astrology C or D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This is in response to hearing that a doctorate on astrology posing as a doctorate on sociology has been accepted in France. I know where i stand but then i'm a science student who knows jackshit about postmodernism.

hamish, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

As entertainment, fun. As truth, I run screaming.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Chicks dig it and I play along. Is that so terrible?

Dan, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i'm such a spoilsport i don't even find it entertaining. when i meet people who ask me my starsign i generally never speak to them again. can someone give me an explanation of postmodernism that doesn't make me want to gag?

hamish, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

oh yeah "chicks dig it". I got dragged into this women's bookstore in Auckland and there was an astrology section and no science section. Whats with that shit? If i was a woman i would have been seriously pissed off.

hamish, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You WISH only chicks dug it. I was asked my star sign by this quite cute truck driver who used to play drums for The Chills (who had a sweet crush on me). He was really so cute and kind, I hardly cared, but I did groan secretly. Oh and I guess I couldn't do it, in the end ... His name was James, by the way. I'm ALMOST of the 'never talk to them again' school. My female friend wrote star signs for that New Zealand Loaded thing, I forgot what it was called, and for the Dominion, and she used to make them up so that they would effect people she was friends with in certain ways - ie, 'Remember to pay back that old loan' etc.

maryann, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think part of the reason you 'swell with impotent rage' when someone asks you your star sign is that it's one of those situations where you would like to scream 'You stupid fucking pygmy, you can't categorise me that easily' but instead you have to make some insipid lame joke and try not to offend THEM. Because people don't like it when you make them feel dumb. Understandably. And what are star signs except for unfortunate idiocy?

maryann, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not in Kepler's case, however. His astrological studies of himself and his family are works of confessional genius. If you ever see a book by Koestler called 'The Sleepwalkers' skip straight to the chapter about Kepler, which contains excerpts from this abject autobiography. In which he describes himself in these amazing terms, as 'hardly fit to be called a poodle' and so on, I can't remember much, but I've always wanted to read the whole document, and never been able to find it ... (Am I spelling Kepler correctly?)

maryann, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

It's more boys who've pestered me for my star sign than girls, can I add.

maryann, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dud, I usually just make up things if someone asks me to read their star sign. Its tedious hearing them read out, as well as a waste of time. I think the idea of a doctorate of astrology is the biggest crock of shit since hamburger university for McDonalds.

What chicks dig astrology? who are they? Maybe they were just humouring you?

Menelaus Darcy, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Darley to Clea: "So you havent changed. Still telling fortunes."
Clea to Darley, much later: "I am through with fortune-tellers once and for all!"

Simon, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i think reading astrology is funny. its funny because its always right, not because of anything mystical but because the predictions are so vague they could apply to anyone. they may as well go "Libra: today something will happen to you. if not, nothing will". same with the personality traits: everyone i think has a really complex personality, the astrology pinpoints one aspect and people go, "oh yeah, i can relate to that", why people want their personalities summed up so simplistically is beyond me.

di, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

that should have read "pinpoints one that could apply to anyone". cos you know, people react differently to different situations really. does that make sense?

di, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

cos honestly does anyone know anyone who is strictly arrogant, or strictly quiet, etc? everyone is in some way all of these things.

i'm no good at explaining myself today, i feel.

di, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

actually di, I've read your stars today:

"You may have difficulty expressing yourself, but persevere and you will be understood"

mr smythe, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

whoa! you don't even know my starsign and you predicted my day! ;)

di, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

working defn of pomo: despite their obvious high intelligence, many scientists as individuals have over the last few decades behaved as such arrogant, ignorant, self- serving jerks, that the general public have had their trust in science as an institution entirely shaken; the scientists slowly and amazedly coming to recognize that not everyone thinks they're so utterly marvellous, prefer to blame the French than modify their behaviour...

mark s, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

stunningly dud, with a capital Duh.

Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

astrology is better science than for example IQ theory

mark s, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Both IQ theory and Astrology are bollocks.

