, we don't have spin docs.

Geoff, Thursday, 25 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.