― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)
(Wait, why is that a bad thing????)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
"Dammit, I paid enough for this fuckin first class deal, I DEMAND to piss into porcelain lips!"
― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 20:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)
BAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!!!
weird, innit? pee-sex in the airport ...
― Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 20:43 (twenty-two years ago)
Plane urinals
― Alba, Friday, 18 April 2008 09:24 (seventeen years ago)
urinals have already been installed on some military aircraft
what a ringing endorsement that is.
― kenan, Friday, 18 April 2008 09:27 (seventeen years ago)
<a href=http://jimwoodring.blogspot.com/2008/08/great-urinals-of-pacific-northwest-17.html>Jim Woodring urinalblogging</a>
I have, no fooling, made the large version of that photo my desktop wallpaper.
― Oilyrags, Friday, 29 August 2008 21:07 (seventeen years ago)
http://jimwoodring.blogspot.com/2008/08/great-urinals-of-pacific-northwest-17.html
Dear BBcode: I wish YOU were a urinal.
― Oilyrags, Friday, 29 August 2008 21:08 (seventeen years ago)
Now if they would make a crapper such that you could take a dump into GWBush's cranium, that might be entertaining. (And enlightening.)
-- dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:26 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Link
-- Jay Kid (Jay K), Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:34 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Link
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 29 August 2008 21:26 (seventeen years ago)
Open-air urinals in S.F. park 'disgusting,' critics say
They said the park's meager three toilets led some to relieve themselves in bushes and on buildings. But the backlash has already started with six civic groups teaming up in a letter to the city that says the urinal must go.
They claim the urinal is a flagrant violation of the law and basic public policy, is unsanitary and discriminates against women and children because it is not designed for females.
― pplains, Saturday, 6 February 2016 02:16 (ten years ago)
You know, I'm actually down with public urinals, but why exactly
http://i.imgur.com/NJibR6b.jpg
did they put one right in front of a damn MUNI stop?
― pplains, Saturday, 6 February 2016 02:17 (ten years ago)
this is not really helping to change my opinion that san francisco is disgusting
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 6 February 2016 02:22 (ten years ago)