RickyT, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the term "gemini" is a good (= usefully predictive) description of my personal character-type; none of the other eleven psychological type-groups that astrology identifies describe my behaviour or mood patterns anything like adequately

mark s, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one reason for this may be that any old fairground conwoman has to have a better instant grasp of the random punter mind — ie be convincingly and immediately "right" — than most psychology graduates, whose silly mistakes can be quickly lost in the noise of professional ranks closing

mark s, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Everyone thinks astrology is bollocks anyway, so there's perhaps no need to labour the point. But it's surprisingly little known that all the astrological statements in the papers and stuff about the position of the planets relative to the zodiac is in fact about 1000 years out of date. So if you read that Mars is in Scorpio, go and look at the sky (or a computer program), and you will see that it is in fact in Libra (one zodiac sign back). Actually, the same is true of the sun's position on the ecliptic, which is what defines the zodiacal times of year. So if you think you were born under Scorpio, you weren't, you're a Libra.

Both astrology and IQ-tests may be bollocks, but there are degrees of bollockshood, no?

Sam, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

astrology's 12-fold categorisation, complete with variants, is a richer, more useful portrait of human behaviour than IQ theory's; the debunker's blanket obsession with the movement of the stars — which is irrelevant, except in tha it provides a helpfully detailed and supervast abstract map-shape of potential movement on which to project — is an admission of the difficulty faced, once the crit begins to focus on people not things.

mark s, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I like being on the cusp of Gemini and Cancer coz I get to describe myself as a split personality mentalist with a bad dose of crabs ARF!

Sarah, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i r also cusp Leo/Virgo

Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't hold much truck with it but my chinese horoscope is scarily acurate.

Ed, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think there is a lot of value in Astrology and I think it is a very interesting science (and art).

I think there is very little of value in Horoscopes and other predictions in newspapers and magazines.

toraneko, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Astrology is very big and can be studied to doctorate level in India. Of course different kind of astrologies the world over. Not to mention missing thirteenth sign shenanigans and the wholesale selling of the October franchise by the Confedaration Astrologique from Xerxes to Libra. Of course its route assumptions are demonstrably false in a scientific universe - however in an astrological universe so are sciences fundamental tenets.

Surely Mark S should be a virgo.

Pete, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Hey babe, what's your sign?" "Sorry, it's unlisted" - 'High Anxiety'

dave q, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

As much as I hate to admit it, I do think there's something to it. Everything I've read about my own sign, for example, is pretty much on the money. Some of the point are vague, sure, but I've read more specific things as well, and all of it is accurate enough to make me fail to dismiss it entirely.

Sean, Tuesday, 23 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think part of the reason you 'swell with impotent rage' when someone asks you your star sign is that it's one of those situations where you would like to scream 'You stupid fucking pygmy, you can't categorise me that easily' but instead you have to make some insipid lame joke and try not to offend THEM. Because people don't like it when you make them feel dumb

well no actually i'm pretty dumb myself. i get really disturbed when people who would otherwise be smarter than me fall for it. Especially the ones who say "the astrology columns in the newspaper are bullshit but real astrology is really scientific because its uses lots of maths". BTW i've heard at least 4 people say the same thing about psychology, another false science. No i've changed my mind those people aren't smarter than me, they're just stupid. i don't care how much they know about French philosophers. Stupid stupid stupid. i guess my indignation is to do with it being an insult to my belief system, the same way fundy Xtians get upset when you tell them god doesn't exist - of course my belief system is more dominant so i'm not confronted with it every day.

oh by the way when i posted oh yeah "chicks dig it" i was quoting Dan but the sarcasm probably didn't come through the keyboard and out into the interweb. sorry.

Thanks for yr pomo explanation, Mark. I agree that scientists have acted badly and have helped caused problems such as this, but its also the fault of non-scientists who have neglected to learn (or deliberately forgotten) the basics of the scientific process so they can no longer be actively critical and instead just throw the whole thing out. And neither astrology nor IQ theory are sciences so you can't compare them as sciences.

hamish, Thursday, 25 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

pyschology is not a false science , because it never pretended to be a science , it is a philosphical system . you could make a tenmous nad dangerous argemnt that drug based therapies are a false science though

anthonyeaston, Thursday, 25 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

at my university psychology is accepted as a science. economics has recently been accepted as a science here, which brings it into the same category.

hamish, Thursday, 25 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

hey alan, me too! when is your b-day? mine is Aug22

lady die, Thursday, 25 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ten months pass...
What mark s says here is exactly one of the things that the person who originally got me to informally make astrological observations (i.e., just find out what the personalities are supposed to be, find out what the sings of various people you know are, and see whether or not things fit). He said, even if you don't accept that people born under a certain sign will have certain characteristics, show me a better general classification of personalities.

Over time I have become convinced that there's something to it, based on patterns of similarity I have found between people with the same signs, my ability to guess other people's signs correctly more often than I think chance would allow (though this has not been systematically recorded, and my grasp on statistics is less than stellar), my deeper investigation of my own birth chart, and a disturbingly accurate prediction that was given to me about the course my life would take up to about now by someone whose wife did a progressed chart for me (something I never wanted from them, incidentally). The latter could be explaiend by my having somehow made this prediction come true but believe me, I had far more invested in keeping it from coming true than in "proving" an astrological prediction. Even now I retain some skepticism about astrology.

It doesn't fit in particularly well with the more naturalistic approach to the world that I prefer. Of course, even if there is something to astrology, the explanation could be purely physical, but it's all a bit odd.

DeRayMi, Wednesday, 18 September 2002 23:56 (twenty-three years ago)

one year passes...
my father was an astrologer though i don't know much about it. i met his old best friend R for lunch the other day & he was telling me about how my dad predicted the time period in which he would find his future (now current) wife A & he DID and my father helped him along the way...

i later called my mother & she says, "oh yes i remember that, R would call your father every day for advice... 'is NOW a good hour astrologically to call?? & what should i SAY?'" which i suppose is a healthy mix between codependency and astrological faith... but anyway, eventually R married A and she has turned out to be the most annoying woman ever created, though the couple is deleriously happy still, 15 odd years later. my dad always hated A to no end, but claimed he had known that too from her chart & eventually told R that astrologically he&A were incompatible & he stopped bringing her along on his visits.

so i'd like to think there's something to it. perhaps many people have such a negative view of astrology because lots of folks just read their newspaper horoscopes and think that's all there is to it, when they're obviously extraordinarily general etc - they have to be applicable to 1/12 of the population!

then again, maybe it IS total crap. which depresses me in a way.

(there was an article in the ny times a few weeks ago about how gwb is always crying at public ceremonies (his inauguration, his thanksgiving heroic voyage, etc) and i mentioned it to my mother & she says, "well OF COURSE! he's a CANCER!")

j c (j c), Monday, 8 December 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Other kinds of bores may take five minutes to become boring. Astrology bores take the time it takes to ask 'what's your sign?'

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Monday, 8 December 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Give me a D! Give me a U! Give me a D!

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 8 December 2003 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)

If you are at all interested in European Art/History/Literature/politics from 10,000 BC to approx. 1850 AD then you need to understand it at least partially.
Replace European with Chinese/Indian/Aztec/Egyptian/Mayan and insert different dates.

pete s, Monday, 8 December 2003 15:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Dud. Sam OTM. Babylonian astrological dates are all off because of the axial progression of the earth.

ACTUAL TRUE ZODIAC
AS OF 2000 AD

1. ARIES = APRIL 19 - MAY 13
2. TAURUS = MAY 14 - JUNE 19
3. GEMINI = JUNE 20 - JULY 20
4. CANCER = JULY 21 - AUG 9
5. LEO = AUGUST 10 - SEPTEMBER 15
6. VIRGO = SEPTEMBER 16 - OCTOBER 30
7. LIBRA = OCTOBER 31 - NOVEMBER 22
8. SCORPIO = NOVEMBER 23 - NOVEMBER 29
9. OPHIUCHUS = NOVEMBER 30 - DECEMBER 17
10. SAGITTARIUS = DECEMBER 18 - JANUARY 18
11. CAPRICORN = JANUARY 19 - FEBRUARY 15
12. AQUARIUS = FEBRUARY 16 - MARCH 11
13. PISCES = MARCH 12 - APRIL 18

That, and of course the nonsense promotes irrational pseudoscience.

Dale the Titled (cprek), Monday, 8 December 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Another name for 'psuedoscience' : Art.

pete s, Monday, 8 December 2003 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry that's 'irrational psuedoscience'

Shouldn't you be called Dale the Tilted?

pete s, Monday, 8 December 2003 21:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the Zodiac, it makes all my character judgements for me, leaving my brane free for more worthwhile pursuits (ie "where the hell did that Morphine disc go in this damned jukebox?").

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 8 December 2003 21:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Dale the Tittled.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 8 December 2003 21:39 (twenty-two years ago)

According to Picasso's Guernica, I will meet my soul mate this week!

oops (Oops), Monday, 8 December 2003 21:41 (twenty-two years ago)

According to the third law of motion, i will have a happy life and satisfying relationships.

pete s, Monday, 8 December 2003 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Seriously though, do not people born at similar times of season often display very similar traits to each other in certain regards? It's not necessarily guided by the stars, but I think seasonal environments & their relation to individuals' development of learned behaviors isn't something that can be exactly instantly dismissed.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 8 December 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)

it depends on what people and which traits you're looking at. you take virtually any two people and you can find certain similarities between them. then you disregard the people who you can't find any similarites between because they don't fit into your theory. out of sight, out of mind.
for example, my sister and my grandpa were on April 11 and 10, respectively. Hmm...they're both, oh i dunno...they're both somewhat shy and stingy with emotions. My other sister and my uncle were born a few calendar days apart. Hmm....what do you know? they're both cynical and domineering! (forget about the fact that all of these traits can be applied to all of these people at one time or another)

oops (Oops), Monday, 8 December 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

PROVEN BY SCIENCE! SEE!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 8 December 2003 21:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Noodle you are kind of a dick.

thirdalternative, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:23 (fourteen years ago)

I don't even think astrology is fun. Tarot cards can be good spooky fun, especially on a rainy night in a dark room with a bottle of wine.

Sebastian Cabinet (u s steel), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:25 (fourteen years ago)

at last somebody who understands me

wanking on the moon (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:27 (fourteen years ago)

Noodle you are like the reigning member of the ILX thought police.

thirdalternative, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:28 (fourteen years ago)

Astrology is the best bcz if I do something that doesn't make any sense I can say, "I'm a gemini" *shrug* –– for some reason everyone accepts this. Either because A) they think 'shit this girl is crazy she believes in astrology I won't try to reason with her' or B) ppl think believe in astrology apparently think geminis have a license to be sillypantses. As long as I don't have to explain my actions, I'm happy either way. Thx astrology.

Col. Pinkney Lugenbeel (Abbbottt), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:28 (fourteen years ago)

Hah!

thirdalternative, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:29 (fourteen years ago)

Try it, you will change your mind about astrology. Penn & Teller will never penn or tell you this kind of useful tip.

Col. Pinkney Lugenbeel (Abbbottt), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:30 (fourteen years ago)

ok. this is about the third thread in as many days where you've been dropping the "people who believe in stuff that isn't real are soooooo stupid, not like me" challops. i don't get why. do you think people on this board are going to debate with you as to the merits of astrology or evangelical christianity or whatever? because those kind of debates clog up quite enough of the internet and i don't see them adding much to the sum total of human enlightenment. are you hoping to convert somebody to your point of view? do you wanna think about what exactly we mean by belief and the extent to which it impinges on the things people do in their day to day lives? cos this kind of "dumb people are dumb" grandstanding is Bush League imo. and i wd rather look at pictures of beautiful birds than encourage ILX to turn into another tawdry "brights vs sheeple" pie fight

wanking on the moon (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:32 (fourteen years ago)

now i'll go back to being a dick, if that's okay

http://www.discoverislay.com/images/islay_wildlife/birds/islay_birds_linnet.jpg

wanking on the moon (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:34 (fourteen years ago)

noodle & his birds otm

there is actually shit worth giving a shit about but whether people enjoy imagining that their destinies are written in the stars is 100% not one of them

Steven Tyler the Creator (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:35 (fourteen years ago)

3rdAlt otm on astrology
NV otm on 3rdAlt
Every 1's a winner baby

Stomp! in the name of love (WmC), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:39 (fourteen years ago)

the Torah says it's forbidden to prognosticate the future or to read signs. that didn't stop King Saul from raising the dead tho! (he got told he'd get owned tho after he did it). also ancient Israelites it turns out were astrologizing all the time for example:

http://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/1648876-L.jpg

so much badass astrological stuff tho. search out this guy's diss: http://www.smoe.org/arcana/diss.html which is a decent survey. also this guy who was one of my advisors in undergrad and does incredibly cool work in Zodiac in antiquities:

http://www.bookreviews.org/PublicImages/7493.jpg

In modernity, Aryah Kaplan is this neat guy who writes a bunch about Zodiac/Astrological type stuff. He died in his forties but his material is really popular (especially in the Kabbalah Center AND charedi community so you know he's doing something right). My friend knows all the Italian renaissance stuff and what's good and what's not. Anyway, I say search all that out. Lots of interesting weird esoterica.

Mordy, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:43 (fourteen years ago)

hey abbott! you will probably really like the pukeko too:

http://www.totarabank.com/pukeko.jpg

just1n3, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:43 (fourteen years ago)

abbott -- half the ppl in my family are geminis including me, my brother, my sister, and upcoming baby! gemini-convention!

Mordy, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:44 (fourteen years ago)

Sweet birds itt.

"This Egret couldn't give a toss about astrologomy, but he is a trained Raiki healer

― wanking on the moon (Noodle Vague), Saturday, May 14, 2011 12:51 PM (48 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink"

There's the girl who I sometimes wind up hanging out with because she's friends with a friend and she's a Reiki healer. A couple months ago she started telling this story about how her boss's energy had been "all wrong" and how she'd made her lie down so she could heal her and blah blah blah. I could only stand about 10 mins of this before looking at my friend and nearly cracking up. I had to pretend to need the bathroom. Then I felt bad for being so cynical about shit like this but it's such BS and she's exceptionally annoying in general but especially when talking about this stuff.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:45 (fourteen years ago)

Although I do like Abbott's take on this but I'm always on the lookout for stuff I can use to explain away my shitty behavior.

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:46 (fourteen years ago)

oh man i spelt Reiki wrong, my chakras must be out of alignment or something

wanking on the moon (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:49 (fourteen years ago)

u need healin stat

\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:49 (fourteen years ago)

yeah also i am hot just like an oven

wanking on the moon (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:50 (fourteen years ago)

Noodle, this stuff isn't harmless, that's the point.

thirdalternative, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:51 (fourteen years ago)

u've convinced me thirdalternative. i'll never pay someone to tell me my fortune again unless i'm bored again and i think it'll be fun oh wait do you think that's why most ppl do it?

can you start a thread about how RealDolls tm aren't healthy surrogates for real relationships?

Mordy, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:53 (fourteen years ago)

the entire advertising industry to thread

wanking on the moon (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:54 (fourteen years ago)

sometimes i see ads that make claims that aren't true and i wish someone could teach me to be more skeptical so i didn't spend so much money on 3in1dishwashingcuttingcleaningironing-exercise machines :'(

Mordy, Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:57 (fourteen years ago)

It's a floor wax AND a dessert topping.

Stomp! in the name of love (WmC), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:58 (fourteen years ago)

cosmetics manufacturers make an awful lot of money out of people's insecurities

wanking on the moon (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 14 May 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)

Have you no sympathy for poor Winona Ryder in Reality Bites? Her phone bill!

thirdalternative, Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:02 (fourteen years ago)

xp

Astrology is seductive because, looking at the basic theory, it actually makes good sense, once you grasp that everything in the universe is connected. Stars and planets are so big and such a huge part of the universe that of course they must be connected to our lives, right?

The fly in the ointment is that, once you get past the basic theory down to any of the details of astrology it runs off the rails immediately. Whatever part of it seems to be true is so vague that it could be duplicated by informed guesswork. And whatever is specific and concrete about its predictions (very little, btw) can easily be proved to be no better than random chance.

As thirdalternative points out, when people start making life-altering decisions based on the more specific advice of astrologers, the results can be ugly.

In my experience, amateur astrologers are simply convinced of the truth of astrology, and rarely do much actual harm, mainly because they have only a minimal belief in their own powers of interpretation. Astrologers who claim to know the future with great certainty and who make use of astrology to acquire power over the lives of others are out-and-out con artists and should be treated as such.

However, attempts have been made to ban astrology in the past have failed miserably. The Roman emperors tried to ban it because astrologers were constantly being consulted by rich and powerful people, not simply about their own lives, but specifically about the emperor's future, which struck them as very dangerous, because it gave courage to their potential rivals. It just confirmed the belief of the general populace in astrology and drove it underground.

So, all you can really do is point out its ridiculous errors and let nature take its course. It won't die out any more than the drug war has eliminated drug use.

Aimless, Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:14 (fourteen years ago)

are you saying I can't tell if somebody's a total sex bomb based on what month they were born? shit.

Steven Tyler the Creator (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:19 (fourteen years ago)

Thank you aimless, for responding in a reasonable manner and for not posting a pic of a bird (thus bumping the thread you don't like anyway, what's the point, noodle?).

Another baffling aspect of it: ok, I'm wrong to call people who believe in it stupid, as there are people who are otherwise intelligent who buy into it. Just like a number of people who seem otherwise reasonable will suddenly talk about a "shift in consciousnss" (whatever the fuck that is) in 2012. The mind boggles.

I think of my otherwise grandfather, an engineer and seemingly above-average smart if remote and grouchy guy, who we found out after his death had sent 50K to Rev. Schuller's Crystal Cathedral over his lifetime. So I'm like, Schuller bilked my grandfather, damn.

Sorry, I'm baked.

thirdalternative, Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:23 (fourteen years ago)

Someone actually once tried to explain astrology to me in terms of science, like how your planet actually affects your psychology. What about Chinese astrology, like goat or chicken? How can everyone born in a certain year have the same personality?

Sebastian Cabinet (u s steel), Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:23 (fourteen years ago)

I think I speak for thirdalternative & myself when I say that Chinese astrology is 100% accurate - the only astrology we're specifically against is Vedic astrology

Steven Tyler the Creator (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:26 (fourteen years ago)

omg the pukeko

Also Mordy, the Viceroy is a gemini – once again, if someone was like "why aren't you hanging w/your husband?" I could say, "Two geminis, you know! I need me time!" And they would either say "..." or "lol it's like there's four of you."

Col. Pinkney Lugenbeel (Abbbottt), Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:29 (fourteen years ago)

Either way it kept me from having to talk about my relationship (yucko!).

Col. Pinkney Lugenbeel (Abbbottt), Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:30 (fourteen years ago)

tbh I don't really know anything about geminis except the #2.
I can tell you the best birthday party I ever went to was "year of the occult" themed and everyone wore lil nametags with their primary star sign. It turned into a battle between signs at leg wrestling (not saying who from 2001-2007 decided leg wrestling was the thing to do at every party). So I also know form this party that geminis are the best at leg wrestling. That's just private knowledge I get to carry in my heart. Also in my legs. Thanks, the stars!

Col. Pinkney Lugenbeel (Abbbottt), Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:35 (fourteen years ago)

are you saying I can't tell if somebody's a total sex bomb based on what month they were born? shit.

actually it's if they were born between Oct. 23rd and Nov. 21st ...iirc?

sarahel, Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:38 (fourteen years ago)

Abbbottt makes some very good points. btw, I am a scorpio, so plz do not reveal my incredible sex-bomberness to any unauthorized personel.

Aimless, Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:40 (fourteen years ago)

Cancer and my name is Redd.

stars on 45 my destination (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 14 May 2011 18:42 (fourteen years ago)

one year passes...

Is there any potential astrological explanation for the great ilx beef from approximately October 12th through let's say the 21st?

how's life, Tuesday, 23 October 2012 12:35 (thirteen years ago)

syzygy

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 23 October 2012 14:26 (thirteen years ago)

According to astrologyzone.com:
A lot of challenging developments were coming up as a result of the full moon of September 29. As you enter October, this monster of a moon - one of the most difficult I have seen in three years - is still full of energy.

*tera, Tuesday, 23 October 2012 23:33 (thirteen years ago)

Is there any potential astrological explanation for the great ilx beef from approximately October 12th through let's say the 21st?

Saturn transiting into Scorpio imho.

real men have been preparing manly dishes for centuries (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 October 2012 00:58 (thirteen years ago)

i've wondered if the monthly (pisces, cancer, etc...) and yearly (year of dragon, rat, etc...) astrologies ever fight for astrological supremacy or if they've settled on some armistice long ago.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 01:10 (thirteen years ago)

Surely you have to calculate using the age of ilx? Do you count from ILM or the branching of ILE, though?

emil.y, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 01:12 (thirteen years ago)

two years pass...

i would like to meet at least one other homosexual who thinks that astrology is embarrassing bullshit, please

(曇り) (clouds), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:17 (eleven years ago)

*shrug* "it's fun to think about" THERE'S NOTHING TO THINK ABOUT

(曇り) (clouds), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:23 (eleven years ago)

i'd be more willing to play along if someone was into like yu-gi-oh cards or something ffs

(曇り) (clouds), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:23 (eleven years ago)

I have been reading some renaissance history and I think it should be noticed that the widespread belief in the predictive powers of astrology proved to be very valuable to various rulers on countless occasions. Of course, its main use was to discover what kind of advice your enemy (who consulted astrologers) was getting, so you could predict his behavior. An even better secondary use was to bribe the astrologer to give your enemy the kind of advice that would manipulate him into acting the way you preferred. Very handy when hatching plots.

oh no! must be the season of the rich (Aimless), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:38 (eleven years ago)

mark s's defense from 2001 is interesting:

astrology's 12-fold categorisation, complete with variants, is a richer, more useful portrait of human behaviour than IQ theory's; the debunker's blanket obsession with the movement of the stars — which is irrelevant, except in tha it provides a helpfully detailed and supervast abstract map-shape of potential movement on which to project — is an admission of the difficulty faced, once the crit begins to focus on people not things.
― mark s, Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:00 AM (13 years ago)

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:44 (eleven years ago)

girls at parties who talk about astrology >>>>>>>>>> boys at parties who talk about being "skeptics" >>>>>>>>>>>>> professional astrologers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> penn + teller

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 10 December 2014 19:51 (eleven years ago)

I read a book on how to do your chart last year, and the writer took great pains to defend astrology as a "science". I must admit - astrologers are good, colorful writers. Their descriptions of personalities are sympathetic and rich.

I don't agree with it but I had fun doing my chart. I did lived ones' and dogs' charts too. One of my dog's charts was really accurate.

Threat Assessment Division (I M Losted), Wednesday, 10 December 2014 21:28 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.